ENG 111

J_2028
Assignmentcomments1.docx

Assignment/paper comments

Remember, you get to revise this grade up. It is normal to receive a low grade on a first draft of a paper that requires citations, which is why you get to revise the paper, so do not panic. The new grade will totally replace the old one. Papers with citation errors, including errors on the Works Cited page, cannot be passed. The highest grade given for a paper with citation issues was a 60. Make sure to fix all citations in the body and to fix the Works Cited page first because the grade cannot go above a 60 if there are citation issues. Papers that do not meet minimum requirements in the syllabus, instructions, or in Canvas also cannot be accepted, graded, or passed. If a paper did not meet minimum requirements, did not have the required number of sources, or had major or significant citation issues, a grade of 25 or below was given, which should go up significantly when the paper is revised and/or meets the minimum requirements. Also, papers with 1st or 2nd person writing and/or perspective cannot be passed. If sources or quotes need to be taken out or replaced, they must be taken out and replaced. Remember, academic quotes and sources are required, so use the college databases for research, not regular web pages. Some issues and errors will be noted, but you have to go through the paper and revise it. For example, a comma splice or two will be noted, but you have to go through the rest of the paper and find and fix other comma splices. Lastly, please make sure to read and apply comments in the revision of the paper. The revision will be due on July 21st, which is a Sunday.

I am not sure what this is. You seem to have filled out the suggested outline, not written an argument paper.

I would like you to sign up for a little extra help at one of TCC's writing centers, learning success centers, and/or virtual tutoring services. This is not bad, nor is it a punishment, but I just want to make sure that you do well in the course. If I am not on campus, a writing center, a student success center, a learning success center, a librarian, or a tutor are the next best options. Again, this is not bad, but I want to make sure that you get the best grade out of the course and do well on all the assignments.

I will try to make some comments on writing, but the paper written was not even what was assigned. Please read and review the weekly modules and assigned chapters again. For future papers, please do the paper assigned. Credit cannot be given if what was assigned was not done. The paper should not have been accepted or graded.

Missing proper heading, page, numbers, and missing a Works Cited page, four academic sources and quotes required, proper format required, two full pages required, title required

-Paper was too short, incomplete, did not meet minimum requirements, was not formatted correctly, and/or did not follow instructions and/or guidelines for papers stated in the instructions and/or syllabus. Consult page 341 in the Simon and Schuster book for the proper format. The paper should not have been accepted or graded. Future papers with any of these issues will not be accepted or graded.

-Short papers cannot receive passing grades and are usually not accepted or graded. Paper must make the full page count. Cover pages and Works Cited pages do not count as pages. Papers may go over the page count, but they should never be short, even by a couple of lines. Extra wide spacing, extra wide spacing between paragraphs, and extra wide margins do not add length to a paper. Future short papers will not be accepted or graded.

-More of an exemplification, persuasion, or personal opinion paper than a narrative or argument paper. Narratives have characters that flesh out morals or lessons, shown through the actions of the characters and events in a story, not just statements or announcements of the author’s personal feelings, beliefs, or opinions. In argument, one has to quote and refute different and/or opposing arguments. In arguments, one cannot just list or describe arguments. A paper cannot just be about your own position or personal opinions and feelings. Exemplification papers are just about one position. In argument papers, you must address, quote, and refute different and/or opposing positions. Persuasion papers can use emotions and feelings, but argument papers do not. Personal opinion papers are not narratives or arguments, usually just state what one feels or believes, and do not really need support or explanation because people and their feelings are allowed to be illogical and irrational.

Title required

-Times New Roman font required for the whole paper

-12 point font required for the whole paper, including a Works Cited page

-the entire paper must be double-spaced…no extra wide spacing

I will no longer be reading papers without the correct heading after this paper.

-paper heading of name, instructor, class, and date should only be on the left-hand side of the first page (consult page 341 in the Simon and Schuster book), not on every page.

-last name and page number should be at the top, on the right-hand side of the page. Example: Baran 4 (consult page 341 in the Simon and Schuster book) (this information must be placed in a header, not typed in the paper)

-only one space should be used between the parts of the heading, the heading and title, and the title and the first paragraph (see page 341)

-No extra wide spaces between paragraphs. Open the paragraph tab and place a check in the box where it asks if you want an extra space between paragraphs of the same style

Papers should not have headings

No bold

No underlining

No first person

Do not write about people

Many can say that one of the main issues society faces is gun violence(comma) but with the help of mental health background checks, we(comma) as a country(comma) could lower the percentage of gun violence lead events.

