assigpharma

cusoss
AssigM3W4PHAR.docx
Home>Nursing homework help>assigpharma

DC is a 46-year-old female who presents with a 24-hour history of RUQ pain.  She states the pain started about 1 hour after a large dinner she had with her family.  She has had nausea and on instance of vomiting before presentation.

PMH:                                                              Vitals: 

HTN                                                                Temp:              98.8oF

Type II DM                                                     Wt:                  202 lbs

Gout                                                                Ht:                   5’8”

DVT – Caused by oral BCPs                          BP:                  136/82

                                                                        HR:                 82 bpm

Current Medications:                                Notable Labs:

Lisinopril 10 mg daily                                   WBC:                          13,000/mm3

HCTZ 25 mg daily                                        Total bilirubin:           0.8 mg/dL

Allopurinol 100 mg daily                               Direct bilirubin:          0.6 mg/dL

Multivitamin daily                                          Alk Phos:                    100 U/L

                                                                     AST:                           45 U/L

                                                                      ALT:                           30 U/L

Allergies:

· Latex

· Codeine

· Amoxicillin

PE:

· Eyes: EOMI

· HENT: Normal

· GI:bNondistended, minimal tenderness

· Skin:bWarm and dry

· Neuro: Alert and Oriented

· Psych:bAppropriate mood

Write a 1-page paper that addresses the following: + title, + introduction, + conclusion, and references pages)

· Explain your diagnosis for the patient, including your rationale for the diagnosis.

· Describe an appropriate drug therapy plan based on the patient’s history, diagnosis, and drugs currently prescribed.

· Justify why you would recommend this drug therapy plan for this patient. Be specific and provide examples.

· Develop the work, putting each question with its answer individually, Not explain altogether.

· using formal APA writing convention, using the 7th Edition

· References at least 4 and not more than 5 years ago

· Medication: generic name (brand name) ..acetaminophen (Tylenol)

· Plagiarism document…. Thank you

Resources:

Rosenthal, L. D., & Burchum, J. R. (2021). Lehne’s pharmacotherapeutics for advanced practice nurses and physician assistants (2nd ed.) St. Louis, MO: Elsevier.

· Chapter 64, “Drugs for Peptic Ulcer Disease” (pp. 589–597)

· Chapter 65, “Laxatives” (pp. 598–604)

· Chapter 66, “Other Gastrointestinal Drugs” (pp. 605–616)

· Chapter 80, “Antiviral Agents I: Drugs for Non-HIV Viral Infections” (pp. 723–743)

Chalasani, N., Younossi, Z., Lavine, J. E., Charlton, M., Cusi, K., Rinella, M., . . . Sanya, A. J. (2018). The diagnosis and management of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: Practice guidance from the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases. Hepatology, 67(1), 328–357. Retrieved from https://aasldpubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/hep.29367

 

This article details the diagnosis and management of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Review this article to gain an understanding of the underlying pathophysiology as well as the suggested pharmacotherapeutics that might be recommended to treat this disorder.

Explain your diagnosis for the patient, including your rationale for the diagnosis.

23 (23%) - 25 (25%)

The response accurately and clearly explains in detail the diagnosis for the patient, including an accurate and thorough rationale for the diagnosis that supports clinical judgment.

20 (20%) - 22 (22%)

The response provides a basic explanation of 1-2 diagnoses for the patient, including an accurate rationale for the diagnosis that may support clinical judgment.

18 (18%) - 19 (19%)

The response inaccurately or vaguely explains the diagnosis for the patient, including an inaccurate or vague rationale for the diagnosis that may or may not support clinical judgment.

0 (0%) - 17 (17%)

The response inaccurately and vaguely explains the diagnosis for the patient, including an inaccurate and vague rationale for the diagnosis that does not support clinical judgment, or is missing.

Describe an appropriate drug therapy plan based on the patient's history, diagnosis, and drugs currently prescribed.

27 (27%) - 30 (30%)

The response accurately and completely describes in detail an appropriate drug therapy plan based on the patient's history, diagnosis, and drugs currently prescribed.

24 (24%) - 26 (26%)

The response describes a basic explanation of the appropriate drug therapy plan based on the patient's history, diagnosis, and drugs currently prescribed.

21 (21%) - 23 (23%)

The response inaccurately or vaguely describes an appropriate drug therapy plan based on the patient's history, diagnosis, and drugs currently prescribed.

0 (0%) - 20 (20%)

The response inaccurately and vaguely describes an appropriate drug therapy plan based on the patient's history, diagnosis, and drugs currently prescribed.

Justify why you would recommend this drug therapy plan for this patient. Be specific and provide examples.

27 (27%) - 30 (30%)

The response provides an accurate, clear, and detailed justification for the recommended drug therapy plan for this patient. The response includes specific, accurate, and detailed examples that fully support the justification provided.

24 (24%) - 26 (26%)

The response provides a basic justification for the recommended drug therapy plan for this patient. The response includes only 1-2 examples that fully support the justification provided.

21 (21%) - 23 (23%)

The response provides an inaccurate or vague justification for the recommended drug therapy plan for this patient. The response may include examples, which may inaccurately or vaguely support the justification provided.

0 (0%) - 20 (20%)

The response provides an inaccurate and vague justification for the recommended drug therapy plan for this patient, or is missing. The response does not include examples that support the justification provided, or is missing.

Written Expression and Formatting - Paragraph Development and Organization: Paragraphs make clear points that support well developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused--neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance.

5 (5%) - 5 (5%)

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity.

4 (4%) - 4 (4%)

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time.

3.5 (3.5%) - 3.5 (3.5%)

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%–79% of the time.

0 (0%) - 3 (3%)

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity less than 60% of the time.

Written Expression and Formatting - English writing standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation

5 (5%) - 5 (5%)

Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors

4 (4%) - 4 (4%)

Contains a few (1–2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors

3.5 (3.5%) - 3.5 (3.5%)

Contains several (3–4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors

0 (0%) - 3 (3%)

Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding

Written Expression and Formatting - The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, running head, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list.

5 (5%) - 5 (5%)

Uses correct APA format with no errors

4 (4%) - 4 (4%)

Contains a few (1–2) APA format errors

3.5 (3.5%) - 3.5 (3.5%)

Contains several (3–4) APA format errors

0 (0%) - 3 (3%)

Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors