week 4

vk4queen
Bronskichapter5.pdf

82 A Queer History of the United States

Yes, I am a Free Lover. I have an inalienable, constitutional

and natural right to love whom I may, to love as long or as

short a period as I can; to change that love every day if I

please, and with that right neither you nor any law you can

frame have any right to interfere. And I have the further right

to demand a free and unrestricted exercise of that right, and it

is your duty not only to accord it, but as a community, to see

I am protected in it. I trust that I am fully understood, for I

mean just that, and nothing else.24

The free love movement in America tried to realize these ideas about

individual freedom and freedom from the state, but could do so only

within small utopian communities.

As the century was drawing to a close, tensions surrounding the

question of what it meant to be an American dominated the political

sphere. The devastation and trauma of the Civil War had profoundly

shaped the social and political issues of the century. Ironically, the

war both codified and reshaped existing gender roles, and both

heightened and lessened the role of religion in public life. It made

possible the Emancipation Proclamation, which freed all slaves, but

also set the stage for new manifestations of the persecuting society.

They would include the continued violent persecution of the descen-

dants of the enslaved Africans-historian Sherrilyn Ifill estimates

that five thousand African Americans were lynched between I890

and :t5)6o, over one lynching a 'm'eek for sixty years-as well as a new wave of attacks on European and Asian immigrants.25

In the end, the Civil War maintained the Union-uniting, to use

Lincoln's domestic metaphor, a "house divided against itself." But it

was difficult in this context to realize a larger sense of equality, let

alone liberation. America was about to enter the Progressive Era, yet

in many ways its culture was to become even more divided and more

perSeCutlng aS it greW0

FIVE

A DANGEROUS PURITY

THE LANGUAGE OF POLITICS

In the second half of the nineteenth century, with rapid expansion

and a constant influx of immigrants, the United States was in a state

of volatile change. The country was expanding, but also growing

internally as people began to move to cities. The second Industrial

Revolution, spurred on by enormous technological innovations -

advances in the uses of electricity, the internal combustion engine,

the mass manufacturing of steel, new chemical substances used to

mass-produce consumer goods-created a need for a large labor

force. Ten million immigrants came to America to work in factories.

The wealth generated by this economic and social revolution helped

create a class structure dominated by a new upper class defined by

capitalist, not inherited, wealth. Its excesses and social profligacy

were disparagingly labeled "the Gilded Age" by Mark Twain and

Charles Dudley Warner.

The nation was now composed of people who varied in race,

ethnicity, class, and identities. The making of a strong middle class

allowed some economic and class mobility. This expansiveness re-

flected Wait Whitman's vision, posing a challenge and an opportu-

nity for conceptualizing a similarly inclusive and American idea of

sexuality.

Whitman's utopian sexual democracy was not in sync with the

reform politics of late nineteenth-century America, nor was it useful

for political organizing at the time. With the exception of a few pro-

from A Queer History of the United States by Michael Bronski Boston: Beacon Press, 2011

84 A Queer History of the United States

gressive thinkers like Victoria Woodhull, social change movements

of the nineteenth century, such as abolition and suffrage, did not

consider sexual expression integral to their vision. For many women

reformers, male sexuality was the problem, not the solution. The suf-

frage movement was focused not only on gaining women's political

independence, but on reforming an economic system that required

women to have sex with men, in or out of marriage, in exchange for

.financial support. (The struggle for suffrage ended in I920 with the

ratification of the Nineteenth Amendment.) Historian Beryl Satter

notes that even progressive women "agreed with more conservative

women activists that male lust damaged society, and that female

virtue would improve it." 1 They saw unrestrained male desire as the

cause and effect of widespread gambling, alcoholism, and prostitu-

tion, all of which threatened women's homes and families, public

decency, and personal freedom. Most women reformers endorsed

accepted ideas about male sexual restraint and female purity as nec-

essary to American social progress, a concept that had roots in the

Second Great Awakening of the early nineteenth century. _

The social purity groups that formed in response to urban growth

and new ideas of personal freedom were confronting real problems

such as public violence, domestic abuse, and the abandonment of

pregnant women, all of which stemmed largely from alcoholism.

The Woman's Christian Temperance Union (WCTU), founded in

I874, and the Anti-Saloon League, founded in I893, are the most

famous of hundreds of groups whose efforts eventually led to Pro-

hibition, enacted with the passage of the Eighteenth Amendment in

r9I9. Temperance advocates had long claimed that drinking was intimately linked to prostitution and sexual immorality. They were

correct. Many saloon owners would rent rooms to prostitutes or

keep brothels above their businesses. Organized prostitution was

often a family business, and saloons and brothels were run by

married couples. 2

Other reformers focused more on problems in the private sphere.

