urgent business tasks

cwdnjoi9
4SpecialTopicArcticShipping.pptx

Shipping in the Arctic: My Arctic your Arctic

M.K Afenyo, PhD

Introduction

News about the Arctic

What is the Arctic?

Picture courtesy: https://nsidc.org/sites/nsidc.org/files/images//arctic_map.gif

Regions around the north pole

Second largest area by size (13,985,000 km²)

Area above the Arctic circle (66° 34’ N)

Any area in high latitudes where average daily temperature does not rise above 10 degree

Canada in the Arctic

Second largest Arctic country

200,000 Canadians live in the Arctic

New Arctic Framework under development

comprehensive Arctic infrastructure

strong Arctic people and communities

strong, sustainable and diversified Arctic economies

Arctic science and Indigenous knowledge

protecting the environment and preserving Arctic biodiversity

the Arctic in a global context

Canada in the Arctic

Applies to

Yukon

Northwest Territories

Nunavut

Inuit Nunangat

the Nunatsiavut region in Labrador

the territory of Nunavik in Quebec

northern Manitoba, including Churchill

Arctic shipping

Taken place since 1978 in the ice-covered western regions of the Northern Sea Route (between the port of Dudinka on the Yenisei River and Murmansk).

“We need to save the Arctic not because of the polar bears, and not because it is the most beautiful place in the world, but because our very survival depends upon it” --Lewis Gordon Pugh

Year Activity
4th Century B.C Use of Arctic shipping by the indigenous people for food supplies and settlement
981 Discovery of Greenland
1490 John Cabot makes a voyage through the NWP
1610 Hudson expedition by the Henry
1903 Roald Amundsen completes the NWP route
1935 NSR opens up for Russia traffic
1994 UN convention on the Law of the sea
1996 Formation of the Arctic council
2010 Russia Constructs its double hull ice-breaker
2012 Opening of the Arctic intensified
2013 China builds first ice breaker in house
2017 The polar code comes into force

The good

Resource deposits: oil, gas and other minerals

Increase shipping saving time and money

Opening up the northern communities

Graphics courtesy: https://www.visualcapitalist.com/energy-and-mineral-riches-of-the-arctic/

The good

Nordic Orion NWP voyage from Europe to Asia instead of Panama Canal

Saved 4 days(~4000km) and $200,000

From Shanghai to Rotterdam

Russia currently ahead

5 Arctic ice breakers & 3 nuclear powered ones

Canada now building 1 ice breaker a fleet of 8 patrol boats

Route Distance
Panama Canal 25,588 kilometres
Suez Canal 19,550 km
Northern Sea Route 15,793 km
Northwest Passage 16,100 km
Transpolar Route 13,630 km

Ship growth in NWP

2007

9 ships

………….

2012

30 ships

The bad

Shorter lengths of ice free months

Extremely harsh conditions

Risk of accident during oil and gas exploration and production

Accidental release during shipping

The Bad

Source: https://www.visualcapitalist.com/energy-and-mineral-riches-of-the-arctic/

The ugly

11

Vessel/Spill Accident Type Spill Year
ATLANTIC EMPRESS and AEGEAN CAPTAIN Collision 287,000 tonnes of oil 1979 
ABT SUMMER Explosion Slick covering 80 sq.km 1991
CASTILLO DE BELLVER Fire 50-60,000 tonnes of oil 1983
AMOCO CADIZ Grounding 223,000 tonnes of oil 1978
EXXON VALDEZ Grounding 37,000 tonnes of oil 1989
BP Oil Spill Blowout 680,000 tonnes of oil 2010

Courtesy: US Coast Guard

Over $50bn spent on BP oil Spill

(after Afenyo et al., 2016)

Oil spill history

Ugly

12

Accidental releases of oil have negative consequences on the marine environment.

Need to prepare for emergency control and mitigation of oil spills.

Countermeasures can only be implemented effectively if the fate and transport is better understood.

Environmental risk assessment: requires fate and transport models.

