assignment and discussion

twinkle
Chapter_6.ppt

*

Copyright © 2013, Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Chapter 6

Physical Barriers

Effective Physical Security

Fourth Edition

Copyright © 2013, Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

The University of Adelaide, School of Computer Science

The University of Adelaide, School of Computer Science

*

Chapter 2 — Instructions: Language of the Computer

*

Chapter 2 — Instructions: Language of the Computer

*

Copyright © 2013, Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Physical Barriers

  • Physical barriers used since before Roman Empire
  • Roman garrisons
  • Fortresses in Revolutionary War
  • Army forts in Indian territories
  • Base camps in war zones
  • Improved concept of physical barriers over the years

6 Physical Barriers

Copyright © 2013, Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

The University of Adelaide, School of Computer Science

The University of Adelaide, School of Computer Science

*

Chapter 2 — Instructions: Language of the Computer

*

Chapter 2 — Instructions: Language of the Computer

*

Doors

  • Function is to provide a barrier at entry/exit
  • In maximum security, provides barrier but:
  • Must be impenetrable by ordinary means
  • Maximum delay time by extraordinary means
  • In building maximum security facility, must define function of all doors and relationship to total protection system

Copyright © 2013, Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Copyright © 2013, Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

*

Doors—Personnel

  • Average industrial personnel door:
  • Hollow steel composite door with 18-gauge metal facing
  • Butt hinges with nonremovable pins
  • Opens in either direction
  • May have ventilation louvers or glass panels

Copyright © 2013, Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Copyright © 2013, Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

*

Doors—Personnel

  • Can be penetrated in 1 minute or less by:
  • Breaking locking mechanism with pipe wrench
  • Pry bar to pry door open
  • Using a fire axe to penetrate the door
  • To make more resistant:
  • Bolting or welding steel plate
  • Install several dead bolts
  • Welding steel louvers on inside
  • Replace or upgrade hardware with more resistant ones

Copyright © 2013, Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Copyright © 2013, Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

*

Doors—Personnel

  • Substantial steel or security class doors:
  • ¾-inch steel on one side, 1/8-in steel on other
  • Ready-made security panels (DELIGNIT®)
  • Highly-tempered plate material (hardwood veneers, cross-laminated, bonded with phenolic resins
  • Thicknesses of 20, 30, 40, and 50 mm

Copyright © 2013, Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Copyright © 2013, Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

*

Doors—Personnel

  • Frames should be anchored to the wall to make it penetration-resistant
  • Hinges should be inaccessible from side of door facing the likely threat or
  • Individual hinges should be case hardened or replaced with heavy-duty hinges and pins

Copyright © 2013, Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Copyright © 2013, Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

*

Doors—Personnel

  • <Insert Figure 6-2>

Copyright © 2013, Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Copyright © 2013, Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

*

Doors—Personnel

  • Other protection methods:
  • Consider installing ¼-inch steel plates over exposed hinges
  • Mortise hinges into door jamb and door
  • Install piano hinge on outside of door

Copyright © 2013, Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Copyright © 2013, Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

*

Doors—Personnel

  • Dead bolt principle:
  • Install ½-inch steel rods equidistant between support hinges on inside of door
  • Install ¼-inch steel plate on inside of door jamb

Copyright © 2013, Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Copyright © 2013, Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

*

Doors—Personnel

  • Existing door can be hardened by welding heavy angle iron or an I-beam to form a grid on inside of front door panel.
  • Doors should open toward likely threat direction
  • Consider turnstile-type doors.

Copyright © 2013, Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Copyright © 2013, Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

*

Retrofit Upgrading of Existing Doors

  • To harden an existing door against tool attack:
  • Customary—clad with heavy-gauge sheet metal or steel plate
  • Can be implemented quickly with local materials
  • Only to solid or laminated wood, substantial hollow metal doors

Copyright © 2013, Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Copyright © 2013, Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

*

Retrofit Upgrading of Existing Doors

  • Thinnest recommended material
  • 12-gauge sheet metal
  • Should be securely fastened using carriage bolts
  • Nuts from the protected side and no less than 5/16 inches in diameter
  • As close to edge of door frame as possible

