Business Ethics Project III

Shaun Webbs
BusinessEthicsProjectIIIArticle10.pdf

Cross-Cultural Management Journal

Volume XX, Issue 1 / 2018

59

Oana-Marina BĂTAE The Bucharest Academy of Economic Studies

ETHICS AND THE IMPACT ON CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Review Article

Keywords Ethics,

Code of Conduct, Fraud,

Whistleblowing, Romanian Banking Ethical Code,

Corporate Governance

JEL Classification D73, G30, M14

Abstract Nowadays, more than ever before, the companies are under the watchful eye of the stakeholders. However much energy, effort and also expertise a company brings in order to bear on the risks of the unethical behavior, many surveys have proved that fraud, bribery and also corruption are unlikely to completely disappear. In order to prevent an unethical behavior, companies must be able to identify, investigate and also remediate actions of different individuals who are prepared not to comply with the ethical principles. Ethics is an important aspect formalised through a Code of Conduct within companies, which has the role to articulate the core values and also employees’ behavioural expectations. It is the responsibility of the management to ensure that the personnel follows this code, otherwise it is informed about the penalties that might arise. Ethics is characterized also by transparency, supporting an increase in the trust of people and institutions.

Cross-Cultural Management Journal

Volume XX, Issue 1 / 2018

60

INTRODUCTION

Business consists in the balance between risk and

also reward. It is well known that once the reward

becomes greater, meaning higher earnings of the

company, increased market share, faster increase in

share price, the risk becomes higher and needs to be

managed very well.

Many companies are constantly assessing the risks

that might arise, both in certain and uncertain

situations, fraud being only one of the multiple risks

that entities are facing in their day-to-day activities,

but fraud is very often perceived as a remote risk –

“it does not happen here”.

However, the companies need to challenge

themselves and make a realistic risk control self-

assessment and answer the question: “How could it

happen here?” It is difficult to address this question

because often the perpetrators of fraud are actually

individuals who occupy position amongst the most

trusted employees and challenging such persons,

who may have been a part of the company for many

years, places the management in an uncomfortable

position (Hussain, 2014).

This is the moment in which the most trusted

individuals break the Ethics Code of the

organization they are part of.

ETHICS – A KEY ISSUE NOWADAYS

Different ethical dilemmas and also multiple

compliance complexities are faced nowadays by all

type of organizations.

The health of the business can be protected by

developing an accurate framework for the

compliance programs and by identifying, assessing

and controlling the risks each company is facing.

During the time, a decrease in confidence of the

public service was observed among all citizens,

along with an increase in the mistrust level. (Public

Management Service, 1998).

Nowadays, most organizations are facing a wide

range of different compliance requirements, internal

and external, that have to be met in order for their

business to keep looking forward. Ethics and

compliance challenges are, in fact, magnified by:

multiple changes in the business structure, various

complex operations, new or changed laws and

regulations and also increase in the enforcement.

A survey prepared by Management Today (“MT”)

together with KPMG Forensic Accounting which

included the opinions of more than 800 managers,

senior managers, directors and partners, points out

the need of ethics since the beginning, this having to

be taken into account due to the following facts

highlighted in the survey: one of three persons says

that each individual lies to their coordinator

depending on occasion; less than half of individuals

who participated in the survey consider the persons

at the top to hold, indeed, strong ethical principles

and to be considered role models for the other below;

25% affirmed that favoring family or close friends

in awarding different contracts still occur even if it

is considered unacceptable; 7% even agreed that it is

fine to inflate profits in an artificial manner as long

as money are not actually stolen; individuals over 40

years adopt a more judgmental approach to their

ethical behavior; one of five individuals was actually

prepared to admitting that it is totally unacceptable

to charge personal entertainment to company’s

expenses; the reasons of not reporting a fraud

include one of the sentences: “It’s a fair game” or

“Everybody is doing it” or “It’s none of my

business.” (Weait, 2001).

During their career, many professionals have to deal

at least once with temptation. Often, gifts are used in

order to disguise criminal activity and bribes and in

most of the cases this situation is hard to be isolated.

