mangement
Welcome Back! I MISSED YOU ALL
12 - ‹#›
Copyright © 2017 Pearson Education, Ltd.
Copyright © 2017 Pearson Education, Ltd.
12 - ‹#›
Inventory Management
Chapter 12
12 - ‹#›
Copyright © 2017 Pearson Education, Ltd.
Copyright © 2017 Pearson Education, Ltd.
12 - ‹#›
Learning Objectives
When you complete this chapter you should be able to:
Conduct an ABC analysis
Explain and use cycle counting
Explain and use the EOQ model
Compute a reorder point
Explain and use the quantity discount model
12 - ‹#›
Copyright © 2017 Pearson Education, Ltd.
Copyright © 2017 Pearson Education, Ltd.
12 - ‹#›
3
Inventory Management
The objective of inventory management is to strike a balance between inventory investment and customer service
12 - ‹#›
Copyright © 2017 Pearson Education, Ltd.
Copyright © 2017 Pearson Education, Ltd.
12 - ‹#›
Importance of Inventory
One of the most expensive assets of many companies representing as much as 50% of total invested capital
Less inventory lowers costs but increases chances of running out
More inventory raises costs but always keeps customers happy but it can damage your business!!!
12 - ‹#›
Copyright © 2017 Pearson Education, Ltd.
Copyright © 2017 Pearson Education, Ltd.
12 - ‹#›
5
Functions of Inventory
Inventory can serve several functions that add flexibility to a firm’s operations. The four functions of inventory are:
To provide a selection of goods for anticipated demand and to separate the firm from fluctuations in demand.
To decouple or separate various parts of the production process. For example, if a firm’s supplies fluctuate, extra inventory may be necessary to decouple the production process from suppliers.
To take advantage of quantity discounts
To hedge against inflation and upward price changes
12 - ‹#›
Copyright © 2017 Pearson Education, Ltd.
Copyright © 2017 Pearson Education, Ltd.
12 - ‹#›
6
Types of Inventory
Raw material
Purchased but not processed
Work-in-process (WIP)
Undergone some change but not completed
Finished goods
Completed product awaiting shipment
12 - ‹#›
Copyright © 2017 Pearson Education, Ltd.
Copyright © 2017 Pearson Education, Ltd.
12 - ‹#›
7
The Material Flow Cycle
Figure 12.1
Input Wait for Wait to Move Wait in queue Setup Run Output
inspection be moved time for operator time time
Cycle time
95% 5%
FYI
12 - ‹#›
Copyright © 2017 Pearson Education, Ltd.
Copyright © 2017 Pearson Education, Ltd.
12 - ‹#›
8
Inventory Management at Amazon.com
Amazon.com started as a “virtual” retailer – no inventory, no warehouses, no overhead – just computers taking orders to be filled by others
Growth has forced Amazon.com to become a world leader in warehousing and inventory management
FYI
12 - ‹#›
Copyright © 2017 Pearson Education, Ltd.
Copyright © 2017 Pearson Education, Ltd.
12 - ‹#›
9
Inventory Management at Amazon.com
Each order is assigned by computer to the closest distribution center that has the product(s)
A “flow meister” at each distribution center assigns work crews
Technology helps workers pick the correct items from the shelves with almost no errors
Items are placed in crates on a conveyor, bar code scanners scan each item 15 times to virtually eliminate errors
FYI
12 - ‹#›
Copyright © 2017 Pearson Education, Ltd.
Copyright © 2017 Pearson Education, Ltd.
12 - ‹#›
10
Inventory Management at Amazon.com
Crates arrive at central point where items are boxed and labeled with new bar code
Gift wrapping is done by hand at 30 packages per hour
Completed boxes are packed, taped, weighed and labeled before leaving warehouse in a truck
Order arrives at customer within 1 - 2 days
FYI
12 - ‹#›
Copyright © 2017 Pearson Education, Ltd.
Copyright © 2017 Pearson Education, Ltd.
12 - ‹#›
11
Managing Inventory
How inventory items can be classified and monitored?
ABC analysis
How accurate inventory records can be maintained?
Record accuracy
Cycle counting
12 - ‹#›
Copyright © 2017 Pearson Education, Ltd.
Copyright © 2017 Pearson Education, Ltd.
12 - ‹#›
12
ABC Analysis
ABC analysis is an inventory categorization method which consists in dividing items into three categories (A, B, C) based on annual dollar volume:
Class A - high annual dollar volume
Class B - medium annual dollar volume
Class C - low annual dollar volume
This method aims to draw managers’ attention on the critical few (A-items) not on the trivial many (C-items).
Used to establish policies that focus on the few critical parts and not the many trivial ones (Based on Pareto Principle, 80/20)
12 - ‹#›
Copyright © 2017 Pearson Education, Ltd.
Copyright © 2017 Pearson Education, Ltd.
12 - ‹#›
ABC Classes
The ABC approach states that a company should rate items from A to C, basing its ratings on the following rules:
A-items About 20% of the items account for about 70-80% of the dollar usage.
B-items 30% of the items account for about 15-25% of the dollar usage.
C-items About 50% of the items account for about 5% of the dollar usage.
12 - ‹#›
Copyright © 2017 Pearson Education, Ltd.
Copyright © 2017 Pearson Education, Ltd.
12 - ‹#›
The ABC analysis
The annual consumption value is calculated with the formula:
(Annual demand) x (item cost per unit)
Through this categorization, the supply manager can identify inventory hot spots, and separate them from the rest of the items, especially those that are numerous but not that profitable.
12 - ‹#›
Copyright © 2017 Pearson Education, Ltd.
Copyright © 2017 Pearson Education, Ltd.
12 - ‹#›
4 Steps for the classification of items:
Find out the unit cost and the usage of each material over a given period;
Multiply the unit cost by the estimated annual usage to obtain the net value;
List out all the items and arrange them in the descending value (Annual Value);
Accumulate value and add up number of items and calculate percentage on total inventory in value and in number
12 - ‹#›
Copyright © 2017 Pearson Education, Ltd.
Copyright © 2017 Pearson Education, Ltd.
12 - ‹#›
ABC analysis How to Interpret the Data
| Percentage of items | Percentage value of annual dollar volume | Action | |
| Class A items | About 20% | About 70-80% | Close day to day control |
| Class B items | About 30% | About 15-25% of total value | Regular review |
| Class C items | About 50% | About 5% | Infrequent review |
12 - ‹#›
Copyright © 2017 Pearson Education, Ltd.
Copyright © 2017 Pearson Education, Ltd.