Copyright © 2013, Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Copyright © 2013, Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

*

Retrofit Upgrading of Existing Doors

  • If cladding applied to outward-opening door:
  • Provide protection to free edge
  • Wrap sheet metal cover around door edges

Copyright © 2013, Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Copyright © 2013, Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

*

Retrofit Upgrading of Existing Doors

  • Take into account:
  • Effects of door fit due to additional thickness
  • Problems of additional weight
  • Provide for mounting with heavy-duty hinges
  • Protect against hinge-pin removal and hinge destruction

Copyright © 2013, Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Copyright © 2013, Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

*

Retrofit Upgrading of Existing Doors

  • Recommended door:
  • Hollow door with skin of 12-gauge cold-rolled steel reinforced by:
  • Internal channel stiffeners of 22-gauge or thicker steel
  • Can fill hollow spaces for thermal insulation

Copyright © 2013, Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Copyright © 2013, Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

*

Door Frames

  • For full resistance to attack:
  • Harden frame and attachments like door.
  • Fabricate frame of at least 16-gauge steel.
  • Fill with cement grouting.
  • Bond to wall structure surrounding the door system.

Copyright © 2013, Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Copyright © 2013, Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

*

Hinge Vulnerability

  • Hinge on exterior frame vulnerable to:
  • Drive out hinge pin with drift punch/hammer
  • Cut off with hacksaw, cold chisel, torch
  • To inhibit/prevent removal of hinge pins:
  • Peening over or tack-welding ends of pins
  • Install set screw in knuckle.
  • Use a continuously interlocking hinge system.

Copyright © 2013, Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Copyright © 2013, Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

*

Door and Frame Interlocking

  • Countermeasures to prevent destruction or removal or hinge pin/knuckle assembly:
  • Install substantial protruding steel dowel pin in hinge edge of door or frame with a mating socket or hole in frame or door
  • Pin engages in socket when door is closed
  • Door/frame automatically interlock when closed

Copyright © 2013, Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Copyright © 2013, Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

*

Door and Frame Interlocking

  • A variety of devices:
  • Pin-in-socket
  • Tongue-in-grove
  • Large fabricated steel doors:
  • Orient channel-iron framing member to create a cavity where a corresponding angle iron can engage

Copyright © 2013, Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Copyright © 2013, Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

*

Hinges Appropriate for Door Weight

  • Security vehicle doors:
  • Standard—corrugated steel, roll-up variety
  • 16-guage steel with stiffness to withstand 20 lb per sq. foot of wind pressure
  • Easily penetrated (a 6-ft. pry bar and a 2 x 4 plank weighing 20 to 25 lb can penetrate in less than a minute)
  • Hardening door is difficult—not useful in maximum-security environment

Copyright © 2013, Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Copyright © 2013, Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

*

Hinges Appropriate for Door Weight

  • Specifically designed doors:
  • At least ¼-inch steel plate
  • Explosions—standard doors, no resistance
  • Hand-carried tools can penetrate a vehicle door
  • Vehicular attack also used

Copyright © 2013, Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Copyright © 2013, Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

*

Hinges Appropriate for Door Weight

  • To harden (upgrade) vehicle doors:
  • Rubber tiers installed directly behind outer door
  • Clad door with sheet metal
  • Insert redwood for resistance to thermal tools
  • Increased weight—upgrade hardware
  • Laid steel channels welded together and covered by sheet metal

Copyright © 2013, Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Copyright © 2013, Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

*

Hinges Appropriate for Door Weight

  • If lateral wall space not a consideration:
  • Consider manual or mechanically actuated sliding door
  • Hardened to same standard and methods as for personnel doors
  • Top runner track must be reinforced
  • Substantial channel for door bottom

Copyright © 2013, Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Copyright © 2013, Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

*

Hinge Appropriate for Door Weight

  • Security advantages of sliding door:
  • Structural steel members to support a roll-up door of greater bulk and complexity than sliding door
  • Joints in corrugated steel roll-up a weakness
  • Sliding door a single, solid entity
  • Forced entry difficult

Copyright © 2013, Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Copyright © 2013, Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

