Peds
Assessment by Sara Turpel
|
NURS 350- The Clinical Issue and Research Questions Developed Using PICOT |
||
|
|
|
|
|
NURS 350- The Clinical Issue and Research Questions Developed Using PICOT |
||
|
Criteria |
Ratings |
Pts |
|
Topic/ Relevance to Nursing view longer description |
33 to >29.37 pts A clear and succinct description of the topic is presented. Background information is relevant and specific to the topic. The significance of the topic to nursing practice is explained clearly and is supported with examples. 29.37 to >24.75 pts A description of the topic is presented but may be ambiguous or confusing. Some background information is provided, but more is needed for a full explanation. The significance of the topic to nursing practice is somewhat explained and may not be supported with examples. 24.75 to >19.47 pts A description of the topic is presented but is ambiguous or confusing. Some background information is provided, but more is needed for a full explanation. The significance of the topic to nursing practice is somewhat explained but is not supported with examples. 19.47 to >0 pts An unclear description of the topic is presented or is missing. No background information is provided. The significance of the topic to nursing practice is not explained. |
33 / 33 pts |
|
PICOT Research Questions view longer description |
33 to >29.37 pts All research questions are accurately framed as complete PICOT questions. PICOT questions provide a clear and specific focus for research within the topic. 29.37 to >24.75 pts Only some research questions are framed as PICOT questions, or some PICOT questions are incomplete. PICOT questions provide a vague or unclear focus for research that may not be within the topic. 24.75 to >19.47 pts Few questions are framed as PICOT questions, or are incomplete. PICOT questions provide a vague or unclear focus for research that is not within the topic. 19.47 to >0 pts Research questions are missing or are not framed as PICOT questions. |
24.75 / 33 pts |
|
APA and Mechanics view longer description |
34 to >30.26 pts Follows all the requirements related to format, length, source citations, and layout. Written in a clear, concise, formal, and organized manner. Responses are mostly error free. Information from sources is paraphrased appropriately and accurately cited. 30.26 to >25.5 pts Follows length requirement and most of the requirements related to format, source citations, and layout. Writing is generally clear and organized but is not concise or formal in language. Multiple errors exist in spelling and grammar with minor interference with readability or comprehension. Most information from sources is paraphrased and cited correctly. 25.5 to >20.06 pts Follows few requirements related to format, source citations, and layout. Writing may be unclear or informal in language. Multiple errors exist in spelling and grammar, interfering with readability or comprehension. Some information from sources is paraphrased and cited correctly. 20.06 to >0 pts Does not follow format, length, source citations, and layout requirements. Writing is generally unclear and unorganized. Errors in spelling and grammar detract from readability and comprehension. Sources are missing or improperly cited. |
30.26 / 34 pts |
|
Total Points: 88.01 |
This is the comment that she put on my paperwork and how she grade the paper.
Marjory, there are many outcomes and comparison interventions for this topic - you chose to just repeat the same question with outcomes that can't be measured. Please see my comments in the paper.