Early nineteenth-century diet reformist Sylvester Graham believed

that alcoholism and sexual urges were brought on by unhealthy

food, in particular meat and food additives. He invented healthy,

or "pure," whole-grain breads and crackers designed to curb lust,

A Dange_rous Purity 85

particularly masturbation, which he believed contributed to blind-

ness. At the beginning of the twentieth century, John Harvey Kel-

logg urged sexual abstinence and believed that "neither the plague,

nor war, nor small-pox, nor similar diseases, have produced results

so disastrous to humanity as the pernicious habit of onanism," by

which he meant masturbation. He advocated whole grains and in- vented the corn flake to grapple with these urges .

These dietary theories seem quaint today. Social purity groups,

however, had a tremendous effect on how America publicly con-

ceptualized and discussed sexuality. Their work stigmatized certain

forms of sexual expression well into the twentieth century. The so-

cial purity movement continued a line of thought that traces back to

the Puritans' entrenchment of individual restraint and persecution

as values fundamental to their vision of a "city upon a hill." Tradi-

tional Christianity taught that reproduction was the only rationale

for sexual activity and that all nonreproductive sexuality was sin-

ful. There was little theoretical difference, in this thinking, between same-sex and different-sex oral and anal intercourse. Separation of

sexuality from reproduction struck at the heart of how society was

organized and threatened social progress.

The tension between securing personal freedom for individu-

als and the social purity movement's desire to protect people was

strongest in urban areas. The economic, religious, and individual

freedoms that many in the United States valued were most often

found in cities. The everyday public life of cities, often rowdy and

unpredictable, created new and conflicting value systems. These of-

ten centered on issues of employment, living arrangements, dining, same-gender and different-gender socializing, entertainment, and

appropriate dress, demeanor, and manners. Women and men who

were concerned about morality increasingly saw cities as centers of

sin, drinking, drug use, sexuality, and general unhealthiness. They

were not necessarily wrong. In the mid to late nineteenth century- when tenements and apartment buildings were rapidly being built

and single-family homes were being converted to rooming houses

to accommodate the mass influx of single women and men-it was

nearly impossible to distinguish brothels from boardinghouses. Even

the New York City census stopped trying; in the 1850s it had listed

86 A Queer History of the United States

the city's most noted brothels, but by the late I87os they were identi-

fied simply as rooming houses. 3

Social reformers wanted to broadly and publicly address what

they saw as dangerous immorality. The best way for them to do that

was through the law. In r873 Anthony Comstock, a member of the National Purity Party and a United States postal inspector, founded

the New York Society for the Suppression of Vice, which continued

until the r94os. It was the prototype for similar organizations, such as Boston's Watch and Ward Society, founded in I878 (and active

in suppressing books until the r95os). These groups advocated le-

gal censorship to improve public morality. In r874 Comstock suc-

cessfully lobbied for a federal law, the Comstock Act, that banned

from the U.S. mail "obscene, lewd, or lascivious" material, which

included some anatomy books as well as all birth control and sex

education material.

Over the next three decades, hundreds of similar social pu-

rity groups formed, including the Union for Concerted Moral Ef-

fort (founded in r891), the National Union for Practical Progress

(founded in r894), the American Purity Alliance (founded in r895),

and the National Congress of Mothers (founded in r897). Although

these groups were concerned with a wide range of topics, their most

vocal pronouncements were often on issues of "dangerous" sexual-

ity, such as prostitution, nonmarital sex, and masturbation. The

statement of principles for the Union for Concerted Moral Effort

argued that "recognizing the n:lJ~l law as the supreme law of the universe, we believe that its supremacy should be enforced in all of

the affairs of life."4 Mrs. Anna Rice Powell of the American Purity

Alliance wrote in I 8 9 6:

While our first active efforts were directed against the legal-

ization of vice, it soon became apparent that this was but a

symptom of a deep seated disease in the body politic, which

could not be cured without constitutional treatment; and that

the people must be made to feel the need for it. 5

Along with banning gambling and lotteries as harmful to the

home, these groups lobbied to criminalize prostitution, remove

A Danger__ous Purity 87

paintings of nudes from saloons, ban books with immoral content,

and censor objectionable material in stage plays, music halls, and

the newly emerging motion pictures. Satter points out that members

of social purity groups were deeply suspicious of most new forms of

communication technology, even newspapers, which would "'daily

enter the home' [and] would plant the 'first seeds of morbid desire

and impure sentiment' in innocent minds."6 They argued that chil-

dren were at great risk and required proper moral guidance and

protection from harm, including being shielded from harmful im-

ages and suggestions that would stunt their growth into mature,

moral, heterosexual adults. Charles Loring Brace, who founded the

Children's Aid Society in r853 to help place abandoned and vagrant

youth in new families, did so because he worried that "homeless

boys and newsboys waste their time going to theaters." 7

The protection of the home was paramount for the social purity

reformers. The home and motherhood were sacred and profoundly

necessary for the construction of a pure society. Lucinda Banister

Chandler, founder of the Moral Education Society of Boston, was

a popular thinker and writer whose pamphlets "A Mother's Aid"

and "The Divineness of Marriage" were significant in shaping social

purity thought. In "Motherhood, Its Power over Human Destiny" she writes, concerned about expectant women reading debased lit-

erature, that moral and physical "deformities" of children were the

result of the pregnant mother experiencing "polluting intrusions." 8

Social purity groups' history and philosophy linked them to other reform movements. Almost all supported women's suffrage, and

many were part of the abolition movement. Yet each of these move-

ments was different, and eventually they had conflicting goals. The

social purity groups, for example, were predicated on social control,

while the abolition and women's suffrage movements were overtly

liberatory. Many women and men lived with contradictions be-

tween the ideas and goals of the multiple movements to which they belonged.