*

Hinge Appropriate for Door Weight

  • Main vulnerability of sliding door:
  • Prying against opening edge
  • Install manually activated drop pins that drop into receiver holes drilled into inner rail of bottom track or the floor
  • Must remain undetectable from the outside and be spaced randomly

Copyright © 2013, Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Copyright © 2013, Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

*

Hinges Appropriate for Door Weight

  • Another high-security vehicle door similar to garage door:
  • A series of rigid panels constructed of panels made of corrugated metal stiffener between aluminum plates
  • Joined together along horizontal edges by hinges
  • Rolls up along a track, stores self under spring tension
  • Track reinforced
  • Susceptible to vehicle attack

Copyright © 2013, Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Copyright © 2013, Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

*

Hinges Appropriate for Door Weight

  • Before deciding on vault doors, ask:
  • Expected maximum period protection needed
  • Regulations require vault protection for assets
  • Size and configuration make removal difficult
  • Can asset be made unusable by removing key components?
  • Movement of assets kept at minimum

Copyright © 2013, Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Copyright © 2013, Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

*

Hinges Appropriate for Door Weight

  • Before deciding on vault doors, ask (con’t):
  • Large numbers requiring daily access
  • Theft of assets have adverse effect on:
  • Remaining in business
  • General public health and welfare
  • Environment
  • National security

Copyright © 2013, Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Copyright © 2013, Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

*

Hinges Appropriate for Door Weight

  • Before deciding on vault doors, ask (con’t):
  • Vault construction lower insurance premiums
  • Vault construction without extensive renovation
  • Present facilities sufficient in event of company growth

Copyright © 2013, Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Copyright © 2013, Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

*

Hinges Appropriate for Door Weight

  • Strong room doors:
  • An enclosed interior space constructed of solid building materials, one door, no windows
  • Doors should be of:
  • Heavy-gauge metal or solid hardwood/metal plate
  • Door louvers and baffle plates reinforced with:
  • 9-gauge, 2-in sq. wire mesh on interior of door
  • Heavy-duty hardware
  • Set door in suitable frame

Copyright © 2013, Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Copyright © 2013, Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

*

Hinges Appropriate for Door Weight

  • Strong room (con’t)
  • Air conditioning, heating ducts, sewers should be equipped with personnel barriers
  • Duct barriers of heavy-gauge wire
  • Sewer, utility tunnel barriers of steel bars or rods to form grill

Copyright © 2013, Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Copyright © 2013, Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

*

Hinges Appropriate for Door Weight

  • Emergency doors:
  • Use often mandated—keep to minimum
  • Number and location depend on:
  • Type of work performed
  • Work space configuration

Copyright © 2013, Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Copyright © 2013, Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

*

Hinges Appropriate for Door Weight

  • Ask the following:
  • Location vs. assets being protected (easy to divert assets through door)
  • Type of emergency door installed
  • What areas do they allow personnel to pass
  • Alarms

Copyright © 2013, Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Copyright © 2013, Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

*

Hinges Appropriate for Door Weight

  • Doors, hinges, and frames should match other security doors in facility
  • Method of mounting should match door
  • Locking mechanism requirements usually decided by ordinances
  • Usually require panic bar, which is often vulnerable
  • Do not chain or lock emergency exits

Copyright © 2013, Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Copyright © 2013, Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

*

Hinges Appropriate for Door Weight

  • To ensure exit doors keep people out but allow safe exit of those inside:
  • Overlapping sections fastened to stiles that met and overlap when door closes
  • No equipment exposed but when panic bar is depressed, barrier springs free
  • Another type—replaces bar with a rim device that is harder to be snagged from outside

Copyright © 2013, Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Copyright © 2013, Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

*

Hinges Appropriate for Door Weight

  • Personnel exiting emergency doors should be channeled by physical barriers to a central assembly area
  • Inhibits employee theft or diversion of assets
  • Stops insider allowing accomplices into building
  • Provide monitoring of evacuation.

