attachment_3.doc

Yuntong

Part 1 – Project Initiation

Max.

Mark

Compare actions to best practices.

5

5

· You have identified many of the best practices identified in Schwalbe and compared these to the events of the ResNet case study.

What would you have done differently?

5

3

· You have provided a high quality suggestion as to what could have been done differently.

Part 2 – Project Planning

Provide a comparison of the WBS with project scope management.

5

1

· You mention the WBS but do not discuss scope management.

Provide 5 suggestions for improving the WBS.

5

2

· You have provided 5 suggestions to improve the project but not the WBS.

Quality of the 5 suggestions.

5

4

· You have suggested high quality improvements based on solid analytics. You have also provided some information about the expected outcomes (the so what), should your suggestions be implemented.

Other Outcomes

Computer communication skills Paper quality – spelling / grammar / graduate level content / structure

5

4

· Partially transparent introduction and excellent summary conclusion.

Total

30

19

· Good effort and result.

· I am sure you are disappointed in this result. Should you wish to resubmit this paper for partial additional marks, please do so before the end of the course.

· I am sure you are disappointed in this result. Should you wish to resubmit this paper for partial additional marks, please do so before the end of the course.