As misguided as many of the social purity groups' actions seem to

us now, they-as much as the abolitionists-were trying to create a

just society. Unfortunately, their basic assumptions about desire and

gender, as well as their actions, did more harm than good.

88 A Queer History of the United States

CONCEPTUALIZING RESISTANCE: LABOR, RACE, AND SEX

As new social opportunities opened up in America in the decades af-

ter the Civil War, women and men had access to new pleasures. New

ways of thinking about sexuality and gender informed all parts of

their lives. Their political thinking shaped their discussions and ap-

proaches to sexuality. In the Gilded Age of urban influx, newly freed African Americans, and a growing middle class, social and sexual

beliefs were tied to socioeconomic status. While the social purity

reformers were battling what they saw as a crisis in public morality,

the last two decades of the nineteenth century also witnessed the

rise of labor organizing to combat the horrific conditions in factories

and mines.

Beginning in the I89os, labor organizer Mary Harris Jones,

known as Mother Jones, fought for workplace safety, a fair wage,

and humane working hours. She did not support suffrage, since she

saw it as an upper-class women's concern and thought more atten-

tion should be paid to the lives of poor women. The labor move-

ment, less concerned about a woman's proper place in society, was

deeply committed to gender issues in the workplace. Famous for her

fiery speaking, Mother Jones raged in a I9IO speech about the treat-

ment of young women who worked as "slaves" in the Milwaukee

breweries:

> ·;,r,

The foreman on those breweries regulates the time, even, that the girls may stay in the toilet room, and in the event of over-

staying it gives him the opportunity he seems to be looking

for, to indulge in indecent and foul language ....

While the wage paid is 75 and 85 cents a day, the poor

slaves are not permitted to work more than three or four days

a week, and the continual threat of idle days makes the slaves

much more tractable and submissive. 9

Jones and other labor organizers, many of whom were women, were

interested in empowering women, not protecting them-a position

that struck at the heart of the_ social purity movement's ideas about

womanhood and domesticity.

A Dangerous Purity 89

While both the labor and social purity groups were abolition-

. ist, there were disagreements on race politics. Many people in the

social purity movement were wedded to a model of racial purity that

placed the "white race" above all others. They imagined the dangers

of race and sex to be strikingly similar. Often they linked nonwhite

races to sexual impurity and immoral sexual behaviors, including

unrestrained sexual desire, rape, and "unspeakable acts" (a euphe-

mism for same-sex sexual activity). Racial purity was intrinsic to

their quest for purifying American culture and ensuring their class

status.

M. Carey Thomas-who was passionately involved with women

her entire adult life and who, as president of Hryn Mawr, profoundly

shaped women's education in the United States-believed in white

racial superiority. She refused to allow any Jewish faculty mem-

bers at the school and frequently questioned the ability of nonwhite

people to be educated. Frances Willard, also involved in passionate

female-female relationships, voiced sentiments indicative of social

purity politics in an I890 newspaper column about temperance,

Northern immigration, and race in the South:

I think we have wronged the South, though we did not mean

to do so. The reason was, in part, that we had irreparably

wronged ourselves by putting no safeguard on the ballot-box

at the North that would sift out alien illiterates. They rule

our cities to-day; the saloon is their palace, and the toddy

stick their sceptre. It is not fair that they should vote, nor is it fair that a plantation negro, who can neither read nor write,

whose ideas are bounded by the fence of his own field and the

price of his own mule, should be entrusted with the ballot ....

The Anglo-Saxon race will never submit to be dominated

by the negro so long as his altitude reaches no higher than the

personal liberty of the saloon. 10

Willard's words did not go uncontested. Ida B. Wells, the African

American activist who was a central leader in antilynching cam-

paigns of the time, accused the temperance leader of "condoning

fraud, violence, murder, at the ballot box; rapine, shooting, hang-

90 A Queer History of the United States

ing, and burning; for all these things are done and being done now

by the Southern white people." 11

Wells was decisive in exposing the murderous physical reality

that logically resulted from Willard's political principles. Her words

also highlight how the tension between progressive reform and the

social purity movement continued to yoke together race and sex as

the battlefield on which an American sexuality was defined. In The Souls of Black Folk (I903), his defining look at race relations in the United States, W. E. B. Du Bois stated that "the problem of the

Twentieth Century is the problem of color line." The problem of

the color line had always been intertwined with the problems

of sexuality and gender.

