Accounting Project
Financial1
| gehen | ||||||||||||||||
| Apple | Netlfix | |||||||||||||||
| ROE (Milions) | ROE (Thousands) | |||||||||||||||
| Net Income | Equtiy | ROE | Net Income | Equtiy | ROE | |||||||||||
| 2019 | 55,256 | 90,488 | 61.06% | 1,866,916 | 7,582,157 | 24.62% | ||||||||||
| 2018 | 59,531 | 107,147 | 55.56% | 1,211,242 | 5,238,765 | 23.12% | ||||||||||
| 2017 | 48,351 | 134,047 | 36.07% | 558,929 | 3,581,956 | 15.60% | ||||||||||
| 2016 | 45,687 | 128,249 | 35.62% | 186,678 | 2,679,800 | 6.97% | ||||||||||
| 2015 | 53,394 | 119,355 | 44.74% | 122,641 | 2,223,426 | 5.52% | ||||||||||
| Apple | Netlfix | Apple | Netlfix | |||||||||||||
| AROE (Milions) | AROE (Thousands) | Year 1 | Year 2 | Avg | Year 1 | Year 2 | Avg | |||||||||
| Net Income | Equtiy | AROE | Net Income | Equtiy | AROE | 90,488 | 107,147 | 98,818 | 7,582,157 | 5,238,765 | 6,410,461 | |||||
| 2019 | 55,256 | 98,818 | 55.92% | 1,866,916 | 6,410,461 | 29.12% | 107,147 | 134,047 | 120,597 | 5,238,765 | 3,581,956 | 4,410,361 | ||||
| 2018 | 59,531 | 120,597 | 49.36% | 1,211,242 | 4,410,361 | 27.46% | 134,047 | 128,249 | 131,148 | 3,581,956 | 2,679,800 | 3,130,878 | ||||
| 2017 | 48,351 | 131,148 | 36.87% | 558,929 | 3,130,878 | 17.85% | 128,249 | 119,355 | 123,802 | 2,679,800 | 2,223,426 | 2,451,613 | ||||
| 2016 | 45,687 | 123,802 | 36.90% | 186,678 | 2,451,613 | 7.61% | 119,355 | 111,547 | 115,451 | 2,223,426 | 1,857,708 | 2,040,567 | ||||
| 2015 | 53,394 | 115,451 | 46.25% | 122,641 | 2,040,567 | 6.01% | ||||||||||
| OROE | OROE (Thousands) | |||||||||||||||
| Operating Income (Milions) | Equtiy | OROE | Operating Income | Equtiy | OROE | |||||||||||
| 2019 | 63,930 | 90,488 | 70.65% | 2,604,254 | 7,582,157 | 34.35% | ||||||||||
| 2018 | 70,898 | 107,147 | 66.17% | 1,605,226 | 5,238,765 | 30.64% | ||||||||||
| 2017 | 61,344 | 134,047 | 45.76% | 838,679 | 3,581,956 | 23.41% | ||||||||||
| 2016 | 60,024 | 128,249 | 46.80% | 379,793 | 2,679,800 | 14.17% | ||||||||||
| 2015 | 71,230 | 119,355 | 59.68% | 305,826 | 2,223,426 | 13.75% | ||||||||||
| AOROE | OROE (Thousands) | Apple | Netlfix | |||||||||||||
| Operating Income (Milions) | Equtiy | AOROE | Operating Income | Equtiy | AOROE | Year 1 | Year 2 | Avg | Year 1 | Year 2 | Avg | |||||
| 2019 | 63,930 | 98,818 | 64.70% | 2,604,254 | 6,410,461 | 40.63% | 90,488 | 107,147 | 98,818 | 7,582,157 | 5,238,765 | 6,410,461 | ||||
| 2018 | 70,898 | 120,597 | 58.79% | 1,605,226 | 4,410,361 | 36.40% | 107,147 | 134,047 | 120,597 | 5,238,765 | 3,581,956 | 4,410,361 | ||||
| 2017 | 61,344 | 131,148 | 46.77% | 838,679 | 3,130,878 | 26.79% | 134,047 | 128,249 | 131,148 | 3,581,956 | 2,679,800 | 3,130,878 | ||||
| 2016 | 60,024 | 123,802 | 48.48% | 379,793 | 2,451,613 | 15.49% | 128,249 | 119,355 | 123,802 | 2,679,800 | 2,223,426 | 2,451,613 | ||||
| 2015 | 71,230 | 115,451 | 61.70% | 305,826 | 2,040,567 | 14.99% | 119,355 | 111,547 | 115,451 | 2,223,426 | 1,857,708 | 2,040,567 | ||||
| ROA | ROA (Thousands) | |||||||||||||||
| Net Income (Milions) | Total Assests | ROA | Net Income | Total Assests | ROA | |||||||||||
| 2019 | 55,256 | 338,516 | 16.32% | 1,866,916 | 33,975,712 | 5.49% | ||||||||||
| 2018 | 59,531 | 365,725 | 16.28% | 1,211,242 | 25,974,400 | 4.66% | ||||||||||
| 2017 | 48,351 | 375,319 | 12.88% | 558,929 | 19,012,742 | 2.94% | ||||||||||
| 2016 | 45,687 | 321,686 | 14.20% | 186,678 | 13,586,610 | 1.37% | ||||||||||
| 2015 | 53,394 | 290,345 | 18.39% | 122,641 | 10,202,871 | 1.20% | ||||||||||
| OROA | OROA (Thousands) | |||||||||||||||
| Net Income (Milions) | Total Assests | OROA | Net Income | Total Assests | OROA | |||||||||||
| 2019 | 63,930 | 338,516 | 18.89% | 2,604,254 | 33,975,712 | 7.67% | ||||||||||
| 2018 | 70,898 | 365,725 | 19.39% | 1,605,226 | 25,974,400 | 6.18% | ||||||||||
| 2017 | 61,344 | 375,319 | 16.34% | 838,679 | 19,012,742 | 4.41% | ||||||||||
| 2016 | 60,024 | 321,686 | 18.66% | 379,793 | 13,586,610 | 2.80% | ||||||||||
| 2015 | 71,230 | 290,345 | 24.53% | 305,826 | 10,202,871 | 3.00% | ||||||||||
| Earnings Per Share | Earnings Per Share | |||||||||||||||
| 2019 | $11.97 | 2019 | $4.26 | |||||||||||||
| 2018 | $12.01 | 2018 | $2.78 | |||||||||||||
| 2017 | $9.27 | 2017 | $1.29 | |||||||||||||
| 2016 | $8.35 | 2016 | $0.44 | |||||||||||||
| 2015 | $9.28 | 2015 | $0.29 | |||||||||||||
| Price to Earnings Ratio for Current Year (For 2019 = Stock price = Dec 2018 Closing price) | ||||||||||||||||
| Price (Prior Year Closing Stock Price) | EPS | PE Ratio | Price (Prior Year Closing Stock Price) | EPS | PE Ratio | |||||||||||
| 2019 | $157.74 | $11.97 | 13 | $267.66 | $4.26 | 63 | ||||||||||
| 2018 | $169.23 | $12.01 | 14 | $191.96 | $2.78 | 69 | ||||||||||
| 2017 | $115.82 | $9.27 | 12 | $123.80 | $1.29 | 96 | ||||||||||
| 2016 | $105.26 | $8.35 | 13 | $114.38 | $0.44 | 260 | ||||||||||
| 2015 | $110.38 | $9.28 | 12 | $48.80 | $0.29 | 168 | ||||||||||
| Price to Earnings Ratio for Previous Year (For 2019 Stock price = Dec 2017 Closing price) | ||||||||||||||||
| Price (Prior Year Closing Stock Price) | EPS | PE Ratio | Price (Prior Year Closing Stock Price) | EPS | PE Ratio | |||||||||||
| 2019 | $169.23 | $11.97 | 14 | $191.96 | $4.26 | 45 | ||||||||||
| 2018 | $115.82 | $12.01 | 10 | $123.80 | $2.78 | 45 | ||||||||||
| 2017 | $105.26 | $9.27 | 11 | $114.38 | $1.29 | 89 | ||||||||||
| 2016 | $110.38 | $8.35 | 13 | $48.80 | $0.44 | 111 | ||||||||||
| 2015 | $80.15 | $9.28 | 9 | $52.60 | $0.29 | 181 | ||||||||||
| Market Capitalization (Thousands) Apple | ||||||||||||||||
| Weighted Average Basic Shares Outstanding | In thousands | Price (Prior Year Closing Stock Price) | Total Cap | |||||||||||||
| 2019 | 4,617,834 | 4,617,834,000 | $157.74 | 728,417,135,160 | seven hundred twenty-eight billion four hundred seventeen million one hundred thirty-five thousand one hundred sixty | |||||||||||
| 2018 | 4,955,377 | 4,955,377,000 | $169.23 | 838,598,449,710 | ||||||||||||
| 2017 | 5,217,242 | 5,217,242,000 | $115.82 | 604,260,968,440 | ||||||||||||
| 2016 | 5,470,820 | 5,470,820,000 | $105.26 | 575,858,513,200 | ||||||||||||
| 2015 | 5,753,421 | 5,753,421,000 | $110.38 | 635,062,609,980 | ||||||||||||
