Discussion..

Article.pdf

Home >Business & Finance homework help >Economics homework help >Discussion..

Difference-in-Differences Analysis of the Association Between State Same-Sex Marriage Policies and Adolescent Suicide Attempts Julia Raifman, ScD; Ellen Moscoe, MA; S. Bryn Austin, ScD; Margaret McConnell, PhD

IMPORTANCE Suicide is the second leading cause of death among adolescents between the ages of 15 and 24 years. Adolescents who are sexual minorities experience elevated rates of suicide attempts.

OBJECTIVE To evaluate the association between state same-sex marriage policies and adolescent suicide attempts.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This study used state-level Youth Risk Behavior Surveillance System (YRBSS) data from January 1, 1999, to December 31, 2015, which are weighted to be representative of each state that has participation in the survey greater than 60%. A difference-in-differences analysis compared changes in suicide attempts among all public high school students before and after implementation of state policies in 32 states permitting same-sex marriage with year-to-year changes in suicide attempts among high school students in 15 states without policies permitting same-sex marriage. Linear regression was used to control for state, age, sex, race/ethnicity, and year, with Taylor series linearized standard errors clustered by state and classroom. In a secondary analysis among students who are sexual minorities, we included an interaction between sexual minority identity and living in a state that had implemented same-sex marriage policies.

INTERVENTIONS Implementation of state policies permitting same-sex marriage during the full period of YRBSS data collection.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Self-report of 1 or more suicide attempts within the past 12 months.

RESULTS Among the 762 678 students (mean [SD] age, 16.0 [1.2] years; 366 063 males and 396 615 females) who participated in the YRBSS between 1999 and 2015, a weighted 8.6% of all high school students and 28.5% of students who identified as sexual minorities reported suicide attempts before implementation of same-sex marriage policies. Same-sex marriage policies were associated with a 0.6–percentage point (95% CI, –1.2 to –0.01 percentage points) reduction in suicide attempts, representing a 7% relative reduction in the proportion of high school students attempting suicide owing to same-sex marriage implementation. The association was concentrated among students who were sexual minorities.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE State same-sex marriage policies were associated with a reduction in the proportion of high school students reporting suicide attempts, providing empirical evidence for an association between same-sex marriage policies and mental health outcomes.

JAMA Pediatr. 2017;171(4):350-356. doi:10.1001/jamapediatrics.2016.4529 Published online February 20, 2017. Last corrected on April 24, 2017.

Editorial page 322

Author Audio Interview

JAMA Pediatrics Patient Page page 404

Supplemental content

Author Affiliations: Epidemiology Department, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland (Raifman); Department of Global Health and Population, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts (Moscoe, McConnell); Division of Adolescent and Young Adult Medicine, Boston Children’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts (Austin); Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts (Austin).

Corresponding Author: Julia Raifman, ScD, Epidemiology Department, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, 615 N Wolfe St, Room E7133, Baltimore, MD 21205 (juliaraifman @gmail.com).

Research

JAMA Pediatrics | Original Investigation

350 (Reprinted) jamapediatrics.com

Downloaded From: https://jamanetwork.com/ by a Texas A&M University-Commerce User on 09/04/2019

S uicide is the second most common cause of death amongadolescents aged 15 to 24 years.1 Adolescents who aresexual minorities are at increased risk of suicide at- tempts. Evidence from nationally representative 2015 Youth Risk Behavior Surveillance System (YRBSS) data indicates that more than 29% of gay, lesbian, and bisexual high school stu- dents reported attempting suicide within the past 12 months, relative to 6% of heterosexual students.2 Adolescent suicide causes decades of life lost, reflects great suffering leading up to the event, and has substantial mental health ramifications for families and communities.3,4 Previous suicide attempts are the strongest known predictor of suicide fatality5 and are as- sociated with poorer long-term health outcomes among survivors.6

Although it is unclear what drives greater rates of suicide attempts among adolescents who are sexual minorities, prior evidence suggests several potential mechanisms, including stigma. Link and Phelan7 defined stigma as the confluence of labeling, stereotyping, differentiation from the norm, status loss, and discrimination in the context of differential power. Stigma based on sexual orientation is associated with mental distress, anxiety and depression, and greater rates of suicide attempts.8-10 Policies preventing same-sex marriage consti- tute a form of structural stigma because they label sexual mi- norities as different and deny them legal, financial, health, and other benefits that are associated with marriage.7,11 Legaliza- tion of same-sex marriage is also often accompanied by me- dia attention and increased visibility of sexual minorities,12

which is associated with increased social support for the rights of sexual minorities.13,14 This increased social support could translate into improved familial and peer acceptance of sexual minorities, which has been shown to be associated with im- proved mental health.15,16 For each of these reasons, same- sex marriage policies may reduce the stigma experienced by adolescents who are sexual minorities. On the other hand, same-sex marriage laws could negatively affect the mental health of adolescents who are sexual minorities. Increased vis- ibility of sexual minorities accompanying same-sex marriage12

could lead to rejection in hostile family environments15 and brings the potential for political and social backlash.17 The in- creased resources devoted to the efforts to legalize same-sex marriage may also detract from the resources devoted to serv- ing youth who are sexual minorities.18

