Annotated Bibliography
Annotated Bib Draft by Tamika Williams
Submission date: 12-Jul-2022 06:51PM (UTC-0400) Submission ID: 1869811848 File name: Banner_Waitlist_Annotated_Bib.docx (19.69K) Word count: 970 Character count: 4876
Summaries look good except citation info - I need the URL or DOI - if they are not from web, send me a copy for review so I can look over them. One line needs some updating - see similarity report - otherwise GOOD job
1
2
2
4
Improper Citation
1
3
9% SIMILARITY INDEX
9% INTERNET SOURCES
2% PUBLICATIONS
3% STUDENT PAPERS
1 4% 2 3% 3 1%
4 1%
Exclude quotes Off
Exclude bibliography Off
Exclude matches Off
Annotated Bib Draft ORIGINALITY REPORT
PRIMARY SOURCES
digitalcommons.wpi.edu Internet Source
www.science.gov Internet Source
Submitted to American Public University System Student Paper
Submitted to Southern New Hampshire University - Continuing Education Student Paper
QM
FINAL GRADE
94/100 Annotated Bib Draft GRADEMARK REPORT
GENERAL COMMENTS
Instructor
PAGE 1
Text Comment. Summaries look good except citation info - I need the URL or DOI - if they are not from web, send me a copy for review so I can look over them. One line needs some updating - see similarity report - otherwise GOOD job
PAGE 2
PAGE 3
Improper Citation Improper citation: Improperly cited material. Please use the link below to find links to information regarding specific citation styles: http://www.plagiarism.org/plag_article_citation_styles.html
PAGE 4
PAGE 5
RUBRIC: ANNOTATED BIBLIOGRAPHY 2022
CONTENT (40%)
A (100)
B (85)
C (75)
D (65)
F (55)
PLAGIARISM (0)
CITATION (30%)
A (100)
B (85)
C (75)
D (65)
F (55)
PLAGIARISM (0)
MLA FORMAT (20%)
A (100)
B (85)
94 / 100
100 / 100
Clear summary, evaluation, and explanation of purpose for each source. Completely developed and well organized annotations. Has correct number of sources.
Includes all parts of annotation: summary, evaluation, and explanation of purpose for each source. Adequately developed and organized. Has correct number of sources.
Includes all parts of annotation: summary, evaluation, and explanation of purpose for each source. Lacks development and/or organization. Has correct number of sources.
Missing one or more parts of an annotation: summary, evaluation, and explanation of purpose, or fewer sources than required.
Missing two or more parts of an annotation: summary, evaluation, and explanation of purpose, or fewer sources than required.
Plagiarism
85 / 100
Correctly formatted MLA citations. Sources from GALILEO.
MLA formatted citations with one or two small mistakes. Sources from GALILEO.
MLA citations formatted mostly correctly. Sources from GALILEO.
Large mistakes in MLA formatting. Sources from GALILEO; some inappropriate sources.
Inappropriate sources, and/or significant mistakes in formatting. No sources from GALILEO.
Plagiarism
100 / 100
100% correct
Mostly correct with only one minor MLA document formatting mistake.
C (75)
D (65)
F (55)
PLAGIARISM (0)
GRAMMAR/TONE (10%)
A (100)
B (85)
C (75)
D (65)
F (55)
PLAGIARISM (0)
Mostly correct MLA document formatting; may have some minor mistakes.
MLA Format 20% Plagiarism Significant mistakes in MLA document formatting. Multiple minor mistakes in MLA document formatting. Mostly correct MLA document formatting; may have some minor mistakes. Mostly correct with only one minor MLA document formatting mistake. 100% correct
Significant mistakes in MLA document formatting.
Plagiarism
85 / 100
No grammar or structure issues; no use of second person.
Grammar and structure does not affect readability; minor issues; no use of second person.
Grammar and structure somewhat affect readability; minor issues; no use of second person.
Grammar and structure affect readability of annotations; some use of second person
Errors in grammar and structure make annotations incoherent; excessive use of second person.
Plagiarism