| Market Capitalization (Thousands) Netflix | ||||||||||||||||
| Weighted Average Shares Outstanding | ||||||||||||||||
| Weighted Average Basic Shares Outstanding | In thousands | Price (Prior Year Closing Stock Price) | Total Cap | |||||||||||||
| 2019 | 437,799 | 437,799,000.00 | $267.66 | 117,181,280,340.00 | one hundred seventeen billion one hundred eighty-one million two hundred eighty thousand three hundred forty | |||||||||||
| 2018 | 435,374 | 435,374,000.00 | $191.96 | 83,574,393,040.00 | ||||||||||||
| 2017 | 431,885 | 431,885,000.00 | $123.80 | 53,467,363,000.00 | ||||||||||||
| 2016 | 428,822 | 428,822,000.00 | $114.38 | 49,048,660,360.00 | ||||||||||||
| 2015 | 425,889 | 425,889,000.00 | $48.80 | 20,783,383,200.00 | ||||||||||||
| Market to Book Ratio | Apple | |||||||||||||||
| Market Cap | Book value of Equity | In Millions | Market to Book Ratio | |||||||||||||
| 2019 | 728,417,135,160.00 | 90,488 | 90,488,000,000.00 | 8.05 | ||||||||||||
| 2018 | 838,598,449,710.00 | 107,147 | 107,147,000,000.00 | 7.83 | ||||||||||||
| 2017 | 604,260,968,440.00 | 134,047 | 134,047,000,000.00 | 4.51 | ||||||||||||
| 2016 | 575,858,513,200.00 | 128,249 | 128,249,000,000.00 | 4.49 | ||||||||||||
| 2015 | 635,062,609,980.00 | 119,355 | 119,355,000,000.00 | 5.32 | ||||||||||||
| Market to Book Ratio | Netflix | |||||||||||||||
| Market Cap | Book value of Equity | In Thousands | Market to Book Ratio | |||||||||||||
| 2019 | 117,181,280,340.00 | 7,582,157 | 7,582,157,000.00 | 15.45 | ||||||||||||
| 2018 | 83,574,393,040.00 | 5,238,765 | 5,238,765,000.00 | 15.95 | ||||||||||||
| 2017 | 53,467,363,000.00 | 3,581,956 | 3,581,956,000.00 | 14.93 | ||||||||||||
| 2016 | 49,048,660,360.00 | 2,679,800 | 2,679,800,000.00 | 18.3 | ||||||||||||
| 2015 | 20,783,383,200.00 | 2,223,426 | 2,223,426,000.00 | 9.35 | ||||||||||||
| October Stock Price | October Stock Price | |||||||||||||||
| 2019 | 227.01 | 2019 | 272.79 | |||||||||||||
| 2017 | 155.3 | 2017 | 198.02 | |||||||||||||
| Gain $ | $71.71 | Gain $ | $74.77 | |||||||||||||
| Gain % | 46.18% | Gain % | 37.76% |
Financial2
| gehen | ||||||||||||||
| Apple | Netlfix | |||||||||||||
| Gross Profit Margin (In Millions) | Gross Profit Margin (In Thousands) | |||||||||||||
| Net Sales | Cost of Sales | Gross Profit | GPM | Sales | Cost of Sales | Gross Profit | GPM | |||||||
| 2019 | 260,174 | 161,782 | 98,392 | 37.82% | 5,467,434 | 2,001,411 | 36.60% | |||||||
| 2018 | 265,595 | 163,756 | 101,839 | 38.34% | 4,186,841 | 1,453,441 | 34.70% | |||||||
| 2017 | 229,234 | 141,048 | 88,186 | 38.47% | 3,285,755 | 1,178,401 | 35.90% | |||||||
| 2016 | 215,639 | 131,376 | 84,263 | 39.08% | 2,477,541 | 823,122 | 33.20% | |||||||
| 2015 | 233,715 | 140,089 | 93,626 | 40.06% | 1,823,333 | 573,968 | 31.50% | |||||||
| Operating Profit Margin | Operating Profit Margin | |||||||||||||
| Net Sales | Gross Profit | Operating Expense | Operating Income | OPM | Sales | Operating Income | OPM | |||||||
| 2019 | 260,174 | 98,392 | 34,462 | 63,930 | 24.57% | 5,467,434 | 2,604,254 | 47.63% | ||||||
| 2018 | 265,595 | 101,839 | 30,941 | 70,898 | 26.69% | 4,186,841 | 838,679 | 20.03% | ||||||
| 2017 | 229,234 | 88,186 | 26,842 | 61,344 | 26.76% | 3,285,755 | 838,679 | 25.52% | ||||||
| 2016 | 215,639 | 84,263 | 24,239 | 60,024 | 27.84% | 2,477,541 | 379,793 | 15.33% | ||||||
| 2015 | 233,715 | 93,626 | 22,396 | 71,230 | 30.48% | 1,823,333 | 305,826 | 16.77% | ||||||
| Net Profit Margin | Net Profit Margin | |||||||||||||
| Net Income | Net Sales | NPM | Net Income | Net Sales | NPM | |||||||||
| 2019 | 55,256 | 260,174 | 21.24% | 1,866,916 | 5,467,434 | 34.15% | ||||||||
| 2018 | 59,531 | 265,595 | 22.41% | 1,211,242 | 4,186,841 | 28.93% | ||||||||
| 2017 | 48,351 | 229,234 | 21.09% | 558,929 | 3,285,755 | 17.01% | ||||||||
| 2016 | 45,687 | 215,639 | 21.19% | 186,678 | 2,477,541 | 7.53% | ||||||||
| 2015 | 53,394 | 233,715 | 22.85% | 122,641 | 1,823,333 | 6.73% | ||||||||
| Income before provision for income taxes | Income before income taxes | |||||||||||||
| EBIT | Depreciation and Amortization | EBITDA | EBIT | Depreciation and Amortization | EBITDA | |||||||||
| 2019 | 65,737 | 12,547 | $78,284 | 2,062,231 | 103,579 | $2,165,810 | ||||||||
| 2018 | 72,903 | 10,903 | $83,806 | 1,226,458 | 83,157 | $1,309,615 | ||||||||
| 2017 | 64,089 | 10,157 | $74,246 | 485,321 | 71,911 | $557,232 | ||||||||
| 2016 | 61,372 | 10,505 | $71,877 | 260,507 | 57,528 | $318,035 | ||||||||
| 2015 | 72,515 | 11,257 | $83,772 | 141,885 | 62,283 | $204,168 | ||||||||
| EBITDA Margin | EBITDA Margin | |||||||||||||
| EBITDA | Net Sales | EBITDA Margin | EBITDA | Net Sales | EBITDA Margin | |||||||||
| 2019 | 78,284 | 260,174 | 30.09% | 2,165,810 | 5,467,434 | 39.61% | ||||||||
| 2018 | 83,806 | 265,595 | 31.55% | 1,309,615 | 4,186,841 | 31.28% | ||||||||
| 2017 | 74,246 | 229,234 | 32.39% | 557,232 | 3,285,755 | 16.96% | ||||||||
| 2016 | 71,877 | 215,639 | 33.33% | 318,035 | 2,477,541 | 12.84% | ||||||||
| 2015 | 83,772 | 233,715 | 35.84% | 204,168 | 1,823,333 | 11.20% | ||||||||
| Working Capital | Working Capital | |||||||||||||
| Current Assests | Current Liabilities | WC | Current Assests | Current Liabilities | WC | |||||||||
| 2019 | 162,819 | 105,718 | $57,101 | 6,178,504 | 6,855,696 | -$677,192 | ||||||||
| 2018 | 131,339 | 115,929 | $15,410 | 9,694,135 | 6,487,320 | $3,206,815 | ||||||||
| 2017 | 128,645 | 100,814 | $27,831 | 7,669,974 | 5,466,312 | $2,203,662 | ||||||||
| 2016 | 106,869 | 79,006 | $27,863 | 5,720,291 | 4,586,657 | $1,133,634 | ||||||||
| 2015 | 89,378 | 80,610 | $8,768 | 5,431,840 | 3,529,624 | $1,902,216 | ||||||||
| Current Ratio | Current Ratio | |||||||||||||
| Current Assests | Current Liabilities | CR | Current Assests | Current Liabilities | CR | |||||||||
| 2019 | 162,819 | 105,718 | 1.5 | 6,178,504 | 6,855,696 | 0.9 | ||||||||
| 2018 | 131,339 | 115,929 | 1.1 | 9,694,135 | 6,487,320 | 1.5 | ||||||||
| 2017 | 128,645 | 100,814 | 1.3 | 7,669,974 | 5,466,312 | 1.4 | ||||||||
| 2016 | 106,869 | 79,006 | 1.4 | 5,720,291 | 4,586,657 | 1.2 | ||||||||