12 - ‹#›
ABC Analysis
A Items
B Items
| | | | | | | | | |
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Percentage of annual dollar usage
80 –
70 –
60 –
50 –
40 –
30 –
20 –
10 –
0 –
Percentage of inventory items
C Items
12 - ‹#›
Copyright © 2017 Pearson Education, Ltd.
Copyright © 2017 Pearson Education, Ltd.
12 - ‹#›
18
ABC Analysis
ABC ANALYSIS FOR A CHIP ANUFACTURER
Silicon Chips, Inc., maker of superfast DRAM chips, wants to categorize its 10 major inventory items
using ABC analysis.
APPROACH ABC analysis organizes the items on an annual dollar-volume basis. Shown below (in columns 1–4) are the 10 items (identified by stock numbers), their annual demands, and unit costs.
SOLUTION Annual dollar volume is computed in column 5, along with the percentage of the total represented by each item in column 6. Column 7 groups the 10 items into A, B, and C categories.
INSIGHT The breakdown into A, B, and C categories is not hard and fast. The objective is to try to separate the “important” from the “unimportant.”
12 - ‹#›
Copyright © 2017 Pearson Education, Ltd.
Copyright © 2017 Pearson Education, Ltd.
12 - ‹#›
19
ABC Analysis
| ABC Calculation | |||||||||||
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) | (7) | |||||
| ITEM STOCK NUMBER | PERCENT OF NUMBER OF ITEMS STOCKED | ANNUAL VOLUME (UNITS) | x | UNIT COST | = | Annual $ usage | % $ usage | CLASS | |||
| #10286 | 20% | 1,000 | $ 90.00 | $ 90,000 | 38.8% | A | |||||
| #11526 | 500 | 154.00 | 77,000 | 33.2% | A | ||||||
| #12760 | 1,550 | 17.00 | 26,350 | 11.3% | B | ||||||
| #10867 | 30% | 350 | 42.86 | 15,001 | 6.4% | B | |||||
| #10500 | 1,000 | 12.50 | 12,500 | 5.4% | B | ||||||
| #12572 | 600 | 14.17 | 8,502 | 3.7% | C | ||||||
| #14075 | 2,000 | .60 | 1,200 | .5% | C | ||||||
| #01036 | 50% | 100 | 8.50 | 850 | .4% | C | |||||
| #01307 | 1,200 | .42 | 504 | .2% | C | ||||||
| #10572 | 250 | .60 | 150 | .1% | C | ||||||
| 8,550 | $232,057 | 100.0% |
72%
23%
5%
12 - ‹#›
Copyright © 2017 Pearson Education, Ltd.
Copyright © 2017 Pearson Education, Ltd.
12 - ‹#›
20
ABC Analysis
Policies employed may include
More emphasis on supplier development for A items
Tighter physical inventory control for A items and should be stored in more secure area.
The accuracy of inventory records for A items should be verified more frequently
More care in forecasting A items
12 - ‹#›
Copyright © 2017 Pearson Education, Ltd.
Copyright © 2017 Pearson Education, Ltd.
12 - ‹#›
21
Example: classify the following items according to ABC analysis
| Item number | Unit cost | Annual demand |
| 101 | 5 | 48,000 |
| 102 | 11 | 2,000 |
| 103 | 15 | 300 |
| 104 | 8 | 800 |
| 105 | 7 | 4,800 |
| 106 | 16 | 1,200 |
| 107 | 20 | 18,000 |
| 108 | 4 | 300 |
| 109 | 9 | 5,000 |
| 110 | 12 | 500 |
12 - ‹#›
Copyright © 2017 Pearson Education, Ltd.
Copyright © 2017 Pearson Education, Ltd.
12 - ‹#›
Step 1
Calculate the total spending per year (Annual $ usage)
| Item number | Unit cost | Annual demand | Annual $ usage |
| 101 | 5 | 48,000 | 240,000 |
| 102 | 11 | 2,000 | 22,000 |
| 103 | 15 | 300 | 4,500 |
| 104 | 8 | 800 | 6,400 |
| 105 | 7 | 4,800 | 33,600 |
| 106 | 16 | 1,200 | 19,200 |
| 107 | 20 | 18,000 | 360,000 |
| 108 | 4 | 300 | 1,200 |
| 109 | 9 | 5,000 | 45,000 |
| 110 | 12 | 500 | 6,000 |
| Total usage | 737,900 |
Total cost per year: Unit cost * total cost per year
Unit cost x Annual demand
12 - ‹#›
Copyright © 2017 Pearson Education, Ltd.
Copyright © 2017 Pearson Education, Ltd.
12 - ‹#›
Step 2
Sort the items by annual usage (Descending Order)
Annual $ usage = Unit Cost x Annual Demand
| Item number | Unit cost | Annual demand | Annual $ usage |
| 107 | 20 | 18,000 | 360,000 |
| 101 | 5 | 48,000 | 240,000 |
| 109 | 9 | 5,000 | 45,000 |
| 105 | 7 | 4,800 | 33,600 |
| 102 | 11 | 2,000 | 22,000 |
| 106 | 16 | 1,200 | 19,200 |
| 104 | 8 | 800 | 6,400 |
| 110 | 12 | 500 | 6,000 |
| 103 | 15 | 300 | 4,500 |
| 108 | 4 | 300 | 1,200 |
| Total usage | 737,900 |
12 - ‹#›
Copyright © 2017 Pearson Education, Ltd.
Copyright © 2017 Pearson Education, Ltd.
12 - ‹#›
Step 3
Calculate the usage of item in total usage (% $ usage)
X 100
| Item number | Unit cost | Annual demand | Annual $ usage | % $ usage |
| 107 | 20 | 18,000 | 360,000 | 48,8% |
| 101 | 5 | 48,000 | 240,000 | 32,5% |
| 109 | 9 | 5,000 | 45,000 | 6,1% |
| 105 | 7 | 4,800 | 33,600 | 4,6% |
| 102 | 11 | 2,000 | 22,000 | 3,0% |
| 106 | 16 | 1,200 | 19,200 | 2,6% |
| 104 | 8 | 800 | 6,400 | 0,9% |
| 110 | 12 | 500 | 6,000 | 0,8% |
| 103 | 15 | 300 | 4,500 | 0,6% |
| 108 | 4 | 300 | 1,200 | 0,2% |
| Total usage | 737,900 |
12 - ‹#›
Copyright © 2017 Pearson Education, Ltd.
Copyright © 2017 Pearson Education, Ltd.
