English
2
Assessment Rubric for Blog Article
|
CATEGORY |
A |
B |
C |
D |
F |
|
Audience and Voice 10 |
Follows the correct purpose for the assignment and illustrates multiple attempts to engage audience through an original voice. 9 to 10 |
Author makes at least one attempt at voice and illustrates at least one attempt to engage audience. 8 to 9 |
Either the attempt to engage audience or voice is unclear. 7 to 8 |
Lacks original voice and efforts at audience engagement are unclear. 7 to 1 |
Lacks both voice and engagement. 0 |
|
Focus
10
|
Maintains focus on topic/subject throughout response. 9 to 10 |
May exhibit minor lapses in focus on topic/subject 8 to 9 |
May lose or may exhibit major lapses in focus on topic/subject. 7 to 8 |
May fail to establish focus on topic/subject. 7 to 1 |
No analytical focus found. 0 |
|
Writing Fluency 10
|
Skillful writing fluency, exhibits few or no mechanical errors. 9 to 10 |
Reasonable writing fluency, exhibits few mechanical errors. 8 to 9 |
Writing fluency is lacking, exhibits several mechanical errors. 7 to 8 |
Minimal writing fluency, exhibits numerous mechanical errors. 7 to 1 |
Writing is not fluent— unreadable. 0 |
|
Sources and Hyperlinks
10
|
Properly incorporates and hyperlinks 3 trustworthy sources. 9 to 10 |
Three sources are cited/hyperlinked as required, but contains errors, an untrustworthy sources, or pastes in full URLs 8 to 9 |
Uses at least 2 hyperlinks, but lacks other outside, trustworthy sources or pastes in full URLs. 7 to 8 |
Uses at least one hyperlink, but lacks other outside, trustworthy sources or uses full URLs instead of hyperlinks. 7 to 1 |
Uses no hyperlinks and does not cite evidence from outside sources. 0 |
|
Visual Component and Layout 10
|
Incorporates a high-quality, credited image or video that boosts visual appeal. Layout also increases readability. 9 to 10 |
Incorporates a high-quality, image or video that boosts visual appeal. However, layout needs improvement for better readability. 8 to 9 |
Incorporates an image or video, but lacks credit, does not boosts visual appeal clearly, or layout needs improvement for better readability. 7 to 8 |
Uses low quality graphics or a layout that makes the blog difficult to read or fails to enhance content. 7 to 1 |
Does not use any graphics, layout is messy, or visuals in no way relate to/enhance the content. 0 |
|
Title/Headline 10 |
Creative, dynamic and draws reader interest/builds curiosity about the topic. Title is directly related to blog content. 9 to 10 |
The title matches the subject matter of the blog, and is interesting, but could build more reader curiosity. 8 to 9 |
Illustrates an attempt to engage the audience, but the connection to subject matter is vague. May need improvement to be more dynamic. 7 to 8 |
Has a title but is disconnected from the subject of the blog or is similar to clickbait. 7 to 1 |
Title lacks effort or has the same name as the assignment (Ex. “Blog Article”). 0 |
|
Content 20 |
Contains a hook, introduction, a promise or problem to be solved, uses emotional appeals, cites experts, gives advice or provides solutions, has a call to action and conclusion. 18 to 20
|
Blog attempts organization, and organization makes sense, but lacks 1-2 of the criteria. 16 to 18 |
Blog makes an attempt at organization but lacks clear direction and is missing 2-4 criteria. 16 to 14 |
Organization is unclear and/or is missing 4-6 criteria. 14 to 1 |
Organization is unclear and/or is missing 6-8 criteria. 0 |
|
Revision 20 |
Significant improvement through correction of errors and illustrates clear understanding of adapting work for a new genre and medium. 18 to 20
|
Made some improvements, but there are still several errors and the understanding of genre and medium adaptation could be clearer. 16 to 18 |
Made some improvements, but there are still several errors or is focus is on sentence-level corrections versus genre and medium. 16 to 14 |
Made superficial revisions, such as just cutting down text, but illustrates a lack of understanding about adapting work for a new genre and medium. 14 to 1 |
No revisions between papers 0 |