Screen Time and Adolescents
Continued on next page
Criteria HD D C P F
SCORES 17-20 15-16 13-14 8-12 0-7
Introduction General (20)
Introduces topic in a logical sequence; states main topic and previews the structure clearly and concisely; the importance and relevance of the area is presented; all major variables are defined clearly and thoroughly.
Introduction presents sequenced salient points; highlights all main points to follow; some alluding to why the area is important; clear definitions of most variables.
Introduction presents an overview of main points; expresses a more descriptive, but fairly complete idea of the study. The importance of the area may not be clear; definitions of variables may not be entirely comprehensive or clear.
Expresses a really simple introduction; fine tuning of style and sequence required. Topic’s importance barely or not included . Some definitions missing or dictionary- based/simplistic rather than academic
There is little or clear introduction and/or main topic/not clearly resented.
Introduction Literature Review (20)
The literature related to the topic is thoroughly and critically reviewed including theory or theories mentioned in the core article and any theory relied on throughout the Investigative Study. Empirical research is reviewed critically, not simply described.
Literature is reviewed including theory or theories mentioned in the core article. Empirical research is explored with an attempt at evaluation and critique.
Literature is reviewed though there may be some misunderstanding of the theoretical explanation provided in the core article. Empirical literature is presented, though in a descriptive manner.
Some literature is reviewed descriptively, but doesn’t go much beyond outcomes and findings.
Little or no coherent review of the literature, and/or is not relevant to the area under investigation.
Q1: Observations (20)
Data gathered through observations are thorough and presented in APA format where relevant (i.e., Tables and/or Figures). Observations/data are related to the reader in formal theoretical terms demonstrating an excellent understanding of what was observed and the academic area under investigation.
Appropriate observations were made and there is an attempt to present observations in APA format where relevant (i.e., Tables and/or Figures). There is a good attempt to relate observations/data to the reader in formal theoretical terms demonstrating an understanding of what was observed and the academic area under investigation.
There is an attempt to present observations in APA format where relevant (i.e., Tables and/or Figures) though observations may need more detail. There is a good attempt to relate observations to the reader in formal theoretical terms. Some informal terms may be used however, there is demonstration of understanding.
Observations may be lacking in detail and presentation. Some attempt at formal language may be used to relate what was observed, but the observations are largely informal in tone and superficial.
Observations are missing, incomplete or incorrect. A misinterpretation of the requirements may be demonstrated.
Q2: Current Study and Existing Literature (20)
Study observations are related to theoretical perspectives reviewed in the introduction. Observations are compared and contrasted to those found in the core articles and other reviewed literature. Where the current observations contribute to the research area in general is articulated.
There is a good comparison of observations in relation to the literature reviewed in the introduction. There is some comparing and contrasting, however the focus may be predominantly on the core article. How the current study fits with the research area in general is included.
There is some linking of observations to information presented in the literature review. An attempt is made to link the findings with the research area in general.
Observations are detailed with some redundant information, but may be overly descriptive. There is little if any linking of the current observations with previous literature.
There is little or no linking of current observations with theory, research, or how they may contribute to the area in general.
101682 Developmental Psychology Investigative Study 2
Criteria HD D C P F
SCORES 17-20 15-16 13-14 8-12 0-7
Q3: Developmental Implications (20)
Trends observed in the current study are clearly and cogently related to developmental implications as per Question 3 of the Investigative Study. There is a superior understanding of developmental progression in the relevant area demonstrated by the ability to synthesise previous theory and research with the current observations. Implications for/ impact upon development are thoughtful and relevant.
Trends observed in the current study are related to developmental implications as per Question 3 of the Investigative Study. An understanding of developmental progression in the relevant area is demonstrated by linking past and current observations. These links are used to comment of developmental progression.
Trends observed in the current study are related to developmental implications as per Question 3 of the Investigative Study. There is some understanding of developmental progression in the relevant area but implications from the research are not fully explored.
Trends observed in the current study are related to developmental implications as per Question 3 of the Investigative Study. The implications for development are either incorrect or there is little or no logical support for the implications outlined.
There may be no attempt at this question, or there is confusion over what was required and either there is a major flaw with relating the current observations to development in the area as a whole, or the implications mentioned are unrelated
Conclusion (20) A logical and original conclusion that summarises the main finding(s) of the study and specific real world applications of this type of research .
Concise and cogent conclusion with applications included. The conclusion is well written, but may not be highly original.
A well written conclusion including general applications for real world policies, employment, education etc.
Conclusion may not be well written, though all elements are included.
Conclusion is either incoherent or unrelated to the study undertaken.
Reflection Questions (20)
All reflection questions answered showing introspection and thinking beyond generalities. Originality and thoughtfulness evident.
All reflection questions addressed thoroughly, with one outstanding response.
All reflection questions addressed with no more than one requiring further detail.
All reflection questions attempted with more than two requiring additional details.
Details missing for more than one reflection question
Organisation, Writing Style, and Referencing (20)
Generally very competent construction and smoothly linked paragraphs; appropriate, clear, and with effective transitions; paragraphs organised in distinct units of thought and arranged logically; Demonstrates an ability to structure sentences effectively; chooses words aptly; observes professional conventions of written English and manuscript format.
In-text citations and Reference list of professional standard and consistent with APA style. Reference list complete and accurate; all references are cited.
Shows competence in organisation; well-developed paragraphs with appropriate and clear transitions; paragraphs organised in distinct units with evidence of logic and thought; uses varied sentence patterns; generally competent and professional academic writing style.
In-text citations and Reference list generally of high standard, and consistent with APA style. Reference list complete and accurate; all references are cited.
Shows mostly good organisation; well-developed paragraphs with generally appropriate and clear transitions; paragraphs organised in distinct units with logic and thought ; uses some varied sentence patterns; shows sufficient competence in the conventions of the academic discipline and professional conventions of academic writing.
In-text citations and Reference list generally competent, and mostly consistent with APA style; may have occasional minor errors. Reference list complete and accurate; all references are cited.
Shows an adequate attempt to organise thought; demonstrates some ability to organise paragraphs; may exhibit abrupt transitions and weak logical argument; tends to simple sentences; shows only adequate competence in the conventions of academic discipline and professional writing.
In-text citations and Reference list generally adequate, and generally consistent with APA style; may have some minor errors. Reference list mostly complete and accurate; and mostly consistent with citations.
Shows little if any ability to organise information and link ideas logically. Generally simplistic style not adequate in meeting minimum professional standard.
APA referencing style is generally flawed in one or both of in-text citation and Reference list. The latter may be incomplete or inaccurate. There may be references not cited in text, or text citations not in Reference list.
101682 Developmental Psychology Investigative Study 2