two assignments
1
The Importance of Studying Child Development
Children play under a parachute.
© Chris Sanders/Chris Garrett/Photolibrary/Getty Images
“We serve children best when we try to find out what their own inner needs are and what their own unique endowments are and to help them capitalize on that.”
Fred Rogers
Learning Objectives
After studying this chapter you will be able to:
■Define child development.
■Understand the value of studying child development.
■List the five major developmental domains.
■Describe the interdependence of domain development.
■Differentiate between developmental and chronological ages.
■Explain the five key debated issues in child development.
■Discuss the steps needed for a child to be referred for early intervention.
Chapter Overview
Knowing what is typical for child development provides caregivers and teachers with the basis for understanding many aspects of working and interacting with children and their families. This knowledge improves a practitioner’s ability to assess a child’s current skills by formulating an appropriate impression of the child’s true developmental status. In doing so, the practitioner acquires the ability to positively influence the child’s developmental progress. Not only do the researcher, practitioner, and parent need to learn how to use this information to support the child’s developmental growth, but they also need to understand how child development affects later behavior and impacts both their responses to the child and the child’s responses to them.
This introductory chapter gives an overview of developmental domains, definitions for terms frequently used in the study of child development, and the conceptual groundwork needed for successfully working with young children. Other chapter components include a review of major issues debated in this field with real-world examples, such as nature versus nurture and behavior stability and instability; a look at how observations of children can guide caregivers’ understanding of development; and steps to take if a child’s developmental progress is not typical. This chapter offers the basis for understanding subsequent chapters in this book. Chapter 2 provides an overview of the principal biological, hereditary, environmental, and experiential influences on how children develop, while Chapter 3 examines theories that provide the fundamental basis for this field of study. Chapters 4 through 8 focus on chronological development through childhood, including the prenatal and neonatal stages, infancy, toddlerhood, and early childhood.
1.1 What Is Child Development and Why Study It?
Child development is the dynamic process of acquiring increasingly more complex motor, cognition, communication, social-emotional, and self-help skills from the stage of conception through adolescence. It is the result of interactions between biology, experiences, and the environment. Therefore, child development includes basic milestones that are somewhat predictable but are influenced by intrinsic (originating from the inside) and extrinsic (originating from the outside) sources, which cause progress to be extremely individualized and different for each child. Development in children continues to change as competencies become more sophisticated and refined (Davies, 2011). According to this maturational perspective, these skills typically develop in a series of stages that follow a sequence of developmental competencies. These competencies are predictable on a continuum of major expectations, just as math teachers would expect their students to learn how to add before learning to multiply, and to master multiplication before learning how to handle larger equations.
In 2011, 32.7 million children participated in some kind of regular child-care arrangement (U.S. Census Bureau, 2011). These arrangements included care for children from birth to age 5 years, as well as programs covering out-of-school time. The adults providing this care have an impact on many aspects of the children in their care. For example, they can influence the children’s attitudes and behavior as well as their future social skills and academic performance. Knowledge of child development also guides caregivers in providing children with the experiences, support, and direction necessary for their optimal development. It is essential that caregivers understand typical human development because that understanding assists them in predicting how a child will learn and progress through specific areas of child development, or developmental domains.
There are many ways to group children’s developmental domains, but child development researchers typically consider five major spheres of development: motor development, cognition, communication, social-emotional, and self-help. These five domains are used in this book. The following definitions are commonly used in the field of child development:
1.Motor development refers to the use, coordination, and growth of a child’s muscles. In the field of child development, the domain of motor development is divided into gross motor skills and fine motor skills.a.Gross motor skills involve the use and coordination of large muscle groups in the arms, legs, and torso. These skills include general body movement and shifting, reaction speed, balance, and strength. Good gross motor development enables a child to move in many different ways and to control body movements. Gross motor skills include rolling over, walking, running, hopping, throwing, riding a bike, and other such activities.
b.Fine motor skills are defined as coordination of small muscle movements, usually in the fingers and hands. These skills are needed for grasping and manipulating objects, for example, holding a crayon, buttoning a shirt, writing, and stacking blocks.