Meanwhile the Arctic is an uncertain terrain with many unknowns

Harsh: very low temperatures

Timely response is a challenge

Darkness

Seasonal variations

The problem of dealing with the ugly

13

Evaporation

Resurfacing of larger oil droplet

Dissolution of water soluble components of oil

Photo-oxidation

Wind

Drifting

Spreading

AIR

Sedimentation

Natural dispersion

SEDIMENTS

WATER

ICE

AIR

WATER

SEDIMENTS

Drift with current

Fixed oil droplet, mobile or being encapsulated in growing ice

Absorption by snow

Oil Pool under snow

Multi-year ice

Lead

Encapsulated oil

Evaporation

Dissolution and mousse formation

Oil on meltwater in pools in spring

Oil migration up brine channel

First-year ice

Oil pool

Complex

Ice makes it more complicated

(after Afenyo et al.,2015)

Oil ice interaction

Oil spill processes in open water

Modeling oil spill in ice is difficult

Lack of data in the Arctic

comprehensive ecological risk assessment framework needed

Limited knowledge

14

Environment Risk

Ecology (marine) Risk

Socio-economic Risk

Information on such risks are required to make decisions

Soures: Environment Picture: https://psmag.com/environment/monitoring-coral-habitat-to-measure-oil-spill-impact

Ecology Picture: https://helpsavenature.com/current-environmental-issues

Socio-economic activities: https://keydifferences.com/difference-between-economic-and-non-economic-activities.html

Elements of ecological risk

15

Source

Fate and transport

Dispersion

Exposure

Risk

Source modeling

Oil could be spilled due to

Ship accidents

Offshore oil installations

Illegal oil discharge

Pipeline rapture

Leak from sunken world war ships

Source modelling for oil spills is challenging as each spill scenario is unique.

The release scenarios may evolve with time and conditions

16

Oil spill due to ship damage*

*Source: http://www.bunkerist.com/en/?p=40692

Dispersion modeling

Dispersion modeling access how much distance a crude could travel in a given time.

While modeling dispersion, we need to consider all possible dimensions to this process in terms of oil

17

Source: Afenyo, M., Khan, F., Veitch, B., & Yang, M. (2017). A probabilistic ecological risk model for Arctic marine oil spills. Journal of environmental chemical engineering, 5(2), 1494-1503.

Dispersion of oil after a leakage from a vessel

Partition modeling

The released oil is transported through

Air

Ice

Water

Sediment

18

*Source: Afenyo, M., Khan, F., Veitch, B., & Yang, M. (2016). Dynamic fugacity model for accidental oil release during Arctic shipping. Marine pollution bulletin, 111(1-2), 347-353.

Oil transport in air, ice, water and sediments*

Exposure Modeling

Exposure modeling involves assessment of the oil concentration and its existence in media of contact.

In marine species, pollutant existence could be due to;

Inhalation

Ingestion of contaminated water and food

Absorption of hydrocarbon

19

Output of ecological model

Risk Quotient is defined as

RQ = PEC/PNEC

Where, Predicted Exposure Concentration (PEC) is measured through fugacity modelling.

And the Predicted No Effect Concentration (PNEC) is obtained from ecotoxicological studies. PNEC represents ecosystem response.

A value of RQ > 1 shows condition requiring attention

20

*Source: Afenyo, M., Khan, F., Veitch, B., & Yang, M. (2017). A probabilistic ecological risk model for Arctic marine oil spills. Journal of environmental chemical engineering, 5(2), 1494-1503.

Concentration of pollutant (oil) in water*

How will ships be insured going into the Arctic?

Material ship is made of

Experience of crew

Single hull or double hull

Piracy

Length of Voyage

Speed of vessel

Age vessel

Days expected at sea

Graphical based socio-economic model

Socio-economic Impact factors

Family separation

Lack of thrust

Stress

Loss of income

Loss of tourists

Movement of people in and out of the affected community

Effect on culture

Effect on hunting

Psychological effect on populace

Weakened social connection

Land Claim Agreement

NORDREG

Scenarios matrix & output for socio-economic model

Scenario Season Type of oil Recovery method Type of ship
1 Summer Light None small
2 Summer Light None Large
3 Summer Heavy None small
4 Summer Heavy None Large
5 Summer Heavy Dispersant Small
6 Summer Heavy Dispersant Large
7 Summer Heavy Insitu-burning small
8 Summer Heavy Insitu-burning Large

Socio-economic impact of scenarios

1 3 13 15 17 19 21 23 88187431 104326960 101022550 108101430 104119470 108126610 105353850 108125960

Sceanarios

Impact ($)

Significance of the output of the SE model

For decision making by governments

Use by insurance companies

Other environmental agencies

What is the Arctic policy of Canada?

"The simple fact is that Arctic strategies throughout my lifetime have rarely matched or addressed the magnitude of the basic gaps between what exists in the Arctic and what other Canadians take for granted. Closing these gaps is what northerners, across the Arctic, wanted to speak to me about as an urgent priority."

-Mary Simon, Interim report on the Shared Arctic Leadership Model

New Arctic Policy Framework

coordinated effort by all levels of government,

Indigenous groups,

industry and other stakeholders

to identify problems and solutions and make great use of the opportunities in the Arctic.