Such gifts can be represented by cash; luxury trips,

travel and accommodation abroad; free holidays;

buying immovable properties below their market

value etc. Once the gifts are accepted, the ethics falls

over (Pickett, 2010).

The first individual who confronted the dependent

relationship between both self-interest and ethics in

the economic behavior was Adam Smith. Also,

Adrian Cadbury has written about the company

codes and how they are prepared with the scope of

providing guidance to the employees. (Jones and

Pollitt, 1998).

ETHICAL CODES IN LONDON

Over the time, different codes have been developed

in order to suit various companies, these covering

either honesty, conduct, objectivity and so on.

A code of conduct is able to provide an easily

accessible statement of all the core values which

relate to the ethical and legal conduct of the

business.

It should typically be comprised of sections related

to: provided services to customers, personal

interests, conflict of interests, inducements and gifts,

insider trading, relationship with both auditors and

regulators, money laundering, personal expenses

claims and reporting the breaches of the code.

(Hitchins et al, 1996).

It functions as an internal document which is

important in the decision making process. In

addition, the code of conduct is also designed to

serve to the stakeholders of a company and to fulfill

their expectations towards the profession.

Some of the purposes of the codes of conduct are the

following: to promote an ethical behavior; to

provide guidance when an individual faces difficult

decisions – a proper code will make distinction

Cross-Cultural Management Journal

Volume XX, Issue 1 / 2018

61

between serving public interests and internal rules or

loyalty towards a company; to establish both the

rights and accountabilities; to state the moral and

professional development; to enhance the status of

each profession etc (Palidauskaite, 2003).

One of the ethical codes is represented by the Civil

Service Code which comprises a set of provisions

which cover the conduct of the civil servants and

most areas of concern and the need for impartiality.

All civil servants should have a behavior defined by

honesty, impartiality and integrity, conduct which

can be acquired by taking into account the

following: impartial and honest advice shall be

given to each Minister without being constrained by

favor or fear; all information relevant in the decision

making process shall be made available anytime not

only upon a request; civil servants shall deal with the

affairs of the public in an efficiently, promptly and

sympathetically manner, without maladministration

or bias; they should use in an effective and efficient

manner the money of the public; they should not take

advantage of their position to follow their private

interests or the interests of others; they shall refuse

any benefits of any kind from another individual,

benefit which might reasonably be seen by others to

compromise both their integrity and their

professional judgement; they shall behave in such a

way to deserve and also keep the confidence of the

Ministers; they shall also comply with all the

restrictions on the political views which are implied

by their profession; any official information shall

not be disclosed by the civil servants without

authority; they shall not try to influence the

decisions or even actions taken by Ministers;

whenever a civil servant confronts a situation in

which he or she thinks is forced to act in an illegal

manner, he or she must report immediately to the

appropriate persons which have the right authority

to act in a specific manner according to the Code;

civil servants have the duty to report any breach of

ethics or an unlawful fact exercised by others, to the

appropriate authorities in a proper time; the duties of

confidentiality need to be exercised even after they

are no longer serving to the public (The Civil Service

Code, 2013).

Another type of ethical code is represented by the

Nolan principles. In the Nolan code, seven

principles are united in order to form the basis for

development of a more detailed code for the public

sector: integrity - individuals shall not place

themselves under any obligation that might lead to a

weak performance of their duties due to the

exercised influence; objectivity – any contract award

or recommendation of an individual for rewards or

an appointment for a top position shall be made on

merit, without a breach of integrity; selflessness –

the decisions are taken solely by covering the public

interest and not the personal ones or of their family

and friends; accountability – the holders of public

office are fully accountable for both their actions and

also decisions no matter what consequences might

appear; openness – they shall be as open as it is

possible regarding the decisions they make and the

actions they take, all the actions being explained by

appropriate reasons proving transparency on the one

side, but on the other side they shall restrict

information if it is not appropriate to reveal it;

honesty – any private interest relating to the public

one must be declared and any conflict between the

two of them must be resolved; leadership – the

promotion of these principles shall be done at each

occasion (The Nolan Code, 2014).

