Research Paper - Final
BUSI 472 Final Paper Grading Rubric
|
Criteria |
Levels of Achievement |
|||
|
Content 70% |
Advanced |
Proficient |
Developing |
Not present |
|
Areas regarding content, analysis, synthesis, evaluation of topics, participation and timeliness |
126 to 140 points
Superior work in all areas - Student consistently exceeds minimal expectations in all areas regarding content, analysis, synthesis, and evaluation of topics, participation, timeliness, and writing style. Specifically: · Identified a relevant contemporary business ethics topic · Thoroughly researched both secular and biblical thoughts concerning the topic · Thoroughly compared and contrasted both secular and biblical thoughts concerning the topic · There is a clear thesis statement · The introduction provides a clear overview of the paper’s contents · Headings correspond to points in the thesis statement · Differing viewpoints considered, analyzed, and treated · 5 - 7 scholarly sources are cited and shown in the references section · The conclusion offers a robust summary of the issues treated in the paper and suggestions for further study · The paper is written in an objective (3rd person) format and covers the topic to sufficient depth for an upper-class research paper
|
98 to 125 points
Good work in most areas - Student demonstrates minor deficiencies in some areas regarding content, analysis, writing style, and/or participation.
Specifically: · Identified a business ethics topic but not necessarily one of a contemporary nature · Adequately researched both secular and biblical thoughts concerning the topic · Adequately compared and contrasted both secular and biblical thoughts concerning the topic · There is a clear thesis statement · The introduction provides a clear overview of the paper’s contents · Headings correspond to points in the thesis statement · Differing viewpoints mostly considered, analyzed, and treated · 5 - 7 scholarly sources are cited and shown in the references section · The conclusion offers a good summary of the issues treated in the paper and suggestions for further study · The paper is written in an objective (3rd person) format and covers the topic to sufficient depth for an upper-class research paper
|
1 to 97 points
Fair work in most areas – Student exhibits need for improvement in most areas regarding content, analysis, writing style, and/or participation.
Specifically: · Identified a topic only remotely related to business ethics · Briefly researched both secular and biblical thoughts concerning the topic · Briefly compared and contrasted both secular and biblical thoughts concerning the topic · There is a somewhat clear thesis statement · The introduction provides a somewhat clear overview of the paper’s contents · Headings somewhat correspond to points in the thesis statement · Differing viewpoints somewhat considered, analyzed, and treated · Fewer than 5 - 7 scholarly sources are cited and shown in the references section · The conclusion offers a brief summary of the issues treated in the paper and may not offer suggestions for further study · The paper is written in an objective (3rd person) format and covers the topic to sufficient depth for an upper-class research paper
|
0 points
Failing – Student shows evidence of refusal or inability to meet minimum standards of work. Specifically: · Did not identify an appropriate business ethics related topic · Did not research both secular and biblical thoughts concerning the topic · Did not compare and contrasted both secular and biblical thoughts concerning the topic · There is no thesis statement · The introduction provides no overview of the paper’s contents · Headings do not correspond to points in the thesis statement · Differing viewpoints not considered, analyzed, and treated · Far fewer than 5 - 7 scholarly sources are cited and shown in the references section · The conclusion offers a weak summary of the issues treated in the paper and may not offer suggestions for further study · The paper is not written in an objective (3rd person) format and does not cover the topic to sufficient depth for an upper-class research paper
|
|
Structure 30% |
Advanced |
Proficient |
Developing |
Not present |
|
Writing Style (APA formatting), grammatical errors and sentence structure |
54 to 60 points
· Minimal to non-existent grammatical and APA errors. · The paper is between 8 and 10 full pages not including the title and references pages
|
42 to 53 points
· Limited grammatical and APA errors. · The paper is between 8 and 10 full pages not including the title and references pages
|
1 to 41 points
· Contains numerous grammatical and APA errors. · The paper is slightly less than 8 and 10 full pages not including the title and references pages
|
0 points
· Contains excessive grammatical and APA errors. · The paper is far less than 8 and 10 full pages not including the title and references pages
|