Risk Comparison

csledge88
assign1_rubric.pdf

7/24/2018 Untitled Document

https://blackboard.strayer.edu/bbcswebdav/institution/MKT/515/1178/Week4/Week%204%20Assignment%201%20Grading%20Rubric.html 1/3

Grading for this assignment will be based on answer quality, logic/organization of the paper, and language and writing skills, using the following rubric.

Points: 240 Assignment 1: Risk Comparison

Criteria Unacceptable Below 70% F Fair

70-79% C Proficient

80-89% B Exemplary

90-100% A

1. Provide a brief (one [1] paragraph) description of the organization you have selected for this project. Present the main drivers supporting the decision to expand internationally. Select your expansion strategy (Export, International, Multinational, or Global) and explain this decision.

Weight: 15%

Did not submit or incompletely provided a brief (one [1] paragraph) description of the organization you have selected for this project. Did not submit or incompletely presented the main drivers supporting the decision to expand internationally. Did not submit or incompletely selected your expansion strategy (Export, International, Multinational, or Global) and explained this decision.

Partially provided a brief (one [1] paragraph) description of the organization you have selected for this project. Partially presented the main drivers supporting the decision to expand internationally. Partially selected your expansion strategy (Export, International, Multinational, or Global) and explained this decision.

Satisfactorily provided a brief (one [1] paragraph) description of the organization you have selected for this project. Satisfactorily presented the main drivers supporting the decision to expand internationally. Satisfactorily selected your expansion strategy (Export, International, Multinational, or Global) and explained this decision.

Thoroughly provided a brief (one [1] paragraph) description of the organization you have selected for this project. Thoroughly presented the main drivers supporting the decision to expand internationally. Thoroughly selected your expansion strategy (Export, International, Multinational, or Global) and explained this decision.

2. Provide a brief description of the higher-ranking country you have selected for this project. Next, analyze the various rankings (provided by the World Bank or CIA World Factbook sites) and discuss the strengths, weaknesses, and key benefits of this selection. You will

Did not submit or incompletely provided a brief description of the higher-ranking country you have selected for this project. Did not submit or incompletely analyzed the various rankings (provided by the World Bank or CIA World Factbook sites) and discussed

Partially provided a brief description of the higher-ranking country you have selected for this project. Partially analyzed the various rankings (provided by the World Bank or CIA World Factbook sites) and discussed the strengths,

Satisfactorily provided a brief description of the higher-ranking country you have selected for this project. Satisfactorily analyzed the various rankings (provided by the World Bank or CIA World Factbook sites) and discussed the strengths,

Thoroughly provided a brief description of the higher-ranking country you have selected for this project. Thoroughly analyzed the various rankings (provided by the World Bank or CIA World Factbook sites) and discussed the

7/24/2018 Untitled Document

https://blackboard.strayer.edu/bbcswebdav/institution/MKT/515/1178/Week4/Week%204%20Assignment%201%20Grading%20Rubric.html 2/3

then examine this country's major existing trade agreements and predict whether they will assist or deter your venture.

Weight: 20%

the strengths, weaknesses, and key benefits of this selection. Did not submit or incompletely examined this country's major existing trade agreements and predicted whether they will assist or deter your venture.

weaknesses, and key benefits of this selection. Partially examined this country's major existing trade agreements and predicted whether they will assist or deter your venture.

weaknesses, and key benefits of this selection. Satisfactorily examined this country's major existing trade agreements and predicted whether they will assist or deter your venture.

strengths, weaknesses, and key benefits of this selection. Thoroughly examined this country's major existing trade agreements and predicted whether they will assist or deter your venture.

3. Provide a brief description about the lower ranking country you have selected for this project. Next, analyze the various rankings (using the same websites as stated above) and discuss the strengths, weaknesses, and key benefits of this selection. You will then examine this country's major existing trade agreements and predict whether they will assist or deter your venture.

