Corporate finance

apt93
CaseDelisle.docx

Delisle Industries

Micheline Rousseau, CEO and owner of Delisle Industries received the 2010 financial statements from the company’s auditors and compared these results with previous years. She was very happy with the company’s rapid growth but had some serious concerns about its future. What should be done about the operating problems resulting from such rapid expansion? Was the company overly dependent on Costco to distribute its product? Is the establishment of a new production facility in Winnipeg advisable? What can be done about its poor cash management and over-reliance on debt financing? How can future growth be financed?

After discussing these issues with her vice-presidents it was agreed that a management consultant Jolly Jeffers, CMC should be retained to conduct a financial review of Delisle. Based on his report, Rousseau would implement operational improvements and decide whether to open a factory in Winnipeg and add plastic fencing to its product line.

Company Formation

Delisle is a manufacturer of plastic products. It was formed in 2005 in Saskatoon, Saskatchewan by Micheline Rousseau, P.Eng. who had worked for over twenty years at Rubbermaid, a U.S.-based plastics manufacturer. At Rubbermaid, Rousseau held positions in operations and was very familiar with the specialized injection molding equipment used in production. Later in her career, she worked as a designer and earned an excellent reputation for her innovative products. After failing to be selected for the VP-Research and Design position at Rubbermaid, Rousseau decided to return to her hometown of Saskatoon and start her own company.

Rousseau’s father had been a successful Saskatoon businessman and owned a manufacturing company that produced laminated oak staircase components such as railings, steps, and risers. Her father decided to close the business in 2003 after suffering a heart attack but kept the building and equipment and continued to hope his daughter would someday return home and take over the operation. When she eventually returned, her father was overjoyed, but she explained her expertise was in plastics and that industry held more potential than wood products. With her savings, severance pay from Rubbermaid, and a gift of the facility by her father, Rousseau began operations.

Rousseau’s first hire was Frank Dempsey as VP-Marketing and Sales. Together, the two thoroughly researched what products should be produced and decided on storage sheds which most households in North America had in their backyards. These sheds contain various items such as gardening supplies, tools, tires, and bicycles. Historically, they were built on cement blocks and made of wood. They were expensive to buy or have built because construction was so labour intensive and the materials so expensive. There was also considerable maintenance as the buildings had to be painted regularly and were subject to rot in more humid climates. If the sheds were made of plastic panels they could be produced more cost-effectively and would last longer with little maintenance. The sheds could also be easily produced in different colours to match existing home designs.

Rousseau and Dempsey agreed to distribute sheds using two channels. A website was developed showcasing the company’s products. Customers can order the sheds on-line and they are shipped in “knock-down” form to reduce shipping costs using a third-party carrier. The sheds are easy to assemble, so customers only have to ensure a proper cement pad is in place – basic paving stones are all that is needed. Costco Wholesale also agreed to carry the sheds. Several standard designs and colours are available in-store for customers wanting to take immediate possession, but Costco also accepts orders for all the variations and delivers them to their stores for pick-up. Costco offers the sheds through its website as well.

Company Expansion

Delisle’s products proved to be very popular and sales expanded quickly. Merchandisers at Costco immediately asked the company to develop additions to their product line. By 2008, Delisle began producing rain barrels, patio furniture, and plant holders in varying designs and colours. Rain barrels were a success as competitor’s products were made from metal and prone to rust and were not visually appealing. Patio furniture was also very popular as Delisle reproduced many of the traditional wood designs that other plastic furniture makers did not. They could be produced at a fraction of the cost of wooden furniture and were much more durable and did not need painting or refinishing. The plant holders were less of a success as there were already a large number of competing products on the market with many coming from low-wage countries.

By late 2010, Delisle’s production facility in Saskatoon was reaching its limit. The building had been expanded several times, but there was simply no more room on the lot and the company was not able to buy any adjoining property. Making this problem worse was a request by Costco to begin producing plastic fencing. Research indicated consumers were frustrated with building expensive fences from wood only to have them deteriorate rapidly due to weather. Even after using more expensive cedar or treated lumber, fences quickly began to lose their visual appeal. Frequent painting or staining was also needed, which was becoming a problem for Canada’s aging “baby boomer” population. By creating an array of fencing designs in various colours, Costco felt an important need for “do-it-yourselfers” and contractors would be met.

