DB 7
Team Dynamics
McShane/Von Glinow M:OB 3e
© 2016 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved
1
7
1
Groups of two or more people
Exist to fulfill a purpose
Interdependent – interact and collaborate
Mutually accountable for achieving common goals
Members influence each other
Perceive themselves to be a team
What are Teams?
© 2016 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved
McShane/Von Glinow M:OB 3e
2
2
Permanence
How long that type of team usually exists
Skill diversity
Degree of skill/knowledge diversity among team members
Authority dispersion
Degree that decision-making responsibility is distributed throughout the team or centralized
Many Types of Teams
© 2016 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved
McShane/Von Glinow M:OB 3e
3
3
Informal Groups
Groups that exist primarily for the benefit of their members
Reasons why informal groups exist:
Innate drive to bond
Social identity -- we define ourselves by group memberships
Goal accomplishment
Emotional support
McShane/Von Glinow M:OB 3e
© 2016 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved
4
4
Team Advantages/Challenges
Advantages
Make better decisions, products/services
Better information sharing
Increase employee motivation/engagement
Challenges
Process losses – resources needed for team maintenance
Social loafing – members potentially exert less effort in teams than alone
© 2016 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved
McShane/Von Glinow M:OB 3e
5
5
Team Effectiveness Model
© 2016 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved
McShane/Von Glinow M:OB 3e
6
6
Reward systems
Communication systems
Organizational structure
Organizational leadership
Physical space
Organization/Team Environment
© 2016 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved
McShane/Von Glinow M:OB 3e
7
Complex tasks divisible into specialized roles
Requires abilities beyond one person, but team can coordinate
Well-structured tasks
Easier to coordinate with low task variability, high task analyzability
Higher task interdependence
Team members share resources to perform their jobs
Best Tasks Characteristics for Teams
© 2016 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved
McShane/Von Glinow M:OB 3e
8
Levels of Task Interdependence
McShane/Von Glinow M:OB 3e
© 2016 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved
9
9
Team Size
Smaller teams are better because:
Less process loss – better coordination and resolve differences
More engaged with team –more influence, feeling responsible for team outcomes
Faster team development
But team must be large enough to accomplish task
McShane/Von Glinow M:OB 3e
© 2016 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved
10
10
Team Composition
Effective team members must be willing and able to work on the team
Effective team members engage in 5C’s behaviors
© 2016 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved
McShane/Von Glinow M:OB 3e
11
11
Team Composition: Diversity
Team members have diverse knowledge, skills, perspectives, values, etc.
Advantages
view problems/alternatives from different perspectives
broader pool of abilities
better representation of team’s constituents
Disadvantages
take longer to become a high-performing team
susceptible to “faultlines” – less motivation to coordinate
© 2016 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved
McShane/Von Glinow M:OB 3e
12
Stages of Team Development
Forming
learn about each other; evaluate membership.
Storming
conflict; members proactive, compete for roles.
Norming
roles established; consensus around team objectives and team mental model.
Performing
efficient coordination; highly cooperative; high trust; commitment to team objectives; identify with the team.
Adjourning
disbanding; shift from task to relationship focus.