The African American and newly identified "homosexual" com-

munities were shaped, in part, in reaction to mainstream oppressive

ideologies predicated on ideas about social purity. The terms "ho-

mosexual" and "heterosexual," which emerged from the European

medical-legal discourse, had a firmer claim on the public discourse

and imagination than did Whitman's "comrade." They fit perfectly

into the social purity movement's increasingly pseudo-scientific

thinking that negatively categorized groups and behavior. Jona-

than Ned Katz documents how the American medical establishment

quickly used these new ideas to pathologize and further criminalize

women and men who engaged in same-sex sexual activity.

The word "homosexual" was first used in the United States in an , ·je,

I892 article by Dr. James G. Kiernan, a noted Chicago neurologist,

in which he stated that homosexuals were persons whose "general

mental state is that of the opposite sex." Later in the article he dis-

cussed two cases of women murdering their lovers:

Sexual pervert crimes of all types are likely to increase, be-

cause of newspaper agitation of the subject, among hysteri-

cal females, from a desire to secure the notoriety dear to the

hysteric heart. All such cases should be carefully scrutinized,

and the mere existence of the alleged perversion should never

be admitted as proof of irresponsibility .... Each case should

be tried on its own merits, and the exact mental state of the

accused determined. 12

A Dangerous Purity 91

Kiernan's article was followed by many others on the subject of ho-

mosexuality. Kiernan's messages are mixed: homosexuality is linked

to crime, but it may not be the cause of the crime. Cultural historian

Lisa Duggan analyzes the racializing of sexuality in one of the cases

Kiernan discussed. She traces the practice of lynching to institution-

alized violence against perceived deviance from traditional gender

and sexual roles.

In I893 Dr. F. E. Daniel, editor of The Texas Medical Journal, gave a speech, later reprinted multiple times, titled "Should Insane

Criminals or Sex Perverts Be Permitted to Procreate?" He argued

that it is more humane to castrate sex criminals than to execute

them or spend public money on imprisonment. 13 This reasoning is

a logical outcome of the social purity movement's desire to curb

all forms of lust and restructure society on an ideal of sexual and

reproductive purity. Daniel explicitly placed his arguments in the

context of creating a "sanitary utopia" based on both purity and ap-

plied eugenics, a theory and practice of the late nineteenth and early

twentieth centuries designed to improve society through elective

human reproduction.

The "sanitary utopia" of the social purists was the nightmarish

opposite of the utopian visions of the more radical strands of the la-

bor movement and the African American civil rights movement. All

three emerged in response to the circumstances of mid-nineteenth-

century America. The latter two embraced two different political

languages, both of which stood in stark opposition to the ideol- ogy of social purity. Some labor organizers embraced anarchism, a

wide-ranging political philosophy that espoused, as an alternative to

government, the option of self-regulation by citizens. Most African

Americans, however, sought more protection from the state against

lynching and other forms of racial violence. They also looked for

more inclusion in the state to attain equal status with white people.

A similar divide can be seen in the struggle of same-sex-desiring

people: the broad project of sexual liberation (which would free peo-

ple from the bonds of sexual repression) and the legal reform move-

ments (which would fight to change laws that prohibit or repress

certain sexual acts, behaviors, or identities). The decisive difference

between the two political philosophies affected how Americans con-

92 A Queer History of the United States

structed political movements concerning sexuality, especially homo-

sexuality. The stark difference between them is evident in two major

political events that occurred at the end of the nineteenth century:

the I886 Haymarket riot and the Supreme Court case Plessy v. Fer-

guson. Each event would have political reverberations throughout

the twentieth century.

In May I886, labor organizers planned a week of national ral-

lies in major cities to support the eight-hour work day. (At the time,

workers were expected to be on the job a minimum of twelve hours

a day.) At least 400,000 women, men, and children went on strike

or marched. Most of the rallies were peaceful, but in Chicago, police

shot and killed two workers at a local factory. The next day, labor

supporters met in Chicago's Haymarket Square to protest police

violence. During the rally, a pipe bomb was thrown at police of-

ficers, who then shot into the crowd. Chaos ensued, leaving eight

dead. Eight anarchists were arrested for murder; four were hanged.

The case, now considered a miscarriage of justice, created an inter-

national furor. It became a symbol of state suppression of legitimate

political activism and a rallying cry for grassroots organizing.

In I892 Homer Plessy, with the support of the Committee of Citi-

zens, an all-black New Orleans group that promoted racial justice,

refused to sit in the "colored" car of the East Louisiana Railroad.

In a 7-I decision handed down in Plessy v. Ferguson on May I8, I896, the Supreme Court affirmed racial segregation in the United '., States through the concept of.}'separate but equal." This decision

reaffirmed the concept, embedded in slavery, that certain classes

of individuals did not have complete equality under the rule of law.

Plessy's actions and the ensuing court case were a harbinger of the

future use of civil disobedience to resist unlawful authority, as well

as of the limits of the legal system.