-Leave people out of most papers. Papers are not about people. Papers are about subjects and topics. In papers, especially argument papers, do not announce that some people may argue, people debate, the opposition believes…just quote a critical argument or explanation about the topic. It is obvious that people will argue in argument papers. This does not have to be announced or explained. Just critically introduce a person and their credentials and quote the argument or explanation. Do not write about people.

-Do not begin sentences with people, some people, many people, other people, and do not announce what groups believe or say. Focus on the type of assignment, the topics, arguments, explanations, and the subjects, not on people, their feelings, and their personal beliefs. Also, do not guess or assume what people may or may not think or feel.

-As stated in the syllabus and instructions, no 1st or 2nd person writing is accepted in the course. No I, we, me, my, us, our, or you or your in academic papers (when you say 'I believe', 'I think', 'In my opinion’, ‘you should do this’, ‘you should do that’ or anything like that because it makes you sound like you are unsure and/or are apologizing for having your opinion, which, in turn, takes away from a writer's credibility. Also, when using the word ‘you,’ it sounds like one is trying to force the audience to do something or making it sound like the audience has all of the blame and responsibility. For example, only you can prevent forest fires. Just me? It almost sounds like I am the one to blame for all the other forest fires…Oh, the pressure. Lastly, the word ‘you’ makes it sound like you are attacking the audience. Also, the usage of I, the first person, takes away from the objectivity of an academic paper. Try to always write in the third person (he/she/it/they, and an occasional we). Lastly, since your name is on the paper, it would be a redundancy to place ‘I’ in a paper. Moreover, the paper is not about you. It is about the topic/subject. It is also a redundancy to make comments like “In my opinion”, “I believe”, “I think”, “In this paper…”, “My paper will show…” or “This paper will be about”. Never make announcements like this. They also make it seem like you are apologizing for having an opinion. Therefore, do not use I, we, me, us, our, my, you, or your in academic papers.

Unclear meaning, wording, and logic

Off topic

Do not announce

Mental health is critical, and it has become more common over the years.

-Do not announce or speak to the audience directly. Stay in 3rd person, stay in past tense, and be objective. Do not write in present tense. You should not be in the paper or be speaking directly to the audience in the paper. The voice of the author should not be heard in the paper. Papers should not sound or read like lectures. Do not add personal opinion or commentary into the paper. Also, not including enough specific detail and description can lead to a paper that has vague, unclear, general announcements without specific meanings. In a story, just say what the characters are doing, but do not put in personal opinion or feelings about the characters or topic. Also, do not announce what is happening. Just show the story. For instance, Jim liked doing things is not showing a story. Should be: Jim smiled while he reeled in a seven-pound trout. In an exemplification or argument paper, do not say: the reason is…, or this is because…, or one can agree/disagree because…In argument, do not just say you agree or disagree or just summarize what a quote said in a general statement. Argue, explain, and refute in critical detail, using critical explanation to talk about the information and ideas in the quotes. Do not just say, Dr. Susan Smith was correct or one agrees with her. Moreover, do not announce that information is important, crucial, essential, a good example, or that the paper contains data or research. In addition, do not refer to your own paper in the paper with statements saying ‘this quote means’ or ‘this essay is about,’ along with not announcing what a quote said after the quote. Lastly, do not just make a statement. For example, do not say: The death penalty is wrong. You have to explain, argue, or refute in specific detail, not just announce a view.

Unclear meaning, wording, and logic

No first person…no we

No personal opinions

Comma splice

We must focus on the mental status of citizens because they are the people that make this country,(period) people can become unpractical when their state of mind is unwell.

This was not an approved thesis statement.

Unclear logic and meaning…does not reduce suicides? Does not reduce school shootings?

Even though some may disagree, mental health background checks should be required when purchasing a gun because it does not violate privacy rights, reduce suicides, and reduce school shootings.

This was the approved thesis statement.

Even though some disagree, a mental health background check should be required when purchasing a gun because it does not violate privacy rights, reduces suicides, and reduces school shootings.