BANKING ETHICAL CODE IN ROMANIA

Another code is the one covering the Romanian

banking system and adopted by the members of the

Romanian Associations of Banks (“RAB”). By

applying the stipulations of the Banking Ethical

Code, RAB is proposing the following: to promote

an adequate conduct of the employees of the credit

institutions towards the clients, authorities, banking

environment, business community and colleagues;

to enhance the confidence of the clients in the

financial banking sector as a whole; to promote the

public image according to which the credit

institutions and the banking personnel offer their

clients highly qualitative products and services; to

encourage and promote the good cooperation

between the banks; to sustain a correct competition

on the financial banking market in accordance with

the market conditions; to promote the mutual respect

within the banking community.

The Banking Ethical Code is applied to all the banks

which are members of RAB. In the cases in which

the banks are outsourcing some of their activities,

the responsibility regarding the compliance with the

Code is maintained by the credit institutions who use

outsourced activities.

The fundamental principles which must be respected

by all the employees of the credit institutions in their

professional relationships with either the clients, the

authorities or other employees of other banks, are

the following: moral integrity – this is a principle

according to which the employees are not allowed to

request or accept, directly or indirectly, for

themselves or for others, any advantage or any

benefit linked to their position in the bank or to

abuse in any way of their position; impartiality and

discrimination – this is a principle according to

which the employees of the financial institutions are

obligated to maintain an objective attitude, neutral to

any political, economical, religious interest when

carrying out their activities; professionalism and

transparency – this is a principle according to which

the personnel has the obligation to fulfill its tasks

with responsibility, competence, efficiency,

rightness and clarity; compliance with the laws and

regulations; confidentiality – this is a principle

Cross-Cultural Management Journal

Volume XX, Issue 1 / 2018

62

which highlights the obligation of the employees not

to transmit any confidential information regarding

the facts, data and information related to the carried

out activity, to persons which are not authorized to

received such information. The personnel of the

banks is obligated to keep the professional secret

towards any information and not to use such

information in order to obtain personal advantages,

any deviation from this principle being punished in

accordance with the applicable laws; preventing and

combatting corruption facts, money laundering and

terrorism activities – through reporting any

transaction which might have any link with those

mentioned, in accordance with the applicable laws;

to exercise prudent activities – when carrying out

any financial transactions through the responsible

administration of the own funds of the credit

institutions and also through informing the clients

about the offered products and services of the banks;

social responsibility – this is a principle which

highlights the implications in resolving different

social problems; avoiding denigration – a principle

according to which the employees of the credit

institutions will exercise their activity with good

faith, respecting the interests of the parts which are

implied and also respecting the interests of the loyal

concurrence in the concrete market conditions.

An important aspect of ethics is related to the

conflict of interests which appears whenever an

incompatibility situation between the statute of the

employee of the credit institution and the personal

statute of this individual, transposed through any

action which might affect the reputation of the

organization. The personnel of the banks is allowed

to carry out different activities outside the credit

institution with the condition not to prejudice the

activity and the position detained by the employee

of the bank. Each employee is expected to avoid the

implication in different activities which enter in a

conflict zone with the interests of the credit

institution and its shareholders.

In order to avoid such situations, the personnel has

the following obligations: to not follow any financial

or personal interest and to act only in the interest of

the bank the employee is working for and the

shareholders and clients of the organization; to not

follow any personal interest when performing

transactions in the account of the clients which is

different from the interest of the customer; to not

borrow money from own funds to the clients or from

the clients of the credit institutions; to not offer any

other service different from the ones of the bank or

group he is part of; to not accept any gifts or rewards

from the clients in order to facilitate any bank

operation, exception being any gift with a symbolic

value or any participation to events to which a

refusal might affect the relationship between the

bank and its clients (The Romanian Association of

Banks, 2009).

CORRUPTION AND WHISTLEBLOWING

Transparency International defined corruption as

being represented by the abuse of public power in

order to obtain a private gain and it has listed the

most significant forces that encourage bribery. Over

the time, all the changes and developments occurred

not only on economics, but also on other areas, led

to an increase in corruption met in foreign

organizations of senior staff due to the following:

low public salaries, changes in political party

funding, deterioration of laws and regulations,

public tolerance of the corruption, inefficient

controls on money laundering, increase in secrecy of

the government, different restrictions on media.

