Sustainability and Ethics 2

asss.docx

Home >Computer Science homework help >Sustainability and Ethics 2

Assessment 2: Case Study

Due date:	Week 5

Group/individual:	Individual assessment

Word count:	2000 words

Weighting:	40%

Unit learning outcomes:	[ULO1], [ULO2], [ULO3], [ULO5]

Course Learning Outcomes:	[CLO1], [CLO2], [CLO6], [CLO8]

Graduate Attributes:	GA-2, GA-3, GA-4, GA-5

Assessment Details:

A Case study will be provided comprising answers to three case study analysis questions. The business report format is required for the submission.

The business report format is required for the individual assignment. The headings and subheadings are strongly recommended to structure the business report. The Harvard Referencing Style is required. For detailed requirement, please refer to the guidelines of how to write Business Report and academic writing style. It is strongly recommended to review SLS learning Enhancement Section in APIC Canvas. The link of Business Report Guideline was provided in the assessment section of this subject in the Canvas.

Marking Criteria and Rubric: The assessment will be marked out of 100% and will be weighted 40% of the total unit mark

Marking

Not satisfactory

Satisfactory

Good

Very Good

Excellent

Criteria

(0-49%) of the

(50-64%) of the

(65-74%) of

(75-84%) of

(85-100%) of

criterion mark)

criterion mark

the criterion

mark

Demonstrate an

Inadequate

Basic understanding

Exhibits breadth

Exhibits accurate

Displays

understanding

understanding of

of the case questions

and depth of

and detailed

exceptional ability

of the case

the case questions

and major issues were

understanding of

breadth and depth

in and

questions (40%)

and major issues

identified partially

the case questions

of understanding

understanding of

are not identified

and major issues

of the case

the case questions

were identified

questions and

and major issues

clearly

major issues were

were discussed

discussed well

critically.

Demonstrate

Poorly

Basic

Evidence of

Above average

Sophisticated

analytical and

articulated,

communication of

clear convincing

use of evidence

critical

unconvincing

some facts in

facts and

to support the

evidences

support of case

evidences

case analysis.

thinking skills

provided. Lack of

solution. Lack of

provided. Some

Good theory

Excellent theory

(40%)

theories

theory application

theories applied

application

for the analysis

Report

Poor

Satisfactory

Good

Excellent

Distinguished

presentation

presentation

and

including report

format and writing

format and

format. Poor

skills with some

writing skills

writing skills.

referencing

writing skills with

grammar and

with spelling

without spelling

Following

(20%)

grammar and

spelling errors. Fail

errors. Fail to

errors. Follow

Harvard

spelling errors.

to follow Harvard

follow Harvard

Harvard

referencing style

Fail to follow

referencing style.

referencing

referencing style

completely.

Harvard

style.

referencing style.