| 2015 | 89,378 | 80,610 | 1.1 | 5,431,840 | 3,529,624 | 1.5 | ||||||||
| Quick Ratio | Quick Ratio | |||||||||||||
| Current Assests | Inventory | Current Liabilities | QR | Current Assests | Inventory | Current Liabilities | QR | |||||||
| 2019 | 162,819 | 496 | 105,718 | 1.5 | 6,178,504 | 0 | 6,855,696 | 0.9 | ||||||
| 2018 | 131,339 | -1,114 | 115,929 | 1.1 | 9,694,135 | 0 | 6,487,320 | 1.5 | ||||||
| 2017 | 128,645 | -2,723 | 100,814 | 1.3 | 7,669,974 | 0 | 5,466,312 | 1.4 | ||||||
| 2016 | 106,869 | 217 | 79,006 | 1.3 | 5,720,291 | 0 | 4,586,657 | 1.2 | ||||||
| 2015 | 89,378 | -238 | 80,610 | 1.1 | 5,431,840 | 0 | 3,529,624 | 1.5 | ||||||
| Cash generated by operating activities | Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities | |||||||||||||
| Operating Cash Flow Ratio | Operating Cash Flow Ratio | |||||||||||||
| Operating Cash Flow | Current Liabilities | OCFR | Operating Cash Flow | Current Liabilities | OCFR | |||||||||
| 2019 | 69,391 | 162,819 | 0.43 | -2,887,322 | 6,855,696 | -0.42 | ||||||||
| 2018 | 77,434 | 131,339 | 0.59 | -2,680,479 | 6,487,320 | -0.41 | ||||||||
| 2017 | 63,598 | 128,645 | 0.49 | -1,785,948 | 5,466,312 | -0.33 | ||||||||
| 2016 | 65,824 | 106,869 | 0.62 | -1,473,984 | 4,586,657 | -0.32 | ||||||||
| 2015 | 81,266 | 89,378 | 0.91 | -749,439 | 3,529,624 | -0.21 | ||||||||
| Accounts Receivable Turnover | Accounts Receivable Turnover | |||||||||||||
| Sales | Accounts Receivable | ART | Per Day | Sales | Accounts Receivable | ART | Per Day | |||||||
| 2019 | 260,174 | 245 | 1061.93 | 0.34 | 5,467,434 | 454,399 | 12.03 | 30.34 | ||||||
| 2018 | 265,595 | -5,322 | -49.91 | -7.31 | 4,186,841 | 362,712 | 11.54 | 31.62 | ||||||
| 2017 | 229,234 | -2,093 | -109.52 | -3.33 | 3,285,755 | 0 | 0 | |||||||
| 2016 | 215,639 | 527 | 409.18 | 0.89 | 2,477,541 | 0 | 0 | |||||||
| 2015 | 233,715 | 417 | 560.47 | 0.65 | 1,823,333 | 0 | 0 | |||||||
| Inventory Turnover | 365 | Inventory Turnover | ||||||||||||
| COGS | Inventory | IT | Per Day | COGS | Inventory | IT | Per Day | |||||||
| 2019 | 161,782 | 496 | 326.17 | 1.12 | 12,440,000 | 0 | ||||||||
| 2018 | 163,756 | -1,114 | -147 | -2.48 | 9,968,000 | 0 | ||||||||
| 2017 | 141,048 | -2,723 | -51.8 | -7.05 | 8,033,000 | 0 | ||||||||
| 2016 | 131,376 | 217 | 605.42 | 0.6 | 6,257,000 | 0 | ||||||||
| 2015 | 140,089 | -238 | -588.61 | -0.62 | 4,591,000 | 0 | ||||||||
| Accounts Payable Turnover | Accounts Payable Turnover | |||||||||||||
| Accounts Payable | COGS | APT | Per Day | Accounts Payable | COGS | APT | Per Day | |||||||
| 2019 | 46,236 | 161,782 | 3.5 | 104.31 | 674,347 | 12,440,000 | 18.45 | 19.79 | ||||||
| 2018 | 55,888 | 163,756 | 2.93 | 124.57 | 562,985 | 9,968,000 | 17.71 | 20.61 | ||||||
| 2017 | 9,618 | 141,048 | 14.67 | 24.89 | 359,555 | 8,033,000 | 22.34 | 16.34 | ||||||
| 2016 | 1,837 | 131,376 | 71.52 | 5.1 | 312,842 | 6,257,000 | 20 | 18.25 | ||||||
| 2015 | 5,001 | 140,089 | 28.01 | 13.03 | 253,491 | 4,591,000 | 18.11 | 20.15 | ||||||
| Liablities-to-equity-ratio | Liablities-to-equity-ratio | |||||||||||||
| Total Liabilities | Shareholders' equity | L/E Ratio | Total Liabilities | Shareholders' equity | L/E Ratio | |||||||||
| 2019 | 248,028 | 90,488 | 2.74 | 26,393,555 | 7,582,157 | 3.48 | ||||||||
| 2018 | 258,578 | 107,147 | 2.41 | 20,735,635 | 5,238,765 | 3.96 | ||||||||
| 2017 | 241,272 | 134,047 | 1.8 | 15,430,786 | 3,581,956 | 4.31 | ||||||||
| 2016 | 193,437 | 128,249 | 1.51 | 10,906,810 | 2,679,800 | 4.07 | ||||||||
| 2015 | 170,990 | 119,355 | 1.43 | 7,979,445 | 2,223,426 | 3.59 | ||||||||
| Debt-to-equity-ratio (In Millions) | Debt-to-equity-ratio (In Thousands) | |||||||||||||
| Short-term Debt | Long-term Debt | Shareholders' equity | Short + Long Debt | D/E Ratio | Short-term Debt | Long-term Debt | Short + Long Debt | Shareholders' equity | D/E Ratio | |||||
| 2019 | 5,980 | 9,181 | 90,488 | 15,161 | 0.17 | 190,620,000 | 16,180,000 | 206,800,000 | 7,582,157 | 27.27 | ||||
| 2018 | 1,196 | 9,374 | 107,147 | 10,570 | 0.1 | - | 10,390,000 | 10,390,000 | 5,238,765 | 1.98 | ||||
| 2017 | 1,198 | 9,721 | 134,047 | 10,919 | 0.08 | - | 6,530,000 | 6,530,000 | 3,581,956 | 1.82 | ||||
| 2016 | 8,110 | 7,543 | 128,249 | 15,653 | 0.12 | - | 3,390,000 | 3,390,000 | 2,679,800 | 1.27 | ||||
| 2015 | 8,500 | 5,346 | 119,355 | 13,846 | 0.12 | - | 2,400,000 | 2,400,000 | 2,223,426 | 1.08 | ||||
| Total cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities | ||||||||||||||
| Net-debt-to-equity ratio (In Millions) | ||||||||||||||
| Short-term Debt | Long-term Debt | Cash and Marketable Securities | Shareholders' equity | Net-debt/E Ratio | Short-term Debt | Long-term Debt | Unrealized Gain/Loss Marketable Securities | Cash | C + M | Shareholders' equity | Net-debt/E Ratio | |||
| 2019 | 5,980 | 9,181 | 205,898 | 90,488 | -2.11 | 190,620,000 | 16,180,000 | - | 5,020,000 | 5,020,000 | 7,582,157 | 26.61 | ||
| 2018 | 1,196 | 9,374 | 237,100 | 107,147 | -2.11 | - | 10,390,000 | - | 3,790,000 | 3,790,000 | 5,238,765 | 1.26 | ||
| 2017 | 1,198 | 9,721 | 268,895 | 134,047 | -1.92 | - | 6,530,000 | - | 2,820,000 | 2,820,000 | 3,581,956 | 1.04 | ||
| 2016 | 8,110 | 7,543 | 237,585 | 128,249 | -1.73 | - | 3,390,000 | -599,000 | 1,470,000 | 871,000 | 2,679,800 | 0.94 | ||
| 2015 | 8,500 | 5,346 | 205,666 | 119,355 | -1.61 | - | 2,400,000 | -806,000 | 1,810,000 | 1,004,000 | 2,223,426 | 0.63 | ||
| OBSD | Operating Leases (In Millions) | OBSD For Netflix Missing | |||||||||||||
| 2019 | $1,300 | |||||||||||||
| 2018 | $1,200 | |||||||||||||
| 2017 | $1,100 | |||||||||||||
| 2016 | $662 | |||||||||||||
| 2015 | $676 | |||||||||||||
| Free Cash Flow is not mentioned in the slides to calculate for presentation packet. |
Fin Apple
| Eirin | be aware that I have a norwegian computer and we use "," as "." | ||||||||
| Apple | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | ||||
| Net Income | $ 55 256,00 | $ 59 531,00 | $ 48 351,00 | $ 45 687,00 | $ 53 394,00 | in millions | |||
| Shareholders' equity Beg | $ 107 147,00 | $ 134 047,00 | $ 128 249,00 | $ 119 355,00 | $ 111 547,00 | in millions | |||