Copyright © 2013, Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Copyright © 2013, Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

*

Hinges Appropriate for Door Weight

  • Alarms should be mandatory
  • Local alarm
  • Alarm at central alarm station
  • Periodically check alarms, at least twice a day
  • Each should have a tamper-indicating seal

Copyright © 2013, Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Copyright © 2013, Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

*

Hinges Appropriate for Door Weight

  • <Insert Figure 6-4>

Copyright © 2013, Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Copyright © 2013, Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

*

Roofs

  • Considerations for roof/ceiling design:
  • Loading roof will be subjected to
  • If ceiling in multistory facility, will space directly above protected area be guarded or by alarm system
  • Will roof or ceiling have piping, ductwork, access hatches

Copyright © 2013, Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Copyright © 2013, Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

*

Roofs

  • Considerations for roof/ceiling design (con’t):
  • Will portions of roof be accessible from outside protected area or grant access outside
  • Roof or ceilings alarmed, monitored by security or CCTV, adequate lighting, places of concealment?

Copyright © 2013, Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Copyright © 2013, Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

*

Roofs

  • Worked out between building architect or room designer and security planner
  • Include security director
  • Be prepared to discuss with staff for input
  • Other site visits helpful

Copyright © 2013, Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Copyright © 2013, Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

*

Roofs

  • Prime requisite in maximum-security setting
  • Able to withstand/defeat forced entry attempt
  • Most commonly selected roof:
  • Concrete, about 5 ½ in, with steel reinforcing rods on 8 x 12-in centers
  • In tests—4 lb of bulk explosives and 20-lb bolt cutters took about 3 minutes to penetrate

Copyright © 2013, Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Copyright © 2013, Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

*

Roofs

  • Another type:
  • 16-gauge sheet metal on ribbed steel decking, covered by 2 inches of insulation, with a final covering of ½-inch of asphalt and gravel
  • A 10-lb fire axe and 5-lb shovel achieved penetration in about 2.5 to 3 minutes
  • 20 lb of explosives penetrated in about 1 minute

Copyright © 2013, Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Copyright © 2013, Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

*

Roofs

  • Best solution:
  • Construct best roof possible but also:
  • Establish protected area around building
  • Provide assessment capabilities, alarms, and other security to detect threats in the protected area

Copyright © 2013, Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Copyright © 2013, Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

*

Roofs

  • If constructing a strong room in an existing maximum-security setting, best composite materials:
  • 0.1-in sheet of 6061-T6 aluminum over ½-in. plywood on both sides of 19-guage 304 stainless steel sheet

Copyright © 2013, Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Copyright © 2013, Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

*

Roofs

  • To defeat attempts to dissasmble the roof when composite in standard-sized panels
  • Substrate laid in random pattern
  • Bond components together with:
  • Nuts and bolts (preen to prevent removal)
  • Tempered screwnails
  • Ringed nails

Copyright © 2013, Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Copyright © 2013, Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

*

Roofs

  • Composite should be covered by insulation and possibly several different layers of weatherproof roofing.
  • Add substantially to penetration resistance
  • Not recommended if no alarm or not easily visible to guards

Copyright © 2013, Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Copyright © 2013, Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

*

Roofs

  • Upgrading Existing Roofs
  • More difficult to upgrade
  • Must consider installation of:
  • Alarms
  • Lights
  • Doors
  • Walls
  • Gates

Copyright © 2013, Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Copyright © 2013, Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

*

Roofs

  • A firsthand look important to find liabilities:
  • Fire escape access to roof
  • Roof hatches, skylights
  • Ducts
  • Piping
  • Air-conditioning
  • Downspouts or coamings

Copyright © 2013, Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Copyright © 2013, Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

*

Roofs

  • Consult plant services maintenance to determine which are necessities.
  • Many can be replaced by more modern equipment
  • Hole filled so physical integrity/strength of repair equal to rest of roof

Copyright © 2013, Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Copyright © 2013, Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

*

Roofs

  • Low flat roofs—install shielding behind coaming to prevent grappling hook anchor
  • <Insert Figure 6-5>

Copyright © 2013, Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Copyright © 2013, Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

*

Roofs

  • Attack by helicopter a possibility
  • Flat roofs
  • Other roofs—landing attack force from hovering helicoptor
  • Consider installing tall, lightweight metal light poles to prevent helicopters from landing or coming close.