12 - ‹#›
Step 4
Find the Cumulative % $
| Item number | Unit cost | Annual demand | Annual $ usage | % $ usage | Cum % $ |
| 107 | 20 | 18,000 | 360,000 | 48,8% | 48,8% |
| 101 | 5 | 48,000 | 240,000 | 32,5% | 81,3% |
| 109 | 9 | 5,000 | 45,000 | 6,1% | 87,4% |
| 105 | 7 | 4,800 | 33,600 | 4,6% | 92% |
| 102 | 11 | 2,000 | 22,000 | 3,0% | 94,9% |
| 106 | 16 | 1,200 | 19,200 | 2,6% | 97,5% |
| 104 | 8 | 800 | 6,400 | 0,9% | 98,4% |
| 110 | 12 | 500 | 6,000 | 0,8% | 99,2% |
| 103 | 15 | 300 | 4,500 | 0,6% | 99,8% |
| 108 | 4 | 300 | 1,200 | 0,2% | 100% |
| Total usage | 737,900 |
12 - ‹#›
Copyright © 2017 Pearson Education, Ltd.
Copyright © 2017 Pearson Education, Ltd.
12 - ‹#›
Step 5
Classify items into classes
| Item number | Unit cost | Annual demand | Annual $ usage | % $ usage | CUM% $ | Class | % of items | Action |
| 107 | 20 | 18,000 | 360,000 | 48,8% | 48,8% | A | 20% of items | Close control |
| 101 | 5 | 48,000 | 240,000 | 32,5% | 81,3% | A | ||
| 109 | 9 | 5,000 | 45,000 | 6,1% | 87,4% | B | 30% of items | Regular review |
| 105 | 7 | 4,800 | 33,600 | 4,6% | 92% | B | ||
| 102 | 11 | 2,000 | 22,000 | 3,0% | 94,9% | B | ||
| 106 | 16 | 1,200 | 19,200 | 2,6% | 97,5% | C | 50% of items | Infrequent review |
| 104 | 8 | 800 | 6,400 | 0,9% | 98,4% | C | ||
| 110 | 12 | 500 | 6,000 | 0,8% | 99,2% | C | ||
| 103 | 15 | 300 | 4,500 | 0,6% | 99,8% | C | ||
| 108 | 4 | 300 | 1,200 | 0,2% | 100% | C | ||
| Total usage | 737,900 |
12 - ‹#›
Copyright © 2017 Pearson Education, Ltd.
Copyright © 2017 Pearson Education, Ltd.
12 - ‹#›
Inventory Record Accuracy
Inventory Record Accuracy (IRA) is a measure of how closely official inventory records match the physical inventory.
Accurate records are a critical ingredient in production and inventory systems.
12 - ‹#›
Copyright © 2017 Pearson Education, Ltd.
Copyright © 2017 Pearson Education, Ltd.
12 - ‹#›
28
Record Accuracy
Incoming and outgoing record keeping must be accurate, specially for class A items.
Stockrooms should be secure specially for class A items.
Necessary to make precise decisions about ordering, scheduling, and shipping, specially for class A items.
12 - ‹#›
Copyright © 2017 Pearson Education, Ltd.
Copyright © 2017 Pearson Education, Ltd.
12 - ‹#›
29
Cycle Counting
Cycle Counting: is an inventory auditing procedure, where a small subset of inventory, in a specific location, is counted on a specified day.
Often used with ABC analysis
A items will be counted frequently (once a month)
B items will be counted less frequently (once a quarter)
C items will be counted (one every 6 months)
Has several advantages:
Eliminates shutdowns and interruptions
Eliminates annual inventory adjustment
Allows causes of errors to be identified and corrected faster
Maintains accurate inventory records
12 - ‹#›
Copyright © 2017 Pearson Education, Ltd.
Copyright © 2017 Pearson Education, Ltd.
12 - ‹#›
30
Cycle Counting Example
5,000 items in inventory, classified as: 500 A items, 1,750 B items, 2,750 C items
Policy is to count A items every month (20 working days), B items every quarter (60 days), and C items every six months (120 days)
| ITEM CLASS | QUANTITY | CYCLE COUNTING POLICY | NUMBER OF ITEMS COUNTED PER DAY | ||
| A | 500 | Each month | 500/20 = | 25/day | |
| B | 1,750 | Each quarter | 1,750/60 = | 29/day | |
| C | 2,750 | Every 6 months | 2,750/120 = | 23/day | |
| 77/day |
Each day 77 items are counted, which is more efficient and accurate than conducting a massive inventory count once a year
12 - ‹#›
Copyright © 2017 Pearson Education, Ltd.
Copyright © 2017 Pearson Education, Ltd.
12 - ‹#›
31
Inventory Models
Need to determine when and how much to order
Basic economic order quantity (EOQ) model
Production order quantity model
Quantity discount model
12 - ‹#›
Copyright © 2017 Pearson Education, Ltd.
Copyright © 2017 Pearson Education, Ltd.
12 - ‹#›
32
Basic EOQ Model
Demand is known and constant
Lead time is known and constant
Receipt of inventory is instantaneous and complete
Quantity discounts are not possible
The only variable costs (that are considered) are setup (ordering ) and holding (carrying) cost .
Stock-outs can be completely avoided
Important assumptions
12 - ‹#›
Copyright © 2017 Pearson Education, Ltd.
Copyright © 2017 Pearson Education, Ltd.
12 - ‹#›
33
Dollar Costs Associated with Inventory Models
Setup costs (S) or Ordering Cost: the costs to prepare a machine or process for manufacturing an order OR the costs of placing an order and receiving goods
Holding cost (H) or Carrying Cost: is the cost of holding a unit in inventory for a given time period.
12 - ‹#›
Copyright © 2017 Pearson Education, Ltd.
Copyright © 2017 Pearson Education, Ltd.
12 - ‹#›
34
Holding Costs (H)
Holding cost might be given in terms of cost/unit/year or it might be given in the form of rate%, in that case we need to find the holding cost by:
H = I* p
p = Unit production cost or unit procurement cost, the cost of manufacturing (materials, labor, overhead) or purchasing one unit
I = Percentage based upon rates for borrowing, insuring, investing (opportunity), and so on.
H includes expenses such as:
storage (rent, lease, mortgage, utilities, maintenance, etc.), tracking and monitoring of inventory, damage and pilferage, insurance, interest on money to produce or procure the items in inventory, and the opportunity cost of money tied up in inventory (and not available for use elsewhere).
12 - ‹#›
Copyright © 2017 Pearson Education, Ltd.
Copyright © 2017 Pearson Education, Ltd.