Prior research suggests an association between same-sex marriage policies and mental health.9,11,19-21 Use of and expen- ditures on mental health care significantly decreased among men who have sex with men in the year following legaliza- tion of same-sex marriage relative to the year prior in Massachusetts.22 The effect was not dependent on partner- ship status, suggesting that same-sex marriage policies may have broad effects on the mental health of sexual minorities beyond the direct benefits of partnership or marriage. Hatzen- buehler and colleagues19 also found that psychiatric disor- ders increased among adults who were sexual minorities af- ter same-sex marriage was banned in 16 states. We contribute evidence linking same-sex marriage policies and health with

a study based on the natural experiment created by geo- graphic and temporal variation in state same-sex marriage poli- cies.

We estimated the association between same-sex mar- riage policies and the proportion of adolescents attempting sui- cide based on a difference-in-differences analysis using YRBSS data.23 We hypothesized that state same-sex marriage poli- cies would be associated with reductions in the proportion of adolescents attempting suicide.

Methods Data and Sample We obtained data on demographic information and suicide at- tempts from the state YRBSS, a Centers for Disease Control and Prevention–supported survey on high school student risk be- haviors conducted every 2 years. The state YRBSS uses 2-stage sampling of schools and classrooms to develop a representa- tive sample of all public school students in grades 9 to 12 in each US state.24 We used data from all 47 YRBSS states in all years with weighted data,25 which included data from 32 of 35 states that implemented same-sex marriage policies between January 1, 2004 and January 1, 2015. We used data from Janu- ary 1, 1999, to December 31, 2015, to capture trends in suicide attempts 5 years before the first same-sex marriage policy in Massachusetts. We used only deidentified data for this study. The Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health Insti- tutional Review Board and the Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health Institutional Review Board approved exemp- tion from human participants review for this study.

We conducted our primary analysis in the full population of high school students and a secondary analysis in the sub- set of students who self-identified as sexual minorities. We re- port demographic charac teristic s including age, race/ ethnicity, and sex. We classified students as sexual minorities if they responded that they were gay, lesbian, bisexual, or not sure, when asked “Which of the following best describes you?”2

Twenty-five states included this question in 2015 (eTable 1 and eTable 2 in the Supplement). Although students who died through suicide are not captured in the data, the mean an- nual suicide rate of 5.3 per 100 000 adolescents between the

Key Points Question Are state same-sex marriage policies associated with a reduction in adolescent suicide attempts?

Findings This difference-in-differences analysis of representative data from 47 states found that same-sex marriage policies were associated with a 7% reduction in the proportion of all high school students reporting a suicide attempt within the past year. The effect was concentrated among adolescents who were sexual minorities.

Meaning Same-sex marriage policies are associated with reduced adolescent suicide attempts.

State Same-Sex Marriage Policies and Adolescent Suicide Attempts Original Investigation Research

jamapediatrics.com (Reprinted) JAMA Pediatrics April 2017 Volume 171, Number 4 351

Downloaded From: https://jamanetwork.com/ by a Texas A&M University-Commerce User on 09/04/2019

ages of 14 and 17 years between 1999 and 2014 is small rela- tive to suicide attempts and should not significantly bias the results.1

We focused our analysis on the full population of stu- dents for the following 3 reasons: we were able to include data from all participating states in all years without restricting the analysis to states that collected information on sexual orien- tation, the full population includes sexual minorities who may not identify as sexual minorities in the YRBSS, and same-sex marriage policies may affect the composition of the self- identified sexual minority population.26 We conducted a sub- group analysis of sexual minorities to assess whether changes in suicide attempts were concentrated in this population but emphasize that these estimates are vulnerable to bias.

Exposure and Outcome We defined the exposure as a state-level policy granting same- sex couples equivalent marriage rights as opposite-sex couples. We categorized states as having same-sex marriage policies if same-sex marriage was legal during the full period of YRBSS data collection; we considered students exposed to the policy even if same-sex marriage was legal for only part of the 12- month recall period for a suicide attempt, but only if same- sex marriage was legal during the full data collection period. A timeline of same-sex marriage laws and method of enact- ment is depicted in the eFigure and eTable 2 in the Supple- ment.