2.Cognition includes skills related to thinking, learning, understanding, processing information, reasoning, problem solving, imagination, and memory development.
3.Communication is the ability to exchange ideas with others. Communication includes the ability to understand others (receptive) and to express oneself through verbalizations, writing, or body movements such as gestures and sign language (expressive).
4.Social-emotional development refers to the ability to regulate emotions, raise self-awareness, self-regulate behavior, build relationships, have positive interactions, show empathy for others, and eventually resolve conflicts.
5.Self-help skills are adaptive skills of daily living such as eating, bathing, dressing, and toileting (Aiger, 2011). Such abilities generally require some level of motor development, for example, as needed for activities like buttoning a shirt or holding a toothbrush.
Progress in one of these developmental domains is not isolated or independent from progress within another domain. Rather, these domains are interdependent and relate to each other. That means progress in one domain may help the child to advance in another domain. For example, a child’s understanding of the world (cognitive domain) is furthered by the child’s ability to move around and explore (motor development). It also means that one domain may be the outlet for another domain. For example, if a child is struggling in the communication domain, it may be difficult for a practitioner to assess the cognitive domain for that child because the child may find it challenging to convey to others what is known and understood. The same is true when a child attempts to engage socially with another child but finds it difficult to communicate that intent.
Within each domain is a set of major expectations called developmental milestones. Developmental milestones are skills that most children have achieved by a common age. These milestones provide a framework for monitoring a child’s development over time (Gerber, Wilks, & Erdie-Lalena, 2010). Chapter 3 discusses the theories and research on which these developmental milestones have been established.
A mother helps her baby walk on grass.
© Sergey Borisov/iStock/Thinkstock
▶A child’s developmental age is characterized by the common age of achievement for particular developmental milestones. Walking is a developmental milestone often achieved around 1 year of age, with variations in timing that are unique to each child.
A child’s developmental age for a particular domain is the age at which children commonly achieve a developmental milestone in that domain. For example, many children first walk at approximately 1 year of age. Therefore, if a child first walks at 9 months, that child is said to have a developmental age of 1 year but only for the motor domain because walking is a part of the motor domain. The child may be at a developmental age of 9 months in the communication domain, and can even be at a younger developmental age in the cognitive domain. Children can be at different developmental ages across the various domains at any one time point.
The skills necessary for achieving a milestone are called prerequisite skills. Prerequisite skills are skills that lead to another more advanced skill. For example, to achieve the milestone of walking independently, a child generally demonstrates and then practices a set of prerequisite skills that include rolling over, sitting, crawling, standing, cruising, and finally, taking steps while holding on to a person or a stable object. Another example of prerequisite skills, from the language domain, is the sounds infants make as they coo, babble, or blow “raspberries.” Next they might vocalize consonants and short syllables such as “da.” This progresses to vowels and short words like “up,” then phrases like “want up,” and finally the milestone of speaking in sentences: “I want up.”
A child’s progress in attaining developmental milestones may be unpredictable and staggered, developing in spurts and stops, and sometimes even regressing for short periods. Variations from typical developmental age must be viewed with extreme care. For example, Olivia took her first steps at 8 months but wasn’t using whole words until 18 months. However, she was forming full sentences by 24 months. Her later verbal development was likely normal; therefore, the early delay was of no lasting consequence.
The way in which a child progresses through these milestones can be affected by intrinsic influences like genetics or by extrinsic influences like those in the environment. A key question is whether one type of influence has more impact on development than the other. This is precisely the issue at the heart of the nature versus nurture debate, which is discussed later in this chapter and in more detail in Chapter 2. As an example of an environmental influence, consider the social-cultural context of different nationalities. In some cultures, babies are carried and protected from too much stimulation, whereas in other cultures, children are tossed and spun around (Venetsanou & Kambas, 2010). These practices certainly can have an effect on the timing of children’s large muscle development. For example, in a comparison of motor development in Brazilian and British children, researchers found that Brazilians have more physically active play and outperform British children in gross motor activities like running, whereas children in England are encouraged to perform quiet work oriented toward school performance and do better with fine motor activities (Victora, Victora, & Barros, 1990).
