managing people
Week 7 A4 Plan Feedback
We were impressed by many of the A4 plans we saw last week.
The better ones had clear links from the models to the chosen approach for the organisation.
Doublecheck that you have chosen a Cancer Charity or an Event Management company. You could also choose a new digital media start up. If choosing the new start up this should be a company that is less than 6 years old.
The organisational life cycle was included on the guide so that you could see where your organisation might be e.g. new start up is in start up or growth. Maturer organisations might be in rebirth to avoid decline.
You are advised to use the models from this module as that is what we are assessing here. The three models required are Strategic HRM, Recruitment and Selection
The Strategic HRM options included several suitable models in week 3. The Event Management company might prefer the Matching Michigan model as the vertical integration (external) elements are clearly labelled and they can discuss these against the horizontal integration (internal) elements which have been defined within the triangle. The Charity may prefer the Harvard Framework with its emphasis on vertical integration with external stakeholders and the need to foster horizontal integration to foster commitment to the organisation. There are also the models of Best Fit and Best Practice but you would have to work harder to illustrate vertical / horizontal fit for your organisations with these rather than just discussing the elements included in the other models.
For example the new digital media start up could work with best fit as best practice would be too expensive for them. You would then illustrate who / what they would integrate with for the Vertical fit and similarly for the Internal horizontal integration there should be comments related to the mission statement / structure/ HR strategy etc.
Recruitment: This was covered in both week 4 (labour market and recruitment) and week 5 (selection week) and we only focused on 2 key models of recruitment: Processual (fit the job to the person) and systematic (fit the person to the job). The latter is more suited to your graduate role. You should endeavour to reference from the current journal debate (post-recession: 2012 onwards)
Selection: has many techniques to choose from. The lecture deliberately did not offer references for situational / structured / unstructured interview approaches so you can research these from the journal debate in the area of selection. You could also offer psychometric testing and assessment centres, again referenced from the journal debate. The vulnerability of psychometric tests to the practice effect and the expense of assessment centres are considerations.
Models of recruitment could include e-recruitment moving onto e-selection at the selection stage or choosing the option of the social exchange theory of selection .
The JNA (Job Needs Analysis) and JA (Job Analysis) with Competence examples have been given in both weeks 4 and 5 to inform the Job Description, which appears in the appendix. The PS has been discussed and a short grid was offered as part of the plan guide. In Chapter 2 of your report the JD and PS information relates to the theory of what (What is a…) and why (why do we want to include the JD / PS?) for the JD and PS and does not include the actual JD or PS developed for your role.
The Recommendations grid should have 3 recommendations. These can focus on any of the areas you decided to guide your organisation on: how to improve Employer Branding (Recruitment); training in Unconscious Bias (panel Selection) how to retain your new graduate employee etc may all feature. The lead times refer to the roll out and the Notional Costings are the same as opportunity costings which recognise that even though internal staff are delivering the recommendation, the staff are still away from their jobs to attend. Below is an example of one recommendation worked through the grid.
|
Recommendations |
Who to Lead |
Lead Times |
Notional Costings |
Intended Benefits |
|
Training in unconscious Bias for all selection panelists. |
HR and Line Managers |
February – March Plan February Roll out to managers 1st March Roll out to all staff by 20th March
|
1 day of HR time to design the training. ½ day of manager time to train ½ day of manager and staff time to train staff |
Increased awareness of unconscious bias leading to greater diversity in new staff appointments. |
We have been asked about references. References should be in the Westminster Harvard format and the organisation’s website should be one of your references. However most of your references will be journal articles, either from the week by week journals uploaded to the site from your e-journal research. There should be roughly 15 journal references; although from any given article you may find several others that you would like to include.
When researching the labour market you will consider the organisations that you compared your chosen organisation to in weeks 2-4. If your organisation is new to the market you can look at the more established companies in that sector so see which roles they have / were advertising for. You can also get useful information from the big data at the Office of National Statistics (ONO) or WERS (Workplace Employment Relations Survey) which was last conducted in 2011 and published in 2013 https://www.gov.uk/government/collections/workplace-employment-relations-study-wers
Your A4 plan from week 6 should be scanned (or photographed) and uploaded to Appendix iv just as it is, with the feedback from your tutor and peers. If you were not there in week 6 then you cannot earn the 5%; as your peers gave peer feedback last week. However, you can still get feedback on your plan by visiting your tutor during office hours: see the Bb site for office hours and for the correct room numbers.
These comments are in response to what we saw on your A4 plans in week 6 and also questions from students who engaged in the process. We hope that these comments prove useful to you.
Week 7 A4 Plan Feedback
We were impressed
by many of the A4 plans we saw last week.
The better ones had clear links from the models to the chosen approach for the organisation.
Doublecheck that you have chosen a Can
ce
r Charity or a
n Event Management
company.
Y
ou
could
also choose a
ne
w
di
gital me
dia start up.
I
f
choosing the new start
up this
should be a company that
is less than 6 years
old.