12 - ‹#›
Holding Costs
| TABLE 12.1 | Determining Inventory Holding Costs | |||
| CATEGORY | COST (AND RANGE) AS A PERCENT OF INVENTORY VALUE | |||
| Housing costs (building rent or depreciation, operating costs, taxes, insurance) | 6% (3 - 10%) | |||
| Material handling costs (equipment lease or depreciation, power, operating cost) | 3% (1 - 3.5%) | |||
| Labor cost (receiving, warehousing, security) | 3% (3 - 5%) | |||
| Investment costs (borrowing costs, taxes, and insurance on inventory) | 11% (6 - 24%) | |||
| Pilferage, space, and obsolescence (much higher in industries undergoing rapid change like tablets and smart phones) | 3% (2 - 5%) | |||
| Overall carrying cost | 26% |
FYI
12 - ‹#›
Copyright © 2017 Pearson Education, Ltd.
Copyright © 2017 Pearson Education, Ltd.
12 - ‹#›
36
Holding Costs
| TABLE 12.1 | Determining Inventory Holding Costs | |||
| CATEGORY | COST (AND RANGE) AS A PERCENT OF INVENTORY VALUE | |||
| Housing costs (building rent or depreciation, operating costs, taxes, insurance) | 6% (3 - 10%) | |||
| Material handling costs (equipment lease or depreciation, power, operating cost) | 3% (1 - 3.5%) | |||
| Labor cost (receiving, warehousing, security) | 3% (3 - 5%) | |||
| Investment costs (borrowing costs, taxes, and insurance on inventory) | 11% (6 - 24%) | |||
| Pilferage, space, and obsolescence (much higher in industries undergoing rapid change like PCs and cell phones) | 3% (2 - 5%) | |||
| Overall carrying cost | 26% |
Holding costs vary considerably depending on the business, location, and interest rates. Generally greater than 15%, some high tech and fashion items have holding costs greater than 40%.
FYI
12 - ‹#›
Copyright © 2017 Pearson Education, Ltd.
Copyright © 2017 Pearson Education, Ltd.
12 - ‹#›
37
Inventory Usage Over Time
Figure 12.3
Order quantity = Q (maximum inventory level)
Usage rate
Average inventory on hand
Q
2
Minimum inventory
Inventory level
Time
0
Total order received
12 - ‹#›
Copyright © 2017 Pearson Education, Ltd.
Copyright © 2017 Pearson Education, Ltd.
12 - ‹#›
38
Minimizing Costs
Objective is to minimize total costs
Table 12.4(c)
Annual cost
Order quantity
Total cost of holding and setup (order)
Holding cost
Setup (order) cost
Minimum total cost
Optimal order quantity (Q*)
12 - ‹#›
Copyright © 2017 Pearson Education, Ltd.
Copyright © 2017 Pearson Education, Ltd.
12 - ‹#›
39
Example
Annual Demand = 4000 units
Setup/ordering cost = $100
Holding cost = $5/unit per year
Which one of the following quantities will minimize the total cost?
| C1 | C2 | C3 | C4 | |
| Quantity (Q) | 50 | 400 | 2000 | 4000 |
| Annual Holding Cost (AHC) | ||||
| Annual Setup Cost (ASC) | ||||
| Total Cost (TC) |
FYI
12 - ‹#›
Copyright © 2017 Pearson Education, Ltd.
Copyright © 2017 Pearson Education, Ltd.
12 - ‹#›
WHAT DO YOU OBSERVE ?!
| C1 | C2 | C3 | C4 | |
| Quantity (Q) | 50 units | 400 units | 2000 units | 4000 units |
| Annual Holding Cost (AHC) | $125 | $1000 | $5000 | $10000 |
| Annual Setup Cost (ASC) | $8000 | $1000 | $200 | $100 |
| Total Cost (TC) | $8125 | $2000 | $5200 | $10100 |
FYI
12 - ‹#›
Copyright © 2017 Pearson Education, Ltd.
Copyright © 2017 Pearson Education, Ltd.
12 - ‹#›
Minimizing Costs
By minimizing the sum of setup (or ordering) and holding costs, total costs are minimized
Optimal order size Q* will minimize total cost
A reduction in either cost reduces the total cost
Optimal order quantity occurs when holding cost and setup cost are equal
12 - ‹#›
Copyright © 2017 Pearson Education, Ltd.
Copyright © 2017 Pearson Education, Ltd.
12 - ‹#›
Minimizing Costs
Q = Number of units per order
Q* = Optimal number of units per order (EOQ)
D = Annual demand in units for the inventory item
S = Setup or ordering cost for each order
H = Holding or carrying cost per unit per year
Annual setup cost = (Number of orders placed per year)
x (Setup or order cost per order)
Annual demand
Number of units in each order
Setup or order cost per order
=
12 - ‹#›
Copyright © 2017 Pearson Education, Ltd.
Copyright © 2017 Pearson Education, Ltd.
12 - ‹#›
Minimizing Costs
Annual setup cost = (Number of orders placed per year)
x (Setup or order cost per order)
Annual demand
Number of units in each order
Setup or order cost per order
=
Q = Number of pieces per order
Q* = Optimal number of pieces per order (EOQ)
D = Annual demand in units for the inventory item
S = Setup or ordering cost for each order
H = Holding or carrying cost per unit per year
12 - ‹#›
Copyright © 2017 Pearson Education, Ltd.
Copyright © 2017 Pearson Education, Ltd.
12 - ‹#›
Q = Number of pieces per order
Q* = Optimal number of pieces per order (EOQ)
D = Annual demand in units for the inventory item
S = Setup or ordering cost for each order
H = Holding or carrying cost per unit per year
Minimizing Costs
Annual holding cost = (Average inventory level)
x (Holding cost per unit per year)
Order quantity
2
(Holding cost per unit per year)
=
12 - ‹#›
Copyright © 2017 Pearson Education, Ltd.
Copyright © 2017 Pearson Education, Ltd.
12 - ‹#›
Minimizing Costs
Optimal order quantity is found when annual setup cost equals annual holding cost
Solving for Q*
Q = Number of pieces per order
Q* = Optimal number of pieces per order (EOQ)
D = Annual demand in units for the inventory item
S = Setup or ordering cost for each order
H = Holding or carrying cost per unit per year
12 - ‹#›
Copyright © 2017 Pearson Education, Ltd.
Copyright © 2017 Pearson Education, Ltd.
12 - ‹#›
D = Annual demand (units)
S = Cost per order ($)
P = Cost per unit ($)
I = Holding cost (%)
H = Holding cost ($) = I x P
Economic Order Quantity (EOQ)
12 - ‹#›
Copyright © 2017 Pearson Education, Ltd.
Copyright © 2017 Pearson Education, Ltd.
12 - ‹#›
EOQ Model Equations
Annual total cots = +
12 - ‹#›
Copyright © 2017 Pearson Education, Ltd.
Copyright © 2017 Pearson Education, Ltd.
12 - ‹#›
EOQ Example
You’re a buyer for SaveMart.