The Haymarket incident and the Plessy case illustrate two fun-

damental American models for organized political resistance. The

labor movement's model of organizing is grassroots based and relies

on challenging state authority with demands for justice. (The vio-

lence at the Chicago rally was not part of this model; it was initiated

by the police.) This model functions outside of the accepted, legally

sanctioned social and judicial system; it claims its authority in a

A Dangerous Purity 93

code of ethics based on human dignity and the innate worth of the

individual. In I984 Audre Lorde, a black lesbian feminist theorist and poet, would state this idea as "the master's tools will never dis-

mantle the master's house." The second model of resistance, as seen

in Plessy v. Ferguson, is predicated in the belief that the existing sys- tem can fix itself when challenged through proper channels of social

or legal appeal. It acknowledges, however, that the existing system

is often constructed to avoid such appeals, and allows for breaking

the law-Henry David Thoreau's concept of civil disobedience-in

order to correct the injustices. Although Plessey's civil disobedience

was effective in bringing the case to court, it would not be until

I954, in Brown v. Board of Education, that the Supreme Court outlawed segregation.

These alternative models have been the bedrock for the LGBT

liberation and equal rights movements that began to come into ex-

istence in I950. The structures of racial prejudice and resistance to

racism have profoundly shaped how Americans have conceptualized

and responded to most problems of social inequality. In this context, questions of sexuality and gender inequality have been fitted into

paradigms created to understand racial prejudice. The movement

to free homosexuals from oppression has become predominantly a

legal, rights-based movement. This approach has largely eclipsed the

idea of a sexual liberation movement and narrowed its vision to a

simple struggle for legal equality.

Many American anarchist theorists, including Emma Goldman,

Alexander Berkman, Ben Reitman, Benjamin Tucker, and Leonard

Abbott-all of whom drew inspiration from Whitman-were in the

forefront of addressing the role of sexuality in U.S. society as a po-

litical issue. They believed that it was unethical for the state to have

any role in personal affairs. Benjamin Tucker wrote in his I895 State

Socialism and Anarchism that anarchists "acknowledge and defend the right of any man and woman, or men and women, to love each

other for as long or as short a time as they can, will, or may. To them

legal marriage and legal divorce are equal absurdities." 14 Tucker's

ideas dovetail with those of Victoria Woodhull. According to Ter-

ence Kissack, Tucker believed that "anarchists look upon attempts

to arbitrarily suppress vice as themselves cr_imes." 15

94 A Queer History of the United States

Emma Goldman wrote several times about homosexuality. Here

she describes a conversation with Dr. Eugene Schmidt in Paris in

I900:

I told the doctor of the indignation I had felt at the [I895] con-

viction of Oscar Wilde. I had pleaded his case against the mis-

erable hypocrites who had sent him to his doom. "You!" the

doctor exclaimed in astonishment, "why, you must have been

a mere youngster then. How did you dare come out in public

for Oscar Wilde in puritan America?" "Nonsense!" I replied;

"no daring is required to protest against a great injustice." 16

Margaret Anderson, who with her lover Jane Heap edited the ex-

perimental literary journal The Little Review, was a close friend of Goldman's in the mid-teens. Anderson suggested that, as historian

Margaret Marsh puts it, "homosexuality might be a more normal

form of sexual behavior than heterosexuality" and that "she and her

friends represented the link between the anarchist-feminist idea of

sexual liberation as one component ... of a society of freely cooper- ating individuals." 17

These anarchist writings about homosexuality are a radical break

from most thinking in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centu-

ries. They argue that sexuality is natural and positive, that sex can

be solely about pleasure and, if consensual, should not be the subject

of any laws. These basic precepi; about sexuality, and homosexual-

ity, that are present today in the LGBT movement-both its libera-

tory and civil rights sides-find their roots in anarchist thinking.

The labor movement profoundly influenced the LGBT move-

ment by conceptualizing workers not as individuals, but as a class of

people who are treated unjustly. The early labor organizations-in

particular the Industrial Workers of the World, also known as the

Wobblies, which had over one million members in I923-concep-

tualized a worldwide movement based on identity and group status.

This concept is the historical basis for the thinking of Harry Hay

(whose membership in the Wobblies was formative to his political

education) when he founded the Mattachine Society, an early homo-

sexual rights group, in I950.

A Dangerous Purity 95

Comparisons of other political movements to the LGBT move-

ment are always inexact. Homosexuals are not a specific racial or

ethnic group. They are not a class bound by a type of employment

or harmed by a similar economic injustice. In organizing politically,

homosexuals predicate their group status on a presumption of shared

injustice. As individuals, their experiences are so varied that any all-

encompassing type of organizing is difficult or inapplicable. In many

ways the LGBT movement is unique; it is able to draw upon, but not

totally conform to, other forms of political organizing.