| Shareholders' equity End | $ 90 488,00 | $ 107 147,00 | $ 134 047,00 | $ 128 249,00 | $ 119 355,00 | in millions | |||
| Operating Income | $ 63 930,00 | $ 70 898,00 | $ 61 344,00 | $ 60 024,00 | $ 71 230,00 | in millions | |||
| Assets Beg | $ 365 725,00 | $ 375 319,00 | $ 321 686,00 | $ 290 345,00 | $ 231 839,00 | in millions | |||
| Assets End | $ 338 516,00 | $ 365 725,00 | $ 375 319,00 | $ 321 686,00 | $ 290 345,00 | in millions | |||
| Price of stock per share | $ 218,82 | $ 225,74 | $ 154,12 | $ 112,71 | $ 114,71 | Where i found it: | https://investor.apple.com/stock-price/default.aspx | Used closing price Friday (the balancedate is Saturday) | |
| Shares outstanding | $ 45 174,00 | $ 40 201,00 | $ 35 867,00 | $ 31 251,00 | $ 27 416,00 | in millions | |||
| Total Liabilities | $ 248 028,00 | $ 258 578,00 | $ 241 272,00 | $ 193 437,00 | $ 17 099,00 | in millions | |||
| Gross Margin | $ 98 392,00 | $ 101 839,00 | $ 88 186,00 | $ 84 263,00 | $ 93 626,00 | in millions | |||
| Sales | $ 260 174,00 | $ 265 595,00 | $ 229 234,00 | $ 215 639,00 | $ 233 715,00 | in millions | |||
| Depreciation and amorization | $ 12 547,00 | $ 10 903,00 | $ 10 157,00 | $ 10 505,00 | $ 11 257,00 | in millions | |||
| Current Assets | $ 162 819,00 | $ 131 339,00 | $ 128 645,00 | $ 106 869,00 | $ 89 378,00 | in millions | |||
| Current Liabilities | $ 105 718,00 | $ 115 929,00 | $ 100 814,00 | $ 79 006,00 | $ 8 061,00 | in millions | Confused bc there are two different numbers for current labiliteis on the 10-k for 2019 and the 10-k for 2018 | ||
| $ 116 866,00 | (10-k 2018) | in millions | |||||||
| Inventory | $ 4 106,00 | $ 3 956,00 | $ 4 855,00 | $ 2 132,00 | $ 2 349,00 | in millions | |||
| Cash | $ 25 913,00 | $ 20 289,00 | $ 20 484,00 | $ 21 120,00 | $ 13 844,00 | in millions | |||
| Short-term investmets (marketable securities, current assets?) | $ 51 713,00 | $ 40 388,00 | $ 53 892,00 | $ 46 671,00 | $ 20 481,00 | in millions | |||
| Operating Cash Flows | $ 69 391,00 | $ 77 434,00 | $ 64 225,00 | $ 66 231,00 | $ 81 266,00 | in millions | Confused bc there are two different numbers for operation cash flows on the 10-k for 2018 and the 10-k for 2017 | ||
| $ 63 598,00 | $ 65 824,00 | in millions | |||||||
| AR | $ 22 926,00 | $ 23 186,00 | $ 17 874,00 | $ 15 754,00 | $ 16 849,00 | in millions | |||
| COGS | |||||||||
| 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |||||
| Average ROE: | |||||||||
| ROE: | (Net income/average total shareholders' equity) | 56 % | 49 % | 37 % | 37 % | 46 % | 45 % | ||
| Average OROE: | |||||||||
| OROE: | (Operationg income/average total shareholders' equity) | 65 % | 59 % | 47 % | 48 % | 62 % | 56 % | ||
| Average ROA: | |||||||||
| ROA: | (Net Income/average total assets) | 16 % | 16 % | 14 % | 15 % | 20 % | 16 % | ||
| Average OROA: | |||||||||
| OROA: | (Operating income/average total assets) | 18 % | 19 % | 18 % | 20 % | 27 % | 20 % | ||
| Average EPS: | |||||||||
| EPS: | (Net income/average # of common stock outstanding) | USD 11,97 | USD 12,01 | USD 9,27 | USD 8,35 | USD 9,28 | USD 10,18 | ||
| Average PE Ratio: | |||||||||
| PE Ratio: | (Price of the stock per share/earning per share) | 18,28 | 18,80 | 16,63 | 13,50 | 12,36 | 15,91 | ||
| Market Cap: | (Price of the stock per share * # of shares outstanding) | $ 9 884 974,68 | $ 9 074 973,74 | $ 5 527 822,04 | $ 3 522 300,21 | $ 3 144 889,36 | $ 6 230 992,01 | ||
| Market-to-book Ratio: | (Market Cap / book value of equity) | $ 109,24 | $ 84,70 | $ 41,24 | $ 27,46 | $ 11,51 | $ 54,83 | ||
| Stock price as of October 1st and % gain (or loss) when compared to exactly two years ago today: | (Maybe show a graf) | ||||||||
| Gross Profit Margin: | ((sales-cost of sales)/sales) | 38 % | 38 % | 38 % | 39 % | 40 % | |||
| Operating Profit Margin: | (operating income/sales) | 25 % | 27 % | 27 % | 28 % | 30 % | |||
| Net Profit Margin: | (Net income/Sales) | 21 % | 22 % | 21 % | 21 % | 23 % | |||
| EBITDA: | (Operating income + Depriciation and Amorization) | $ 76 477,00 | $ 81 801,00 | $ 71 501,00 | $ 70 529,00 | $ 82 487,00 | |||
| EBITDA Margin: | (Earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, amorization/sales) | 29 % | 31 % | 31 % | 33 % | 35 % | |||
| Working Capital: | (Current assets - Current liabilities) | $ 57 101,00 | $ 15 410,00 | $ 27 831,00 | $ 27 863,00 | $ 81 317,00 | |||
| Current Ratio: | (Current assets / Current liablities) | 1,54 | 1,13 | 1,28 | 1,35 | 11,09 | |||
| Qick Ratio: | (Current assets - Inventory) / Current Liabilities | 1,50 | 1,10 | 1,23 | 1,33 | 10,80 | |||
| Cash Ratio: | (Cash + Short term investments) / Current Liabilities | 0,73 | 0,52 | 0,74 | 0,86 | 4,26 | |||
| Operating Cash Flow Ratio: | (Operating Cash Flow / Current liabilities) | 0,66 | 0,67 | 0,64 | 0,84 | 10,08 | |||
| AR turnover: | (Sales/ AR) | 11,35 | 11,45 | 12,82 | 13,69 | 13,87 | |||
| Day's Receivables: | (AR/ average sales PER DAY) | ||||||||
| Inventory turnover: | (COGS / Inventory) | ||||||||
| Day's Inventory: | (Inventory / AVG Cost of Goods Sold PER DAY) | ||||||||
| AP turnover: | (COGS /AP) | ||||||||
| Day's payables: | (AP / COGS PER DAY) | ||||||||
| Liabilities-to-equity ratio: | (Total Liabilities / shareholders' equity) | YOU SHOULD CALCULATE THESE PER THE BALANCE SHEET….AND THEN ADJUST THEM PER THE FOOTNOTES (OFF-BALANCE SHEET DEBT ADDED TO THE BALANCE SHEET DEBT)…SHOW THEM SIDE BY SIDE..HINT!!!!!!!!!!!! | |||||||
| Debt-to-equity ratio: | (Short term debt + Long time debt - Cash and marketable securities)/Shareholders equity | ||||||||
| Net-debt-to-equity ratio: | (Short term debt + long term debt) / shareholders' equity | ||||||||
| Free Cash Flow (FCF) | (Cash flow opearations - capital expenditures) |
Vertical - Apple
| Vertical Analysis - Apple | ||||||||||||||
| Income Statement | ||||||||||||||
| Period Ending | Forecast, 2020 | September 28,2019 | September 29, 2018 | September 30, 2017 | September 24, 2016 | September 26, 2015 | ||||||||
| Total Revenue | (is the same as Total Net Sales, right?) | $ 260 174,00 | $ 265 595,00 | $ 229 234,00 | $ 215 639,00 | $ 233 715,00 | ||||||||