The
organisational life cycle
was
included on the guide so th
at you
c
ould
see where
your
organisat
ion might be e
.
g
.
new start up is in start up or growth. Maturer organisations might be in
rebirth to avoid decline.
You are advi
sed to use the models from this modu
le as that is what we are assessing here.
The three
models required
are
Strategic HRM, Recruitment and
Selection
The
Strategic
HRM
options included
several suitable models
in week 3
. The Event Management
company might prefer the
Matching Michigan model
as the vertical integration (external) elements
are clearly labelled and they can discuss these against t
he horizontal integration (internal) elements
which have been defined within the triangle. The Charity may prefer the
Harvard Framework
with
its emphasis on vertical integration with external stakeholders and the need to foster horizontal
integration to fo
ster commitment to the organisation. There
are
also the models of
Best Fit and Best
Practice
but
you would
have to work harder to illustrate vertical / horizontal
fit for your
organisations with these rather than just discussing the elements included in th
e other models.
For example the
new digital media start up could work with best fit as
best practice
would be too
expensive for them.
You would then
illustrate who / what they would integrate with for the Vertical
fit and similarly for the Internal horizo
ntal integration there should be comments related to the
mission statement / structure/ HR strategy etc.
Recruitment:
This was covered in both week 4
(labour market and recruitment)
and week 5
(selection week) and we only focused on 2
key
models of recrui
tment: Processual (fit the job to the
person) and systematic (fit the person to the job). The latter is more suited to
your
grad
uate
role.
You
should endeavour to reference from the current journal debate (post
-
recession: 2012 onwards)
Selection
:
has many
techniques
to
choose from.
The lecture
deliberately did not offer references
for situational / structured / unstructured interview approaches so
you can
research these
from the
journal debate in the area of selection
.
You
could also offer
psychome
tric testing and assessment
centres
, again referenced from the journal debate
. The vulnerability of psychometric tests to the
practice effect and the expense of assessment centres are considerations.
Models of
recruitment c
ould include e
-
recruitment
movin
g onto
e
-
selection
at the selection stage
or
choosing the option of
the social exchange theory of selection .
The
JNA
(Job Needs Analysis)
and JA
(Job Analysis)
with Competence examples have been given in
both weeks 4 and 5
to inform the Job Description, w
hich appears in the appendix.
The
PS
has been
discussed and a short grid was offered as part of the plan guide. In C
hapter 2
of your report the
JD
and
PS
information
relates to the
theory of what
(What is
a
…)
and why
(why do we want to include
the JD / PS?)
for the JD and PS and does not include the actual JD or PS developed for your role
.
Week 7 A4 Plan Feedback
We were impressed by many of the A4 plans we saw last week.
The better ones had clear links from the models to the chosen approach for the organisation.
Doublecheck that you have chosen a Cancer Charity or an Event Management company. You could
also choose a new digital media start up. If choosing the new start up this should be a company that
is less than 6 years old.
The organisational life cycle was included on the guide so that you could see where your
organisation might be e.g. new start up is in start up or growth. Maturer organisations might be in
rebirth to avoid decline.
You are advised to use the models from this module as that is what we are assessing here. The three
models required are Strategic HRM, Recruitment and Selection
The Strategic HRM options included several suitable models in week 3. The Event Management
company might prefer the Matching Michigan model as the vertical integration (external) elements
are clearly labelled and they can discuss these against the horizontal integration (internal) elements
which have been defined within the triangle. The Charity may prefer the Harvard Framework with
its emphasis on vertical integration with external stakeholders and the need to foster horizontal
integration to foster commitment to the organisation. There are also the models of Best Fit and Best
Practice but you would have to work harder to illustrate vertical / horizontal fit for your
organisations with these rather than just discussing the elements included in the other models.
For example the new digital media start up could work with best fit as best practice would be too
expensive for them. You would then illustrate who / what they would integrate with for the Vertical
fit and similarly for the Internal horizontal integration there should be comments related to the
mission statement / structure/ HR strategy etc.
Recruitment: This was covered in both week 4 (labour market and recruitment) and week 5
(selection week) and we only focused on 2 key models of recruitment: Processual (fit the job to the
person) and systematic (fit the person to the job). The latter is more suited to your graduate role.
You should endeavour to reference from the current journal debate (post-recession: 2012 onwards)
Selection: has many techniques to choose from. The lecture deliberately did not offer references
for situational / structured / unstructured interview approaches so you can research these from the
journal debate in the area of selection. You could also offer psychometric testing and assessment
centres, again referenced from the journal debate. The vulnerability of psychometric tests to the
practice effect and the expense of assessment centres are considerations.
Models of recruitment could include e-recruitment moving onto e-selection at the selection stage or
choosing the option of the social exchange theory of selection .
The JNA (Job Needs Analysis) and JA (Job Analysis) with Competence examples have been given in
both weeks 4 and 5 to inform the Job Description, which appears in the appendix. The PS has been
discussed and a short grid was offered as part of the plan guide. In Chapter 2 of your report the JD
and PS information relates to the theory of what (What is a…) and why (why do we want to include
the JD / PS?) for the JD and PS and does not include the actual JD or PS developed for your role.