Biblical Ethics

Serenity3203
BiblicalEthicsinResearchAssignmentGradingRubric.pdf

Criteria Ratings Points

Abstract, Introduction

10 to >9 pts

Advanced

Abstract clearly states the purpose and main conclusion and Introduction provides a complete overview of the discussion.

9 to >8 pts

Proficient

Abstract and Introduction provides a partial purpose, main conclusion, and overview of the discussion

8 to >0 pts

Developing

Abstract and Introduction present but does not provide an overview of the discussion.

0 pts

Not Present

Not completed.

10 pts

The Foundation of Biblical Ethics

16 to >14 pts

Advanced

A complete discussion of the foundation of Biblical ethics is present. Flow is logical.

14 to >13 pts

Proficient

A partial discussion of the foundation of Biblical ethics is present. Flow is mostly logical.

13 to >0 pts

Developing

A discussion of the foundation of Biblical ethics is significantly lacking. Flow is not logical.

0 pts

Not Present

Not completed or not related to requirements for the section.

16 pts

Demonstrating Biblical Ethics in Research

16 to >14 pts

Advanced

A complete discussion of how Biblical ethics is demonstrated in research is present. Flow is logical.

14 to >13 pts

Proficient

A partial discussion of how Biblical ethics is demonstrated in research is present. Flow is mostly logical.

13 to >0 pts

Developing

A discussion of how Biblical ethics is demonstrated in research is insufficient. Flow is not logical.

0 pts

Not Present

Not completed or not related to requirements for the section.

16 pts

Mitigating Researcher Bias Using Biblical Principles

16 to >14 pts

Advanced

A complete discussion of mitigating researcher bias using Biblical principles is present. Flow is logical.

14 to >13 pts

Proficient

A partial discussion of mitigating researcher bias using Biblical principles is present. Flow is mostly logical.

13 to >0 pts

Developing

There is minimal discussion of mitigating researcher bias using Biblical principles. Flow is not logical.

0 pts

Not Present

Not completed or not related to requirements for the section.

16 pts

Biblical Ethics in Research Assignment Grading Rubric | BUSI830_B02_202530

Criteria Ratings Points

Accurate Representation of the Literature

16 to >14 pts

Advanced

A complete discussion of accurately representing the literature is present. Flow is logical.

14 to >13 pts

Proficient

A partial discussion of accurately representing the literature is present. Flow is mostly logical.

13 to >0 pts

Developing

There is minimal discussion of accurately representing the literature. Flow is not logical.

0 pts

Not Present

Not completed or not related to requirements for the section.

16 pts

Sharing the Gospel through Character

21 to >19 pts

Advanced

A thorough discussion of how to share the Gospel through character in a research study is present. Flow is logical.

19 to >17 pts

Proficient

A partial discussion of how to share the Gospel through character in a research study is present. Flow is mostly logical.

17 to >0 pts

Developing

The discussion of how to share the Gospel through character in a research study is insufficient. Flow is not logical.

0 pts

Not Present

Not completed or not related to requirements for the section.

21 pts

Conclusion 10 to >9 pts

Advanced

A complete summary of the discussion with highlights of key points is present. No new information and/or personal opinions are present.

9 to >8 pts

Proficient

A partial summary of the discussion with highlights of key points is present. Some new information and/or personal opinions are present.

8 to >0 pts

Developing

A summary is present but does not contain highlights of key points. Mostly new information and/or personal opinions are present.

0 pts

Not Present

Not completed.

10 pts

Biblical Ethics in Research Assignment Grading Rubric | BUSI830_B02_202530

Criteria Ratings Points

APA Format and Structure, References, and Citations, Grammar, Spelling, Mechanics, Composition

23 to >21 pts

Advanced

APA formatting and structure are followed, all references and citations correspond to each other and are formatted according to APA 7th ed. guidelines, and all assertions are supported by peer-reviewed scholarly sources. Grammar, spelling, mechanics and composition are all correct.

21 to >19 pts

Proficient

APA formatting and structure are mostly followed, most references and citations correspond to each other and are formatted according to APA 7th ed. guidelines, and most assertions are supported by peer-reviewed scholarly sources. Minor errors in grammar, spelling, mechanics and composition.

19 to >0 pts

Developing

APA formatting and structure are not followed, most references and citations do not correspond to each other and/or are not formatted according to APA 7th ed. guidelines, and most assertions are not supported by peer-reviewed scholarly sources. Significant number of errors in grammar, spelling, mechanics and composition.

0 pts

Not Present

There are many errors in mechanics, composition, grammar.

23 pts

Sources/ Word Count

22 to >20 pts

Advanced

Nine or more peer-reviewed scholarly sources are provided. There are nine integrations of Biblical integration with five Scripture citations. Two citations for Keller are provided. The book sources provided are Yin (2018), Keller, and the Bible only. Word Count is thorough (1600-2400 words).

20 to >18 pts

Proficient

Eight to six peer-reviewed scholarly sources are provided. There are six to eight integrations of Biblical integration with three to four Scripture. One citation for Keller is provided Books other than Yin (2018) and the Bible are used as sources. Word Count is satisfactory (+/- 2%).

18 to >0 pts

Developing

One to five peer-reviewed scholarly sources are provided. There are one to five integrations of Biblical integration with five Scriptures. No citations for Keller are provided Books other than Yin (2018) and the Bible are used as sources. Non-peer-reviewed sources are provided. Word Count is insufficient (+/- 3-4%).

0 pts

Not Present

No structure or formatting provided. Missing references and/or citations are rare, repetitious or non-existent. Word Count (> +/-4%).

22 pts

Total Points: 150

Biblical Ethics in Research Assignment Grading Rubric | BUSI830_B02_202530