| Cost of Revenue | (is the same as Cost of Sales, right?) | $ 161 782,00 | $ 163 756,00 | $ 141 048,00 | $ 131 376,00 | $ 140 089,00 | ||||||||
| Gross Profit | $ 98 392,00 | $ 101 839,00 | $ 88 186,00 | $ 84 263,00 | $ 93 626,00 | |||||||||
| Operating Expenses | ||||||||||||||
| Research and development | $ 16 217,00 | $ 14 236,00 | $ 11 581,00 | $ 10 045,00 | $ 8 067,00 | |||||||||
| Selling, general and administrative | $ 18 245,00 | $ 16 705,00 | $ 15 261,00 | $ 14 194,00 | $ 14 329,00 | |||||||||
| Total Operating Expenses | $ 34 462,00 | $ 30 941,00 | $ 26 842,00 | $ 24 239,00 | $ 22 396,00 | |||||||||
| Operating Income or Loss | ||||||||||||||
| Income from Continuing Operations | ||||||||||||||
| Other income/(expense), net | $ 1 807,00 | $ 2 005,00 | $ 2 745,00 | $ 1 348,00 | $ 1 285,00 | |||||||||
| Income before provision for income taxes | $ 65 737,00 | $ 72 903,00 | $ 64 089,00 | $ 61 372,00 | $ 72 515,00 | |||||||||
| Provision for income taxes | ||||||||||||||
Vertical - Netflix
| Vertical Analysis - Netflix | ||||||||||||||
| Income Statement | ||||||||||||||
| Period Ending | Forecast, 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | ||||||||
| Total Revenue | (is the same as Total Net Sales, right?) | |||||||||||||
| Cost of Revenue | (is the same as Cost of Sales, right?) | |||||||||||||
| Gross Profit | ||||||||||||||
| Operating Expenses | ||||||||||||||
| Research and development | ||||||||||||||
| Selling, general and administrative | ||||||||||||||
| Total Operating Expenses | ||||||||||||||
| Operating Income or Loss | ||||||||||||||
| Income from Continuing Operations | ||||||||||||||
| Other income/(expense), net | ||||||||||||||
| Income before provision for income taxes | ||||||||||||||
| Provision for income taxes | ||||||||||||||
Compilation of arguments
| General guidelines and rules set by the professor | |||||||||||||||
| DO'S: | DON'T: | ||||||||||||||
| - Cover's each of Porter's 5 forces | - No financial statements can be used | ||||||||||||||
| - Explain why we have assigned each the risk level that we have | - Video presentation can be NO LONGER than 8 minutes | ||||||||||||||
| - Include the strategies that apple uses to address each risk | - Don't talk about profitability/rev or using number statistics in general | ||||||||||||||
| - Include competitive strategy analysis (cost leadership/product differ) | - Don't just read off the slide | ||||||||||||||
| - Suggested to give a brief history of Apple and where they are now | |||||||||||||||
| Porter's Five Forces - Apple | Competitive Strategy Analysis: Product Differentiation | ||||||||||||||
| Gehen | Rivalry Among Existing Firms: | Risk Level - High | Bargaining Power of Buyers: | Risk Level - | Joel | ||||||||||
| Competitors: Dell, HP, Microsoft, Samsung | |||||||||||||||
| - Can stand alone with mobile prodcuts and other handheld devices, excluding latops | |||||||||||||||
| - Can be comprosmised if it's competitors is able to develop thier own operating | |||||||||||||||
| system that is unquie and similar to Apple, EX, iMessage, facetime, | |||||||||||||||
| no sim calling (iPod with a email address | |||||||||||||||
| Kennedi- | Threat of New Entrants | Risk Level - low | Bargaining Power of Suppliers: | Risk Level - | Eirin | ||||||||||
| Cole | Threat of Substitute Products | Risk Level - Low | |||||||||||||
| - Summary: Not likey due to the number of substitutes it would take to meet feature parody with one of their products. See 'Sub. Products' TAB for expanded information. | |||||||||||||||
Company Background Info - INTRO
| Yu | ||
| Company industry and background information about the executive management (CEO, CFO, level of experience and professional background, hierarchy in the company) | ||
| Most resent Apple 10-k, 8-k and 10-q will most likely include some of this informaton (if not all) | ||
| Compnay Background: When the company was first established, the purpose was to change the way people viewed computers. Steve Jobs and Steve Wozniak was trying to make computer small enough for people to have them in their homes or offices. | ||
| Founded on April 1, 1976 by Steve Jobs and Steve Wozniak. | ||
| CEO: Tim Cook | After Graduating from Aubum University, he worked for IBM's personal computer business for 12 years. | |
| Ultimately serving as director of North American fulfillment. Meanwhile,he got an MBA degree from Duke University and was honored as Fuqua Scholar in 1998. | ||
| In 1997, he became the Vice Prisident of Corporate Materials at Compaq until he left to Apple. | ||
| His first position in Apple was Senior Vice President for worldwide operations. | ||
| Promoted to lead operations in 2007 and served as chief executive in 2009, while Jobs was away on a leave of absence for health related issues. Became CEO from 2011- present. | ||
| CFO: Luca Maestri, firstly worked at General Motors, worked at Nokia Networks and Xerox as CFO in 2009. He was appointed CFO of Apple Inc in 2014. |
Sub. Products
| VOLUNTEER'S 4 THIS PAGE - COLE | |||||||||
| APPLE: | NETFLIX | ||||||||
| Risk Level: Low | Risk Level: Medium | ||||||||
| POSITION: In Porter's Five Forcers, a substitute threat is considered a replacement product that fills the needs the consumer is looking for - not just a product that directly competes. Apple has a stable advantage here due to the technology of their product and the shear number of features that come with each. For example, an individual would need to carry a digital camera, encyclopedia, telephone, etc. just to have the same functionality as an iPhone. | POSITION: In Porter's Five Forcers, a substitute threat is considered a replacement product that fills the needs the consumer is looking for - not just a product that directly competes. Netflix provides a centralized platform for video content to be consumed that is offered on most electronic devices that are connected to the internet today. While the convenience/accessibility factor is Netflix selling point, there are multiple other avenues to go in order to watch most of the content offered on the platform today. DVD's/BluRays, Cable TV, etc. are all still available and many times offer a larger variety to choose from than the library that Netflix maintains. | ||||||||