McShane/Von Glinow M:OB 3e
© 2016 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved
13
13
Developing Team Identities and Mental Models
Developing team identity
Viewing team as “us” rather than “them”
Team becomes part of the person’s social identity
Developing team mental models and coordinating routines
Forming habitual routines with team members
Forming shared/complementary mental models
© 2016 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved
McShane/Von Glinow M:OB 3e
14
Team Building
Formal activities intended to improve the team’s development and functioning
Types of team building
Clarify team’s performance goals
Improve team’s problem-solving skills
Improve role definitions
Improve relations
© 2016 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved
McShane/Von Glinow M:OB 3e
15
Team Norms
Informal rules and shared expectations team establishes to regulate member behaviors
Norms develop through:
Initial team experiences
Critical events in team’s history
Experience/values members bring to the team
Preventing/Changing Dysfunctional Team Norms
State desired norms when forming teams
Select members with preferred values
Discuss counter-productive norms
Counter dysfunctional norms with team-based rewards
Disband teams with dysfunctional norms
McShane/Von Glinow M:OB 3e
© 2016 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved
16
16
Team Cohesion
The degree of attraction people feel toward the team and their motivation to remain members
Team cohesion is stronger/builds faster with:
Higher member similarity
Smaller team size
Regular/frequent member interaction
Somewhat difficult team entry (membership)
Higher team success
More external competition/challenges
McShane/Von Glinow M:OB 3e
© 2016 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved
17
17
Team Cohesion and Performance
High cohesion teams usually perform better because:
Motivated to maintain membership and achieve team objectives
Share information more frequently
Higher coworker satisfaction
Better social support (minimizes stress)
Resolve conflict more swiftly and effectively
Contingencies of cohesion and performance
Task interdependence
Cohesion motivates cooperation; less important in low interdependence tasks
Team norms consistent with organizational objectives
Cohesion motivates conformity to team norms
Cohesion motivates LOWER performance if norms oppose company objectives
McShane/Von Glinow M:OB 3e
© 2016 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved
18
18
Three Levels of Trust
McShane/Von Glinow M:OB 3e
© 2016 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved
19
19
Self-Directed Teams
Self-directed teams:
are cross-functional groups
organized around work processes
complete an entire piece of work requiring several interdependent tasks,
have substantial autonomy over task decisions
Success factors
Responsible for entire work process
High interdependence within the team
Low interdependence with other teams
Autonomy to organize and coordinate work
Work site/technology supports team communication/coordination
McShane/Von Glinow M:OB 3e
© 2016 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved
20
Virtual Teams
Members operate across space, time, and organizational boundaries -- linked through information technologies
Virtual Team Success Factors
Virtual team member characteristics
Toolkit of communication channels and freedom to choose channels that work best for them
Fairly high task structure
Opportunities to meet face-to-face
© 2016 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved
McShane/Von Glinow M:OB 3e
21
21
Team Decision Making Constraints
Time constraints
Time to organize/coordinate
Production blocking
Evaluation apprehension
Reluctance to mention ideas that seem silly – concern that other team members are evaluating them
Peer pressure to conform
Suppressing opinions that oppose team norms
Overconfidence (inflated team efficacy)
Team efficacy usually beneficial (motivates performance)
Inflated team efficacy
Outcomes: false sense of invulnerability, less vigilant decisions, less task conflict
Caused by: collective self-enhancement, high cohesion, external threats
McShane/Von Glinow M:OB 3e
© 2016 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved
22
22
General Guidelines for Team Decisions
Team norms should encourage critical thinking
Sufficient team diversity
Checks/balances to avoid dominant participants
Maintain optimal team size
Introduce effective team structures
McShane/Von Glinow M:OB 3e
© 2016 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved
23
23
Brainstorming
Participants think up as many ideas as possible
Four brainstorming rules
Speak freely
Don’t criticize
Provide as many ideas as possible
Build on others’ ideas
Dismissed by lab research, but supported in field research and by leading creative firms
But brainstorming requires:
Experienced facilitator
Supportive culture (not internally competitive)
McShane/Von Glinow M:OB 3e
© 2016 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved
24
24
Other Team Structures for Creative Decision Making
Brainwriting -- brainstorming without conversation
Individuals write down/distribute ideas to others, develop further ideas
Less production blocking than brainstorming
Electronic Brainstorming –brainwriting using technology
Electronically write/distribute ideas anonymously to other participants
Anonymously vote on ideas, followed by discussion
Strengths: less production blocking, evaluation apprehension, conformity
Limitations: considered too structured and technology-bound
Nominal Group Technique – variation of brainwriting
Problem is described, then participants privately write down solutions
Participants describe their solutions – no criticism or debate
Participants privately rank-order or vote on solutions
Problems of production blocking and evaluation apprehension
McShane/Von Glinow M:OB 3e
© 2016 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved
25
25
Team Dynamics
McShane/Von Glinow M:OB 3e
© 2016 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved
26
7
26