The main outcome of interest was whether students re- ported 1 or more suicide attempts in response to the ques- tion, “During the past 12 months, how many times did you ac- tually attempt suicide?” In a study of the test-retest reliability from the 1999 YRBSS national survey, the κ statistic for this question was 72.7, indicating substantial reliability.27 This find- ing is consistent with other studies indicating high sensitiv- ity and specificity of self-reported suicide attempts, and self- report is the standard approach to assessing suicide attempts.28

Although suicide attempts do not always represent a desire to die, there is a consensus that attempted suicide reflects great emotional distress.6,28-30 We selected suicide attempts as the main outcome because there are large disparities in suicide at- tempts based on sexual orientation, attempts are strongly as- sociated with suicide,5 and most states collected information on suicide attempts in most years. We did not use death from suicide as our main outcome because it is a rare event,31 be- cause it is difficult to identify the sexual orientation of indi- viduals who committed suicide, and because data on suicide mortality can be subject to underreporting owing to stigma.32

Statistical Analysis We estimated the association between implementation of same-sex marriage policies and the proportion of adoles- cents attempting suicide through a difference-in-differences analysis, an approach that entails comparing mean changes in an outcome in a treatment group before and after a policy change with mean changes in a control group with no policy change.23,33,34 The method requires that baseline temporal trends (but not absolute levels) of the outcome are equiva- lent in states that did and did not implement same-sex mar-

riage policies by 2015; the corollary is that the trends in both groups would have continued to be the same in the absence of a policy change. We tested this assumption with a linear re- gression analysis of suicide attempts before implementation of same-sex marriage policies. We estimated an interaction term between linear year and states with same-sex marriage policies, allowing for a different intercept in states with same- sex marriage policies and controlling for age, race/ethnicity, sex, state, annual state unemployment rates,35 and state- level policies preventing employment discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation.

For our main analysis, we estimated a linear regression dif- ference-in-differences model with a binary indicator for same- sex marriage policies, with state and year fixed effects, and with controls for state, year, annual state unemployment rates,35

state-level policies preventing employment discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation, and individual race/ethnicity, age, and sex. We estimated linear models rather than logit mod- els owing to their unbiased estimation properties with fixed effects analyses.36 We accounted for the complex survey de- sign of the YRBSS by using Taylor series linearization with clus- tering by state and classroom to estimate standard errors. In the analysis focused on youth who are sexual minorities, we estimated the interaction between state same-sex marriage policies and sexual minority identity and included controls for state same-sex marriage policies and for sexual minority iden- tity.

Controlling for each state serves 2 important functions in our analysis. First, controlling for each state means that the analysis captures only relative changes in suicide attempts in each state, preventing differing baseline state rates of adoles- cent suicide attempts from affecting the analysis. Second, con- trolling for each state controls for time-invariant state char- acteristics such as cultural, political, historical, and other differences that could otherwise confound the analysis.

We conducted several robustness checks. First, we re- peated our main analyses with a binary lead exposure indica- tor that states would implement same-sex marriage policies 2 years in the future. If the lead variable for implementing same-sex marriage policies in the future was associated with suicide attempts, it would indicate that our results may be ow- ing to time trends in states with same-sex marriage policies being systematically different from time trends in states with- out same-sex marriage policies.37 Second, we tested a lagged exposure variable for states implementing same-sex mar- riage policies 2 or more years in the past to assess whether the effects of same-sex marriage policies persisted. We con- ducted an analysis excluding Massachusetts to assess whether results were driven by the earliest state to implement a same- sex marriage policy. Finally, we conducted falsification tests by assessing the association between same-sex marriage poli- cies and behaviors that we would not expect to be affected by changes in the legal status of same-sex marriage, including fruit juice and carrot consumption within the past 7 days and never using a seatbelt.37,38 If same-sex marriage policies were asso- ciated with these behaviors, it would suggest that omitted vari- ables affecting youth health decisions were driving our re- sults.