Expanding the product line to include fencing would require the construction of a new factory. Output from the existing facility might also be transferred to this new plant to address space restrictions. Skilled labour was in short supply in Saskatoon due to rapid growth in the resource sector in Alberta and Saskatchewan. Winnipeg was viewed as a good location for the new facility. The city was very affordable with low land and labour costs and had a ready supply of skilled production workers. The city was a major North American producer of home windows where the primary material was plastics.

Financial Data

Delisle Industries

Income Statement (CAD)

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

Sales

15,015,500

26,130,560

39,403,320

58,532,340

71,511,720

Cost of Goods Sold

10,434,500

18,595,530

28,323,060

42,565,660

53,000,150

Gross Profit

4,581,000

7,535,030

11,080,260

15,966,680

18,511,570

Operating Costs

Selling and Distribution

1,650,340

2,450,630

3,763,400

5,400,350

6,001,230

Research & Development

145,340

453,640

765,340

1,580,340

1,900,450

Administration

550,340

1,050,750

1,950,600

3,400,000

4,080,520

Amortization

574,944

908,884

1,880,284

2,999,199

3,838,790

Operating Profit

1,660,036

2,671,126

2,720,636

2,586,791

2,690,580

Interest

224,139

392,759

952,30

1,653,235

2,301,176

Earnings Before Taxes

1,435,897

2,278,367

1,768,328

933,556

389,404

Taxes

502,564

797,429

618,915

326,744

136,291

Net Income

933,333

1,480,939

1,149,413

606,811

253,112

Delisle Industries

Balance Sheets (CAD)

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

Cash

400,840

790,670

1,034,690

823,580

765,340

A/R

2,459,600

4,340,540

6,450,340

9,950,340

11,550,420

RM Inventory

675,340

1,103,400

1,789,340

2,450,340

3,240,340

WIP Inventory

874,230

1,440,530

1,950,340

2,340,680

2,489,390

Finished Goods Inventory

802,160

1,674,293

2,614,583

4,413,753

6,751,713

Total Current Assets

5,212,170

9,349,433

13,839,293

19,978,693

24,797,203

L,P,&E, Net

5,504,440

8,756,340

18,345,340

29,453,350

37,689,560

Intangibles

245,000

332,500

457,500

538,640

698,340

Total Assets

10,961,610

18,438,273

32,642,133

49,970,683

63,185,103

A/P

1,760,340

4,009,870

6,498,227

9,922,996

12,885,442

Current Portion of LT Debt

399,534

649,188

1,518,833

2,636,739

3,545,726

Total Current Liabilities

2,159,874

4,659,058

8,017,060

12,559,735

16,431,168

Long-term Debt

3,995,340

6,491,880

15,188,326

26,367,389

35,457,263

Shareholders' Equity

4,806,396

7,287,335

9,436,748

11,043,559

11,296,671

Total Liabilities and Equities

10,961,610

18,438,273

32,642,133

49,970,683

63,185,103

Sales Analysis (CAD)

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

Sheds

Price

590

590

590

590

590

Cost

410

419

423

430

435

Quantity

25,450

43,530

65,400

75,600

84,000

Rain Barrels

Price

0

98

98

98

98

Cost

0

78

79

80

81

Quantity

0

4,570

8,340

11,340

14,580

Patio Furniture

Price

0

0

0

180

180

Cost

0

0

0

120

127

Quantity

0

0

0

55,340

95,030

Plant Holders

Price

0

0

0

33

33

Cost

0

0

0

29

31

Quantity

0

0

0

86,540

103,560

Financial Benchmarks

The following industry average information was available from RMA:

5

Key Financial Ratios

Industry Averages ‘10

Current Ratio

3.17X

Cash Ratio

0.16X

RM Turnover in Days

33.86 days

WP Turnover in Days

9.69 days

FG Turnover in Days

96.54 days

A/R Turnover in Days

30.44 days

A/P Turnover in Days

59.47 days

Cash Conversion Cycle

111.06 days

Fixed Assets Turnover

2.19X

Total Assets Turnover

1.00X

LT Debt to Total Cap

0.32X

Cash Flow Coverage

2.06X

Gross Profit Margin

42.00%

Operating Profit Margin

15.55%

Net Profit Margin

9.08%

Return on Assets

5.90%

Return on Equity

14.71%

Vertical Analysis (%)