| EXAMPLE: - The iPad would now need the same subsitute products as a computer would. - The Apple Watch would require a normal watch, music player, cell phone, step counter and health monitor, etc. - The iPhone (already listed) - AppleTV now acts as a centralized hub for all movies, tv streaming applications, digital media... It would take MANY substitute products to meet a similar feature expectation but even then it would be an inferior replacement. | EXAMPLE: - DVD's/Blu-rays - Cable Television - Other streaming services | ||||||||
| HOW DOES APPLE ADDRESS THIS THREAT: - By continuing to pack each of their products with the base expectation, plus all of the innovations and features that the consumer has come to expect from Apple. If they continue to take this approach, while integrating technologies so that each product crosses over and impacts the other, they will continue to create an eco system that cannot be matched with any one substitute products. | HOW DOES APPLE ADDRESS THIS THREAT: - Netflix has spent a great deal of money in both locking down exclusivity streaming rights to various popular tv shows to ensure that fanbases would neet to subscribe to enjoy the content. In addition to contractual agreements, Netflix has been producing and creating a vast library of original content in-house that you can only find on their platform. Popular series such as Ozarks or Making A Murderer have garnered vast waves of new subscriptions and new customers. | ||||||||
Rivalry among existing firms
| VOLUNTEER'S 4 THIS PAGE - Gehen | |
| Risk Level : High | |
| What is thier competitive rivalry like? | |
| High competition with other techonoligical markets, but mainly differentiates among others with IOS operating | |
| system where there are arguments that it not easily penetrable like andrioid or windows system. With same amount of sales | |
| among its competitors it is able to differentiate itself with IOS. Due to this, even at high risk rivalry it is more likely | |
| Apple gets majority of market share in this industry. | |
| Is it easy for new competitiors to pop up? | |
| With the hype around apple prodcuts that usually targets younger adults, it is hard for it's competitiors to have | |
| them buy other than ios products, even though other devices offer twice as much as what apple phones offer | |
| with their cameras and storage and others. | |
| Rivalry amongs exisitng firm. - Med | |
| What is their competitive rivalry like? | |
| High competiton within industry, some are hulu, disney, hbo and youtube. There is not enought subscriber at current asking price for Neflix. Long waiting times for tv shows and movies. Their competition beats them by asking more price with thier customers. Although they have individual casting for Netlfix series, there is no revenue growth to reinvest into more tv shows by themselves and produced by others. | |
| Is it easy for a new competitior to pop up? | |
| Easily able to pop up. Netlfix is not able to retain customers with thier current offerings. It grew too fast and is now in a limbo, with competitors offering either high quality at low price than netflix and or even greater quality with time excepton from disney and hbo. | |
Threat of new entrants
| Risk Level: Low | |
Position: The threat of new entrants is the ease with which a new firm can enter an industry and will affect the profitability of other firms within the industry.The risk level of new entrants for Apple and the industry which Apple is in is low. There are factors that affect the barrier of entry for any industry and they are economies of scale, first mover advantage, relationships with customers and suppliers, and legal barriers. If any of these are in place, it is harder for competition to arise. Many of these barriers are present to the industry which Apple is in. The economies of scale barrier is present in the technology industry which means that there are cost advantages that come from being a large company. Apple along with all of their competitors are very large and well funded companies. This means that their costs are usually cut because they are producing so much but, if a smaller company were to try and join, they would experience very high costs for a very low number of goods because the materials for this industry are expensive which results in it being very difficult for new companies to arise. The next barrier is the first mover advantage which is when a company is the first in an industry so they hold the majority of the market share. Apple wasn't the first in the technology industry but they were the first to create the high-end and luxury models of technology which gives Apple some first mover privileges and makes it hard for new companies to compete. The next barrier is relationships with suppliers and customers. In the technology industry this barrier is very high. There are certain components to the devices produced that can only be obtained through very limited sources. The companies in this industry already have to compete for these various components with limited sources. Apple is in agreement with some sources but there is a possibility that they could not be renewed so there are risks for all in the industry of supply shortages or an increase of prices. Relationships with customers is another barrier that other companies would have to overcome when entering the industry. Apple has developed relationships with customers throughout the years. Other industries have also been present and created relationships which makes it very hard for new industries to enter. The final barrier is legal. Legal barriers are things like patents that legally prevent other companies from entering. There are some legal barriers in this industry. There are patents, copyrights, and service marks that are registered so that companies can’t imitate other products. All of these barriers are present in some way in the technology industry so it makes it very difficult for new companies to enter the industry making this a low risk for Apple.