Research Original Investigation State Same-Sex Marriage Policies and Adolescent Suicide Attempts

352 JAMA Pediatrics April 2017 Volume 171, Number 4 (Reprinted) jamapediatrics.com

Downloaded From: https://jamanetwork.com/ by a Texas A&M University-Commerce User on 09/04/2019

Results

We analyzed data from 762 678 adolescents who participated in the YRBSS in 47 states between 1999 and 2015. As Table 1 indicates, the weighted percentages of male and female stu- dents were similar in states that did and did not implement same-sex marriage policies before 2015 (same-sex marriage policies, 49.7% males and 50.3% females; no same-sex mar- riage policies, 49.6% males and 50.4% females). Students in states with same-sex marriage policies were slightly younger than those in states without same-sex marriage policies (mean [SD], 15.9 [1.2] vs 16.0 [1.2] years). A larger weighted propor- tion of students in states without same-sex marriage policies were were Hispanic (16.1% vs 11.3%) and African American (18.6% vs 14.3%). In states that inquired about sexual minor- ity orientation in 2015, a weighted mean of 12.7% of students identified as sexual minorities. Among students in these states, 2.3% identified as gay or lesbian, 6.4% as bisexual, and 4.0% as not sure of their orientation.

Figure 1 shows that trends in suicide attempts were rela- tively flat and were similar in the comparison states and in the intervention states that we visualize in 2 waves (wave 1, states that implemented same-sex marriage policies before 2013; wave 2, states that implemented same-sex marriage policies in 2013-2014). Before the implementation of same-sex mar- riage policies, temporal trends in suicide attempts were not sig- nificantly different in states with same-sex marriage policies relative to temporal trends in suicide attempts in states with- out same-sex marriage policies (0.001 percentage points; 95% CI, more than –0.001 to 0.001; eTable 3 in the Supplement).

Table 2 presents the net change in high school students’ reported suicide attempts after implementation of same-sex marriage policies in the states with those policies relative to states without same-sex marriage policies. Across all states be- fore the implementation of same-sex marriage policies, a weighted 8.6% of all high school students and 28.5% of stu- dents who were sexual minorities reported 1 or more suicide attempts within the past year. Although high school students who were sexual minorities made up a weighted 12.7% of the population, they accounted for 34.1% of students reporting 1 or more suicide attempts in 2015. Same-sex marriage was as-

sociated with a statistically significant decline in the propor- tion of all students attempting suicide of 0.6 percentage points (95% CI, –1.2 to –0.01 percentage points) across the full time period following implementation of same-sex marriage poli- cies, for a relative reduction of 7%. In the analysis in which we assessed an interaction term for minority sexual orientation and implementation of same-sex marriage policies, such poli- cies were associated with a statistically significant decline in the proportion of adolescents who were sexual minorities who reported attempting suicide in the past year (–4.0 percentage points; 95% CI, –6.9 to –1.2 percentage points). These results are equivalent to a 14% relative decline in the proportion of ado- lescents who were sexual minorities reporting suicide at- tempts in the past year. The full regression output for these analyses is in eTable 4 and eTable 5 in the Supplement. The

Table 1. Participant Characteristics Across All Years of the Youth Risk Behavior Surveillance System (1999-2015)

Characteristic

Valuea

P Value Same-Sex Marriage Policies (n = 546 276)b

No Same-Sex Marriage Policies (n = 216 402)c

Age, mean (SD), y 15.9 (1.2) 16.0 (1.2) <.001

Sex

Male 262 808 (49.7) 103 255 (49.6) .48

Female 283 468 (50.3) 113 147 (50.4) .48

Race/ethnicity

White 296 334 (58.4) 119 730 (55.0) .03

Hispanic 53 060 (11.3) 34 048 (16.1) <.001

African American 78 139 (14.3) 25 519 (18.6) <.001

Other race/ethnicity 118 734 (16.0) 37 105 (10.3) <.001

a All numbers are unweighted while percentages are weighted to be representative of the state population of high school students by student sex, grade, and race/ethnicity. Sex, age, and race/ethnicity are based on participant self-report.

b Data from 32 states. c Data from 15 states.

Figure 1. Trends in Suicide Attempts Before Implementation of Same-Sex Marriage Policies

0 2000 2010 2015

0.20

0.15

M ea

n Su

ic id

e A

tt em

pt s,

Survey Year

0.10

0.05

2005

Never legal Wave 2: before legalization Wave 1: before legalization

States are grouped based on the years when they implemented same-sex marriage. Wave 1 is states that implemented same-sex marriage policies before 2013, and Wave 2 is states that implemented same-sex marriage policies in 2013 or 2014. There were no overall statistically significantly different trends in suicide attempts in states without same-sex marriage policies relative to those with same-sex marriage policies before implementation of such laws (interaction term between same-sex marriage policies and linear year, 0.001 percentage points; 95% CI, more than −0.001 to 0.001 percentage points) or by wave (wave 1, −0.06 percentage points; 95% CI, −0.1 to 0.03 percentage points; wave 2, 0.01 percentage points; 95% CI, −0.06 to 0.08 percentage points).