THE POLITICS OF LANGUAGE

If the nascent LGBT movement was to organize itself and be taken seriously by the law, it needed language with authority. An-

archists understood the power of words. In the I88os Angela and

Ezra Heywood, who published the free love journal the Word, argued that the use of plain Anglo-Saxon words such as "cock,"

"cunt," and "fuck" would demystify sexuality, reduce individual

shame, and liberate women. (In I873 Ezra Haywood had been sen-

tenced to prison for using the U.S. Postal Service to mail copies of

his free love pamphlet Cupid's Yokes.) 18 This political position was antithetical to the social purity movement, which sought to suppress

sexual speech. In the midst of these extremes, the new discipline of sexology

gained authority through language. (Sexology was, to some degree,

an extension of the Enlightenment's desire to prove everything ra-

tionally.) The scientific discovery of "homosexuality" generated

language that promoted more open discussion about the subject.

Ironically, it immediately led to a clear articulation of negative ste-

reotypes about homosexuals. For the first time in U.S. history, same-

sex-desiring people could now feel diseased. The most common sexological theory of same-sex desire was that

it was the result of physical, emotional, or psychological "inver-

sion." In other words, the gender of persons who desired their own sex was somehow reversed. When a man desired a man, it was actu-

ally a woman-presumably existing within the man's body-who

96 A Queer History of the United States

was desiring a man. When a woman desired a woman, it was actu-

ally a male essence within the woman's body who felt that desire.

This metaphysical explanation, accepted as scientific (at this

point of the emergence of psychology as a science), had a substantial

effect on the public imagination for the next fifty years. It became

how many people understood the phenomenon of same-sex desire.

Theories of inversion were published widely, and sexologists were

understood by the average person to be the experts on a "new sci-

ence." The idea of the "invert," or "third sex," also quickly and

profoundly informed two popular and lasting stereotypes: the man-

nish lesbian and the effeminate homosexual man. (Although there

were preexisting stereotypes of the effeminate male, sexological tax-

onomy invented him as a homosexual man.) Anthropologist Esther Newton notes that the concept of the mas-

culine woman who loves other women made emotional sense to both

homosexuals and heterosexuals, because it played into the popular

idea that if sexual desire is masculine, then a woman who desires a

woman must be mannish. 19 Lillian Faderman argues that the man-

nish lesbian was a break from the concept of romantic friendship,

because her masculinity gave her access to sexuality. This new step

in how mainstream culture understood sexual attraction between

women made the concept of the romantic friendship-so integral

to personal and social acceptance of both female and male same-

sex relationships-impossible: 2~, The mannish lesbian was also used in the popular imagination t&,_"explain," as well as demonize, the

new twenti;th-century woman who was active in the public sphere,

including the suffragette. The mannish lesbian was not, however,

conflated with the well-known concept of the "passing woman"-a

woman who dressed to pass as a man, like the Civil War soldiers-

which was understood as a masquerade, not an identity.

The early sexologists created a space for homosexuals to tell

their stories. This new form of "scientific" autobiography allowed

women and men to clearly describe their sexual histories. The fol-

lowing autobiography of a patient was included in "Sexual Crimes,"

an 1894 article by Charles Gilbert Chaddock, a leading American

neurologist:

A Dangerous Purity 97

The knowledge that I am so unlike others makes me very

miserable. I form no acquaintances outside of business, keep

~ostly to myself, and ... do not indulge my sexual feelings

.... I do not want to create the impression that my feel-

ings for my own sex are weak, for they are strong; but I have

heretofore had sufficient will-power to restrain them .... My

desire ... has always been to handle the genitals of those for

whom I feel affection and to have them do the same to me. 21

The existence of forthright personal narratives that overtly ad-

mitted to same-sex desire was a major advance toward a public ho-

mosexual identity. The link between medical discourse and openly

pro-homosexual literature is clear in this excerpt from Edward

Prime-Stevenson's 1906 Imre: A Memorandum. Prime-Stevenson wrote the novel under the pseudonym Xavier Mayne and had it pri-

vately printed in Naples. Here Oswald, the main character, tells his life story to his lover:

From the time when I was lad ... I felt myself unlike other

boys in one element of my nature. That one matter was my

special sense, my passion for the beauty, ·the dignity, the

charm, the-what shall I say-the loveableness of my own

sex. I hid it, at least so far as, little by little, I came to realize its

force. For, I soon perceived that most other lads had no such

passional sentiments. 22

In his widely read 1912 Prison Memoirs of an Anarchist~ Alexan- der Berkman, who was Emma Goldman's lover, offers an example

of how same-sex desire need not be explained through sexological

language. In the book, he wrote at length about male homosexuality

in prison. His series of portraits of intensely emotional male-male

relationships, some of which include sexual intimacy, are extraor-

dinary for the time. In the chapter "Passing the Love of Woman"

(the title is a common literary reference to the relationship between

the biblical David and Jonathan and to male homosexuality), af-

ter Berkman relates his own experience of a passionate male-male

98 A Queer History of the United States

friendship, a friend and fellow prisoner named George tells Berk-

man about his relationship with a younger man:

For two years I loved him without the least taint of sex desire.

