CJAS6

Rawono1
Chapter10PPT.ppt

Administration and Management in Criminal Justice

Chapter 10: Courts

*

Federal Court System Structure

Administration and Management in Criminal Justice

Chapter 10: Courts

  • Hierarchical
  • Trial court (U.S. District Courts) decide upon issues of fact and law (initially)
  • Appellate courts decide upon issues of law

Administration and Management in Criminal Justice Chapter 10: Courts

*

Federal Court Design

  • Administrative Office of the United State Courts handles administrative functions of the federal courts
  • Federal courts hear different types of cases
  • Civil and criminal
  • Trial and appellate
  • Federal courts are decentralized with each of the federal courts having a great deal of freedom

Administration and Management in Criminal Justice

Chapter 10: Courts

Administration and Management in Criminal Justice Chapter 10: Courts

*

Federal Court System

  • Congress (executive branch) plays a significant role in shaping the federal court system
  • Creates federal courts
  • Determines jurisdiction (types of cases to be heard)
  • Allocates funding
  • Decides upon number of judges and their assignment
  • Federal judges are nominated by the President and confirmed by the Senate
  • Checks and balances
  • Federal courts may declare a law created by Congress unconstitutional if it violates provisions of the U.S. Constitution

Administration and Management in Criminal Justice

Chapter 10: Courts

Administration and Management in Criminal Justice Chapter 10: Courts

*

Judicially Independent Judges?

  • Judicial autonomy is supported through:
  • Lifetime appointments for federal judges
  • Removal of federal judges through impeachment only
  • Judicial autonomy is weakened by:
  • Others questioning the judgment of judges
  • Critical assessments of credentials of judges seeking appointment to the federal bench

Administration and Management in Criminal Justice

Chapter 10: Courts

Administration and Management in Criminal Justice Chapter 10: Courts

*

Theories of Judicial Decision-Making

  • How do judges exercise their formal powers and informal influence?
  • Two theories
  • Managerial theory: decisions are based on the volume of workload
  • Attitudinal theory: decisions are based on judge’s political preferences

Administration and Management in Criminal Justice

Chapter 10: Courts

Administration and Management in Criminal Justice Chapter 10: Courts

*

Politicization of the Judiciary Process

  • There is a trend of judges settling issues that should be best left to other branches of government such as legislatures
  • This problem may be particularly acute for judges (not federal judges) who are subject to election
  • One solution would be to afford citizens some input into judicial selection and retention decisions

Administration and Management in Criminal Justice

Chapter 10: Courts

Administration and Management in Criminal Justice Chapter 10: Courts

Sometimes referred to as judicial activism.

*

State Court Organization

  • Very similar in structure to federal courts
  • Hierarchical: both trial and appellate courts
  • Most states have multiple appellate courts— an intermediate and a supreme court (some only have one)
  • Courts are often organized by subject matter
  • Types of cases: civil v. criminal
  • Seriousness of the offense: misdemeanor v. felony
  • Participant: adult v. juvenile

Administration and Management in Criminal Justice

Chapter 10: Courts

Administration and Management in Criminal Justice Chapter 10: Courts

*

Specialty Courts/Problem-Solving Courts

  • Limited jurisdiction courts designed to address specific problems
  • Examples:
  • Drug courts
  • Gun courts
  • Domestic violence courts
  • Mental health courts

Administration and Management in Criminal Justice

Chapter 10: Courts

Administration and Management in Criminal Justice Chapter 10: Courts

Drug court expansion was visible beginning in the 1990s. Other examples include community courts (see Midtown Community Court) and wellness courts.

*

Six Elements of Specialty Courts

  • Enhanced information to facilitate decision-making
  • Staff are well-trained in specific area (e.g., guns)
  • Information is available on clients and victims
  • Technology is used to provide access to information such as treatment participation
  • Community engagement
  • Community members help identify, prioritize, and solve problems
  • Public trust in justice system is enhanced
  • Example: Neighborhoods around the Midtown Community Court (NY) identified community service-type projects used in sentencing offenders

Administration and Management in Criminal Justice

Chapter 10: Courts

Administration and Management in Criminal Justice Chapter 10: Courts

*

Six Elements of Specialty Courts (cont’d)

