Annotated Bibliography
BUSI 472 Annotated Bibliography Grading Rubric
|
Criteria |
Levels of Achievement |
|||
|
Content 70% |
Advanced |
Proficient |
Developing |
Not present |
|
Areas regarding content, analysis, synthesis, evaluation of topics, participation and timeliness |
19 to 21 points
Superior work - in all areas - Student consistently exceeds minimal expectations in all areas regarding content, analysis, synthesis, and evaluation of topics, participation, timeliness, and writing style. Specifically: · The annotated bibliography consists of 8–10 quality references (primarily peer-reviewed, scholarly journals or theoretical texts in addition to the textbook and the Bible · The annotated bibliography describes the journal or text and includes how the resource will be used in the Research Paper · For each source, the annotation demonstrates the value of the source in informing the research question(s)
|
Good work in most areas - Student demonstrates minor deficiencies in some areas regarding content, analysis, and style.
Specifically: · There are between 5-7 sources listed and not all sources are from peer reviewed, scholarly journals or theoretical texts or the bible. · The annotated bibliography describes the journal or text and includes how the resource will be used in the Research Paper · For each source, the annotation demonstrates the value of the source in informing the research question(s)
|
1 to 14 points
Fair work in most areas – Student exhibits need for improvement in most areas regarding content, analysis, writing style, and/or participation.
Specifically: · There are fewer than 5 sources listed, and most sources are not from peer reviewed scholarly journals or theoretical texts or the bible. · Several of the annotations describing the value of the source to the research question(s) are missing |
0 points
Failing – Student shows evidence of refusal or inability to meet minimum standards.
Specifically: · Required sources are not used and few, if any, sources are from peer reviewed scholarly journals or theoretical texts or the bible. · The annotations describing the value of each source are missing |
|
Structure 30% |
Advanced |
Proficient |
Developing |
Not present |
|
Writing Style (APA formatting), grammatical errors and sentence structure |
8 to 9 points
Minimal to non-existent grammatical and APA errors. |
6 to 7 points
Limited grammatical and APA errors.
|
1 to 5 points
Contains numerous grammatical and APA errors. |
0 points
Contains excessive grammatical and APA errors.
|