report
Criteria Fail
(0-49.5 marks)
Pass
(50-64.5)
Credit Distinction
(65-74.5) (75-84.5)
High Distinction
(85-100 marks)
1. Introduction about the case study, topic
it relates to and brief
introduction about
the organization
(3 Marks)
Introduction not
given at all
Brief
introduction
given but the
topic to which
it relates to
not given
along with no
description
about the
organization
Introduction
given but just
mentioned the
topic to which it
relates to without
giving the
meaning. But a
brief introduction
of the
organization also
given.
Good
introduction
given and the
meaning of topic
to which it relates
to also discussed
along with a brief
introduction
about the
organization
Very good introduction given along with
a very clear explanation of the topic to
which it relates to along with a good
description of the organization
2. Discussion about the case study
(4 Marks)
Just copied the
case study-no
effort has been
made to write in
his/her own
words
A brief
discussion of
the case study
given in
his/her own
words
A good
discussion of the
case study given
in his/her own
words
A meaningful
discussion of the
case study given
in his/her own
words
An outstanding discussion of the case
study given in his/her own words
3. Conclusions & recommendations
(4 Marks)
No conclusions
or
recommendations
given
Simple
conclusions
attempted
Both conclusions
and
recommendations
discussed
Conclusions and
recommendations
both discussed
and well
expressed
Conclusions and recommendations very
well expressed
4. Credible sources and referencing
(2 marks)
Research is not
evident in
submission.
Harvard
referencing is not
attempted.
.
5 or less
sources used
to support the
report. Not
from a
credible
source.
Harvard
More than 5
credible sources
used to support
the report.
Harvard
referencing is
attempted in
reference list and
in text. Some
At least 10
credible sources
utilized in the
report. Harvard
referencing is
applied correctly
in both reference
list and in-text
Correctly formatted citations are
included where appropriate, all citations
are included in the reference list, all
references are cited in the report and the
reference list is correctly formatted.
Many resources from reliable sources,
e.g. journals, company websites,
trustworthy articles are used. No errors in
referencing is
attempted in
reference list
or in text.
Many
referencing
errors evident.
referencing errors
evident.
citations.
Minimal
referencing errors
evident.
referencing evident.
5. Writing style (2 marks)
Writing style is
of poor quality.
Lack of logic and
flow. The report
has significant
grammar,
punctuation, or
spelling
mistakes.
A below
average
writing style
with some
lack of
attention to
detail. Some
logic and
flow. Some
understanding
of editing is
demonstrated.
Close to or
within word
count
An average
writing style.
Adequate
structure. Some
grammatical and
spelling errors
may be present.
An average
standard of
editing skill.
Within word
count.
Above average,
professional style
of presentation
and writing that is
well structured.
Above average
editing skills.
Well formatted
with relevant
images utilised to
complement text.
Presentation well
paced throughout.
Well-designed and
written presentation.
No grammar,
punctuation, or
spelling mistakes.
Excellent presentation design.
Exceptional
selection of images
that are appropriately
formatted.
Directions for improvement: Total Marks out
of 15