SaveMart needs 1000 coffee makers per year. The cost of each coffee maker is $50. Ordering cost is $100 per order. Carrying cost is 40% of per unit cost. Lead time is 3 days. SaveMart is open 200 days/yr.
What is the optimal order quantity & ROP?
Find the total cost
Determine expected number of orders
Determine the time between orders
Determine the ROP?
12 - ‹#›
Copyright © 2017 Pearson Education, Ltd.
Copyright © 2017 Pearson Education, Ltd.
12 - ‹#›
1. SaveMart EOQ
D = 1000
S = $100
P = $50
I = 40%
H = P x I
H = $20
EOQ = 100 coffeemakers
EOQ = Q* =
12 - ‹#›
Copyright © 2017 Pearson Education, Ltd.
Copyright © 2017 Pearson Education, Ltd.
12 - ‹#›
2. SaveMart total cost
D = 1000
S = $100
H = $20
Q* = 100
Annual total cots = +
Annual total cots = +
Annual total cots = +
12 - ‹#›
Copyright © 2017 Pearson Education, Ltd.
Copyright © 2017 Pearson Education, Ltd.
12 - ‹#›
3. Number of orders
D = 1000
S = $100
H = $20
Q* = 100
Number of order (N) =
N = = 10 orders
12 - ‹#›
Copyright © 2017 Pearson Education, Ltd.
Copyright © 2017 Pearson Education, Ltd.
12 - ‹#›
4. Time between orders
D = 1000
S = $100
H = $20
Q* = 100
No. working days = 200
N = 10 orders
Time between orders (T) =
T= = 20 days
12 - ‹#›
Copyright © 2017 Pearson Education, Ltd.
Copyright © 2017 Pearson Education, Ltd.
12 - ‹#›
5. SaveMart ROP
ROP = daily demand x lead time (days)
ROP = d x LT
Daily Demand (d) =
d = = 5 units
ROP = 5 x 3 = 15 units
It means: once you reach 15 units, you have to place an order of 100 units (i.e your EOQ)
D = 1000
No. working days = 200
12 - ‹#›
Copyright © 2017 Pearson Education, Ltd.
Copyright © 2017 Pearson Education, Ltd.
12 - ‹#›
An EOQ Example
Determine optimal number of needles to order
D = 1,000 units
S = $10 per order
H = $.50 per unit per year
12 - ‹#›
Copyright © 2017 Pearson Education, Ltd.
Copyright © 2017 Pearson Education, Ltd.
12 - ‹#›
55
An EOQ Example
Determine expected number of orders
D = 1,000 units Q* = 200 units
S = $10 per order
H = $.50 per unit per year
N = = 5 orders per year
1,000
200
= N = =
Expected number of orders
Demand
Order quantity
12 - ‹#›
Copyright © 2017 Pearson Education, Ltd.
Copyright © 2017 Pearson Education, Ltd.
12 - ‹#›
56
An EOQ Example
Determine optimal time between orders
D = 1,000 units Q* = 200 units
S = $10 per order N = 5 orders/year
H = $.50 per unit per year
T = = 50 days between orders
250
5
= T =
Expected time between orders
Number of working days per year
Expected number of orders
12 - ‹#›
Copyright © 2017 Pearson Education, Ltd.
Copyright © 2017 Pearson Education, Ltd.
12 - ‹#›
57
An EOQ Example
Determine the total annual cost
D = 1,000 units Q* = 200 units
S = $10 per order N = 5 orders/year
H = $.50 per unit per year T = 50 days
Total annual cost = Setup cost + Holding cost
12 - ‹#›
Copyright © 2017 Pearson Education, Ltd.
Copyright © 2017 Pearson Education, Ltd.
12 - ‹#›
58
The EOQ Model
When including actual cost of material P
Total annual cost = Setup cost + Holding cost + Product cost
12 - ‹#›
Copyright © 2017 Pearson Education, Ltd.
Copyright © 2017 Pearson Education, Ltd.
12 - ‹#›
59
The EOQ Model
When including actual cost of material P
Total annual cost = Setup cost + Holding cost + Product cost
12 - ‹#›
Copyright © 2017 Pearson Education, Ltd.
Copyright © 2017 Pearson Education, Ltd.
12 - ‹#›
60
Robust Model
The EOQ model is robust
It works even if all parameters and assumptions are not met
The total cost curve is relatively flat in the area of the EOQ
FYI
12 - ‹#›
Copyright © 2017 Pearson Education, Ltd.
Copyright © 2017 Pearson Education, Ltd.
12 - ‹#›
Reorder Points
EOQ answers the “how much” question
The reorder point (ROP) tells “when” to order
Lead time (L) is the time between placing and receiving an order
ROP =
Lead time for a new order in days
Demand per day
ROP = d x L
d =
D
Number of working days in a year
12 - ‹#›
Copyright © 2017 Pearson Education, Ltd.
Copyright © 2017 Pearson Education, Ltd.
12 - ‹#›
Reorder Point Curve
Q*
ROP (units)
Inventory level (units)
Time (days)
Figure 12.5
Lead time = L
Slope = units/day = d
Stock is replenished as order arrives
12 - ‹#›
Copyright © 2017 Pearson Education, Ltd.
Copyright © 2017 Pearson Education, Ltd.
12 - ‹#›
Reorder Point Example
Demand = 8,000 iPhones per year
250 working day year
Lead time for orders is 3 working days, may take 4
ROP = d x L
d =
D
Number of working days in a year
= 8,000/250 = 32 units
= 32 units per day x 3 days = 96 units
= 32 units per day x 4 days = 128 units
12 - ‹#›
Copyright © 2017 Pearson Education, Ltd.
Copyright © 2017 Pearson Education, Ltd.
12 - ‹#›
Production Order Quantity Model
Used when inventory builds up over a period of time after an order is placed
Used when units are produced and sold simultaneously
Inventory level
Time
Demand part of cycle with no production (only usage takes place)
Part of inventory cycle during which production (and usage) is taking place
t
Maximum inventory
Figure 12.6
FYI
12 - ‹#›
Copyright © 2017 Pearson Education, Ltd.
Copyright © 2017 Pearson Education, Ltd.
12 - ‹#›
65
Production Order Quantity Model
Q = Number of units per order p = Daily production rate
H = Holding cost per unit per year d = Daily demand/usage rate
t = Length of the production run in days
= (Average inventory level) x
Annual inventory holding cost
Holding cost per unit per year
= (Maximum inventory level)/2
Annual inventory level
= –
Maximum inventory level
Total produced during the production run
Total used during the production run
= pt – dt
FYI
12 - ‹#›
Copyright © 2017 Pearson Education, Ltd.
Copyright © 2017 Pearson Education, Ltd.