Why was the approved thesis statement not used? Use the approved thesis statement.

???

No, they are not

Capitalization error

Off topic

Comma splice

What does this mean?

Firstly, Background checks are universal(comma) but not required,(period) typical background checks investigate a person’s criminal history, financial status, driving record, and employment history.

-Grammar errors…I did not fix all of them.

Major common comma errors: Do not use commas where you think a pause should be or for an effect. Use the rules for commas.

If a dependent clause comes first and an independent clause comes second, place a comma between the two. If an independent clause comes first and a dependent clause comes second, do not use a comma between them. Also, use a comma after a transitional word, like I have in this sentence (after the word 'also'). Set proper names and titles off with commas; for example: My best friend, Lucy, likes cats. Dave, the mail carrier, was bit by a dog. The mail carrier, Dave, was bit by a dog. This is called an appositive. Lastly, remember, items in a series of three or more need to be separated by commas. For example: Steak, fries, peas, and carrots. If you do not put a comma between peas and carrots, then they will be mixed together.

Here is some grammar help:

An independent clause is a sentence that can stand by itself.

For example: The fans applauded the soccer player.

This sentence is complete. It has a subject (fans), a verb (applauded), and it is a complete idea, which means that it needs nothing else to make sense; we understand the meaning after we read it.

A dependent clause is, basically, half a sentence. A dependent clause can also called a fragment, which is any sentence that is missing a subject, verb, or complete idea.

For example: After he scored a goal. This half sentence is missing a complete idea. In other words, if someone came up to you and said this, you would probably ask, “so, after he scored a goal, he did what?” Did he go out for pizza? Did he jump for joy? Did he smile? We don’t know because the sentence is incomplete. Below is some information about how to place commas using independent and dependent clauses.

Remember, if an independent clause comes first and a dependent clause comes second, do not use a comma between the two clauses. For example:

Correct: The fans applauded the soccer player after he scored a goal.

Incorrect: The fans applauded the soccer player, after he scored a goal.

If a dependent clause comes first and an independent clause comes second, use a comma between the two clauses. For example:

Correct: After he scored a goal, the fans applauded the soccer player.

Incorrect: After he scored a goal the fans applauded the soccer player.

To connect two independent clauses, you can do many things. For instance:

Use a period, leaving both clauses independent of each other.

Ex:

Correct: The fans applauded the soccer player. He was very happy.

Incorrect: The fans applauded the soccer player he was very happy. (This is called a fused or run-on sentence.)

Use a comma and a conjunction. Conjunctions are For, And, Nor, But, Or, Yet, and So. You can remember them by using the acronym FANBOYS.

Ex:

Correct: The fans applauded the soccer player, and he was very happy.

Incorrect: The fans applauded the soccer player and he was very happy.

Incorrect: The fans applauded the soccer player, he was very happy. (This is called a comma splice; it is also the most common error in writing.)

Use a semi-colon if the ideas are closely related, the clauses are both independent, and the sentences are of the same length.

Ex:

Correct: The fans applauded the soccer player; he was very happy.

The idea of being applauded makes one happy, so a semi-colon would be okay to use.

Semi-colons should rarely be used.

Also, remember, use commas after transitions, words like also, additionally, in addition, moreover, furthermore, first, second, third, however, therefore, etc…etc. Moments in time also use commas after transitions. For example: yesterday, tomorrow, today, in 1999, at 4:30, etc…etc.

Here are some examples.

Correct: First, we will watch a movie.

Incorrect: First we will watch a movie

Correct: Today, we will have pizza.

Incorrect: Today we will have pizza.

Comma splice: A comma splice is putting a comma where a period should go. For example:

Incorrect comma splice: Ducks like water, they pick up food in the water.

To correct a comma splice, you can do three things: use a period, use a semicolon, or use a comma and a conjunction.

Correct: Ducks like water. They pick up food in the water.

Correct: Ducks like water; they pick up food in the water. (use a semicolon only when the two sentences are closely related)

Correct: Ducks like water, and they pick up food in the water.

