create a 3 page report detailing your stakeholder analysis
MHA-FPX5016 u03a1 - Stakeholder Communication in Health Information Systems Learner: Elizabeth , Foster
OVERALL COMMENTS Elizabeth,
This is a great start on assessment 3. You did a wonderful job completing the Stakeholder Matrix but you must also
submit an executive summary. Please take a look at the assessment instructions and submit both documents for
review.
Dr McGuire
RUBRICS
CRITERIA 1
Describe the relevant stakeholders related to an impact analysis.
COMPETENCY
Analyze administrative, clinical, management, and decision-support information technology tools. (L12.1, 12.2,
14.3)
NON_PERFORMANCE: Does not identify stakeholders within an organization.
BASIC:
Identifies stakeholders within an organization but does not describe the stakeholders, and may be missing
relevant stakeholders, or have identified irrelevant stakeholders for an impact analysis.
PROFICIENT: Describes the relevant stakeholders related to an impact analysis.
DISTINGUISHED:
Describes the relevant stakeholders related to an impact analysis and identifies why specific stakeholders
may be more important than others.
Comments:
Please see overall comments.
CRITERIA 2
Explain the process used to arrive at recommendations related to a health information management system.
COMPETENCY
Apply emerging models or best practices to implement a health information system that improves operations
and patient outcomes. (L8.4, L12.2, L14.3)
NON_PERFORMANCE:
Does not describe the process used to arrive at recommendations related to a health information
management system.
BASIC:
Describes recommendations related to a health information management system, but fails to fully explain
the process that was used to arrive at the recommendations.
PROFICIENT:
Explains the process used to arrive at recommendations related to a health information management
system.
DISTINGUISHED:
Explains the process used to arrive at recommendations related to a health information management
system; also, identifies areas of unclear or missing information that could be used to improve the process in
the future.
Comments:
Please see overall comments.
CRITERIA 3
Describe a timeline for implementing recommendations related to a health information management system.
COMPETENCY
Analyze administrative, clinical, management, and decision-support information technology tools. (L12.1, 12.2,
14.3)
NON_PERFORMANCE:
Does not describe parts of a timeline for implementing recommendations related to a health information
management system.
BASIC:
Describes parts of a timeline for implementing recommendations related to a health information
management system, but does not present a comprehensive implementation timeline or the timeline is
unclear.
PROFICIENT:
Describes a timeline for implementing recommendations related to a health information management
system.
DISTINGUISHED:
Describes a timeline for implementing recommendations related to a health information management system
and acknowledges challenges with regards to logistics, resources, or training related to implementation.
Comments:
Please see overall comments.
CRITERIA 4
Analyze the impact of recommendations on relevant stakeholders and an organization with relation to considerations, such as patient outcomes, new training, resource allocation, and workflow changes.
COMPETENCY
Apply best practices relative to the financial assessments and decisions required for the implementation of
health information systems. (L 8.1, 8.2, 8.4)
NON_PERFORMANCE:
Does not explain the impact of recommendations with relation to considerations, such as patient
outcomes, new training, resource allocation, and workflow changes.
BASIC:
Explains the impact of recommendations with relation to considerations, such as patient outcomes, new
training, resource allocation, and workflow changes, but fails to relate the impact of recommendations to
relevant stakeholders and an organization.
PROFICIENT:
Analyzes the impact and value of recommendations on relevant stakeholders and an organization with
relation to considerations, such as patient outcomes, new training, resource allocation, and workflow
changes.
DISTINGUISHED:
Analyzes the impact and value of recommendations on relevant stakeholders and an organization with
relation to considerations, such as patient outcomes, new training, resource allocation, and workflow
changes; also, impartially considers contrary data and opposing viewpoints.
Comments:
Please see overall comments.
CRITERIA 5
Analyze best practices to overcome barriers in creating buy-in from stakeholders and implementation related to recommendations.
COMPETENCY
Apply evidence to influence buy-in from all stakeholders. (L10.5)
NON_PERFORMANCE: Does not explain best practices for overcoming implementation barriers.
BASIC:
Explains best practices for overcoming implementation barriers, but fails to relate these best practices to
creating buy-in from stakeholders.
PROFICIENT:
Analyzes best practices to overcome barriers in creating buy-in from stakeholders and implementation
related to recommendations.
DISTINGUISHED:
Analyzes best practices to overcome barriers in creating buy-in from stakeholders and implementation
related to recommendations.
Comments:
Please see overall comments.
CRITERIA 6
Develop value statements for relevant stakeholder groups related to critical success factors and recommendations related to a health information management system.
COMPETENCY
Apply emerging models or best practices to implement a health information system that improves operations
and patient outcomes. (L8.4, L12.2, L14.3)
NON_PERFORMANCE:
Identifies the values of relevant stakeholder groups regrading recommendation about a health information
management system.
BASIC:
Identifies the values of relevant stakeholder groups regrading recommendation about a health information
management system, but fails to fully develop value statements or relate statements to critical success
factors.
PROFICIENT:
Develops value statements for relevant stakeholder groups related to critical success factors and
recommendations regarding a health information management system.
