ASSIGNMENT 3-1

1 Unsatisfactory 0.00%

2 Less than Satisfactory 74.00%

3 Satisfactory 79.00%

4 Good 87.00%

5 Excellent 100.00%

70.0 %Content

15.0 %Describe how social responsibility and public interest intersect.

Description of how social responsibility and public interest intersect is missing.

Description of how social responsibility and public interest intersect is vague and inconsistent.

Description of how social responsibility and public interest intersect is present and complete.

Description of how social responsibility and public interest intersect is complete and clear.

Description of how social responsibility and public interest intersect is clear, concise, and makes connections to current research.

15.0 %Analyze the responsibility to stakeholders from an ethical standpoint. Include how a code of ethics or oath of office for the position informs ethical responsibilities.

Analysis of the responsibility to stakeholders from an ethical standpoint. Include how a code of ethics or oath of office for the position informs ethical responsibilities is missing.

Analysis of the responsibility to stakeholders from an ethical standpoint. Include how a code of ethics or oath of office for the position informs ethical responsibilities is vague and inconsistent.

Analysis of the responsibility to stakeholders from an ethical standpoint. Include how a code of ethics or oath of office for the position informs ethical responsibilities is present and complete.

Analysis of the responsibility to stakeholders from an ethical standpoint. Include how a code of ethics or oath of office for the position informs ethical responsibilities is complete and clear.

Analysis of the responsibility to stakeholders from an ethical standpoint. Include how a code of ethics or oath of office for the position informs ethical responsibilities is clear, concise, and makes connections to current research.

15.0 %Describe how you will make the decisions necessary to ethically execute your position as a public administrative role chosen.

Description of how you will make the decisions necessary to ethically execute your position as a public administrative role chosen is missing.

Description of how you will make the decisions necessary to ethically execute your position as a public administrative role chosen is vague and inconsistent.

Description of how you will make the decisions necessary to ethically execute your position as a public administrative role chosen is present and complete.

Description of how you will make the decisions necessary to ethically execute your position as a public administrative role chosen is complete and clear.

Description of how you will make the decisions necessary to ethically execute your position as a public administrative role chosen is clear, concise, and makes connections to current research.

10.0 %Create a suggested code of ethics or add to an existing code of ethics for the administrative role chosen.

Creation of a suggested code of ethics or add to an existing code of ethics for the administrative role chosen is missing.

Creation of a suggested code of ethics or add to an existing code of ethics for the administrative role chosen is vague and inconsistent.

Creation of a suggested code of ethics or add to an existing code of ethics for the administrative role chosen is present and complete.

Creation of a suggested code of ethics or add to an existing code of ethics for the administrative role chosen is complete and clear.

Creation of a suggested code of ethics or add to an existing code of ethics for the administrative role chosen is clear, concise, and makes connections to current research.

15.0 %Explain why it is essential for you, in this role, to conduct yourself in a legal and ethical manner, including how failure to conduct yourself in an ethical manner affects various stakeholders. (Comp 1.1)

Explanation of why it is essential for the student, in this role, to conduct yourself in a legal and ethical manner; including how failure to conduct self in an ethical manner affects various stakeholders is missing.

Explanation of why it is essential for the student, in this role, to conduct yourself in a legal and ethical manner; including how failure to conduct self in an ethical manner affects various stakeholders is vague and inconsistent.

Explanation of why it is essential for the student, in this role, to conduct yourself in a legal and ethical manner; including how failure to conduct self in an ethical manner affects various stakeholders is present and complete.

Explanation of why it is essential for the student, in this role, to conduct yourself in a legal and ethical manner; including how failure to conduct self in an ethical manner affects various stakeholders is complete and clear.

Explanation of why it is essential for the student, in this role, to conduct yourself in a legal and ethical manner; including how failure to conduct self in an ethical manner affects various stakeholders is clear, concise, and makes connections to current research.

20.0 %Organization and Effectiveness

7.0 %Thesis Development and Purpose

Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.

Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not clear.

Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose.

Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.

Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.

8.0 %Argument Logic and Construction

Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources.

Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility.

Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis.

Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative.

Clear and convincing argument that presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.

5.0 %Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)

Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used.

Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied.

Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed.

Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech.

Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.

10.0 %Format

5.0 %Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)

Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly.

Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent.

Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present.

Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style.

All format elements are correct.

5.0 %Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style)

Sources are not documented.

Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.

Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present.

Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct.

Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.

100 %Total Weightage