It was the purest affection I ever felt in my life. It was all-

absorbing, and I would have sacrificed my life for him if he

had asked it. But by degrees the psychic stage began to mani-

fest all the expressions of love between the opposite sexes. I

remember the first time he kissed me .... Never in my life had

I experienced such bliss as at that moment. It's five years ago,

but it thrills me every time I think of it .... From then on we

became lovers. 23

Berkman's Memoirs brought anarchist theories, as well as radical

sexual ideas, to ""a wide range of readers. Unlike others who wrote

about sexuality at the time, Berkman explicitly discussed the reality

and importance of masturbation. His was also one of the first books

to discuss the homosexual behavior of young men, who as a g.roup

would not be acknowledged until later in the century. True-life accounts could easily reinforce ideas about gender and

defined categories of sexual orientation. Autobiography of an An-

drogyne was a I9I9 memoir by Earl Lind, who also called himself Ralph Werther and went by the name Jennie June when dressed as a

woman. In this remarkable book, the author understands his condi- ~ "!§•.

tion as being congenital: ·?Jo·

As to my own feminine characteristics, I have been told by

my intimate associates from boyhood down to my middle for-

ties-when this book goes to press-that I markedly resemble

a female physically, besides having instinctive gestures, poses,

and habits that are characteristically feminine. ~y school-

mates said that I would make a good-looking girl and that

kissing me was "as good as kissing a girl.." 24

Lind identifies himself as a "fairie," an "invert," a "homosexual,"

and an "androgyne" and compares himself to the Sleeping Her-

maphrodite, the famous Greek sculpture that inspired Julia Ward

A Dangerous Purity 99

Howe's The Hermaphrodite. But in contrast to Howe's use of the image, which opened up an imaginative and expansive space for

being sexual, Lind's use was based in a scientific typology that medi-

calized his sexuality. For the time, Lind's medicalization of himself

was extreme: in his early thirties he had his testes removed because

he feared that his "emissions" were causing him health problems.

Sexology generated a broad-based public discussion about the

need for sex education and legal birth control, both of which helped

bring reproductive choices to women. It is not a coincidence that

the emergence of an affirming, clearly defined homosexual iden-

tity coincided with social changes that gave women freedom over

their bodies. The connection between the advance of widespread sex

education and birth control and the acceptance of homosexuality

was clear to Mary Casal. Her I930 autobiography (which describes • events three decades earlier), The Stone Wall, is one of the few writ-

ten accounts by a lesbian in the early twentieth century:

People are now daring to talk about birth control, and im-

portant provisions are being made for the execution of such

methods .... There is no suffering comparable to unsatisfied

sex desire, not any condition that brings about such dire re-

sults .... The time is coming when a man's love for a man and

a woman's love for a woman will be studied and understood

as it never has been in the past. 25

The dissemination of information about sexuality and reproduc-

tion, almost all of which was in a heterosexual context, was an im-

portant development in a culture in which sexuality had not been

discussed openly. The emergence of a homosexual identity that in-

creasingly refused criminalization and discrimination-what Prime-

Stevenson called "any intelligent civilization's disrespect" -related

directly to the newly emerging reproductive rights movement. Both

embodied a social ideal that reflected the integrity of the human

body and the integral importance of sexuality to the citizen. Most

important was the radical idea, literally embodied in homosexual

activity, that sex and reproduction can be completely separate, that

sex can be enjoyed without the fear of pregnancy.

100 A Queer History of the United States

This distinction between sexual activity, pleasure, and reproduc-

tion threatened the social purity advocates, who prized motherhood

and the family. Ironically, even those who advocated sexual free-

dom were often not immune to social purity ideology. Margaret

Sanger, for instance, who was highly influential in forging a national

movement for birth control and family planning, held racist, eu-

genicist views about nonwhite people. And while a firm believer in

women controlling their bodies, she was not a sexual liberationist.

She believed that "every normal man and woman has the power to

control and direct his sexual impulse. Men and woman who have

it in control and constantly use their brain cells thinking deeply,

are never sensual."26 Like the staunchest advocates of the social pu-

rity movement, she was against masturbation, which she saw as a

"revolting disease." And physical masturbation was not the only

menace:

In the boy or girl past puberty we find one of the most danger-

ous forms of masturbation, i.e., mental masturbation, which

consists of forming mental pictures, or thinking of obscene or

voluptuous pictures. This form is considered especially harm-

ful to the brain, for the habit becomes so fixed that it is almost

impossible to free the thoughts from lustful pictures. 27

Sanger's views on masturbation, seemingly at odds with her more 1" ~-

progressive stands on sexu~lity, were intimately connected with the gradual formation of a "pure" race through eugenic practices.

Sanger's objection arose from her claim that masturbation can, es-

pecially for women, be physically addictive and replace sexual in-

tercourse, thus harming the chances of genitally sound and racially

pure reproduction.