Corruption appears when ethics falls over and it

impacts companies in many ways. Sometimes in

worst case scenarios it can cost lives, and in the most

encountered cases, it costs people health, freedom

and money. These costs can be divided into four

categories such as: economic, political,

environmental and social.

Economically, it breaks the national wealth, the

corrupt politicians investing in projects that in fact

will fulfill their pockets rather than benefit

communities.

Politically, corruption is one of the major obstacles

to the law and democracy, public institutions losing

their legitimacy when they are misused for personal

advantages.

On the environmental front, natural resources are

exploited in a careless manner and the ecological

systems are destroyed. All over the world,

companies still pay bribes in return for access to

unrestricted destructions through different approved

projects.

Socially, corruptions leads to a decrease in the trust

of individuals in a state as a whole (Transparency

International, 2018).

When people do not speak about corruption, it often

is unchallenged. The reason for which

whistleblowers are considered to detain a crucial

role in saving companies from corruption is the fact

that the witness, in most cases, provide invaluable

insights, becoming a powerful tool used in the fight

against corruption.

However, in many countries across the world,

blowing the whistle brings a high personal risk,

especially when no legal protection is offered.

Though the whistleblowers are a benefit to the

public, sometimes they are seen as betrayers. Also,

they are not expected to often report misconduct in

their workplace if the employers did not ensure a

clear channel of internal reporting of soft facts

within the organization (Transparency International,

2013).

Cross-Cultural Management Journal

Volume XX, Issue 1 / 2018

63

ETHICAL THREATS AND SAFEGUARDS

Any situation in which an individual or an

organization is tempted not to comply with their

code of ethics is considered an ethical threat.

There are five types of ethical threats such as: self-

interest, self-review, advocacy, familiarity and also

intimidation.

The guidance or any action which has the scope of

removing the ethical threat represents an ethical

safeguard.

Usually, the ethical safeguards fall into three main

categories which are created by profession, work

environment and also individual.

The safeguards created by profession include the

following: setting of a proper code of corporate

governance within the company and also

supervising the professional work, process which

includes also disciplinary proceeding.

In case of the work environment safeguards, the

followings are included: a strong control

environment within a company, efficient and

effectively internal controls established within a

company, accurate disciplinary procedures,

organizational code of ethics or conduct and also a

set of review procedures and policies up to date.

For the individual safeguards, the followings are

examples of components: compliance with all the

professional standards established at the level of an

entity, maintaining records of issues identified and

measures through which the risks were mitigated,

transferred or eliminated, contacting different

professional bodies across the world if questions are

open (Kaplan Publishing, 2014).

THE IMPACT OF ETHICS IN CORPORATE

GOVERNANCE

An effective corporate governance represents one of

the most significant components of a proper

functioning of the economy as a whole. The

corporate governance represents a system by which

the organizations are conducted and also directed

and controlled (The Committee on the Financial

Aspects of Corporate Governance and Gee and Co.

Ltd. – Cadbury Report t, 1992).

Additionally, the corporate governance represents

an internal system which comprises policies,

procedures, processes and also individuals that serve

the needs of both shareholders and stakeholders by

directing and also controlling all the management

activities with integrity, objectivity and good savvy

(Dovonan, 2003).

The ethical responsibilities relate to what is actually

expected from different companies across the world

compared with what those entities are required to do

from both a legal and economic point of view. In

fact, the ethical responsibilities highlight doing what

is in fact seen to be right comparing with doing what

is actually simply legal.

Hence, higher than both legal and economic

accountabilities are the ethical responsibilities

within a company.

The social responsibility represents the manner both

employees and also people who occupy positions in

top management view their duties in making

decisions that help in protecting, enhancing and

promoting the well-being of the stakeholders and

society as a whole, as mentioned by Carrol in 1981.