Here is a quick and dirty rule that does not always apply, but is sometimes a clue to double-check to see if a comma is needed: if the first word of a sentence ends in 'ly', check it over carefully to see if it needs a comma.

hint: a comma usually goes before 'which', but not before 'that'

'which' usually signifies extra information and implies no restriction

"that' restricts a subject

hint: if a sentence begins with 'if', place a comma just before 'then'

correct: If Dave goes to college, then he will get a better job.

Correct: If Dave goes to college, he will get a better job.

Incorrect: If Dave goes to college then he will get a better job.

Incorrect: If Dave goes to college he will get a better job.

-semicolons come before the conjunctive adverb. For example (;however,) not (,however;) or (,however,). A semi-colon can also be placed between two separate sentences that are closely related. A semi-colon can be placed where a period could go, but it cannot be placed where a comma could go.

-an apostrophe s shows possession. For example: David's car drives well. America's war on drugs is being won. Apostrophes do not make something plural.

-fused sentences, commonly called run-on sentences, are sentences without punctuation. A run-on does not have to be a long sentence, but just one that has no punctuation. EX: Ducks like water and they swim well. This is a run-on sentence because there is supposed to be a comma between ‘water’ and ‘and’. Since there is no punctuation, it is a run-on.

Fragments are half sentences. EX: When Dave went to the store. After Katie went home. Dave to store. Went home. These are fragments; they cannot stand alone. What happened when Dave went to the store? What happened when Katie went home? One may fix a fragment by adding a subject, a verb, taking off the subordinate conjunction, or by completing an idea.

Run on

Deeper view?

Mental health background checks are no different(period or semicolon) they just take a deeper view into the state of mind of a person.

Why? Because you say so?

Do not announce

Make a critical argument

Mental background health checks do not go against citizens’ privacy rights.

Yes, obvious, so discuss them

Privacy rights are important to discuss when a person’s personal information is involved.

-Unclear perspective shifting. Your personal voice, feelings, and/or perspective should not in interrupt or be inserted into the paper. Do not write in first or second person and or switch to first or second person perspective. Start and stay in third person and past tense.

-Do not refer to your own paper in the paper, explain why the topic or points are important to write about, or announce how the paper will be written or organized.

So can any object.

Stop describing why you chose the topic.

However, firearms can cause potential harm when resulting from misuse(comma) which calls for a needed balanced approach.

No, it violates privacy rights

Who says? Are you making this up?

U8nclear logic, meaning, and wording

Requiring mental health background checks respects human privacy while ensuring the safety of those who might be harmful to themselves or others by identifying them.

Stop announcing

Next, the most captivating reason for mental health background checks is their potential to reduce suicide rates.

Obvious

Where, not in which

Who says? Are you making this up?

Unclear wording

Looks like missing words or grammar

Screening buyers for mental issues, mainly those who are at risk of suicidal ideation access to firearms can denied, saving many lives.

How do you know it would?

Administering mental health background checks could identify those with severe mental issues or violent behavior, which will prevent them from gaining access to firearms.

Stating a personal opinion, feeling, or belief is no critically arguing, explaining, or refuting

More specific detail needed. Do not write “Walmart has many things.” Name the things. Do not say “Walmart has clothing, food, and electronics.” This is not detailed enough. You should write “Walmart has Wrangler jeans, Tyson chicken nuggets, and Samsung 52 inch flat screen LED televisions. Description papers require specific details. Do not tell an audience that someone is happy. Show the audience that someone is happy by saying that the person is laughing like a wild polar bear, with a smile that would stretch from the North to the South pole, who infects people with humorous stories ranging from losing their first tooth at four years old to an apple as hard as granite to realizing how he/she forgot how old he/she was on their 50th birthday and had to be reminded that memory is the first sense to falter when one crosses over to the halfway point to the next century. Also, do not say amazing, do not say someone is stressed, that something is beautiful, awesome, or horrific…this is telling, not showing. No one can know what amazing looks like, what stress means, what beautiful looks like, how awesome something is, or how horrific something is, and no one can know who someone is or what something is. You have to show what these are, not just say what these are. Show the audience with specific details. Do not just tell the audience what is happening or being felt.

This is not description. This is telling, not showing. Specific details needed.