1.2 Developmental Stages and Ages
In addition to domains and milestones, developmental scientists generally refer to a child’s development in six developmental stages. These stages are prenatal, infancy, toddlerhood, early childhood, middle childhood, and adolescence. Most cultures in developed countries recognize these same stages of development. This book covers the first four developmental stages, through age 8 years.
Ultrasound image of a fetus.
© Isabelle Limbach/iStock/Thinkstock
▶The prenatal stage is the initial stage of development, occurring from conception until birth.
These stages generally match chronological ages in the following way:
1.The prenatal stage is from conception until birth. Also, some disciplines refer to a neonatal stage next, which is the first 4 weeks of life.
2.Infancy is the first year after birth; the earliest period of early childhood.
3.Toddlerhood is ages 1–3 years; the period of early childhood after infancy.
4.Early childhood generally applies to children ages 3–8 years. Some researchers refer to children ages 2–5 years as preschoolers; in addition, some literature presents the early childhood stage as all the years from birth to age 8. This book contains a separate chapter on early childhood development for ages 4–5 years.
5.Middle childhood covers the period from ages 9 to 12 years.
6.Adolescence is the time period of transition between childhood and adulthood that includes key developmental changes such as puberty. It is typically considered to cover ages 13–18 years.
1.3 Issues in Child Development
Chapter 3 examines in detail the theories that underpin child development thought, advances, organization, and implementation. Embedded in these theories are basic issues or ideas that are debated by experts, scholars, and researchers in the field regarding their applicability, importance, and influence on child development. Each issue is described briefly here. As you read the descriptions, consider your own views on these issues of frequent debate:
•Nature versus nurture
•Continuity versus discontinuity
•Similarity versus uniqueness
•Behavior stability versus instability
•Active behavior versus passive behavior (Slee, Campbell, & Spears, 2012)
Nature Versus Nurture
Nature versus nurture is another way of phrasing the debate over whether our heredity or the environment contribute more heavily to who we become. This debate is a major issue in many social science disciplines and is concerned with the influence that biology, genetics, and overall heredity have, along with or in contrast to environmental influences. This debate encompasses the following questions: Which traits dominate future capabilities and behaviors, the intrinsic traits that children are born with or the extrinsic traits that are the result of experiences? Are some of these intrinsic characteristics changeable, or are they fixed? Does our environment have a strong enough influence that it can change some of the impact of nature’s influences? Can we change our life course trajectory through nurturing, relationships, learning, and experiencing? Perhaps rather than seeing this as strictly an either-or situation, the real question is how much does each influence contribute to an individual and what happens when these influences combine?
Nature vs. Nurture
Dean Hamer, Director of the Gene Structure and Regulation Unit at the National Cancer Institute, takes a fresh look at the nature vs. nurture controversy.
Critical Thinking Questions
•Can you identify parts of your own personality that you think you can attribute primarily to nature (genetics)? Why do you think they come from "nature" rather than "nurture"?
•Think of someone close to you whose character you admire. How might their environment have influenced their character?
Some theorists who favor the nature argument explain that an entertainer’s tendency toward outgoing, bold behavior is predetermined at birth and is obvious when one or both of the parents had careers in the performing arts. Others offer an explanation that puts much more weight on the individual’s environment during crucial developmental years. A child whose parents fostered confidence and encouraged creativity may be more likely to enjoy entertaining as an adult. Today, many development professionals agree that a complex relationship exists between nature and nurture that may lead to a variety of outcomes later in life.
Continuity Versus Discontinuity
Next is the debate of continuity versus discontinuity of development. Supporters of continuity describe development as incremental, gradual changes in a skill until it is mastered. This view emphasizes the quantitative improvement of skills. This would suggest “continuous” growth, much like a plant would grow in a fluid and consistent manner until it reaches its mature size. Those advocating discontinuity of development point to larger steps in developing skills, such as going from crawling to walking. This opinion focuses on the qualitative advances and refinements of skills through patterns referred to in this chapter as developmental stages.
Steve and Justin, fathers with 2-year-old sons, are discussing their sons’ development. Steve is sure he saw an abrupt change in his son whenever he acquired a new skill. Steve describes the day his son said his first word, took his first independent step, and first fed himself berries. Justin views all of the same events as happening gradually for his son. He describes how his son worked on feeding himself cereal pieces for weeks by slowly learning to grasp the small pieces with his palm and fingers, next by using all of his fingertips with the assistance of his palm, until he finally pinched with only two fingertips, pointer and thumb, and brought them to his mouth. Justin says it was even later that his son had mastered the skill enough to do this independently and with enough speed to get through an entire meal. Documentation of both boys’ progress would show them at the same developmental age. However, Justin’s description of his son would support the continuous development theory, but what Steve is describing reflects discontinuous development.
Similarity Versus Uniqueness
Similarity versus uniqueness in child development is based partly on Carl Jung’s writings on personality, in which he described the interactions between similarity and uniqueness in people as psychological types (Jung, 1969). Similarity refers to the notion that most people are basically the same even though they seem different on the surface. By contrast, uniqueness refers to the belief that each person has distinctive traits, beliefs, and thoughts, and that developmentalists should encourage individuality. The view that experiences and inherent traits have an impact on development would support the uniqueness argument because experiences affect individuals differently and may combine uniquely with inherited traits.
Religion is an interesting place to look for evidence of similarity versus uniqueness. The ancient and universal idea of religion itself shows that people across cultures have always shared common beliefs and a common desire to understand the world around them. This commonality supports the idea of developmental similarity, even in our modern world. However, if we look at the values and beliefs of individuals within any one religion we would find many different interpretations and varying degrees of faith. Uniqueness may be at play when members of the same family, especially siblings with similar rearing, have different religious beliefs later in life.
A group of primary schoolboys and schoolgirls smile at the camera while standing in a line in front of a chalkboard in a classroom.
Digital Vision/Thinkstock
▶A debate exists in child development regarding the similarity or uniqueness of personality. The view that experiences have an impact on development would point to the uniqueness of personality.
Behavior Stability Versus Instability
The arguments of behavior stability versus instability focus on whether individual personality characteristics stay as part of the person over time or change with development and drive changes in behaviors. Sigmund Freud (1923/1961) stated that an individual’s personality is formed in early childhood and that future development of personality is determined by these early experiences. In contrast to this rigid model, Erik Erikson (1963) wrote that people are always changing and developing throughout their lives. This debate can be combined with the argument over continuity and discontinuity of behavior to produce a strong defense of development as a continually dynamic process.
For example, Patti, now 19 years old, has always been polite, reserved, and shy. The members of Patti’s family, including her parents and siblings, tend to be boisterous, outspoken, and social. Despite Patti’s environment and her siblings’ good-natured teasing, Patti remains quiet and well-mannered, even as a young adult. Patti’s unchanging characteristics may provide evidence for behavior stability.
Active Behavior Versus Passive Behavior
The final debate, over active behavior versus passive behavior, relates to whether children initiate behavior (activity) or are reactive to whatever happens because they believe it to be out of their control. A child with active behavior is one who acts on changes to get what was expected and may appear resistant to others’ expectations. A child with passive behavior is more likely to be flexible and adapts rapidly to unexpected circumstances without obvious stress.
Teagan and Kaya are twins with two very different personalities. Every day after dinner, Teagan and Kaya are allowed to have one cookie. Today, their mother told them they could not have a cookie because they did not put away their toys as she asked them to do. Teagan, a child with passive behavior, quietly leaves the dining room to get her coloring book even though she really wants a cookie. Kaya has always displayed more active behavior. She wants a cookie, too, so she asks her father for a cookie instead. Both siblings have found their own way to cope with the unexpected loss of a cookie.
