paper

Criteria 2

Explain the advantages public health NGOs have over government-sponsored programs. Competency

Evaluate the structure and function of public health nongovernmental funding organizations.

NON_PERFORMANCE Does not identify the advantages public health NGOs have over government-sponsored programs. BASIC Identifies but does not explain the advantages public health NGOs have over government-sponsored programs. PROFICIENT Explains the advantages public health NGOs have over government-sponsored programs. DISTINGUISHED Explains and evaluates the advantages public health NGOs have over government-sponsored programs.

Comments:

Þ   This section was missing in your assessment. Here you need to explain and evaluate the advantages of public health NGOs have over government sponsored programs. Take a moment to review the assessment instructions and the Scoring Guide Tool prior to resubmitting. Please let me know if you need any clarification on this section. 

Criteria 3

Summarize the challenges public health NGOs have in comparison with government-sponsored programs. Competency

Evaluate the structure and function of public health nongovernmental funding organizations.

NON_PERFORMANCE Does not summarize the challenges public health NGOs have in comparison with government-sponsored programs. BASIC Provides a cursory summary of the challenges public health NGOs have in comparison with government-sponsored programs. PROFICIENT Summarizes the challenges public health NGOs have in comparison with government-sponsored programs. DISTINGUISHED Summarizes and evaluates the challenges public health NGOs have in comparison with government-sponsored programs.

Comments:

Þ   I do not see this section in your assessment. You need to outline public health NGO challenges. In addition, to an outline, share an evaluative argument to demonstrate a comprehensive understanding of current threats and challenges of public health NGOs in contrast to government sponsored programs. Please review the Assessment instructions and the Scoring Guide Tool (Grading rubric) for information that will help guide you to be successful in this section. Also, let me know if you have any questions. I am happy to help. 

Criteria 4

Analyze the sufficiency of data available to meet the criteria public health NGOs use to choose to get involved in a health issue.​ Competency

Evaluate global health issues.

NON_PERFORMANCE Does not describe available data related to a specific health issue. BASIC Describes available data but does not analyze its sufficiency to meet the criteria public health NGOs use to choose to get involved in a health issue. PROFICIENT Analyzes the sufficiency of data available to meet the criteria public health NGOs use to choose to get involved in a health issue. DISTINGUISHED Analyzes the sufficiency of data available to meet the criteria public health NGOs use to choose to get involved in a health issue. Notes methods by NGOs to develop their criteria.

Comments:

Þ   I do not see this section. You can do this. This criterion asked you to analyze whether there was enough data to meet public health NGO health care initiatives and to support your comments by current literature. You need to share the methods used in the data selection to assist the reader to understand how NGO’s develop criterion on selection of health care initiatives. To earn a higher proficiency score on this assessment, you need to address all these factors. Please re-read the assessment instructions and the Scoring Guide Tool (Grading rubric) prior to resubmitting. Ask yourself some questions prior to providing an analysis to determine if the information is sufficient to make a balanced decision. Elaborate and provide in-depth details on what sort of data is available. Do you as an NGO leader have enough data to make an educated decision?

     Let me know if you have any questions to clarify this criterion. You can do this!

Criteria 5

Explain how practicum research and interviewing experiences challenged or met assumptions about public health organizations and delivery. Competency

Obtain the minimum expected practicum hours.

NON_PERFORMANCE Does not describe practicum research and interviews that were conducted. BASIC Describes practicum research and interviews that were conducted, but does not offer a full explanation or address how these experiences challenged or met assumptions about public health organizations and delivery. PROFICIENT Explains how practicum research and interviewing experiences challenged or met assumptions about public health organizations and delivery. DISTINGUISHED Explains how practicum research and interviewing experiences challenged or met assumptions about public health organizations and delivery. Reflects on how this will affect future professional practice with regard to public health.

Comments:

Þ   This section was left out of your assessment. To be successful in this section you need to explain how the interview experiences challenged or met assumptions about the public health organization and delivery. You also need to reflect on how this will affect future professional practice with regards to public health. Ask yourself how public health is affected? Be specific and provide details. The reader wants to learn more! Consider how this affects future professional practice with regards to public health.