Critical Analysis of a Film Review

amfernando
AttanayakaFernandoEssay1Draft.docx.pdf

Attanayaka Fernando Essay 1 Draft.docx by Attanayaka Fernando

Submission date: 09-Jun-2021 07:35AM (UTC-0500) Submission ID: 1603430964 File name: Attanayaka_Fernando_Essay_1_Draft.docx (22.31K) Word count: 1376 Character count: 7013

Title Dev.

Title Punct.Title Punct. 1

POV

2

Expl.

3

4

5

6

7

Expl.

8

9

10

11

0% SIMILARITY INDEX

0% INTERNET SOURCES

0% PUBLICATIONS

0% STUDENT PAPERS

Exclude quotes Off

Exclude bibliography On

Exclude matches Off

Attanayaka Fernando Essay 1 Draft.docx ORIGINALITY REPORT

PRIMARY SOURCES

QM

QM

QM

QM

FINAL GRADE

/100

Attanayaka Fernando Essay 1 Draft.docx GRADEMARK REPORT

GENERAL COMMENTS

Instructor

PAGE 1

Title Dev.

Work on developing engaging, specific titles that hint at your specific argument. 

Title Punct.

Title punctuation error

Additional Comment

Film titles are in italics, not quotes. 

Title Punct.

Title punctuation error

Additional Comment

Newspaper/website titles should be italicized. 

Comment 1

You should probably mention the critic's name here, since that's whose work you are analyzing. 

POV

Point of view shift

Additional Comment

Stay in 3rd person point of view exclusively in formal academic writing. Just start with "This is logical since." Is it all that logical however? Consider if the documentary did not present Ali in a positive light or was horribly made with just old interviews poorly edited together. 

Comment 2

he was also loved for his out of ring personality, way with words, and important cultural role for African Americans in sports, so "purely" might not really work here. 

QM

QM

Expl.

Expletive

See pg. 662 in SMH.

Comment 3

You need to include a thesis that clearly sets up your overall argument about the quality of the reviewer's stylistic and rhetorical strategies. Keep in mind, this essay is not really about the film at all--the film is largely irrelevant. Instead, you are analyzing the writing skills of a film reviewer. 

Comment 4

what does any of this paragraph have to do with the review?

PAGE 2

Comment 5

What claims? You haven't summarized or quoted any of the critics' words yet.

Comment 6

Keep the focus on the review, not the movie. 

PAGE 3

Comment 7

Give specific examples--use direct quotations. 

Expl.

Expletive

See pg. 662 in SMH.

PAGE 4

Comment 8

again, provide specific examples from the review as evidence. 

Comment 9

perhaps a bit out of context. Was this source commenting on this review specifically as the citation implies, or about the power of metaphors in general? 

PAGE 5

PAGE 6

Comment 10

Use the words Works Cited here as a header instead of References. 

Comment 11

You need to cite the film review in MLA format. See  #45 pg 429 in SMH.