12 - ‹#›
66
Production Order Quantity Model
Q = Number of units per order p = Daily production rate
H = Holding cost per unit per year d = Daily demand/usage rate
t = Length of the production run in days
= –
Maximum inventory level
Total produced during the production run
Total used during the production run
= pt – dt
However, Q = total produced = pt ; thus t = Q/p
Maximum inventory level
= p – d = Q 1 –
Q
p
Q
p
d
p
Holding cost = (H) = 1 – H
d
p
Q
2
Maximum inventory level
2
FYI
12 - ‹#›
Copyright © 2017 Pearson Education, Ltd.
Copyright © 2017 Pearson Education, Ltd.
12 - ‹#›
67
Production Order Quantity Model
Q = Number of units per order p = Daily production rate
H = Holding cost per unit per year d = Daily demand/usage rate
t = Length of the production run in days
FYI
12 - ‹#›
Copyright © 2017 Pearson Education, Ltd.
Copyright © 2017 Pearson Education, Ltd.
12 - ‹#›
68
Production Order Quantity Example
D = 1,000 units p = 8 units per day
S = $10 d = 4 units per day
H = $0.50 per unit per year
FYI
12 - ‹#›
Copyright © 2017 Pearson Education, Ltd.
Copyright © 2017 Pearson Education, Ltd.
12 - ‹#›
69
Production Order Quantity Model
When annual data are used the equation becomes:
Note:
d = 4 = =
D
Number of days the plant is in operation
1,000
250
FYI
12 - ‹#›
Copyright © 2017 Pearson Education, Ltd.
Copyright © 2017 Pearson Education, Ltd.
12 - ‹#›
70
Quantity Discount Models
Reduced prices are often available when larger quantities are purchased
Trade-off is between reduced product cost and increased holding cost
| TABLE 12.2 | A Quantity Discount Schedule | ||
| PRICE RANGE | QUANTITY ORDERED | PRICE PER UNIT P | |
| Initial price | 0 to 119 | $ 100 | |
| Discount price 1 | 200 to 1,499 | $ 98 | |
| Discount price 2 | 1,500 and over | $ 96 |
12 - ‹#›
Copyright © 2017 Pearson Education, Ltd.
Copyright © 2017 Pearson Education, Ltd.
12 - ‹#›
Quantity Discount Models
Total annual cost = Setup cost + Holding cost + Product cost
where Q = Quantity ordered P = Price per unit
D = Annual demand in units I = Holding cost per unit per year
S = Ordering or setup cost per order expressed as a percent of price P
Because unit price varies, holding cost is expressed as a percent (I) of unit price (P)
12 - ‹#›
Copyright © 2017 Pearson Education, Ltd.
Copyright © 2017 Pearson Education, Ltd.
12 - ‹#›
Quantity Discount Models
Steps in analyzing a quantity discount
Starting with the lowest possible purchase price, calculate Q* until the first feasible EOQ is found. This is a possible best order quantity, along with all price-break quantities for all lower prices.
Calculate the total annual cost for each possible order quantity determined in Step
Select the quantity that gives the lowest total cost.
12 - ‹#›
Copyright © 2017 Pearson Education, Ltd.
Copyright © 2017 Pearson Education, Ltd.
12 - ‹#›
Quantity Discount Models
Figure 12.7
520,053 –
517,155 –
Annual Total Cost
Order Quantity
550,000 –
540,000 –
530,000 –
510,000 –
500,000 –
120
1,500
TC for No Discount
TC for Discount 2
TC for Discount 1
Initial Price
Discount Price 1
Discount Price 2
Possible Order Quantities
Not Feasible
Not Feasible
Feasible
FYI
12 - ‹#›
Copyright © 2017 Pearson Education, Ltd.
Copyright © 2017 Pearson Education, Ltd.
12 - ‹#›
Quantity Discount Models
D = 5200 units S = $200 I = 28%
Because unit price varies, holding cost is expressed as a percent (I) of unit price (P)
H = IP
| TABLE 12.2 | A Quantity Discount Schedule | ||
| PRICE RANGE | QUANTITY ORDERED | PRICE PER UNIT P | |
| Initial price | 0 to 119 | $ 100 | |
| Discount price 1 | 200 to 1,499 | $ 98 | |
| Discount price 2 | 1,500 and over | $ 96 |
12 - ‹#›
Copyright © 2017 Pearson Education, Ltd.
Copyright © 2017 Pearson Education, Ltd.
12 - ‹#›
Quantity Discount Example
Calculate Q* for every discount starting with the lowest price
Q$96* = = 278 drones/order
2(5,200)($200)
(0.28)($96)
Q$98* = = 275 drones/order
2(5,200)($200)
(0.28)($98)
Infeasible – calculate Q* for next-higher price
Feasible
12 - ‹#›
Copyright © 2017 Pearson Education, Ltd.
Copyright © 2017 Pearson Education, Ltd.
12 - ‹#›
Quantity Discount Example
| TABLE 12.3 | Total Cost Computations for Chris Beehner Electronics | |||||
| ORDER QUANTITY | UNIT PRICE | ANNUAL ORDERING COST | ANNUAL HOLDING COST | ANNUAL PRODUCT COST | TOTAL ANNUAL COST | |
| 1,500 | $96 | $693 | $20,160 | $499,200 | $520,053 | |
| 275 | $98 | $3,782 | $3,773 | $509,600 | $517,155 |
Choose the price and quantity that gives the lowest total cost
Buy 275 drones at $98 per unit
12 - ‹#›
Copyright © 2017 Pearson Education, Ltd.
Copyright © 2017 Pearson Education, Ltd.
12 - ‹#›
Quantity Discount Variations
All-units discount is the most popular form
Incremental quantity discounts apply only to those units purchased beyond the price break quantity
Fixed fees may encourage larger purchases
Aggregation over items or time
Truckload discounts, buy-one-get-one-free offers, one-time-only sales
FYI
12 - ‹#›
Copyright © 2017 Pearson Education, Ltd.
Copyright © 2017 Pearson Education, Ltd.
12 - ‹#›
Probabilistic Models and Safety Stock
Used when demand is not constant or certain
Use safety stock to achieve a desired service level and avoid stockouts
ROP = d x L + ss
Annual stockout costs = The sum of the units short for each demand level x The probability of that demand level x The stockout cost/unit x The number of orders per year
FYI
12 - ‹#›
Copyright © 2017 Pearson Education, Ltd.
Copyright © 2017 Pearson Education, Ltd.