Strategy: Apple addresses the first risk of the economies of scale by continuing to produce large amounts to receive cost advantages when producing. They are able to be the first mover in a luxury technology industry although they were not the first in the industry, they continue to combat this by making high-end products that separate them from the competition. They are able to combat the relationships with suppliers and customers as they have agreements with many sources that provide the components that are limited. They also have created strong relationships with customers by promising a high-quality buying experience. They place their stores in high traffic areas so they can continue to attract customers. Apple employs knowledgeable people who can provide advice, service, and training. With all of the many products and services, Apple has a strong relationship with customers. To address the legal barriers, Apple is able to hold many patents and copyrights and also has registered for more patents, copyrights, trademarks, and service marks. They are able to combat many of these barriers to hold their place in the market.
Competitive Advantage: One competitive advantage that Apple holds is with direct contact with customers. Having so many stores allows them to demonstrate their products and show the advantages they have over competitors which helps them attract and retain customers. They continue to have strong relationships with customers as they are dedicated to selling to educational institutions and businesses. Apple creates strong relationships with customers as they retain many customers with all of their many products and services. Apple is very invested in their research and development which gives them more intellectual property. Apple able to patent their new products and if a competing company infringes upon their intellectual property and imitates products it could end up hurting them.
Threat of New Entrants-- Netflix Medium The market for entertainment video is intensely competitive and subject to rapid change ● Economies of Scale: Netflix is able to combat the economies of scale really well. As their company has grown with more consumers, they are able to reduce operating costs on a per subscriber basis. ● First Mover Advantage: Netflix was able to perfect video streaming to become one of the first streaming media services. ● Relationships w/ Customers and Suppliers: This is one of the major risks that Netflix faces. If they struggle to attract and retain members then the business will struggle to grow and the business will be negatively affected. If Netflix fails to maintain a positive relationship with customers through content, then they could lose memberships. They also rely on a number of suppliers and if any of those were to fall through it could hurt Netflix. ● Legal Barriers: The legal barriers do not protect Netflix very well because most of the content can be appropriated. They face the risk of losing the value of their brand and intangible assets. Strategy: Netflix faces some risks because the media streaming business does not have many barriers that slow competition from arising. However, they do hold a large share of the market and have the competitive advantage of more consumers and being one of the first and well known in the business. They need to keep good relationships with their customers by keeping a positive consumer reaction by the content that is streamed. As long as Netflix maintains a customer relationship that is positive and try to keep their proprietary rights protected then Netflix should be able to overcome the threat of new entrants.
Bargaining power of buyers
| Apple | ||
| Risk Level: | High | |
| Breakdown: | ||
| High Buyer Power Factors | Low Buyer Power Factors | |
| -Low switching costs | -Low concentration of buyers | |
| -Well-educated buyers | -Low purchase volume | |
| -Undifferentiated products | ||
| Netflix | ||
| Risk Level: | ||
| Breakdown: | ||
| High Buyer Power Factors | Low Buyer Power Factors | |
| -Very low switching costs | -Low concentration of buyers | |
| -Most offerings undifferentiated | -Very low purchase volume | |
| - | -Netflix Original Series |
Brown Financial Ratios
| Apple | Formulas - Video 1 | Calculate | Apple | ||||||||||||||
| Does your company deal with foreign currencies? | Return on Equity | - ROE | ROE | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |||||||||
| - Which ones? | ROE = Net Income / Shareholders' Equity | - Avg ROE | Net Income | $55,256.00 | $59,531.00 | $48,531.00 | $45,687.00 | $53,394.00 | |||||||||
| - Strategy to offset fluctuations? | - OROE | Shareholders' Equity | $90,448.00 | $107,147.00 | $134,047.00 | $128,249.00 | $119,335.00 | ||||||||||
| How much revenue comes from international operations? | Operating Return on Equity | - Avg OROE | Return on Equity | 61.09% | 55.56% | 36.20% | 35.62% | 44.74% | |||||||||
| - What are the specific countries? | OROE = Operating Income / Total Equity | - PE for most current year (market price per share / EPS | |||||||||||||||
| - What percentages per country? | - PE for previous years | AVG ROE | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | ||||||||||
| Segment Info | Return on Assets | - Market to book ratio | Net Income | $55,256.00 | $59,531.00 | $48,531.00 | $45,687.00 | $53,394.00 | |||||||||
| - Build consolidated income statement | ROA = Net Income / Total Assets | - Market Cap / Book value of equity | Beg Shareholders' Equity | $107,147.00 | $134,047.00 | $128,249.00 | $119,335.00 | $111,547.00 | |||||||||
| - Build segmented income statement by product and country | - Market Cap = PPS X # of share outstanding | End Shareholders' Equity | $90,448.00 | $107,147.00 | $134,047.00 | $128,249.00 | $119,335.00 | ||||||||||
| - Produce ratios at consolidated level as well as micro level | Operating Return on Assets | - Book Value of Equity = Total Shareholders' Equity | Avg Shareholders' Equity | $98,797.50 | $120,597.00 | $131,148.00 | $123,792.00 | $115,441.00 | |||||||||
| Revenue recognition policy? | OROA = Operating Income / Total Assets | - Stock price as of Oct 1st and % gain or loss when compared to exactly two years ago today | Avg Return on Equity | 55.93% | 49.36% | 37.00% | 36.91% | 46.25% | |||||||||
| How do they value their inventory? | |||||||||||||||||
| Method of depreciation? | Earnings Per Share | OROE | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | ||||||||||
| % of allowance for bad debt? | EPS = Net Income / Avg # Common Stock Outstanding | Operating Income | $63,930.00 | $70,898.00 | $61,344.00 | $60,024.00 | $71,230.00 | ||||||||||
| How much off-balance sheet debt? | Shareholders' Equity | $90,448.00 | $107,147.00 | $134,047.00 | $128,249.00 | $119,335.00 | |||||||||||
| Price to Earnings Ratio | Operating Return on Equity | 70.68% | 66.17% | 45.76% | 46.80% | 59.69% | |||||||||||
| Netflix | PE = Price of stock per share / EPS | ||||||||||||||||
| Does your company deal with foreign currencies? | AVG OROE | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |||||||||||
| - Which ones? | Market Capitalization | Operating Income | $63,930.00 | $70,898.00 | $61,344.00 | $60,024.00 | $71,230.00 | ||||||||||
| - Strategy to offset fluctuations? | Market Cap = Stock price per share X # of shares outstanding | Beg Shareholders' Equity | $107,147.00 | $134,047.00 | $128,249.00 | $119,335.00 | $111,547.00 | ||||||||||
| How much revenue comes from international operations? | End Shareholders' Equity | $90,448.00 | $107,147.00 | $134,047.00 | $128,249.00 | $119,335.00 | |||||||||||