Copyright © 2013, Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Copyright © 2013, Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

*

Floors

  • Give as much thought to floor security as wall and roof design.
  • Typical floor—poured concrete 6 to 8 in. thick, reinforced with rebar steel rods or 6-in sq. mesh of no. 10 wire
  • Penetration time – 2 to 4 minutes

Copyright © 2013, Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Copyright © 2013, Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

*

Floors

  • If target in multistory building, penetration could come from above or below
  • Floor must offer same amount as resistance as rest of security features
  • To reinforce:
  • Increase thickness with layers of rebar, reinforcing wire, and concrete
  • Be sure building design can handled extra tons of weight

Copyright © 2013, Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Copyright © 2013, Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

*

Floors

  • If cost of building redesign/renovation not possible:
  • Relocate objective to ground floor or below
  • Place away from exterior walls, with several intervening walls
  • If basement or utility space is below site, seal off or set up sophisticated alarms.

Copyright © 2013, Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Copyright © 2013, Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

*

Floors

  • Greatly increasing penetration resistance of walls that can be adaptable to floors:
  • Anchor steel I-beams into concrete walls, interlocking more beams across width of floor
  • Covered with simple wooden floor

Copyright © 2013, Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Copyright © 2013, Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

*

Floors

  • I-beams increase penetration resistance to 2 to 4 hours
  • Restricted to new construction or a facility where redesign can ensure proper engineering for extra weight
  • <insert Figure 6-6>

Copyright © 2013, Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Copyright © 2013, Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

*

Fences

  • Used to:
  • Define particular area
  • Preclude inadvertent/accidental area
  • Prevent/delay unauthorized entry
  • Control/channel pedestrian/vehicular traffic

Copyright © 2013, Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Copyright © 2013, Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

*

Fences

  • In maximum-security situations
  • Use walls of solid construction if possible
  • Fencing may be necessary instead.
  • Base fence type on:
  • One or two or more in series needed
  • Vehicle barriers added
  • Distance from area of chief concern
  • Closest area of concealment
  • Alarms

Copyright © 2013, Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Copyright © 2013, Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

*

Fence

  • Environmental conditions to consider:
  • Erosion under fence
  • Corrosion of fence
  • Natural features or vegetation that may interfere with detection of activity assessment in area

Copyright © 2013, Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Copyright © 2013, Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

*

Fence

  • Consider:
  • Choice of fabric
  • Height
  • Means to anchor posts and bottom
  • Type of topping
  • Anything placed between fences
  • Type of tools necessary for penetration

Copyright © 2013, Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Copyright © 2013, Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

*

Fence

  • Most frequent—no. 11 American wire gauge or heavier, with 2-in. mesh openings, 7 ft. high, with 3 strands of barbwire
  • Can be breached in about 5 seconds with no aids but assistance of one person
  • Installing V-shaped overhangs with concertina barbwire will raise that time to 8 to 9 seconds

Copyright © 2013, Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Copyright © 2013, Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

*

Fence

  • Other fences include:
  • V-fence—3-in. posts at 60o angle in 30-in diameter by 24-in. high concrete footings 12 in below grade.
  • Posts in 10-ft. centers and staggered 5 ft. front to back, with chain-link mesh at 10 ft. high and corrugated steel sheet on outside posts and nine rolls of barbed tape obstacle inside the V

Copyright © 2013, Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Copyright © 2013, Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

*

Fence

  • In this fence:
  • All rolls secured to chain-link mesh with wire ties.
  • Cutting through fence takes about 4 minutes
  • Climb-over using breaching aids—40 seconds
  • To add resistance:
  • Razor ribbon instead of GPBTO
  • Second sheet of corrugated steel, forming a V-shaped trough filled with rocks, poles, and barbed tape
  • Resistance—10 minutes

Copyright © 2013, Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Copyright © 2013, Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

*

Fence

  • Bottom rail can double penetration time
  • Without anchoring, crawl-under is simple
  • Burying lower 3 to 6 inches in concrete precludes crawl-under
  • Anchoring bottom with 3-in. reinforcing rods to precast concrete sills

Copyright © 2013, Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Copyright © 2013, Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