12 - ‹#›
Safety Stock Example
| NUMBER OF UNITS | PROBABILITY | ||
| 30 | .2 | ||
| 40 | .2 | ||
| ROP 50 | .3 | ||
| 60 | .2 | ||
| 70 | .1 | ||
| 1.0 |
ROP = 50 units Stockout cost = $40 per frame
Orders per year = 6 Carrying cost = $5 per frame per year
FYI
12 - ‹#›
Copyright © 2017 Pearson Education, Ltd.
Copyright © 2017 Pearson Education, Ltd.
12 - ‹#›
Safety Stock Example
ROP = 50 units Stockout cost = $40 per frame
Orders per year = 6 Carrying cost = $5 per frame per year
| SAFETY STOCK | ADDITIONAL HOLDING COST | STOCKOUT COST | TOTAL COST |
| 20 | (20)($5) = $100 | $0 | $100 |
| 10 | (10)($5) = $ 50 | (10)(.1)($40)(6) = $240 | $290 |
| 0 | $ 0 | (10)(.2)($40)(6) + (20)(.1)($40)(6) = $960 | $960 |
A safety stock of 20 frames gives the lowest total cost
ROP = 50 + 20 = 70 frames
FYI
12 - ‹#›
Copyright © 2017 Pearson Education, Ltd.
Copyright © 2017 Pearson Education, Ltd.
12 - ‹#›
Safety stock
16.5 units
ROP
Place order
Probabilistic Demand
Inventory level
Time
0
Minimum demand during lead time
Maximum demand during lead time
Mean demand during lead time
Normal distribution probability of demand during lead time
Expected demand during lead time (350 kits)
ROP = 350 + safety stock of 16.5 = 366.5
Receive order
Lead time
Figure 12.8
FYI
12 - ‹#›
Copyright © 2017 Pearson Education, Ltd.
Copyright © 2017 Pearson Education, Ltd.
12 - ‹#›
82
Probabilistic Demand
Use prescribed service levels to set safety stock when the cost of stockouts cannot be determined
ROP = demand during lead time + ZsdLT
where Z = Number of standard deviations
sdLT = Standard deviation of demand during lead time
FYI
12 - ‹#›
Copyright © 2017 Pearson Education, Ltd.
Copyright © 2017 Pearson Education, Ltd.
12 - ‹#›
83
Probabilistic Demand
Safety stock
Probability of no stockout 95% of the time
Mean demand 350
ROP = ? kits
Quantity
Number of standard deviations
0
z
Risk of a stockout (5% of area of normal curve)
FYI
12 - ‹#›
Copyright © 2017 Pearson Education, Ltd.
Copyright © 2017 Pearson Education, Ltd.
12 - ‹#›
84
Probabilistic Example
m = Average demand = 350 kits
sdLT = Standard deviation of demand during lead time = 10 kits
Stockout policy = 5% (service level = 95%)
Using Appendix I, for an area under the curve of 95%, the Z = 1.645
Safety stock = ZsdLT = 1.645(10) = 16.5 kits
Reorder point = Expected demand during lead time + Safety stock
= 350 kits + 16.5 kits of safety stock
= 366.5 or 367 kits
FYI
12 - ‹#›
Copyright © 2017 Pearson Education, Ltd.
Copyright © 2017 Pearson Education, Ltd.
12 - ‹#›
85
Other Probabilistic Models
When data on demand during lead time is not available, there are other models available
When demand is variable and lead time is constant
When lead time is variable and demand is constant
When both demand and lead time are variable
FYI
12 - ‹#›
Copyright © 2017 Pearson Education, Ltd.
Copyright © 2017 Pearson Education, Ltd.
12 - ‹#›
86
Other Probabilistic Models
Demand is variable and lead time is constant
ROP = (Average daily demand x Lead time in days) + ZsdLT
where sdLT = sd Lead time
sd = Standard deviation of demand per day
FYI
12 - ‹#›
Copyright © 2017 Pearson Education, Ltd.
Copyright © 2017 Pearson Education, Ltd.
12 - ‹#›
87
Probabilistic Example
Average daily demand (normally distributed) = 15
Lead time in days (constant) = 2
Standard deviation of daily demand = 5
Service level = 90%
Z for 90% = 1.28
From Appendix I
ROP = (15 units x 2 days) + ZsdLT
= 30 + 1.28(5)( 2)
= 30 + 9.02 = 39.02 ≈ 39
Safety stock is about 9 computers
FYI
12 - ‹#›
Copyright © 2017 Pearson Education, Ltd.
Copyright © 2017 Pearson Education, Ltd.
12 - ‹#›
88
Other Probabilistic Models
Lead time is variable and demand is constant
ROP = (Daily demand x Average lead time in days) + Z x (Daily demand) x sLT
where sLT = Standard deviation of lead time in days
FYI
12 - ‹#›
Copyright © 2017 Pearson Education, Ltd.
Copyright © 2017 Pearson Education, Ltd.
12 - ‹#›
89
Probabilistic Example
Daily demand (constant) = 10
Average lead time = 6 days
Standard deviation of lead time = sLT = 1
Service level = 98%, so Z (from Appendix I) = 2.055
ROP = (10 units x 6 days) + 2.055(10 units)(1)
= 60 + 20.55 = 80.55
Reorder point is about 81 cameras
FYI
12 - ‹#›
Copyright © 2017 Pearson Education, Ltd.
Copyright © 2017 Pearson Education, Ltd.
12 - ‹#›
90
Other Probabilistic Models
Both demand and lead time are variable
ROP = (Average daily demand x Average lead time) + ZsdLT
where sd = Standard deviation of demand per day
sLT = Standard deviation of lead time in days
sdLT = (Average lead time x sd2) + (Average daily demand)2s2LT
FYI
12 - ‹#›
Copyright © 2017 Pearson Education, Ltd.
Copyright © 2017 Pearson Education, Ltd.
12 - ‹#›
91
Probabilistic Example
Average daily demand (normally distributed) = 150
Standard deviation = sd = 16
Average lead time 5 days (normally distributed)
Standard deviation = sLT = 1 day
Service level = 95%, so Z = 1.645 (from Appendix I)
FYI
12 - ‹#›
Copyright © 2017 Pearson Education, Ltd.
Copyright © 2017 Pearson Education, Ltd.
12 - ‹#›
92
Single-Period Model
Only one order is placed for a product
Units have little or no value at the end of the sales period
Cs = Cost of shortage = Sales price/unit – Cost/unit
Co = Cost of overage = Cost/unit – Salvage value
Service level =
Cs
Cs + Co
FYI
12 - ‹#›
Copyright © 2017 Pearson Education, Ltd.
Copyright © 2017 Pearson Education, Ltd.