  • Collaboration
  • Justice system leaders coordinate a wide range of service providers
  • Examples include treatment officials, job programs, etc.
  • Individualized justice
  • Link offender to specific services in order to reduce recidivism
  • Examples include treatment plans or counseling

Administration and Management in Criminal Justice

Chapter 10: Courts

Administration and Management in Criminal Justice Chapter 10: Courts

*

Six Elements of Specialty Courts (cont’d)

  • Accountability
  • All offenders are monitored and there are consequences for noncompliance
  • Example: drug offender might be subject to repeated drug testing
  • Outcomes
  • The success of programs are evaluated
  • Information is disseminated to the public

Administration and Management in Criminal Justice

Chapter 10: Courts

Administration and Management in Criminal Justice Chapter 10: Courts

*

Specialty Court Challenges

  • Role of judge is altered
  • Judge is no longer neutral; he/she is an advocate for treatment and may push the defendant in this direction
  • Increased use of resources/costs
  • Cases consume a lot of time. A drug offender in a drug court may return to the court on a bi-weekly basis
  • The adversarial process is replaced by a therapeutic one
  • The individual rights of the offender may be surrendered

Administration and Management in Criminal Justice

Chapter 10: Courts

Administration and Management in Criminal Justice Chapter 10: Courts

*

Juvenile Courts

  • Emerged in 1899 to alter the practice of trying adults and juveniles the same way
  • Juveniles were once housed with adults (early 1800s) but later send to houses of refuge/reformatories
  • Indeterminate sentences
  • Child removed from home situations
  • Focused on education, vocational training, and religion
  • Concerns were raised about the treatment of juveniles in reformatories, leading to a separate juvenile system

Administration and Management in Criminal Justice

Chapter 10: Courts

Administration and Management in Criminal Justice Chapter 10: Courts

*

Juvenile Court Operation

  • Cases
  • Juveniles who committed delinquent/criminal acts and children in need of care
  • Juvenile age defined by statue (varies by state)
  • Behaviors
  • Crimes: illegal conduct if committed by a juvenile or adult
  • Status offenses: only illegal because of the age of the offender (examples include truancy, running away, incorrigibility)
  • In some cases, a juvenile can be transferred to adult court via statutory waiver or prosecutorial discretion

Administration and Management in Criminal Justice

Chapter 10: Courts

Administration and Management in Criminal Justice Chapter 10: Courts

*

Goals of the Juvenile Court

  • Juvenile courts are illustrative of the service quality approach
  • Individualized justice to offender
  • Treat, reform, and rehabilitate the offender
  • Rely on others to do what is in the best interests of the child (recognizes the interdependence of agencies)
  • Juvenile courts are working with other stakeholders to make the process more effective

Administration and Management in Criminal Justice

Chapter 10: Courts

Administration and Management in Criminal Justice Chapter 10: Courts

*

Examples of Stakeholder Involvement

  • Restorative justice
  • The offense harms the individual and the offender needs to make a mends for the harm done
  • All parties must be involved in the process (offender, victim, police, etc.)
  • Examples
  • Pre-adjudication mediation
  • Victim-impact statements or panels

Administration and Management in Criminal Justice

Chapter 10: Courts

Administration and Management in Criminal Justice Chapter 10: Courts

*

Examples of Stakeholder Involvement (cont’d)

  • Station adjustments
  • An arrested juvenile is dealt with by the police instead of proceeding to the juvenile court
  • Offender might be required to fulfill certain conditions (complete community service) under the direction of a police officer
  • Failure to complete requirements could result in referral to juvenile court
  • Benefits/drawbacks
  • Primary benefit: juvenile obtains services and avoids court ordered sanctions and records
  • Drawback: many adjustments are informal with no written agreement detailing plans

Administration and Management in Criminal Justice

Chapter 10: Courts

Administration and Management in Criminal Justice Chapter 10: Courts

*

Measuring the Performance of Criminal Courts

  • Customer (victim, witnesses, jurors, employees) perceptions
  • Timeliness of case processing
  • Fairness
  • Outcomes
  • Operations measures
  • Disposition time
  • Percent of cases disposed

Administration and Management in Criminal Justice

Chapter 10: Courts

Administration and Management in Criminal Justice Chapter 10: Courts

*