-No personal opinion, feeling, assumption, speculation, hope, commentary, or belief in academic papers. Use logic, details, examples, rational, explanation, argument, refutation to make points. Do not give personal advice, tell people what to do, tell people how to live, or announce what you personally find important. Also, remember, do not state personal opinion as factual information. Lastly, do not insert personal opinion in the paper. The audience should not hear the author’s voice in a paper. Stating a personal opinion is also not an explanation, argument, or refutation. Why an opinion is held should be the focus in an explanation, argument, or refutation, not just that a person has an opinion. Do not frame personal opinion as factual information.

???

How?

For a gun purchase?

What does this mean?

Unclear meaning, logic, and point

Many disagree with mental health background checks because they could condemn those seeking treatment for mental health issues.

What does this mean?

Empty sentence without details, argument, or explanation

-One cannot use one vague term to define another. For example: happiness is being glad, glad is having joy, joy is feeling great, great is feeling good, good is enjoyment, enjoyment is being happy. Vague, fuzzy words do not define or describe, and they lead to circular logic.

-One cannot use vague words to describe. Feeling excited, something being amazing, Dave looked happy, and Susan was sad are not descriptions. They do not let the audience see, hear, small, taste, or feel, as in touch. Show the audience. Do not just tell the audience what is happening. Feel excited should be: After winning the lottery, the family was jumping, crying, and laughing like a child who received an Optimus Prime Transformer on Christmas morning. Something looking amazing should be: At 5:37 am, on Sunday morning in the middle of July, the sun broke over Mount Herman like wild Mustang horses racing over the plains of Kansas. Dave looked happy should be: Dave smiled and laughed like King Leonidas of Sparta when he received a promotion to full partner at the law firm of Smith, Jones, and Thomas. For Susan being sad: Susan, after failing here college algebra test with a grade of 48, knew she would have to give up on her career choice of Ocean Biologist because math is necessary for cataloging the migrating patterns of vampire squid, great white sharks, and blue whales. Show the audience…do not just tell the audience. No vague words. If one cannot see it, hear it, smell it, taste it, or touch and feel it, it is not description.

Empty sentence: Sentences that do not add new information are very general. For example, humans need water to survive. We already know this, and it does not add anything to the content of the paper. Also, another example would be summarizing a story, almost word for word, when your instructor has also read the story. If you read the story, and I have already read the story, then there is no need to include much summary. Basically, get right into the critical stuff and leave out most of the summary stuff, especially in short papers. Empty sentences can also be sentences that cancel themselves out. EX: Chess is sometimes considered a sport and sometimes not considered a sport. Lastly, empty sentences just repeat the same idea. EX: Walmart has many things. Walmart has a lot of stuff. Each sentence should be filled with information and specific detail. Sentences that do not are called deadwood or empty sentences. Some college instructors and students also use the terms 'filler' or 'fluff'. Empty sentences also tell us what we already know in general, so defining abortion or capital punishment is unnecessary for a college educated audience. Another example might be that most people think it would be nice to be rich, so there is no reason to state that it would be nice; it is a given assumption. Two more examples are: people like to do different things. Or Wal-Mart has much stuff. The words ‘things’ and ‘stuff’ are clear indicators that you have an empty sentence. Basically, do not write about the obvious. Leave empty sentences out of papers.

Source not listed on a Works Cited page

Missing intext citation

The National Rifle Association states, “Mental health screenings for gun purchases could infringe on individuals’ privacy rights and stigmatize those seeking mental health treatment.”

Improper and/or missing MLA Documentation

Below is some information about proper MLA Citation:

