Collaboration
Assignment 3 Rubric
Assignment 3: Reaching a Common Goal Through Collaboration
Levels of Achievement
Criteria Unacceptable Needs Improvement
Satisfactory Competent Exemplary
COM200-A3-1 1. Provide clear and comprehensive documentation of the common measurable goal the team has completed.
0.00 %
Does not provide documentation of the common measurable goal completed.
65.00 %
Provides incomplete or unclear documentation of the common measurable goal the team has completed.
75.00 %
Provides partial documentation of the common measurable goal the team has completed.
85.00 %
Provides documentation of the common measurable goal the team has completed.
100.00 %
Provides clear and comprehensive documentation of the common measurable goal the team has completed.
COM200-A3-2 2. Describe team process, including each person’s role and responsibilities and how these were established.
0.00 %
Does not describe team process.
65.00 %
Describes team process in general terms without providing specifics.
75.00 %
Describes team process, but does not include each person’s role and responsibilities.
85.00 %
Describes team process, including each person’s role and responsibilities
100.00 %
Fully describes team process, including each person’s role and responsibilities and how these were established.
COM200-A3-3 3. Identify collaborative tools (or potential tools used and explain how they supported (or would support) work towards a common goal, with specific examples.
0.00 %
Does not identify any collaborative tools.
65.00 %
Identifies collaborative tools used (or potential tools that could be used).
75.00 %
Identifies collaborative tools (or potential tools that could be used and partially explains how they supported (or would support) work towards a common goal.
85.00 %
Identifies collaborative tools (or potential tools used and explains how they supported (or would support) work towards a common goal.
100.00 %
Identifies collaborative tools (or potential tools used and explains how they supported (or would support) work towards a common goal. Includes specific examples.
Name
Description
Rubric Detail
Weight 10.00%
Weight 20.00%
Weight 20.00%
1 of 2
Levels of Achievement
Criteria Unacceptable Needs Improvement
Satisfactory Competent Exemplary
COM200-A3-4 4. Describe 2–3 effective collaborative approaches and how they were used by the group to accomplish the team’s goal, including concrete examples.
0.00 %
Does not describe collaborative approaches or describes ineffective approaches used.
65.00 %
Describes collaborative approaches used, but does not describe how they were used to accomplish the team’s goal.
75.00 %
Describes 1–2 effective collaborative approaches and how they were used by the group to accomplish the team’s goal.
85.00 %
Describes 2–3 effective collaborative approaches and how they were used by the group to accomplish the team’s goal. Provides concrete examples of only one of these approaches.
100.00 %
Describes 2–3 effective collaborative approaches and how they were used by the group to accomplish the team’s goal. Provides concrete examples of these approaches.
COM200-A3-5 5. Describe challenges and opportunities for improvement in collaborative teamwork, including specific examples.
0.00 %
Does not describe challenges or opportunities for improvement in collaborative teamwork.
65.00 %
Describes challenges or opportunities to improve collaborative teamwork.
75.00 %
Describes challenges and opportunities to improve collaborative teamwork.
85.00 %
Describes challenges and opportunities to improve collaborative teamwork. Provides specific examples of either challenges or opportunities.
100.00 %
Describes challenges and opportunities for improvement in collaborative teamwork. Provides specific examples of each.
6. The submission was clean, clear, and easy to read.
0.00 %
Did not submit an assignment.
65.00 %
Submission had major spelling/grammar issues in 50% of the assignment.
75.00 %
Submission had major spelling/grammar issues in 25% of the submission.
85.00 %
Submission had no major spelling/grammar issues, but minor issues throughout the assignment.
100.00 %
Submission was clean, clear, and easy to read.
Weight 25.00%
Weight 20.00%
Weight 5.00%
2 of 2