State Same-Sex Marriage Policies and Adolescent Suicide Attempts Original Investigation Research

jamapediatrics.com (Reprinted) JAMA Pediatrics April 2017 Volume 171, Number 4 353

Downloaded From: https://jamanetwork.com/ by a Texas A&M University-Commerce User on 09/04/2019

decline in overall suicide attempts by high school students fol- lowing implementation of same-sex marriage policies in the states that implemented these policies is depicted in Figure 2 and Figure 3. A 0.6–percentage point decline in suicide rates for all students would be equivalent to an estimated 134 446 (95% CI, 16 890-252 437) fewer adolescents attempting sui- cide each year, based on the 2015 US population estimates of adolescents aged 15 to 19 years.39

The results of sensitivity analyses are in eTables 6-9 in the Supplement. A lead indicator for states implementing same- sex marriage policies in the following 2 years was not associ- ated with suicide attempts among all high school students or among students who were sexual minorities (eTable 6 in the Supplement), indicating that our main findings are not owing to changes in trends that occurred before implementation of same-sex marriage policies.37,40 A lagged indicator for states implementing same-sex marriage policies 2 or more years prior

was significantly associated with reduced suicide attempts (–0.7 percentage points; 95% CI, –1.3 to –0.2 percentage points), indicating that reductions in suicide attempts persisted over time in the years following implementation of same-sex mar- riage policies (eTable 7 in the Supplement). We also found that the estimated effect of same-sex marriage policies was ro- bust to the exclusion of Massachusetts (eTable 8 in the Supple- ment) and, in falsification checks, that same-sex marriage poli- cies were not associated with behaviors that should not be affected by such policies (eTable 9 in the Supplement).

Table 2. Changes in High School Student Suicide Attempts in States With Same-Sex Marriage Policies Relative to States Without Same-Sex Marriage Policiesa

Students

Students Reporting a Suicide Attempt in the Past Year Before Same-Sex Marriage Policies, %b

Net Change in Suicide Attempts After Same-Sex Marriage Policies Implemented, Percentage Points 95% CI

All students (n = 762 678) 8.6 −0.6c −1.2 to −0.1

Students identifying as sexual minorities (n = 231 413)d

28.5 −4.0e −6.9 to −1.2

a In each linear regression, we controlled for sex, age, and race/ethnicity. We included fixed effects for state and year and clustered standard errors by school and by classroom. We included the full regression tables for each analysis in eTables 3 and 4 in the Supplement.

b Percentages are weighted to be representative of the state population of high school students by student sex, grade, and race/ethnicity.

c P < .05.

d The sample size includes students who identified as straight as well as those who identified as sexual minorities in states that collected data on sexual orientation. The analysis of sexual minority adolescents was based on interacting a term for state same-sex marriage implementation and adolescents identifying as sexual minorities. The full results can be found in eTable 4 in the Supplement.

e P < .01.

Figure 2. Suicide Attempts by Years Relative to Implementation of Same-Sex Marriage Policies in States Implementing Same-Sex Marriage Policies Before 2013

0.20

0.15

0.10

0.05

0 –10 –8 –6 –4 –2 0 2 4 6 8 10

M ea

n Su

ic id

e A

tt em

pt s,

Years to Legalization

Mean IA MD NH VT

CT MA ME NY

Year 0 reflects the first Youth Risk Behavior Surveillance System (YRBSS) data collection period after same-sex marriage policies were implemented. The vertical line marks the beginning of year 0. The 2-year increments on the x-axis reflect the 2-year increments of YRBSS data collection. Point estimates in Table 2 reflect the mean of the period after implementation of same-sex marriage policies relative to the mean of the period before implementation of such policies. Time trends depicted in the graph suggest that the proportion of students attempting suicide declined following implementation of same-sex marriage policies.

Figure 3. Suicide Attempts by Years Relative to Implementation of Same- Sex Marriage Policies in States Implementing Same-Sex Marriage Policies in 2013 or 2014

0.20

0.15

0.10

0.05

0 –10 –8 –6 –4 –2 0 2 4

M ea

n Su

ic id

e A

tt em

pt s,

Years to Legalization

Mean AK AZ CA DE HI ID IL IN MT NC NM NV OK PA RI SC VA WV WY

Research Original Investigation State Same-Sex Marriage Policies and Adolescent Suicide Attempts

354 JAMA Pediatrics April 2017 Volume 171, Number 4 (Reprinted) jamapediatrics.com

Downloaded From: https://jamanetwork.com/ by a Texas A&M University-Commerce User on 09/04/2019