*

Fence

  • Topping fence with barbwire/barbed tape:
  • NCR requires at least three strands of barbwire angled outward
  • Does not significantly increase penetration resistance

Copyright © 2013, Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Copyright © 2013, Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

*

Fence

  • Cutting through fence slower than climbing or crawling under
  • Secure bottom anchors increases penetration time
  • Interlace metal or wood lattice in fabric
  • Reduces visibility

Copyright © 2013, Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Copyright © 2013, Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

*

Entry and Exit Points

  • Consider when erecting security fence:
  • First criterion—integrity of gates/doors should be same or better than that of fence
  • Number kept to minimum
  • Gate—open out if possible and equipped with a jamb or frame
  • Most common—swing gates and sliding gates

Copyright © 2013, Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Copyright © 2013, Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

*

Entry and Exit Points

  • Most vehicle gates have access roads
  • Facilitates vehicle intrusions
  • Penetration resistance of fabric-type gates equivalent to fence
  • Drive-through easier at gate than other parts of fence

Copyright © 2013, Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Copyright © 2013, Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

*

Entry and Exit Points

  • Use of metal doors set in jambs—higher resistance than gates
  • Cost not always worth it
  • Emergency fence doors—should be mandatory
  • Opening facilitated by panic bar on inside
  • Set so intruder cannot get to panic bar

Copyright © 2013, Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Copyright © 2013, Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

*

Entry and Exit Points

  • Controlling pedestrian traffic:
  • Turnstile gates—penetration time about 1 min.
  • Easier to breach fence than turnstile gate
  • Weak link at gate usually hardware:
  • Hinges and locks

Copyright © 2013, Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Copyright © 2013, Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

*

Entry and Exit Points

  • Fence locks should be accessible only from inside.
  • Built-in locks depend on fence alignment
  • Supplement with piece of case-hardened or stainless steel chain and padlock
  • <Insert Figure 6-8>

Copyright © 2013, Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Copyright © 2013, Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

*

Entry and Exit Points

  • Securely anchor a double-leaf swing gate where both leaves meet
  • Solid foot bolt on each leaf dropped into steel anchoring hole in the ground.
  • <Insert Figure 6-9>

Copyright © 2013, Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Copyright © 2013, Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

*

Walls and Moats

  • Thick, high wall most penetration resistant
  • Cost may be prohibitive
  • Do not allow visual access to area outside
  • Alternative—modern equivalent of a moat

Copyright © 2013, Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Copyright © 2013, Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

*

Walls and Moats

  • Moats—completely surround protected area
  • All entry/exit points bridged with fixed or movable structures
  • Keep to a minimum and control around the clock
  • Can be equipped with ability to prevent breach by vehicle ramming

Copyright © 2013, Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Copyright © 2013, Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

*

Walls and Moats

  • Moats are dry and equipped with drainage system
  • At least 8 feet deep
  • Minimum of 10 feet from edge to edge
  • Standard chain-link fence at inner edge
  • Little or no lip to support a ladder
  • Fence posts minimum of 3 inches
  • Bottom edge of fence fabric embedded in concrete

Copyright © 2013, Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Copyright © 2013, Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

*

Walls and Moats

  • Depth and width specifications decided with entire barrier design
  • Minimum depth of 8 feet recommended
  • Ladder needed to breach would be bulky
  • Deterrent to vehicle crashing through fence
  • Minimum width of 10 feet recommended
  • Precludes use of bridges
  • To prevent ladder to be used as a hook bridge:
  • Attach aluminum or galvanized steel sheet to outside of fence to height of 3 feet

Copyright © 2013, Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Copyright © 2013, Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

*

Walls and Moats

  • Easiest way to bridge barrier:
  • 20-foot extension ladder with hook on upper end.
  • Extended to full height and allow to fall behind top of fence as an inclined plane
  • To defeat:
  • Use a double moat system

Copyright © 2013, Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Copyright © 2013, Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

*

Walls and Moats

  • Double moat:
  • Second 8 x 10-ft (or more) moat
  • Fence installed between moats on a 12- to 15-in thick reinforced concrete wall
  • Topped with Y-type of barbed tape with concertina tape installed at Y center

Copyright © 2013, Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Copyright © 2013, Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.