| - What are the specific countries? | Formulas - Video 2 | Avg Shareholders' Equity | $98,797.50 | $120,597.00 | $131,148.00 | $123,792.00 | $115,441.00 | ||||||||||
| - What percentages per country? | Gross Profit Margin | Avg Operating Return on Equity | 64.71% | 58.79% | 46.77% | 48.49% | 61.70% | ||||||||||
| Segment Info | GP Margin = (Sales - Cost of Sales) / Sales | ||||||||||||||||
| - Build consolidated income statement | **Compare to previous years and industry as a whole | EPS | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | ||||||||||
| - Build segmented income statement by product and country | Basic | $11.97 | $12.01 | $9.27 | $8.35 | $9.28 | |||||||||||
| - Produce ratios at consolidated level as well as micro level | Operating Profit Margin | Diluted | $11.89 | $11.91 | $9.21 | $8.31 | $9.22 | ||||||||||
| Revenue recognition policy? | OP Margin = Operating Income / Sales | ||||||||||||||||
| How do they value their inventory? | PE | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |||||||||||
| Method of depreciation? | Net Profit Margin | Price of Stock per Share | $248.76 | $201.59 | $172.50 | $115.59 | $119.27 | 105.11 | |||||||||
| % of allowance for bad debt? | NP Margin = Net Income / Sales | Earnings Per Share | $11.97 | $12.01 | $9.27 | $8.35 | $9.28 | ||||||||||
| How much off-balance sheet debt? | Price to Earnings Ratio | 20.78 | 16.79 | 18.61 | 13.84 | 12.85 | |||||||||||
| EBITDA Margin | |||||||||||||||||
| EBITDA Margin = EBITDA / Sales | MARKET CAP | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |||||||||||
| Price of Stock per Share | $248.76 | $201.59 | $172.50 | $115.59 | $119.27 | 105.11 | |||||||||||
| Shares Outstanding | 4443.265 | 4745.398 | 5134.132 | 5332.313 | 5575.331 | ||||||||||||
| Market Capitalization | $1,105,306.60 | $956,624.78 | $885,637.77 | $616,362.06 | $664,969.73 | ||||||||||||
| MARKET CAP/BOOK VALUE | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | ||||||||||||
| Market Capitalization | 1105306.60 | 956624.78 | 885637.77 | 616362.06 | 664969.73 | ||||||||||||
| Book Value of Equity | $90,448.00 | $107,147.00 | $134,047.00 | $128,249.00 | $119,335.00 | ||||||||||||
| $12.22 | $8.93 | $6.61 | $4.81 | $5.57 | |||||||||||||
| Stock Price Comparison | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | ||||||||||||
| GROSS PROFIT MARGIN | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | ||||||||||||
| Sales | $260,174.00 | $265,595.00 | $229,234.00 | $215,639.00 | $233,715.00 | ||||||||||||
| Cost of Sales | $161,782.00 | $163,756.00 | $141,048.00 | $131,376.00 | $140,089.00 | ||||||||||||
| Gross Profit Margin | 37.82% | 38.34% | 38.47% | 39.08% | 40.06% | ||||||||||||
| OPERATING PROFIT MARGIN | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | ||||||||||||
| Operating Income | $63,930.00 | $70,898.00 | $61,344.00 | $60,024.00 | $71,230.00 | ||||||||||||
| Sales | $260,174.00 | $265,595.00 | $229,234.00 | $215,639.00 | $233,715.00 | ||||||||||||
| Operating Profit Margin | 24.57% | 26.69% | 26.76% | 27.84% | 30.48% | ||||||||||||
| NET PROFIT MARGIN | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | ||||||||||||
| Net Income | $55,256.00 | $59,531.00 | $48,531.00 | $45,687.00 | $53,394.00 | ||||||||||||
| Sales | $260,174.00 | $265,595.00 | $229,234.00 | $215,639.00 | $233,715.00 | ||||||||||||
| Net Profit Margin | 21.24% | 22.41% | 21.17% | 21.19% | 22.85% | ||||||||||||
| EBITDA MARGIN | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | ||||||||||||
| EBITDA | |||||||||||||||||
| Sales | |||||||||||||||||
Bargaining power of suppliers
| VOLUNTEER'S 4 THIS PAGE - Eirin | |||
| Bargaining power of suppliers: Risk level – medium | |||
| - Suppliers power is weakened by a high number of potential suppliers: Most of the components that are essential to Apple are available from multiple sources. sources. | |||
| However, Apple also use certain components that are currently obtained from single or limited | |||
| - Since there is multiple suppliers for most of the essential components Apple needs it is also a low switching cost for Apple (more power less risk) | |||
| - Apple is perceived by many a successful and power full company and many suppliers want to be a part that. This creates a competition between suppliers which again put | |||
| the power in Apple’s hands and lower the risk level. It can be considered as a big loss for a supplier to lose Apple, which strengthen Apples position when negotiating deals and contracts. | |||
| - Risk: | |||
| - Competition: Apple competes for different kinds of components with other companies in the markets for smartphones, | |||
| personal computers, tablets and other electronic devices. | |||
| - Industry-wide shortage: Many of the components used by the Apple, including those that are available from multiple sources, | |||
| are at times subject to industry-wide shortage and significant commodity pricing fluctuations. | |||
| - Supplier of Apple specific components change their production: Apple uses some custom components that are not commonly used by its competitors. | |||
| When Apple introduces new components or products, they also uses new technologies. To be able to produce enough fast enough, they usually | |||
| get this component or product from only one source. Limited capacity may exist until the suppliers’ yields have matured or their manufacturing capacities have increased. | |||
| The continued availability of these components at acceptable prices, or at all, may be affected if suppliers decide to concentrate on the production of common | |||
| components instead of components customized to meet the Company’s requirements. --> higher switching cost | |||
| - Apple’s strategy to lower the risk: Apple created agreements for the supply of many components. In other words, Apple locks down | |||
| their suppliers by getting the suppliers to sign contracts that contains the number of unites they are going | |||
| to produce which complete the suppliers capacity for the year. This way the | |||
| Apple dominates a supplier and the supplier cannot supply Apples competitor. | |||
| - Risk: | |||
| - There can be no guarantee that Apple will be able to extend or renew these agreements on similar terms, or at all. | |||
| So that is a future risk that one need to take in consideration, but for now they have lowered the | |||
| bargaining power of the supplier | |||
| - Another thing to be aware of is that all Apple’s hardware products are manufactured by outsourcing partners | |||
| that are located primarily in Asia, with some Mac computers manufactured in the U.S. and Ireland. | |||
| Apple also depends on transportation and logistical services provided by outsourcing partners | |||
| outside of the U.S, which can reduce Apple’s direct control over production and distribution | |||
| Such diminished control can effect quality or quantity of products or services | |||
| Strategies for creating competitive advantage: Product Differentiation Strategy | |||
| - Apple is using a Product Differentiation Strategy. Expensive product, high quality, premium product, all product are connected --> people buy different devices and accessories | |||
| - Apple does not use low price campaigns, sale and coupons ($50 dollar off, buy 1 get 1 for free) | |||
| - Apple introduced a lower priced iPhone to be competitive on the lower price market, but still offer great quality and technology --> is Apple picking a fight in the cost leadership market? | |||
| - Stop selling products instead of selling them cheap (sale) | |||
| - The strategy is sustainable --> why? |
Form Responses 1
| Timestamp | Untitled Question |
Form Responses 2
| Timestamp | Untitled Question |