Comprehensive Arctic infrastructure

Lack of infrastructure in the Canadian Arctic

Internet access is based on satellite and is very expensive

Inaccessible year round

Climate change caused damage to infrastructure in the Arctic

What needs to be done for this region?

Strong Arctic people and communities

Unemployment is higher than Canadian average and can go as high as 50% in some places

High rate of crowd living

High rate of violence

Assess to health care is a challenge

No university physically in the arctic (not the case for other arctic countries)

What key actions could increase well-being within arctic communities?

Strong, sustainable and diversified Arctic economies

Canadian Arctic is mineral rich

What can be done to advance

sustainable economic development,

diversify the Arctic economy,

build capacity/expertise and increase the participation of Arctic residents in local economies,

grow small-to-medium Arctic businesses and enhance partnerships?

Arctic science and Indigenous knowledge

The new Canadian High Arctic Research Station campus in Cambridge Bay (Nunavut),

the Churchill Marine Observatory (Manitoba)

Institut nordique du Québec,

Genice (https://www.genice.ca/)

How can Canada respond more effectively to

local knowledge needs,

collaborate with territorial and provincial institutions and better integrate Indigenous knowledge into decision-making?

increase the capacity of Arctic residents to participate in Arctic research initiatives,

Protecting the environment and conserving Arctic biodiversity

Oil spills

Protecting the flora and fauna

Coast guard responsible for any emergency response

How can Indigenous and local experience/knowledge be incorporated into action on climate change and biodiversity?

The Arctic in a global context

Engage the world through the arctic council

Make the indigenous nations part of this engagement

What domestic interests and priorities should the government of Canada pursue internationally?

What do you see as the main challenges and opportunities for Canada's arctic foreign and defense policy in the next 10-20 years?

Progress

Source: https://ca.news.yahoo.com/food-security-top-mind-inuit-100000741.html

Make your input

There are three ways to participate:

Send a letter to: Arctic Policy Framework Secretariat 15 rue Eddy, 14th floor Gatineau QC K1A 0H4

Send an email to: ArctiqueEnsemble-ArcticTogether@canada.ca.

Send a tweet using the hashtag #ArcticTogether.

References

Afenyo,M., Khan,F., Veitch,B., Ng,A.K.Y., Sajid,Z., Fahd,F. 2019. An explorative object-oriented Bayesian network model for oil spill response in the Arctic Ocean. Safety in Extreme Environments.

Afenyo, M., Ng, A.K.Y., and Jiang, C., 2018. Climate change and Arctic shipping: A method for assessing the impacts of oil spills in the Arctic. Transportation Research Part D,476-490 (Article in press).

Afenyo, M., Khan, F. and Ng, A.K.Y. (2020): ‘Assessing the risk of potential oil spills in the Arctic due to shipping’. In: Ng, A.K.Y., Monios, J. and Jiang, C. (Eds.): Maritime Transport and Regional Sustainability. Elsevier, Cambridge, MA, Chapter 11 (in press).

Afenyo, M., Lin, Y. and Ng, A.K.Y., Jiang, C. (2020): ‘The opportunities and challenges of developing the Arctic area and shipping in the Arctic’. In: Lasserre, F., and Faury, O. (Eds.): Arctic shipping: Climate change, commercial traffic and port development. Elsevier, Cambridge, MA, Chapter 12.

Lin, Y., Afenyo, M. and Ng, A.K.Y. (forthcoming): ‘Climate change, a double-edged sword: The case of Churchill on the northwest passage’. In: Ng, A.K.Y., Monios, J. and Jiang, C. (Eds.): Maritime Transport and Regional Sustainability. Elsevier, Cambridge, MA, Chapter 13 (in press).

Afenyo, M., Khan, F., Veitch, B., & Yang, M. (2017). A probabilistic ecological risk model for Arctic marine oil spills. Journal of environmental chemical engineering, 5(2), 1494-1503.

Afenyo, M., Khan, F., Veitch, B., & Yang, M. (2016). Dynamic fugacity model for accidental oil release during Arctic shipping. Marine pollution bulletin, 111(1-2), 347-353

Afenyo, M., Khan, F., & Veitch, B., 2016. A state-of-the-art review of fate and transport of oil spills in open and ice-covered water. Ocean Engineering. 119:233-248.

https://www.rcaanc-cirnac.gc.ca/eng/1503687877293/1537887905065

.MsftOfcThm_Accent1_Fill { fill:#1D9A78; } .MsftOfcThm_Accent1_Stroke { stroke:#1D9A78; }