The emergence of sexology as a public way of discussing sexu-

ality increased the anxiety abo~t the rise of urban culture. Moral

guides for young women and men were increasingly popular at the

turn of the century, when many youths were moving to cities. Such

guides were often published by church groups, with a religious mes-

sage complementing the sex advice. They turned sex education into

sex regulation. Their messages echoed social purity ideologies about

A Dangerous Purity 101

what made sexuality dangerous: women were susceptible to it, and

men were irresponsible with it. (Implicit in these warnings was that

sex was dangerous for women because it "ruined" them for mar-

riage, which was the only condition within which they could survive

economically.) These books, while concerned with the dangers of

intemperate drinking, gambling, public dancing, and music halls,

were often obsessed with sex.

The I929 Helps to Purity: A Frank~ Yet Reverent Introduction

on the Intimate Matters of Personal Life for Adolescent Girls by

Rev. Fulgence Meyer, OFM, was explicit in its warnings against

masturbation. Meyer noted that "this unnatural and abominable

sin of self-abuse is committed by a girl when she voluntarily excites

and stimulates her sexual nature in a degree to bring on complete

sexual satisfaction." He we·nt on to note that "sexual gratification

is allowed only in the virtuous sexual conduct between husband

and wife" and that "sinful lovemaking, or ... immodest touches by

oneself or another, of the same of the opposite sex, or even of ani-

mals, or by some other unjustified method, is always a mortal sin."28

Meyer was careful to stipulate that immodest actions are possible

with either the same or the opposite sex, indicating that the possibil-

ity of homosexual behavior was commonplace and easily articulated

by religious instructors.

Medically based marriage guides of the early twentieth century,

such as the I926 best seller The Doctor Looks at Love and Life by Joseph Collins, MD, gave similar messages. Collins was in favor

of less sexual repression and rejected religious morality in favor of

scientific fact. He was sympathetic to the struggles women faced,

arguing that the "problem" of frigidity may well be caused by male

selfishness. He also viewed "natural homosexuals" -those born

that way-as "victims of fate," but his arguments were complicated:

There are many persons who indulge in unnatural sexual re-

lations who are not homosexuals. They are the real degen-

erates. There are many potential and actual homosexuals

whose intercourse with persons of their own sex is confined to

emotional and intellectual contacts .... They are not degener-

ates .... They are victims of Fate, the only ones who do not

102 A Queer History of the United States

excite our compassion; and all because we cannot distinguish

between the work of God and Satan. 29

In contrast to men, women, in Collins's view, more often fell into homosexuality through "bad habits, kisses, embraces, tender inti-

macies, feeblemindedness and evil companionship." 30 Echoing the

earlier religious instruction books and their concerns about leisure

time, Collins believed that homosexuality in women "flows from

idleness, boredom and loneliness, a~d its victims are as a rule un- der- or oversexed."31 Despite his relative (for the time) tolerance,

he ultimately believed that "we should rid ourselves of the notion

that we are the keepers of the natural homosexual, but we should

hearten ourselves to prevent and cure those who accidentally or

deliberately acquire vicious sexual habits." 32 Collins devoted forty

pages to discussing homosexuality, an indication of its importance

in 1920s culture.

Marriage manuals were best sellers because the average Ameri-

can wanted to read and think about sexuality. Americans discovered

that the changes wrought by the sexology movements allowed them

to have discussions not possible before. Changes in book distribu-

tion, the low cost of mass book production, and increasing literacy

rates made this information easily accessible to a huge, diverse read-

ership. Not all Americans could agree on the specifics of sex educa-

tion, but most agreed that !?$ topic should be discussed. As Estelle Freedman and John D'Emiho point out, "[B]y the 1920s circum-

stances were present to encourage acceptance of the modern idea

that sexual expression was of overarching importance to individual

happiness."33

This "modern idea" was antithetical to the social purity move-

ment, since one person's sexual expression was another's mortal sin.

The vision of social purity was fueled mainly by women and men

who were attempting to gain full citizenship for women through

suffrage and other reforms. Some, such as Frances Willard, had lives

centered on other women. Unfortunately, this vision was essentially

denying full citizenship to others, especially racial minorities. The

social purity movement also reinforced social standards that were

directly antithetical to sexual freedom and directly harmful to many

A Dangerous Purity 103

women and men who desired their own sex. These standards, predi-

cated on traditional heterosexual ideals of gender, were written into

laws clearly delineating what was legally pure and impure. That

was the language of politics. The politics of language, in contrast,

allowed for an individual interpretation that was not based on abso-

lutes. People wanted to read about sex so that they could imagine, in

private, their sexual lives. This was the underlying fear about mas-

turbation and its connection to sexual fantasies.

The articulation of sexual desire was the first step in building

a consciously constructed community of individuals who desired

others of their own sex. The hope for this community is expressed

implicitly in the patient's story from Chaddock's "Sexual Crimes"

article and explicitly in Prime'.""Stevenson's novel Imre. In both in- stances, the narrator's identity radically changes when he realizes

that he is not alone in the world. The attraction of reading such

material in private was similar to the attraction single people had

to cities in which they could find freedom. Aided by cities and the

imagination, this sense of individual freedom would complicate

the divide between public and private and blur the line between

purity and danger.