Discussion

Our study documents that implementation of same-sex mar- riage policies was associated with a significant decrease in the proportion of high school students attempting suicide in 32 states that implemented same-sex marriage policies by Janu- ary 1, 2015, relative to 15 states that did not implement same- sex marriage policies by that date. After same-sex marriage laws were implemented, the proportion of high school students re- porting suicide attempts in the past year decreased by 0.6 per- centage points, equivalent to a 7% decline. Reductions in the proportion of high school students attempting suicide were concentrated among students identifying as sexual minori- ties. Furthermore, we found that the effects of legalization per- sisted 2 years after legalization, suggesting that social and po- litical backlash does not have the effect of worsening mental health outcomes in this window. The 7% reduction in adoles- cent suicide attempts suggests that same-sex marriage poli- cies may contribute to the Healthy People 2020 goal of reduc- ing adolescent suicide attempts by 10%.41 We estimated that, each year, same-sex marriage policies would be associated with more than 134 000 fewer adolescents attempting suicide. These results reflect an important reduction in adolescent emo- tional distress29 and risk of mortality from suicide.5

This study addresses 2 important challenges to analyzing the association between state same-sex marriage policies and health: underlying state characteristics are likely to influence both state same-sex marriage policies and the prevalence of suicide attempts, and states have different baseline levels of suicide attempts. We addressed both of these issues by con- trolling for state, which accounts for time-invariant state char- acteristics such as cultural and political differences and con- trols for baseline state differences in the prevalence of suicide attempts. In this manner, we focused on the differences in sui- cide attempts within each state before and after the imple- mentation of same-sex marriage policies relative to year-to- year differences in states that did not implement same-sex marriage policies.

Our results build on prior research indicating that state same-sex marriage bans were associated with increased rates of psychiatric disorders19 and that health expenditures de- creased following implementation of a same-sex marriage policy in Massachusetts.22 Our study contributes evidence on the association between same-sex marriage and mental health based on a robust analysis that controls for differences in state characteristics and for other state-level events that may affect suicide attempts, which are unlikely to systematically vary with the same geographic and temporal pattern as same-sex mar- riage implementation.

Our findings are particularly meaningful in the context of the statistically insignificant effects of most school-based, mass media, and other interventions to reduce suicide attempts in the general population.30,31 We did not identify suicide inter- vention studies that addressed the substantially elevated risk of suicide attempts among adolescents who identifed as sexual minorities.42 Although implementation of same-sex mar- riage policies reduced suicide attempts among adolescents who were sexual minorities, more than 1 in 5 adolescents who iden- tified as sexual minorities reported attempting suicide after same-sex marriage laws were implemented in same-sex mar- riage states. Interventions addressing suicide attempts among adolescents who identify as sexual minorities should be a re- search priority.

Limitations Our study has some limitations. The main outcome is based on self-report, which is the standard approach to assessing sui- cide attempts, given that a minority of individuals who at- tempt suicide present to hospitals and that suicides are rare31

and often underreported.32 The analyses on the association be- tween implementation of same-sex marriage policies and ado- lescent suicide attempts among those identifying as sexual mi- norities should be interpreted with caution given the limited data availability on sexual orientation (eTables 1 and 2 in the Supplement) and the potential for same-sex marriage to affect sexual minority identity.26 We also could not control for un- measured individual-level characteristics, including socioeco- nomic status, or for unmeasured state characteristics that may change over time, such as religious affiliation or acceptance of sexual minorities. Finally, our analysis does not allow us to understand the mechanisms through which implementation of same-sex marriage policies reduced adolescent suicide at- tempts. There is a need for further research to understand the association between sexual minority rights, stigma, and sexual minority health.

Conclusions We provide evidence that implementation of same-sex mar- riage policies reduced adolescent suicide attempts. As coun- tries around the world consider enabling or restricting same- sex marriage, we provide evidence that implementing same- sex marriage policies was associated with improved population health. Policymakers should consider the mental health con- sequences of same-sex marriage policies.

ARTICLE INFORMATION

Accepted for Publication: November 19, 2016.

Correction: This article was corrected on April 3, 2017, to fix an error in the Abstract and to add a footnote to Table 2 and on April 24, 2017, to fix the sample size for all students in Table 2.

Published Online: February 20, 2017. doi:10.1001/jamapediatrics.2016.4529

Author Contributions: Drs Raifman and McConnell had full access to all the data in the study and take responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis. Study concept and design: All authors.

Acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data: Raifman, Moscoe, McConnell. Drafting of the manuscript: Raifman, Moscoe, McConnell. Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: All authors. Statistical analysis: Raifman, Moscoe, McConnell. Obtained funding: Raifman.

State Same-Sex Marriage Policies and Adolescent Suicide Attempts Original Investigation Research

jamapediatrics.com (Reprinted) JAMA Pediatrics April 2017 Volume 171, Number 4 355

Downloaded From: https://jamanetwork.com/ by a Texas A&M University-Commerce User on 09/04/2019

Administrative, technical, or material support: Raifman. Study supervision: Raifman, McConnell.