The corporate social responsibility strategy includes

five significant steps such as: identifying the

stakeholders, classifying the stakeholders,

establishing the claims of the stakeholders, assessing

the importance of the stakeholders and deciding

upon response to social pressure. All these steps help

including the corporate social responsibility as part

of a company’s strategic planning processes while

behaving in an ethical manner. (Kaplan Publishing,

2014).

CONCLUSIONS

The existence of a good corporate governance

model, high ethics, good business and also high

corporate responsibility are factors which lead to an

increase in the changes of corporate sustainability

(Sims, 2003). Being ethical is all about playing fair,

thinking about the consequences some actions might

bring and also thinking about the welfare of the

others (Mihelic et al, 2010).

Therefore, the ethical leadership is linked to

corporate governance due to both their principles

and characteristics.

However, there will always exist different global

hotspots related to corruption and also impropriety

which will increase both corruption and fraud risks

that an organization might enhance.

Nowadays, businesses are more likely than ever to

become under scrutiny in the relation to their

compliance reporting framework. Thus, in today’s

world, the desired transformation within companies

is enhanced if ethics, corporate governance and

corporate social responsibility jointly become a

significant component of the organizational culture.

In conclusion, in each company a reinforcement

process to commitment to driving ethical growth

shall exist and be always monitored.

REFERENCES

[1] Dovonan, G. (2003). A board culture of

corporate governance. Corporate Governance

International Journal, 6(3).

[2] Hitchins, J., Hogg, M., Mallett, D. (1996).

Banking – An Industry Accounting and Auditing

Guide, London: Mackays of Chatman plc.

Cross-Cultural Management Journal

Volume XX, Issue 1 / 2018

64

[3] Hussain, M. (2014). Corporate Fraud. The

Human Factor, London: Bloomsbury

Publishing Plc.

[4] Jones, I., Pollitt, M. (1998). The Role of Business

Ethics in Economic Performance, London:

Palgrave Macmillan.

[5] Kaplan Publishing (2014). ACCA, Paper P1,

Governance, Risk and Ethics, Complete Text –

1 September 2014 to 31 August 2015, Great

Britan:Kaplan Financial Limited.

[6] Mihelic, K. K., Lipicnik, B. & Tekavcic, M.

(2010). Ethical leadership. International

Journal of Management and Information

System, 14(5), pp. 31 – 41.

[7] Palidauskaite, J. (2003). Codes of Conduct for

Public Servants in Eastern and Central

European Countries: Comparative Perspective,

pp. 3-4, retrieved from

http://www.oecd.org/mena/governance/355214

38.pdf.

[8] Pickett, K.H.S. (2010). The Internal auditing

handbook, Third Edition, United Kingdom:

John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

[9] Public Management Service (1998). Managing

ethics: An OECD Recommendation. Focus

Journal, No. 9, pp. 1-2.

[10] Sims, R. (2003). Ethics and corporate social

responsibility: Why giants fall. London:

Greenwood Publishing Group.

[11] The Civil Service Code (2013), retrived from

https://www.gov.uk/government/collections/ci

vil-service-conduct-and-guidance.

[12] The Committee on the Financial Aspects of

Corporate Governance and Gee and Co. Ltd. –

Cadbury Report (1992). Report of the

Committee on the financial aspects of corporate

governance, retrieved from

http://www.ecgi.org/codes/documents/cadbury.

pdf.

[13] The Nolan Code (2014), retrived from

www.public-standards.gov.uk.

[14] The Romanian Association of Banks (2009).

Cod de etică bancară [Banking Ethical Code],

retrived from http://www.arb.ro/cod-de-etica-

bancara/.

[15] Transparency International (2013).

Whistleblowing in Europe Legal Protections

For WhistleBlowers in the EU, retrived from

https://www.transparency.org/topic/detail/whis

tleblowing.

[16] Transparency International (2018). What is

corruption?, retrived from

https://www.transparency.org/what-is-

corruption.

[17] Weait, M. (2001). The workplace ethic – is it a

crime. Management Today Bulletin, pp. 53–55.

Copyright of Cross-Cultural Management Journal is the property of Romanian Foundation for Business Intelligence and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use.