Income Statement ‘10

Sales

100.00

Cost of Sales

58.00

Gross Profit

42.00

Operating Costs

Selling and Distribution

14.45

R&D

1.56

Administration

5.67

Depreciation

4.77

Operating Profit

15.55

Interest

1.59

Earnings Before Taxes

13.97

Taxes

4.89

Net Income

9.08

Vertical Analysis (%)

Balance Sheet ‘10

Cash

16.45

Accounts Receivable

8.34

Parts Inventory

5.38

WIP Inventory

1.54

Finished Goods Inventory

15.34

Total Current Assets

47.05

Land, Plant , & Equipment, Net

45.65

Other Assets

7.30

Total Assets

100.00

Accounts Payable

9.45

Current Portion of LT Debt

5.39

Total Current Liabilities

14.84

Long-term Debt

23.45

Shareholders' Equity

61.71

Total Liabilities and Equities

100.00

Operations

The key to Delisle’s success is its close relationship with Costco, which accounts for approximately 95% of its sales. Costco negotiates 5-year, fixed-price contracts to be the exclusive dealer for each of Delisle’s products, although it does allow Delisle to maintain its own on-line sales operation to better research customer needs, which aids in product design. All sales to Costco are at terms net 60.

Initially, Delisle had problems managing its factory. Coordinating production between different workstations was difficult as scheduling was done manually. Also, many of the operators were inexperienced using injection molding equipment and required considerable training. This inexperience resulted in higher cleaning and other maintenance costs. Production scheduling software was purchased in 2009, but with the introduction of new products and the space limitations at the Saskatoon plant, Delisle continued to have difficulties.

Raw materials are purchased from an Edmonton distributor who can supply most plastics on a just-in-time basis. This helps Delisle to lower its raw materials inventories, but it pays a 10% premium compared to purchasing directly from the manufacturer. The dealer provides net 60 terms and charges interest on overdue accounts at a rate of 8%. Delisle has experienced significant raw material price increases in the last five years due to rapid growth in the developing world. Labour costs have also risen due to a shortage of skilled workers.

For the seasonal items Delisle produces, manufacturers must normally carry considerable finished goods inventory. Since many of Costco’s stores are in the southern U.S. and Mexico, sales of these items are more balanced throughout the year. With so many new products, Delisle has also begun to rely more on batch production.

Since its inception, Delisle has prided itself on remaining “lean and mean.” The company managed its operations with minimal staff from a suite of offices overlooking the factory floor. In 2009, the new production planning centre took over that space, and administration was relocated to a neighbouring industrial park. This location also contains a new R&D facility where products are designed and evaluated.

Financing

Delisle has a 3-year, CAD 5,000,000 revolving credit agreement with the Bank of Montreal, which is used to finance seasonal fluctuations in working capital. It has re-mortgaged its production facility and negotiated a number of term loans to fund equipment purchases.

The revolving credit agreement is committed and secured by Delisle’s inventories and accounts receivable as well as a personal guarantee by Rosseau and a CAD 1,000,000 limited, third-party guarantee by her father. The Bank of Montreal will lend up to 75% of accounts receivable, 30% of raw materials, 40% of work-in-process, and 50% of finished goods inventory. The revolving credit agreement must be paid down to zero once a year to ensure it is not used to fund long-term assets.

Delisle must maintain a Current Ratio of 1.5, a Fixed-Charge Coverage ratio of 1.5, and a Long-term Debt to Total Capitalization ratio of no higher than 60% to comply with its loans. Audited quarterly and annual financial statements must also be provided to the bank. Delisle has a very good working relationship with the Bank of Montreal. The bank is impressed with their rapid growth and recognizes the security that the long-term sales contracts with Costco provide.

In order to finance Delisle’s rapid expansion, Rosseau was forced to sell 40% of the company to Westco, a Regina-based venture capital firm specializing in Canadian manufacturing start-ups. A number of senior managers also made modest equity investments and agreed to receive a portion of their pay in shares – they currently own 5% of the company. The company does not pay dividends and instead reinvests all profits back in the business to finance its growth.

After a 5-year relationship, Westco indicated it wants to exit the investment through either an IPO or sale to another manufacturer. Rousseau wishes to maintain control, but she and her father do not have sufficient personal funds given the company’s current size and knows it is too leveraged to support a management buyout.