-For MLA citations, you have to create a Works Cited page at the end of the paper that has the complete citation list. In the body of the paper, you have to critically introduce a quote, put quotation marks around it, and use an in-text citation, which is placed at the end of the sentence and looks like this (Smith 42) or (American Cancer 42). Smith would be the author's name, and 42 would be the page number. American Cancer, being The American Cancer Society, would be the online source's name, and again, 42 would be the page number the quote or information was taken from. If I see (Smith 42) in the body of the paper, then that will refer me to the Works Cited page, at the end of the paper, where the full citation is written out. Here is an example of a proper quote and an in-text citation in the body of a paper: According to Douglass Adams, author of The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy, “the answer to the ultimate question is 42” (166). You could also write: “The answer to the ultimate question is 42,” according to Douglass Adams, author of The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy (166). Both are acceptable and correct. However, if you do not introduce your source, you must place the author’s last name and the page number or paragraph number in the in-text citation. For instance: According to the author of The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy, “The answer to the ultimate question is 42” (Adams 166). I would prefer the former to the latter. One must always preface a quote or tell where it came from, put quotation marks around what is quoted, and then place the author's last name and page number in brackets with a period at the end. The only difference when paraphrasing is that you do not use the quotation marks, but you must still introduce the quote and use an in-text citation. Do not do this (Smith, 42). Do not place a comma in the in-text citation. Lastly, if there is no author, use the first word or two of the citation on the Works Cited page to create an in-text citation. Look at the left-hand side of the screen or page when looking at your Works Cited page. The author’s last name or the title of the source should be there. Use the author’s last name and page or paragraph number: example (Smith 42) or (Smith p.4). For a source with no author that begins with a title, say the American Heart Association, use the first word or two of the title ( American 42) or (“American” p.4). If the title is in quotation marks or italics on the Works Cited page, carry them over to the in-text citation. One should be able to see an in-text citation and easily scan the left side of a Works Cited page to see which source is being quoted. All quotes in the body should have a corresponding full citation on the Works Cited page. All full citations on a Works Cited page should have a corresponding critical introduction, quote in quotation marks, and in-text citation in the body of a paper. (Remember, there is no paraphrasing or summary allowed in the course…only direct quotation is accepted)

-begin and end paragraphs with your words since it is your paper. Do not begin or end paragraphs with quotation or sentences that contain quotation. Begin and end paragraphs with your own words, only use a quoted sentence or two in the middle of a paragraph, and then say something in your own words about your quotation. You can agree with, disagree with, add to, subtract from, or interpret the quotation.

Say something in your own words about your quotation. You can agree with, disagree with, add to, subtract from, or interpret the quotation. Do not simply move on or into another quote. A quote is not just another sentence in a paper. In an argument appear, you have to agree or disagree with what a quote said and go into critical detail and explanation about why the information in a quote is logical or illogical. Do not just repeat what the quote said.

Whenever you quote someone, always try to say something critical in your own words about the quote. You should always try to interpret, explain, add to, subtract from, agree with, disagree with, point out faulty logic, or show the reasoning behind a quote. Try not to link too many quotes together. Use quotation for support, but do not let it write or dominate parts of your paper. Always place a critical comment after a quote. Say something about the information in the quote. Do not just go right into another quote or idea. Do not just repeat what the quote said.

-always say something about a quotation before moving on to a different topic, subject, or other quote. Always make critical comment on a quote. Never leave a quotation hanging, and never expect the quote to speak for itself.

-when quoting, always introduce a quote, use quotation marks around the quoted words, and place an in-text citation at the end of the sentence. This must be done in order to protect yourself from accidental plagiarism due to improper citation.

-do not quote in introductions or conclusions. The introduction should be setting up the thesis and giving any background information needed and the conclusion is wrapping the paper up and making a final point, so there is no need for quotation in the introduction or conclusion. Save quotes for the body of a paper. The body is where the explanation takes place, so that is where the quotes should be placed.

-Quoting out of context and/or off topic. Research and quotes have to be about specific information relevant to the thesis and topic. You cannot make a quote fit a paper. For example, you cannot have a quote about abuse in general if your thesis and topic are about spanking. You cannot assume that spanking is abuse or assume that a quote about abuse is talking about spanking. You have to have a specific quote about spanking if that is what your topic and thesis are about. In addition, using a background or historical quote is not a substitute for a critical argument or explanation quote. Lastly, for instance, when writing about illegal immigration, you cannot use quotes about regular, legal immigration. You would have to find quotes specifically about illegal immigration or illegal immigrants. Finally, just quoting numbers and statistics is not arguing or explaining a position. For example, saying that 700000 happen in the U.S. each year does not argue for or against abortion. Quotes must be specific to the type of paper, topic, and thesis.

The paper had major and significant citation issues. Quotes did not match up to the sources listed on the Works Cited page, the sources of the quotes were not listed on the WC page, and/or the sources on the WC page do not seem to be quoted in the paper. If a source is on the WC page, it must be quoted in the body. If a sentence is quoted in the body, the source must be listed and included on the Works Cited page.

-Paper suddenly stops and ends without a conclusion, moral, lesson, or point for the audience.

-Paper has no conclusion and just stops