Weight: 20%

Did not submit or incompletely provided a brief description about the lower ranking country you have selected for this project. Did not submit or incompletely analyzed the various rankings (using the same websites as stated above) and discuss the strengths, weaknesses, and key benefits of this selection. Did not submit or incompletely examined this country's major existing trade agreements and predict whether they will assist or deter your venture.

Partially provided a brief description about the lower ranking country you have selected for this project. Partially analyzed the various rankings (using the same websites as stated above) and discuss the strengths, weaknesses, and key benefits of this selection. Partially examined this country's major existing trade agreements and predict whether they will assist or deter your venture.

Satisfactorily provided a brief description about the lower ranking country you have selected for this project. Satisfactorily analyzed the various rankings (using the same websites as stated above) and discuss the strengths, weaknesses, and key benefits of this selection. Satisfactorily examined this country's major existing trade agreements and predict whether they will assist or deter your venture.

Thoroughly provided a brief description about the lower ranking country you have selected for this project. Thoroughly analyzed the various rankings (using the same websites as stated above) and discuss the strengths, weaknesses, and key benefits of this selection. Thoroughly examined this country's major existing trade agreements and predict whether they will assist or deter your venture.

4. Based on your research of comparative advantage, present the primary risks (economic, political, cultural, language, etc.) associated with expanding into the lower-ranking

Did not submit or incompletely presented the primary risks (economic, political, cultural, language, etc.) associated with expanding into the lower-ranking country versus the

Partially presented the primary risks (economic, political, cultural, language, etc.) associated with expanding into the lower-ranking country versus

Satisfactorily presented the primary risks (economic, political, cultural, language, etc.) associated with expanding into the lower-ranking country versus the higher-ranking

Thoroughly presented the primary risks (economic, political, cultural, language, etc.) associated with expanding into the lower-ranking country versus

7/24/2018 Untitled Document

https://blackboard.strayer.edu/bbcswebdav/institution/MKT/515/1178/Week4/Week%204%20Assignment%201%20Grading%20Rubric.html 3/3

country versus the higher-ranking country. Next, provide the competitive advantages (economic, political, cultural, language, etc.) associated with expanding into the lower-ranking country versus the higher-ranking country.

Weight: 15%

higher-ranking country. Did not submit or incompletely provided the competitive advantages (economic, political, cultural, language, etc.) associated with expanding into the lower-ranking country versus the higher-ranking country.

the higher- ranking country. Partially provided the competitive advantages (economic, political, cultural, language, etc.) associated with expanding into the lower-ranking country versus the higher- ranking country.

country. Satisfactorily provided the competitive advantages (economic, political, cultural, language, etc.) associated with expanding into the lower-ranking country versus the higher-ranking country.

the higher- ranking country. Thoroughly provided the competitive advantages (economic, political, cultural, language, etc.) associated with expanding into the lower-ranking country versus the higher- ranking country.

5. Based on this comparative advantage study, suggest which country is the better choice and provide a rationale for your selection. Next, state which key factors you can identify to support your decision.

Weight: 15%

Did not submit or incompletely suggested which country is the better choice and provided a rationale for your selection. Did not submit or incompletely stated which key factors you can identify to support your decision.

Partially suggested which country is the better choice and provided a rationale for your selection. Partially stated which key factors you can identify to support your decision.

Satisfactorily suggested which country is the better choice and provided a rationale for your selection. Satisfactorily stated which key factors you can identify to support your decision.

Thoroughly suggested which country is the better choice and provided a rationale for your selection. Thoroughly stated which key factors you can identify to support your decision.

6. Use at least three (3) quality references.

Weight: 5%

No references provided.

Does not meet the required number of references; some or all references are poor-quality choices.

Meets number of required references; all references are high-quality choices.

Exceeds number of required references; all references are high-quality choices.

7. Clarity, writing mechanics, and formatting requirements

Weight: 10%

More than 6 errors present.

5-6 errors present.

3-4 errors present. 0-2 errors present.