DISTINGUISHED:
Develops value statements for relevant stakeholder groups related to critical success factors and
recommendations regarding a health information management system, and proposes criteria to evaluate the
degree to which value for the stakeholders was delivered.
Comments:
Please see overall comments.
CRITERIA 7
Communicate analysis of stakeholders and value of recommendations in a manner that is clear and concise.
COMPETENCY
Communicate in a manner that is scholarly, professional, and consistent with expectations for professionals in
health care administration. (L6.1, L6.2, L6.3, and L6.4)
NON_PERFORMANCE: Does not communicate analysis of stakeholders.
BASIC:
Communicates analysis of stakeholders, but the value of recommendations may be unclear. There are
mechanical writing errors that reduce the effectiveness of communication.
PROFICIENT:
Communicates analysis of stakeholders and value of recommendations in a manner that is clear and
concise.
DISTINGUISHED:
Communicates analysis and recommendations of an electronic health records system in a manner that is
clear and concise; the written content is mechanically accurate with correct use of grammar, punctuation,
and spelling.
Comments:
Please see overall comments.
Supplemental Feedback
CRITERIA 8
Integrate relevant sources to support assertions, correctly formatting citations and references using current APA style.
COMPETENCY
Communicate in a manner that is scholarly, professional, and consistent with expectations for professionals in
health care administration. (L6.1, L6.2, L6.3, and L6.4)
NON_PERFORMANCE:
Does not integrate relevant sources to support assertions; does not correctly format citations and
references using current APA style.
BASIC: Sources lack relevance or are poorly integrated, or citations or references are incorrectly formatted.
PROFICIENT:
Integrates relevant sources to support assertions, correctly formatting citations and references using current
APA style.
DISTINGUISHED:
Integrates relevant sources to support assertions, correctly formatting citations and references using current
APA style, which are free from all errors.
Comments:
Please see overall comments.
SUPPLEMENTAL CRITERIA 1
Purpose Compose a text that articulates meaning relevant to the main topic, scope, and purpose of the prompt
BEGINNING: This text is unrelated to the assignment prompt.
DEVELOPING:
This text is related to the assignment prompt but does not demonstrate an understanding of the main topic,
scope, and purpose.
SKILLED:
This text responds to the assignment prompt and appropriately addresses the main topic, scope, and
purpose.
ADVANCED:
This text presents a focused response to the assignment prompt and demonstrates a thorough
understanding of the main topic, scope, and purpose.
Comments:
SUPPLEMENTAL CRITERIA 2
Organization Develop text using organization, structure, and transitions that demonstrate understanding of relationship between main and subtopics
BEGINNING:
This text does not include a thesis statement and is organized inappropriately for the assignment.
DEVELOPING:
The thesis statement in this text is unclear and/or the text is presented in paragraphs with unclear main
idea(s) and/or transitional phrases.
SKILLED:
This text includes a thesis statement and is organized into paragraphs, with clear main ideas and effective
transitional phrases.
ADVANCED:
This text reflects a strong thesis statement. Additionally, this text is organized with skillful transitions into
paragraphs with clear main ideas, sufficient evidence, analysis, and linking information.
Comments:
SUPPLEMENTAL CRITERIA 3
Evidence Integrate into text appropriate use of scholarly sources and evidence
BEGINNING: This text included plagiarized information.
DEVELOPING:
This text lacks synthesis of information from sources and/or the credibility of the sources is questionable,
with many flaws in APA citation style.
SKILLED:
The included evidence was integrated and synthesized from outside sources, most of which are scholarly,
with minimal flaws in APA citation style.
ADVANCED:
The evidence in this text was integrated and synthesized from credible, scholarly, and professionally sound
sources, with minimal flaws in APA citation style.
Comments:
SUPPLEMENTAL CRITERIA 4
Tone Apply in text the standard writing conventions for the discipline, including structure, voice, person and tone
BEGINNING: Text uses language inappropriate for the intended audience.
DEVELOPING:
This text does not meet writing conventions for the discipline and lacks appropriate voice, person, and/or
tone for the intended audience.
SKILLED:
This text meets writing conventions for the discipline and there were minimal issues in appropriate use of
voice, person, or tone for the intended audience.
ADVANCED:
This text exhibits strict adherence to writing conventions for the discipline and uses appropriate voice,
person, and tone for the intended audience.
Comments:
SUPPLEMENTAL CRITERIA 5
Sentence Structure Produce text with minimal grammar, usage, spelling, and mechanical errors
BEGINNING:
Text meaning is unclear due to errors in sentence structure, grammar, usage, word choice, spelling, or
mechanics in 75% or more of text.
DEVELOPING:
Text meaning is interrupted due to sentence structure, grammar, usage, word choice, spelling, or mechanical
errors in 25%-75% or more of text.
SKILLED:
Text conveys clear meaning with minimal issues in grammar, usage, word choice, spelling, or mechanical
errors in 10%-25% of text.
ADVANCED:
Text complexity and concision conveys clear meaning, with grammar, usage, word choice, spelling, or
mechanical errors in 10% or less of text.
Comments: