Budgeting and Control Final Assignment (High Grade Needed)

Amashho
9017.docx

BCO322 Budgeting & Control Task brief & rubrics

Final Assignment:

It assesses the following learning outcomes:

Compare reports with budgets and analyse the reasons for differences

• prepare cash budgets and predicted a pro forma income statement and a pro forma balance sheet.

• develop an understanding and working knowledge of real-world budget issues including variances in input, labour and other prices, and costs of finance;

• analyse the way in which costs can be managed.

Submission file format: Excel document with all the answers, clearly identifying all steps, results, journals and including comments besides each answer.

Calculation results HAVE TO be explained and the calculation steps explained

We are in the first week of November and Stalk & Case Inc. its CEO needs your help. After continued growth and profits the company will report losses for the first time. In a series of exercises try to understand the root causes for the current situation and provide useful insight for their CEO to help fix the issues and get back on track.

1. The Business is reporting a negative 8% Operating Profit Ratio, but the liquidity index is looking great and inventories turnover beat any benchmark in the industry. (20 pts) Here are some figures from Stalk & Case:

Past (2019)

Now (2020)

Revenue

12,0 Mio€

11,0 Mio€

Yearly

Expenses

11,5 Mio€

11,9 Mio€

Yearly

FG Inventories

1,5 Mio€

150 k€

@ year-end

DM Inventories

0,5 Mio€

70 k€

@ year-end

AR

1,8 Mio€

0,9 Mio€

@ year-end

AP

1,05 Mio€

0,5 Mio€

@ year-end

Cash

?

?

@ year-end

1. If Current Assets Past were at 4 Mio€ and they are Now at 3,2 Mio€, what can you tell about Cash? Please indicate your ‘made up’ amount for Past and Now.

a) Please explain how the Inventory turnover must have evolved from Past to Now, taking into account that CoGS have been 7Mio€ Past & Now (didn’t change). Calculate the Gross Profit Margin percentage.

b) Please explain how the AR turnover must have evolved from Past to Now.

c) Explain briefly if the company is doing business as usual, expanding (investing) or contracting (cashing out).

1. Stalk & Case Inc., wants a projection of cash receipts and cash payments for the month of November. On November 28, a note will be payable in the amount of €2.402.250,- including interest. The cash balance on November 1 is €2.080,200,- Accounts payable to merchandise creditors at the end of October were €2,112,000. The company’s experience indicates that 70 percent of sales will be collected during the month of sale, 25 percent in the month following the sale, and 3 percent in the second month following the sale; 2 percent will be uncollectible. The company sells various products at an average price of €52 per unit. Selected sales figures are as follows: September actual 50.000 units October actual 70.000 units November forecast 85.000 units December forecast 60.000 units Total forecast for year-end: 900.000 units Because purchases are payable within 15 days, approximately 50 percent of the purchases in a given month are paid in the following month. The average cost of units purchased is €36 per unit. Inventories at the end of each month are maintained at a level of 2,000 units plus 10 percent of the number of units that will be sold in the following month. The inventory on October 1 amounted to 9,000 units. Budgeted operating expenses for November are €1357,000. Of this amount, €350,000 is considered fixed (including depreciation of €150,000). All operating expenses, other than depreciation, are paid in the month in which they are incurred. The company expects to sell fully depreciated equipment in November for €19,000 cash. Instructions Prepare a cash budget for the month of November, supported by schedules of cash collections on accounts receivable and cash payments for purchases of merchandise and let the CEO know if the note payable due Nov, 28th can be paid back in full or not. What happens if Stalk & Case can’t sale the used equipment? (Show all computations.) (25pts.)

2. Stalk & Case manufactures and sells a single product. In preparing the budget for the first quarter, the company’s cost accountant has assembled the following information: The company uses the first-in, first-out (FIFO) method of pricing its inventory of finished goods. (20 pts.) Instructions Compute the following budgeted quantities or dollar amounts:

a) Planned production of finished goods (in units).

b) Cost of finished goods manufactured.

c) Finished goods inventory, March 31. (Remember to use the first-in, first-out method in pricing the inventory.)

d) Cost of goods sold

3. a.) Explain briefly what Standard Costs are. (10 pts.) b.) What are the typical challenges when establishing Standard Costs for Budgeting Purposes? (10 pts.)

4. The Anthony Company, a sole proprietorship, reports the following information pertaining to its operating activities: During the year, the company purchased $40,000 of direct materials and incurred $21,000 of direct labor costs. Total manufacturing overhead costs for the year amounted to $18,000. Selling and administrative expenses amounted to $60,000, and the company’s annual sales amounted to $250,000.

a) Prepare Anthony’s schedule of the cost of finished goods manufactured.

b) Prepare Anthony’s income statement (ignore income taxes) (15 pts.)

Rubrics

Exceptional

90-100

Good

80-89

Fair

70-79

Fail

<70

Knowledge about the theoretical concepts and models

(30%)

Student correctly identify, describes and apply the concepts, relevant topics and theories of each key stage/ task of decision-making, demonstrating a full understanding of the stage

Student identify, describes and apply the concepts, relevant topics and theories of each key stage/ task of decision-making, demonstrating a good understanding of the stage (a few aspects might be missing).

Student makes a fair attempt at identifying, describing and applying the concepts, relevant topics and theories of each key stage/ task of decision- making, demonstrating an adequate understanding of the stage (although some key aspects might be missing).

Student fails to correctly identify, describe and apply the concepts, relevant topics and theories of each key stage/ task of decision- making, demonstrating insufficient understanding of the stage.

Critical evaluation

(30%)

Student effectively engages in critical evaluation of all aspects presented in the case.

Student makes a good attempt at engaging in critical evaluation of most aspects presented in the case.

Student makes a fair attempt at engaging in critical evaluation of some aspects presented in the case (argument might be weak).

Student makes an insufficient attempt to critically evaluate aspects presented in the case.

Formulation of solutions

(30%)

Student effectively leads discussion towards strong theory/information/data-driven solutions.

Student makes a good attempt at leading discussion towards theory/information/ data-driven solutions.

Student makes a fair attempt at leading discussion towards theory/information/data-driven solutions.

Student fails to lead discussion towards relevant solutions

Communication and organization (10%)

Student communicates their ideas extremely clearly and concisely.

Student includes all relevant sections, meeting professional standards of presentation.

Text uses a variety of cohesive devices and organizational patterns with flexibility.

Student communicates their ideas clearly and concisely.

Student includes all relevant sections but falls short of professional standards of presentation.

Text uses sufficient variety of cohesive devices and organizational patterns to generally good effect.

Student communicates their ideas with some clarity and concision.

Student includes most relevant sections but falls short of professional standards of presentation.

Text uses some linking words and cohesive devices, but not with complete accuracy nor sufficiency.

Student fail to communicate their ideas clearly and concisely.

Student fails to submit several relevant sections and/or falls significantly short of professional presentation standards.

Text is missing linking words and cohesive devices, making the text not understandable enough.