Week 3 Discussion post and Assignment

Jlm1128
Assignment3Rubric.pdf

7/10/22, 4:52 PMRubric Detail – Blackboard Learn

Page 1 of 4https://class.waldenu.edu/webapps/bbgs-deep-links-BBLEARN/app/course/rubric?course_id=_16983265_1&rubric_id=_3174062_1

Rubric Detail Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric's layout.

Excellent Good Fair Poor

Using the Week 3 Part 3, section of your Academic Success and Professional Development Plan Template complete Step 1. Conduct an analysis of the elements of the research article you identi!ed. Be sure to include the following:

· The topic of interest you have selected.

· Correctly formatted APA citation of the article you selected, along with link or search details.

· Identify one or more professional practice uses of the theories/concepts presented in the article.

23 (23%) - 25 (25%) The response clearly identi!es the topic of interest selected.

The response accurately and completely provides a citation of the article selected, including an accurate and complete link or thorough search details.

The response clearly identi!es and describes in detail a professional practice use of the theories/concepts presented in the article.

20 (20%) - 22 (22%) The response partially identi!es the topic of interest selected.

The response provides a partial citation of the article selected, including a partial link or search details.

The response partially identi!es and describes a professional practice use of the theories/concepts presented in the article.

18 (18%) - 19 (19%) The response vaguely identi!es the topic of interest selected.

The response vaguely or inaccurately provides a citation of the article selected, including vague or inaccurate search details.

The response vaguely or inaccurately identi!es and describes a professional practice use of the theories/concepts presented in the article.

0 (0%) - 17 (17%) The response vaguely and inaccurately identi!es the topic of interest selected or is missing.

The response vaguely and inaccurately provides a citation of the article selected, including vague and inaccurate search details, or is missing.

The response vaguely and inaccurately identi!es and describes a professional practice use of the theories/concepts presented in the article or is missing.

Name: NURS_6002_Week_3_Assignment_Rubric EXIT

Grid View List View

7/10/22, 4:52 PMRubric Detail – Blackboard Learn

Page 2 of 4https://class.waldenu.edu/webapps/bbgs-deep-links-BBLEARN/app/course/rubric?course_id=_16983265_1&rubric_id=_3174062_1

Analysis of the article using the Research Analysis Matrix section of the template for:

Strengths of the Research Limitations of the Research Relevancy to the Topic of Interest.

· Write a one- paragraph justi!cation explaining whether or not you would recommend the use of this article to inform professional practice.

18 (18%) - 20 (20%) The response clearly and accurately provides a detailed analysis of the article using the Research Analysis Matrix section of the template.

The response clearly and accurately explains in detail the justi!cation of whether to recommend the use of the article to inform professional practice.

16 (16%) - 17 (17%) The response provides a partial analysis of the article using the Research Analysis Matrix section of the template.

The response partially explains the justi!cation of whether or not to recommend the use of the article to inform professional practice.

14 (14%) - 15 (15%) The response provides a vague or inaccurate analysis of the article using the Research Analysis Matrix section of the template.

The response vaguely or inaccurately explains the justi!cation of whether or not to recommend the use of the article to inform professional practice.

0 (0%) - 13 (13%) The response provides a vague and inaccurate analysis of the article using the Research Analysis Matrix section of the template or is missing.

The response vaguely and inaccurately explains the justi!cation of whether or not to recommend the use of the article to inform professional practice or is missing.

Part 3, Step 2: Write a 2-3 paragraph summary that you will add to your Academic Success and Professional Development Plan that includes the following:

· Describe your approach to identifying and analyzing peer- reviewed research

· Identify at least two strategies that you would use that you found to be e"ective in !nding peer-

41 (41%) - 45 (45%) The response clearly and accurately describes in detail the approach to identifying and analyzing peer- reviewed research. The response clearly identi!es and accurately describes in detail at least two strategies used to be e"ective in !nding peer- reviewed research.

The response clearly identi!es and accurately

36 (36%) - 40 (40%) The response partially describes the approach to identifying and analyzing peer- reviewed research. The response partially identi!es and describes at least two strategies used to be e"ective in !nding peer- reviewed research.

The response partially identi!es and describes in detail at least one resource you intend to use in

32 (32%) - 35 (35%) The response vaguely or inaccurately describes the approach to identifying and analyzing peer- reviewed research. The response vaguely or inaccurately identi!es and describes at least two strategies used to be e"ective in !nding peer- reviewed research.

The response vaguely or inaccurately identi!es

0 (0%) - 31 (31%) The response vaguely and inaccurately describes the approach to identifying and analyzing peer- reviewed research or is missing. The response vaguely and inaccurately identi!es and describes at least two strategies used to be e"ective in !nding peer- reviewed research or is missing.

The response vaguely or

7/10/22, 4:52 PMRubric Detail – Blackboard Learn

Page 3 of 4https://class.waldenu.edu/webapps/bbgs-deep-links-BBLEARN/app/course/rubric?course_id=_16983265_1&rubric_id=_3174062_1

reviewed research.

· Identify at least one resource you intend to use in the future to !nd peer-reviewed research.

describes in detail at least one resource you intend to use in the future to !nd peer-reviewed research.

the future to !nd peer-reviewed research.

describes in detail at least one resource you intend to use in the future to !nd peer-reviewed research.

inaccurately identi!es describes in detail or is missing at least one resource you intend to use in the future to !nd peer-reviewed research.

Written Expression and Formatting - Paragraph Development and Organization:

Paragraphs make clear points that support well developed ideas, #ow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused--neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. which delineates all required criteria.

5 (5%) - 5 (5%) Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for #ow, continuity, and clarity.

4 (4%) - 4 (4%) Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for #ow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time.

3 (3%) - 3 (3%) Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for #ow, continuity, and clarity 60%- 79% of the time.

0 (0%) - 2 (2%) Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for #ow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time.

Written Expression and Formatting - English writing standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation

5 (5%) - 5 (5%) Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.

4 (4%) - 4 (4%) Contains a few (1- 2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

3 (3%) - 3 (3%) Contains several (3-4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

0 (0%) - 2 (2%) Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding.

Total Points: 100

Name: NURS_6002_Week_3_Assignment_Rubric

7/10/22, 4:52 PMRubric Detail – Blackboard Learn

Page 4 of 4https://class.waldenu.edu/webapps/bbgs-deep-links-BBLEARN/app/course/rubric?course_id=_16983265_1&rubric_id=_3174062_1

EXIT