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: None reported.

Funding/Support: Ms Raifman is supported by training grants T32AI102623 and R25MH083620 from the National Institutes of Health. Dr Austin is supported by training grants T71-MC-00009 and T76-MC-00001 from the Maternal and Child Health Bureau, Health Resources and Services Administration, US Department of Health and Human Services.

Role of the Funder/Sponsor: The funding sources played no role in the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, or interpretation of the data; preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript; and decision to submit the manuscript for publication.

Additional Contributions: We thank the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; the Colorado, Massachusetts, Pennsylvania, and New Mexico Departments of Education; the Florida, Hawaii, Indiana, Ohio, South Dakota, and Vermont Departments of Health; and the Texas Department of State Health Services for sharing Youth Risk Behavior Surveillance System data.

REFERENCES

1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Welcome to WISQARS. https://www.cdc.gov/injury /wisqars/. Updated January 12, 2017. Accessed January 19, 2017.

2. Kann L, Olsen EO, McManus T, et al. Sexual identity, sex of sexual contacts, and health-related behaviors among students in grades 9-12—United States and selected sites, 2015. MMWR Surveill Summ. 2016;65(9):1-202.

3. Yip PS, Caine E, Yousuf S, Chang S-S, Wu KC-C, Chen Y-Y. Means restriction for suicide prevention. Lancet. 2012;379(9834):2393-2399.

4. Lewiecki EM, Miller SA. A piece of my mind: time to reconsider. JAMA. 2011;305(11):1070-1071.

5. Owens D, Wood C, Greenwood DC, Hughes T, Dennis M. Mortality and suicide after non-fatal self-poisoning: 16-year outcome study. Br J Psychiatry. 2005;187(5):470-475.

6. Goldman-Mellor SJ, Caspi A, Harrington H, et al. Suicide attempt in young people: a signal for long-term health care and social needs. JAMA Psychiatry. 2014;71(2):119-127.

7. Link BG, Phelan JC. Conceptualizing stigma. Annu Rev Sociol. 2001;27:363-385. doi:10.1146 /annurev.soc.27.1.363

8. Almeida J, Johnson RM, Corliss HL, Molnar BE, Azrael D. Emotional distress among LGBT youth: the influence of perceived discrimination based on sexual orientation. J Youth Adolesc. 2009;38(7): 1001-1014.

9. Herek GM, Garnets LD. Sexual orientation and mental health. Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2007;3:353- 375.

10. Hatzenbuehler ML. The social environment and suicide attempts in lesbian, gay, and bisexual youth. Pediatrics. 2011;127(5):896-903.

11. Hatzenbuehler ML. Structural stigma and the health of lesbian, gay, and bisexual populations. Curr Dir Psychol Sci. 2014;23(2):127-132. doi:10.1177 /0963721414523775

12. Ramos C, Goldberg NG, Badgett MVL. The effects of marriage equality in Massachusetts: a survey of the experiences and impact of marriage on same-sex couples. http://eprints.cdlib.org/uc /item/9dx6v3kj.pdf. Published May 2009. Accessed May 5, 2016.

13. Lewis GB. The friends and family plan: contact with gays and support for gay rights. Policy Stud J. 2011;39(2):217-238.

14. Chomsky D, Barclay S. The mass media, public opinion, and lesbian and gay rights. Annu Rev Law Soc Sci. 2010;6:387-403. doi:10.1146/annurev- lawsocsci-102209-152825

15. Ryan C, Huebner D, Diaz RM, Sanchez J. Family rejection as a predictor of negative health outcomes in white and Latino lesbian, gay, and bisexual young adults. Pediatrics. 2009;123(1):346- 352.

16. Gini G, Espelage DL. Peer victimization, cyberbullying, and suicide risk in children and adolescents. JAMA. 2014;312(5):545-546.

17. Ball CA. The backlash thesis and same-sex marriage: learning from Brown vs Board of Education and its aftermath. Wm Mary Bill Rts J. 2006;14(8):1493.

18. Stewart-Winter T. The price of gay marriage. New York Times. June 26, 2015. http://www .nytimes.com/2015/06/28/opinion/sunday/the- price-of-gay-marriage.html?_r=0. Accessed November 4, 2016.

19. Hatzenbuehler ML, McLaughlin KA, Keyes KM, Hasin DS. The impact of institutional discrimination on psychiatric disorders in lesbian, gay, and bisexual populations: a prospective study. Am J Public Health. 2010;100(3):452-459.

