ANNOTATED BIBLIOGRAPHY WEEK 6 IN
Annotated Bibliography Rubric
50 Pts
|
|
Exemplary |
Developing |
Needs Improvement |
|
|
Written Criteria |
10 Points |
7 Points |
4 Points |
Faculty Comments |
|
Bibliographical Information |
Bibliographical information is accurately stated and formatted. |
Bibliographical information contains 2-3 errors. |
Bibliographical information contains more than 3 errors. |
|
|
Summary of Article |
Article is concisely summarized in one paragraph with no more than one error |
Article is more than one paragraph with one error |
Article exceeds one paragraph and has more than 2 errors. |
|
|
Evaluation of Article |
Article is evaluated in light of its purpose and credibility |
Evaluation is loosely based on evidence but well organized |
Evaluation does not relate to purpose of article and is not evidence-based. |
|
|
Reflection on Application to Practice |
Reflection contains reference to application to current of future practice merits or lack of merit. |
Reflection is vague and only loosely related to current or future practice. |
Reflection does not connect merit or lack of merit to practice. |
|
|
Grammar, Syntax, APA Format |
APA format, grammar, spelling, and/or punctuation are accurate, or with zero to three errors. |
Four to six errors in APA format, grammar, spelling, and syntax noted. |
Paper contains greater than six errors in APA format, grammar, spelling, and/or punctuation or repeatedly makes the same errors after faculty feedback. |
|