As is evident in the number of deliberations and terms that occur in the field of child development, this area of study is complex. However, the field has basic perspectives that, though inherently complicated, fit together logically, especially in practice. These principles are part of the position statement of the National Association for the Education of Young Children (NAEYC, n.d.). They are described as “theoretical perspectives that inform decisions about early childhood practice” (see Table 1.1).
Table 1.1 NAEYC’s principles of child development and learning
All the domains of development and learning—physical, social and emotional, and cognitive—are important, and they are closely interrelated. Children’s development and learning in one domain influence and are influenced by what takes place in other domains.
Many aspects of children’s learning and development follow well documented sequences, with later abilities, skills, and knowledge building on those already acquired.
Development and learning proceed at varying rates from child to child, as well as at uneven rates across different areas of a child’s individual functioning. Development and learning result from a dynamic and continuous interaction of biological maturation and experience.
Early experiences have profound effects, both cumulative and delayed, on a child’s development and learning; and optimal periods exist for certain types of development and learning to occur.
Development proceeds toward greater complexity, self-regulation, and symbolic or representational capacities.
Children develop best when they have secure, consistent relationships with responsive adults and opportunities for positive relationships with peers.
Development and learning occur in and are influenced by multiple social and cultural contexts. Always mentally active in seeking to understand the world around them, children learn in a variety of ways; a wide range of teaching strategies and interactions are effective in supporting all these kinds of learning.
Play is an important vehicle for developing self-regulation as well as for promoting language, cognition, and social competence.
Source: National Association for the Education of Young Children. (2009). Developmentally appropriate practice in early childhood programs serving children from birth through age 8. Retrieved from http://www.naeyc.org/files/naeyc/file/positions /position%20statement%20Web.pdf.
1.2 Developmental Stages and Ages
In addition to domains and milestones, developmental scientists generally refer to a child’s development in six developmental stages. These stages are prenatal, infancy, toddlerhood, early childhood, middle childhood, and adolescence. Most cultures in developed countries recognize these same stages of development. This book covers the first four developmental stages, through age 8 years.
Ultrasound image of a fetus.
© Isabelle Limbach/iStock/Thinkstock
▶The prenatal stage is the initial stage of development, occurring from conception until birth.
These stages generally match chronological ages in the following way:
1.The prenatal stage is from conception until birth. Also, some disciplines refer to a neonatal stage next, which is the first 4 weeks of life.
2.Infancy is the first year after birth; the earliest period of early childhood.
3.Toddlerhood is ages 1–3 years; the period of early childhood after infancy.
4.Early childhood generally applies to children ages 3–8 years. Some researchers refer to children ages 2–5 years as preschoolers; in addition, some literature presents the early childhood stage as all the years from birth to age 8. This book contains a separate chapter on early childhood development for ages 4–5 years.
5.Middle childhood covers the period from ages 9 to 12 years.
6.Adolescence is the time period of transition between childhood and adulthood that includes key developmental changes such as puberty. It is typically considered to cover ages 13–18 years.
1.3 Issues in Child Development
Chapter 3 examines in detail the theories that underpin child development thought, advances, organization, and implementation. Embedded in these theories are basic issues or ideas that are debated by experts, scholars, and researchers in the field regarding their applicability, importance, and influence on child development. Each issue is described briefly here. As you read the descriptions, consider your own views on these issues of frequent debate:
•Nature versus nurture
•Continuity versus discontinuity
•Similarity versus uniqueness
•Behavior stability versus instability
•Active behavior versus passive behavior (Slee, Campbell, & Spears, 2012)
Nature Versus Nurture
Nature versus nurture is another way of phrasing the debate over whether our heredity or the environment contribute more heavily to who we become. This debate is a major issue in many social science disciplines and is concerned with the influence that biology, genetics, and overall heredity have, along with or in contrast to environmental influences. This debate encompasses the following questions: Which traits dominate future capabilities and behaviors, the intrinsic traits that children are born with or the extrinsic traits that are the result of experiences? Are some of these intrinsic characteristics changeable, or are they fixed? Does our environment have a strong enough influence that it can change some of the impact of nature’s influences? Can we change our life course trajectory through nurturing, relationships, learning, and experiencing? Perhaps rather than seeing this as strictly an either-or situation, the real question is how much does each influence contribute to an individual and what happens when these influences combine?
