migration
|
Name/Matric No. |
|
|
Course |
|
|
Topic |
|
|
|
1 = Poor |
2 = Fair |
3 = Good |
4 = Excellent |
Marks |
|
Topic |
Totally unrelated |
Remotely related |
Somewhat relevant |
Directly relevant |
|
|
Organization |
Not organized, discussion makes no sense |
Some organization, discussion jump around, start and end are unclear. |
Organized, discussion are somewhat jumpy |
Good organization and discussion are logically ordered. |
|
|
|
The content is not interesting |
Content is rather difficult to read and fairly interesting |
Content is easy and interesting to read |
Content is very interesting to read |
|
|
Content |
Provide little or no information on background and significance. Information is inaccurate or with many errors. Reader learns little. |
Insufficient information on background and significance. Some information is accurate, but enough errors are made to be distracting. |
Gives general information about the topic, but some relevant information may be missing, or significance is not clearly explained. No significant errors made. |
Discusses pertinent background information. Clearly explains significance of topic. Information is consistently accurate. |
|
|
|
No discussion of global/Islamic issues. |
Little discussion of global/Islamic issues. |
Some discussion of global/Islamic issues |
Enough discussion of global/Islamic issues. |
|
|
Mechanics |
Errors are frequent and distracting; therefore it is hard to determine meaning. |
Enough errors in style or grammar occur that they become distracting. |
Writing is generally error free, but some errors in language or grammar may occur |
Writing is free of errors, in grammar, punctuation, sentence structure, capitalization and spelling |
|
|
Aesthetics |
Unacceptable appearance. Does not use appropriate font, font size, line spacing and border areas. |
Appearance is acceptable but a lot could be improve |
Appearance is generally good; only some elements need to be improved |
Excellent formatting and appearance. Use appropriate font, font size, line spacing and border areas |
|
|
|
1 = Poor |
2 = Fair |
3 = Good |
4 = Excellent |
Marks |
|
References |
References are not cited in text, and no reference list is provided. |
Few references are cited in text and incomplete references |
Most references are cited in text and appropriately provided in reference list. |
Complete references in text and references list. |
|
|
|
Style/format is incorrect. |
Many references uses incorrect style/format |
Most references uses correct style/format |
References is in the correct style/format |
|
|
Timeliness |
Report handed in more than 1 week late |
Up to 1 week late |
Up to two days late |
Report handed in on time |
|
|
Total Points : |
|
Scoring key
|
|
Undergraduate |
Masters |
DBA |
|
Poor |
0 - 10 |
0 - 17 |
|
|
Fair |
11 - 20 |
18 - 24 |
0 - 27 |
|
Good |
21 - 30 |
25 - 34 |
28 - 36 |
|
Excellent |
31 - 40 |
35 - 40 |
37 - 40 |