Social Work Two Section Narrative

XiDeltaQue02
46FinalProjectRubric.htm

Rubric Detail

A rubric lists grading criteria that instructors use to evaluate student work. Your instructor linked a rubric to this item and made it available to you. Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric's layout.

Content

Name: SOCW_6446_Week11_Project_Rubric

  Excellent Good Fair Poor
Responsiveness to Directions Points: Points Range: 70.2 (27%) - 78 (30%) Paper fully addresses all instruction prompts. Feedback: Points: Points Range: 62.4 (24%) - 70.12 (26.97%) Paper addresses most of the instruction prompts; however, one or more prompts may have been insufficiently addressed. Feedback: Points: Points Range: 54.6 (21%) - 62.32 (23.97%) Paper addresses some of the instructions prompts, but may have missed several prompts or did not sufficiently address the majority of prompts. Feedback: Points: Points Range: 0 (0%) - 54.52 (20.97%) Paper does not address the majority of instruction prompts and/or insufficiently addresses all instruction prompts. Feedback:
Content Points: Points Range: 93.6 (36%) - 104 (40%) Paper demonstrates an excellent understanding of all of the concepts and key points presented in the text(s) and Learning Resources. Paper provides significant detail including multiple relevant examples, evidence from the readings and other sources, and discerning ideas. Paper demonstrates exemplary critical thought. Feedback: Points: Points Range: 83.2 (32%) - 93.5 (35.96%) Paper demonstrates a good understanding of most of the concepts and key points presented in the text(s) and Learning Resources. Paper includes moderate detail, evidence from the readings, and discerning ideas. Paper demonstrates good critical thought. Feedback: Points: Points Range: 72.8 (28%) - 83.1 (31.96%) Paper demonstrates a fair understanding of the concepts and key points as presented in the text(s) and Learning Resources. Paper may be lacking in detail and specificity and/or may not include sufficient pertinent examples or provide sufficient evidence from the readings. Paper demonstrates some critical thought. Feedback: Points: Points Range: 0 (0%) - 72.7 (27.96%) Paper demonstrates poor understanding of the concepts and key points of the text(s) and Learning Resources. Paper is missing detail and specificity and/or does not include any pertinent examples or provide sufficient evidence from the readings. Paper demonstrates poor critical thought. Feedback:
Writing Points: Points Range: 70.2 (27%) - 78 (30%) Paper is well organized, uses scholarly tone, follows APA style, uses original writing and proper paraphrasing, contains very few or no writing and/or spelling errors, and is fully consistent with graduate level writing style. Paper contains multiple, appropriate and exemplary sources expected/required for the assignment. Feedback: Points: Points Range: 62.4 (24%) - 70.12 (26.97%) Paper is mostly consistent with graduate level writing style. Paper may have some small or infrequent organization, scholarly tone, or APA style issues, and/or may contain a few writing and spelling errors, and/or somewhat less than the expected number of or type of sources. Feedback: Points: Points Range: 54.6 (21%) - 62.32 (23.97%) Paper is somewhat below graduate level writing style, with multiple smaller or a few major problems. Paper may be lacking in organization, scholarly tone, APA style, and/or contain many writing and/or spelling errors, or shows moderate reliance on quoting vs. original writing and paraphrasing. Paper may contain inferior resources (number or quality). Feedback: Points: Points Range: 0 (0%) - 54.52 (20.97%) Paper is well below graduate level writing style expectations for organization, scholarly tone, APA style, and writing, or relies excessively on quoting. Paper may contain few or no quality resources. Feedback:
Show Descriptions Show Feedback
Responsiveness to Directions--
Levels of Achievement: Excellent 70.2 (27%) - 78 (30%) Paper fully addresses all instruction prompts. Good 62.4 (24%) - 70.12 (26.97%) Paper addresses most of the instruction prompts; however, one or more prompts may have been insufficiently addressed. Fair 54.6 (21%) - 62.32 (23.97%) Paper addresses some of the instructions prompts, but may have missed several prompts or did not sufficiently address the majority of prompts. Poor 0 (0%) - 54.52 (20.97%) Paper does not address the majority of instruction prompts and/or insufficiently addresses all instruction prompts. Feedback:
Content--
Levels of Achievement: Excellent 93.6 (36%) - 104 (40%) Paper demonstrates an excellent understanding of all of the concepts and key points presented in the text(s) and Learning Resources. Paper provides significant detail including multiple relevant examples, evidence from the readings and other sources, and discerning ideas. Paper demonstrates exemplary critical thought. Good 83.2 (32%) - 93.5 (35.96%) Paper demonstrates a good understanding of most of the concepts and key points presented in the text(s) and Learning Resources. Paper includes moderate detail, evidence from the readings, and discerning ideas. Paper demonstrates good critical thought. Fair 72.8 (28%) - 83.1 (31.96%) Paper demonstrates a fair understanding of the concepts and key points as presented in the text(s) and Learning Resources. Paper may be lacking in detail and specificity and/or may not include sufficient pertinent examples or provide sufficient evidence from the readings. Paper demonstrates some critical thought. Poor 0 (0%) - 72.7 (27.96%) Paper demonstrates poor understanding of the concepts and key points of the text(s) and Learning Resources. Paper is missing detail and specificity and/or does not include any pertinent examples or provide sufficient evidence from the readings. Paper demonstrates poor critical thought. Feedback:
Writing--
Levels of Achievement: Excellent 70.2 (27%) - 78 (30%) Paper is well organized, uses scholarly tone, follows APA style, uses original writing and proper paraphrasing, contains very few or no writing and/or spelling errors, and is fully consistent with graduate level writing style. Paper contains multiple, appropriate and exemplary sources expected/required for the assignment. Good 62.4 (24%) - 70.12 (26.97%) Paper is mostly consistent with graduate level writing style. Paper may have some small or infrequent organization, scholarly tone, or APA style issues, and/or may contain a few writing and spelling errors, and/or somewhat less than the expected number of or type of sources. Fair 54.6 (21%) - 62.32 (23.97%) Paper is somewhat below graduate level writing style, with multiple smaller or a few major problems. Paper may be lacking in organization, scholarly tone, APA style, and/or contain many writing and/or spelling errors, or shows moderate reliance on quoting vs. original writing and paraphrasing. Paper may contain inferior resources (number or quality). Poor 0 (0%) - 54.52 (20.97%) Paper is well below graduate level writing style expectations for organization, scholarly tone, APA style, and writing, or relies excessively on quoting. Paper may contain few or no quality resources. Feedback:

Name:SOCW_6446_Week11_Project_Rubric