Personal Reflection Paragraph
|
Assignment 1: Personal Reflection on Project |
Name: |
Grade: |
/100 |
|||||
|
Comments: |
F: 0-49 P: 50-64 C: 65-74 D: 75-84 HD: 85+ |
|||||||
|
|
Content: |
/75 |
|
Language: |
/20 |
|
Formatting & submitting: |
/5 |
|
HD |
Reflection is personal and thoughtful. Student describes in detail highly relevant personal experiences with issues in developing countries, community development, design or teamwork. Student identifies relevant acquired knowledge, strengths and skills. Student provides a clear and succinct explanation of the usefulness of the acquired knowledge, strengths and skills, in relation to the EWB Challenge Project. |
75 73 71 69 67 65 |
Writing is easy to understand and flows smoothly in clear, well-structured sentences. Writing style is formal, concise and articulate. No or very minor errors in spelling, punctuation, and grammar. |
20 19 18 17 |
Document layout follows all submission and formatting instructions with no or very few errors. |
5
4.5 |
||
|
D |
|
63 61 59 57 |
|
16 15 |
|
4 |
||
|
C
|
Reflection is personal, and is somewhat thoughtful but may lack depth. Student describes relevant personal experiences with issues in developing countries, community development, design or teamwork, but some/much clarity or detail is missing. Acquired knowledge, strengths and skills identified are somewhat/not relevant. Usefulness to the EWB project is somewhat/not clear. |
55 53 51 49 |
Writing is occasionally disjointed but overall meaning is apparent. Writing style is mostly/ sometimes formal and concise. Some errors in spelling, punctuation, and grammar, but sentences can be understood. |
14 13 |
Document follows most/some submission and formatting instructions. |
3.5
|
||
|
P |
|
47 45 43 41 39 |
|
12 11 10 |
|
3.0
2.5 |
||
|
F |
Reflection is not personal. No relevant experiences identified or described, or inadequate detail. No resulting knowledge, strengths and skills identified. No indication of relevance to the EWB Challenge Project. |
37 32 27 22 17 12 5 2 0
|
Writing is difficult to understand and/or key ideas are not logically presented. Writing style is unacceptably or excessively longwinded or informal. Multiple errors with spelling, punctuation and grammar, making comprehension difficult. |
9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 0 |
No or very few submission and formatting instructions followed. |
2 1 0 |
Further comments: