For KateTutor

mlr296
AssignmentforKatetutor.docx

RESEARCH II Grade Sheet

Agency Assessment Paper Part I Description of the Program

Name of Student _________________________________________________

1.An overview of the program (Heading)

2. History of the organization?

3. Mission statement in the organization

4. Organization Structure

5. History of the program within the organization

6. Program’s rationale /

definition. General purpose of the program

7..Social problems addressed by the Program (Explain in full detail with statistics) (Heading)- 1pg.

8.Intervention Methods (Heading)

9. Methods proposed to achieve the

program’s results

10. Theories that underlie the proposed

Interventions

11.Logic within the program in using these

interventions to achieve its goals

12 Describe the length of services

13.Program Funding and Cost – cost per day in hospice in New Jersey.

(Subheadings)

14. Method for Program Funding

(Public, private, state, federal, or

Local money? Public or private

Organization/) This is a private company

15.Characteristics of the staff providing services –(Heading)

16.Professional and non-professional

staff Role and credentials

(What are professional and non-

professional staff background? Are

they trained in the type of

intervention being utilized by the

program? What are the

professionals’ perspectives on

the model of intervention being

utilized?

17.What standardized method is used to

evaluate the staff performance and

client satisfaction? (Provide

SAMPLEs)

Implementation issues – (Heading)

(Subheadings)

18. Successes and Challenges in the program?

19.Do the intervention methods seem

appropriate?

20. Are people coming for services?

21.Are they the types of clients expected to come?

22.Has the amount of outreach work been underestimated and has this delayed program implementation?

Conclusion: The students demonstrate knowledge and skills by writing a summary of the evaluation process. Describe the successes and limitations of the program and the difficulties you encountered in writing this paper? What do they think needs to be changed in order to enhance this program? How would implement these changes?  How does this program evaluation paper relate to social work policy, practice and research?