|
Criteria
|
Poor to Fair Job
|
Good Job
|
Excellent Job
|
|
Student and Setting
|
PB not really problematic. Little background information. (0-2)
|
Student has mild-moderate PB. However, background information is irrelevant/insufficient or Informed Consent is not provided (3-4)
|
Student has mild-moderate PB. Relevant background information provided AND informed consent is provided (5)
|
|
Target Behavior Defined
|
Target behavior not defined or definition not observable and/or measurable. (0-6)
|
Target behavior(s) not defined in observable and/or measurable terms raising issues of reliability. (7-8)
|
Target behavior(s) defined in observable and measurable terms. (9-10)
|
|
Data Collection System
|
Data collection system does not match the topography, frequency or duration of target behaviors. (0-6)
|
Data collection system is ineffective or impractical (e.g., too fancy); does not truly represent target behaviors. (7-8)
|
Data collection system provides best representation of the occurrence of target behaviors. (9-10)
|
|
Actual Data on PB
|
Less than 3 days of data for either BL or intervention. Data collected at different class periods (no pattern). Not all data sheets attached. (0-10)
|
At least 3 (but < 5) days of data on target behaviors for BL and/or intervention phases. Data are inconsistent across time or class periods. Not all data sheets attached. (11-12)
|
Up to 5 days of data on target behaviors during specific time periods for both BL and intervention. All original data sheets attached. (13-15)
|
|
Graphs
|
No graphs presented or data collected such that cannot be presented visually (e.g., anecdotal). (0-6)
|
Graphed data do not match raw data or graphs do not represent data accurately (e.g., pie instead of line graph). (7-8)
|
Graphed data provide an accurate assessment of the behavioral pattern. (9-10)
|
|
Hypothesis
|
The hypothesis is not noted or is not observable or measurable (i.e., psychoanalytic). (0-2)
|
The hypothesis does not accurately state the function of PB. (3-4)
|
Hypothesis accurately states the function of problem behavior. (5)
|
|
Quality of Behavioral Objectives
|
Less than 2 behavioral objectives for decreasing or increasing behavior but not for both. Poor quality of objectives. No baseline data indicated, no STO’s present (0-14).
|
Two or more behavioral objectives for decreasing but not increasing behavior are noted. Average quality of objectives. (15-17)
|
At least 2 high quality behavioral objectives. One of which designed to increase appropriate behavior and 1 to decrease PB. Both goals include short term objectives and baseline data. (18-20)
|
|
Positive Behavior Change Plan
|
Behavior change plan is based solely on Type 1 punishment procedures and/or implemented less than 1 week. (0-6)
|
Behavior change plan not entirely related to behavioral objectives. Implemented procedures for at least 1 week. (7-8)
|
Behavior change plan based on the behavioral objectives and implemented procedures for at least 1 week. (9-10)
|
|
Data (Results) Analysis
|
Visual analysis done. Appears to have excessive or false claims about change in behavior. (0-6)
|
Visual analysis is selective. Provides logical explanations but does have excessive or false claims. (7-8)
|
Visual analysis of data with logical explanations for the results without excessive/false claims. (9-10)
|
|
Writing Mechanics
|
Product does not meet requirements for written assignments or APA guidelines as noted in the course syllabus. (0-2)
|
Product partially meets the requirements for written assignments or APA guidelines as noted in the course syllabus. (3-4)
|
Product meets all the requirements for written assignments as noted in the syllabus including APA guidelines. (5)
|
|
Total Points Earned = ___ / 100
|