20. Hatzenbuehler ML. Social factors as determinants of mental health disparities in LGB populations: implications for public policy. Soc Issues Policy Rev. 2010;4(1):31-62. doi:10.1111/j.1751- 2409.2010.01017.x

21. Beyrer C. Pushback: the current wave of anti-homosexuality laws and impacts on health. PLoS Med. 2014;11(6):e1001658.

22. Hatzenbuehler ML, O’Cleirigh C, Grasso C, Mayer K, Safren S, Bradford J. Effect of same-sex marriage laws on health care use and expenditures in sexual minority men: a quasi-natural experiment. Am J Public Health. 2012;102(2):285-291.

23. Dimick JB, Ryan AM. Methods for evaluating changes in health care policy: the difference-in-differences approach. JAMA. 2014;312 (22):2401-2402.

24. Brener ND, Kann L, Kinchen SA, et al. Methodology of the youth risk behavior surveillance system. MMWR Recomm Rep. 2004;53 (RR-12):1-13.

25. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Youth Risk Behavior Surveillance System (YRBSS): 2015 YRBS national, state, and district combined datasets user’s guide. https://www.cdc.gov /healthyyouth/data/yrbs/pdf/2015/2015_yrbs_sadc _documentation.pdf. Published August 2016. Accessed January 19, 2017.

26. Charlton BM, Corliss HL, Spiegelman D, Williams K, Austin SB. Changes in reported sexual orientation following US states recognition of

same-sex couples. Am J Public Health. 2016;106 (12):2202-2204.

27. Brener ND, Kann L, McManus T, Kinchen SA, Sundberg EC, Ross JG. Reliability of the 1999 Youth Risk Behavior Survey questionnaire. J Adolesc Health. 2002;31(4):336-342.

28. Hawton K, Saunders KE, O’Connor RC. Self-harm and suicide in adolescents. Lancet. 2012; 379(9834):2373-2382.

29. Scoliers G, Portzky G, Madge N, et al. Reasons for adolescent deliberate self-harm: a cry of pain and/or a cry for help? findings from the child and adolescent self-harm in Europe (CASE) study. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2009;44(8):601-607.

30. Spirito A, Esposito-Smythers C. Attempted and completed suicide in adolescence. Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2006;2:237-266.

31. Brown CH, Wyman PA, Brinales JM, Gibbons RD. The role of randomized trials in testing interventions for the prevention of youth suicide. Int Rev Psychiatry. 2007;19(6):617-631.

32. Gosney H, Hawton K. Inquest verdicts: youth suicides lost. Psychiatrist. 2007;31(6):203-205. doi: 10.1192/pb.bp.105.007773

33. Wooldridge JM. Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. https://mitpress.mit.edu/books/econometric- analysis-cross-section-and-panel-data. Accessed May 5, 2016.

34. French B, Heagerty PJ. Analysis of longitudinal data to evaluate a policy change. Stat Med. 2008; 27(24):5005-5025. doi:10.1002/sim.3340

35. Bureau of Labor Statistics, US Department of Labor. Local area unemployment statistics. http: //www.bls.gov/lau/. Accessed October 30, 2016.

36. Greene W. The behaviour of the maximum likelihood estimator of limited dependent variable models in the presence of fixed effects. Econom J. 2004;7(1):98-119. doi:10.1111/j.1368-423X.2004 .00123.x

37. Granger CWJ. Investigating causal relations by econometric models and cross-spectral methods. Econometrica. 1969;37(3):424-438.

38. Prasad V, Jena AB. Prespecified falsification end points: can they validate true observational associations? JAMA. 2013;309(3):241-242.

39. US Census Bureau. American FactFinder. http: //factfinder.census.gov/faces/tableservices/jsf /pages/productview.xhtml?src=bkmk. Accessed April 7, 2016.

40. Bertrand M, Duflo E, Mullainathan S. How much should we trust differences-in-differences estimates? Q J Econ. 2002;119(1):249-275. doi:10 .1162/003355304772839588

41. Office of Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Department of Health and Human Services. Mental health and mental disorders. https://www.healthypeople.gov/2020/topics- objectives/topic/mental-health-and-mental- disorders/objectives. Updated January 13, 2017. Accessed January 19, 2017.

42. Institute of Medicine (IOM). The Health of Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender People: Building a Foundation for Better Understanding. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2011.

Research Original Investigation State Same-Sex Marriage Policies and Adolescent Suicide Attempts

356 JAMA Pediatrics April 2017 Volume 171, Number 4 (Reprinted) jamapediatrics.com

Downloaded From: https://jamanetwork.com/ by a Texas A&M University-Commerce User on 09/04/2019