Presentation/Assigment

TinaF
657PPlessonplanDB6.docx

Instruction:

You will  present this lesson to your peers when you complete Db # 6.  All materials needed for the lesson must be used or referred to during the PPT presentation  including anchor charts, visual supports and manipulatives needed for the presentation.            (Outcomes: 6,9,10,13,15 )  

PPT of the lesson plan .

Please submit your 10 slide + PPT presenting your lesson plan with commentary. In this presentation, you are expected to share your lesson and its rational with the analysis with your peers. Your presentation should highlight major aspects of your final project.

 

Grading Rubric for Discussion Boards 

Criteria

Ratings

Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePromptness and Initiative

0 pts

Below Expectations

No posting credit at all for postings outside of the date range.

1 pts

Proficient

Contributes but doesn't meet the requirement of responding to two peer postings, and /or posts all requirements on the same day of the week.

2 pts

Exemplary

Posts original contribution, responds to at least two peers postings, and posts on at least two different days of the week.

2 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeMechanics of Writing

0 pts

Below Expectations

Poor spelling and grammar in posts; format is extremely hard to read would be deemed as unprofessional documentation by common business standards.

1 pts

Proficient

An error in spelling and grammar, yet overall format is clear.

2 pts

Exemplary

Submissions are grammatically correct, posts with rare misspellings, format is easy to read/ professional delivery

2 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeRelevance of Post

0 pts

Below Expectations

Posts topics which do not relate to the discussion; remarks are not backed up by a reference; rehashes or summarizes other postings; unclear connection to topic; minimal expression of opinions or ideas.

1 pts

Proficient

Most posts are short in length and offer no further insight into the topic; opinions and ideas are stately clearly with occasional lack of connection to topic, and/or provides limited citations (from text, website, etc) for the community to reference.

2 pts

Exemplary

Consistently posts topics related to assigned topic; cites at least one but preferably several credible references related to topic (text, website, or other credible / scholarly references); expresses opinions and ideas in a clear and concise manner with obvious connection to topic.

2 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCreating Community

0 pts

Below Expectations

Argumentative or abrasive. No peer interaction.

1 pts

Proficient

Displays an effort to become involved with group; interacts with others. This category is concerned with quality of interactions.

2 pts

Exemplary

Frequently attempts to motivate the group discussion; presents creative approaches to topic, can differ or counter peers points with diplomacy, if applicable. Refers to peer contributions. Creates community in the discussion. This category is concerned with quality of interactions.

2 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCritical Thinking/Analysis

0 pts

Below Expectations

Makes errors in interpreting topics; opinion based comments only; superficial commentary.

1 pts

Proficient

Accurately interprets topic; uses main points of information from resources/ references; may repeat the ideas of other but attempts to offer new insight; response does not provoke significant new thinking or further discussion.

2 pts

Exemplary

Interprets topic in accurate and insightful ways. Uses information thoughtfully, in a ways that are factually relevant and accurate; postings shows analysis, might offer alternatives or creative viewpoints based on concrete evidence.

2 pts

Total Points: 10