12 - ‹#›
Single-Period Example
Average demand = = 120 papers/day
Standard deviation = = 15 papers
Cs = cost of shortage = $1.25 – $.70 = $.55
Co = cost of overage = $.70 – $.30 = $.40
Service level =
Cs
Cs + Co
=
= = .579
.55
.55 + .40
.55
.95
Service level 57.9%
Optimal stocking level
= 120
FYI
12 - ‹#›
Copyright © 2017 Pearson Education, Ltd.
Copyright © 2017 Pearson Education, Ltd.
12 - ‹#›
Single-Period Example
From Appendix I, for the area .579, Z .20
The optimal stocking level
= 120 copies + (.20)()
= 120 + (.20)(15) = 120 + 3 = 123 papers
The stockout risk = 1 – Service level
= 1 – .579 = .422 = 42.2%
FYI
12 - ‹#›
Copyright © 2017 Pearson Education, Ltd.
Copyright © 2017 Pearson Education, Ltd.
12 - ‹#›
Fixed-Period (P) Systems
Fixed-quantity models require continuous monitoring using perpetual inventory systems
In fixed-period systems orders placed at the end of a fixed period
Periodic review, P system
FYI
12 - ‹#›
Copyright © 2017 Pearson Education, Ltd.
Copyright © 2017 Pearson Education, Ltd.
12 - ‹#›
96
Fixed-Period (P) Systems
Inventory counted only at end of period
Order brings inventory up to target level
Only relevant costs are ordering and holding
Lead times are known and constant
Items are independent of one another
FYI
12 - ‹#›
Copyright © 2017 Pearson Education, Ltd.
Copyright © 2017 Pearson Education, Ltd.
12 - ‹#›
97
Fixed-Period (P) Systems
On-hand inventory
Time
Q1
Q2
Target quantity (T)
P
Q3
Q4
P
P
Figure 12.9
FYI
12 - ‹#›
Copyright © 2017 Pearson Education, Ltd.
Copyright © 2017 Pearson Education, Ltd.
12 - ‹#›
98
Fixed-Period Systems
Inventory is only counted at each review period
May be scheduled at convenient times
Appropriate in routine situations
May result in stockouts between periods
May require increased safety stock
FYI
12 - ‹#›
Copyright © 2017 Pearson Education, Ltd.
Copyright © 2017 Pearson Education, Ltd.
12 - ‹#›
99
Annual setup cost = D Q S
Annual setup cost =
D
Q
S
Annual holding cost = Q 2 H
Annual holding cost =
Q
2
H
= D Q ⎛
⎝ ⎜
⎞
⎠ ⎟S
=
D
Q
æ
è
ç
ö
ø
÷
S
Annual setup cost = D Q S
Annual setup cost =
D
Q
S
= Q 2
⎛
⎝ ⎜
⎞
⎠ ⎟H
=
Q
2
æ
è
ç
ö
ø
÷
H
D Q
⎛
⎝ ⎜
⎞
⎠ ⎟S =
Q 2
⎛
⎝ ⎜
⎞
⎠ ⎟H
D
Q
æ
è
ç
ö
ø
÷
S =
Q
2
æ
è
ç
ö
ø
÷
H
2DS =Q2H
Q2 = 2DS H
Q* = 2DS H
2DS=Q
2
H
Q
2
=
2DS
H
Q
*
=
2DS
H
H
S
D
EOQ
´
´
=
2
Optimal Or
der Quanti
ty
Expected N
umber Orde
rs
Expected T
ime Betwee
n Orders
Working Da
ys
/
Year
Working Da
ys
/
Year
=
=
×
×
=
=
=
=
=
=
×
Q
D
S
H
N
D
Q
T
N
d
D
ROP
d
L
*
*
2
H
S
D
EOQ
´
´
=
2
Q* = 2DS H
Q
*
=
2DS
H
Q* = 2(1,000)(10)
0.50 = 40,000 = 200 units
Q
*
=
2(1,000)(10)
0.50
=40,000=200 units
D Q*
D
Q
*
TC = D Q S + Q 2 H
= 1,000 200
($10)+ 200 2 ($.50)
= (5)($10)+(100)($.50) =$50+$50=$100
TC=
D
Q
S+
Q
2
H
=
1,000
200
($10)+
200
2
($.50)
=(5)($10)+(100)($.50)
=$50+$50=$100
TC = D Q S + Q 2 H +PD
TC=
D
Q
S+
Q
2
H+PD
Setup cost = (D /Q)S Holding cost = 1
2 HQ 1− d p( )⎡⎣ ⎤⎦
Setup cost = (D/Q)S
Holding cost =
1
2
HQ1-dp
(
)
é
ë
ù
û
D Q S = 1
2 HQ 1− d p( )⎡⎣ ⎤⎦
Q2 = 2DS
H 1− d p( )⎡⎣ ⎤⎦
Qp * =
2DS H 1− d p( )⎡⎣ ⎤⎦
D
Q
S=
1
2
HQ1-dp
(
)
é
ë
ù
û
Q
2
=
2DS
H1-dp
()
é
ë
ù
û
Q
p
*
=
2DS
H1-dp
()
é
ë
ù
û
Qp * =
2DS H 1− d p( )⎡⎣ ⎤⎦
Qp * =
2(1,000)(10) 0.50 1−(4 8)⎡⎣ ⎤⎦
= 20,000
0.50(1 2) = 80,000
= 282.8 hubcaps, or 283 hubcaps
Q
p
*
=
2DS
H1-dp
()
é
ë
ù
û
Q
p
*
=
2(1,000)(10)
0.501-(48)
é
ë
ù
û
=
20,000
0.50(12)
=80,000
=282.8 hubcaps, or 283 hubcaps
Qp * =
2DS
H 1− Annual demand rate Annual production rate
⎛
⎝ ⎜
⎞
⎠ ⎟
Q
p
*
=
2DS
H1-
Annual demand rate
Annual production rate
æ
è
ç
ö
ø
÷
Q* = 2DS IP
Q
*
=
2DS
IP
TC = D Q S+ Q 2 IP+PD
TC=
D
Q
S+
Q
2
IP+PD
Q* = 2DS IP
Q
*
=
2DS
IP
ROP=(150 packs×5 days)+1.645σ dLT
σ dLT
= 5 days×162( )+ 1502 ×12( ) = 5×256( )+ 22,500×1( ) = 1,280( )+ 22,500( ) = 23,780 ≅154
ROP =(150×5)+1.645(154)≅750+253=1,003 packs
ROP=(150 packs´5 days)+1.645s
dLT
s
dLT
=5 days´16
2
( )
+150
2
´1
2
( )
=5´256
()
+22,500´1
( )
=1,280
()
+22,500
( )
=23,780@154
ROP =(150´5)+1.645(154)@750+253=1,003 packs