Nature vs. Nurture
Dean Hamer, Director of the Gene Structure and Regulation Unit at the National Cancer Institute, takes a fresh look at the nature vs. nurture controversy.
Critical Thinking Questions
•Can you identify parts of your own personality that you think you can attribute primarily to nature (genetics)? Why do you think they come from "nature" rather than "nurture"?
•Think of someone close to you whose character you admire. How might their environment have influenced their character?
Some theorists who favor the nature argument explain that an entertainer’s tendency toward outgoing, bold behavior is predetermined at birth and is obvious when one or both of the parents had careers in the performing arts. Others offer an explanation that puts much more weight on the individual’s environment during crucial developmental years. A child whose parents fostered confidence and encouraged creativity may be more likely to enjoy entertaining as an adult. Today, many development professionals agree that a complex relationship exists between nature and nurture that may lead to a variety of outcomes later in life.
Continuity Versus Discontinuity
Next is the debate of continuity versus discontinuity of development. Supporters of continuity describe development as incremental, gradual changes in a skill until it is mastered. This view emphasizes the quantitative improvement of skills. This would suggest “continuous” growth, much like a plant would grow in a fluid and consistent manner until it reaches its mature size. Those advocating discontinuity of development point to larger steps in developing skills, such as going from crawling to walking. This opinion focuses on the qualitative advances and refinements of skills through patterns referred to in this chapter as developmental stages.
Steve and Justin, fathers with 2-year-old sons, are discussing their sons’ development. Steve is sure he saw an abrupt change in his son whenever he acquired a new skill. Steve describes the day his son said his first word, took his first independent step, and first fed himself berries. Justin views all of the same events as happening gradually for his son. He describes how his son worked on feeding himself cereal pieces for weeks by slowly learning to grasp the small pieces with his palm and fingers, next by using all of his fingertips with the assistance of his palm, until he finally pinched with only two fingertips, pointer and thumb, and brought them to his mouth. Justin says it was even later that his son had mastered the skill enough to do this independently and with enough speed to get through an entire meal. Documentation of both boys’ progress would show them at the same developmental age. However, Justin’s description of his son would support the continuous development theory, but what Steve is describing reflects discontinuous development.
Similarity Versus Uniqueness
Similarity versus uniqueness in child development is based partly on Carl Jung’s writings on personality, in which he described the interactions between similarity and uniqueness in people as psychological types (Jung, 1969). Similarity refers to the notion that most people are basically the same even though they seem different on the surface. By contrast, uniqueness refers to the belief that each person has distinctive traits, beliefs, and thoughts, and that developmentalists should encourage individuality. The view that experiences and inherent traits have an impact on development would support the uniqueness argument because experiences affect individuals differently and may combine uniquely with inherited traits.
Religion is an interesting place to look for evidence of similarity versus uniqueness. The ancient and universal idea of religion itself shows that people across cultures have always shared common beliefs and a common desire to understand the world around them. This commonality supports the idea of developmental similarity, even in our modern world. However, if we look at the values and beliefs of individuals within any one religion we would find many different interpretations and varying degrees of faith. Uniqueness may be at play when members of the same family, especially siblings with similar rearing, have different religious beliefs later in life.
A group of primary schoolboys and schoolgirls smile at the camera while standing in a line in front of a chalkboard in a classroom.
Digital Vision/Thinkstock
▶A debate exists in child development regarding the similarity or uniqueness of personality. The view that experiences have an impact on development would point to the uniqueness of personality.
Behavior Stability Versus Instability
The arguments of behavior stability versus instability focus on whether individual personality characteristics stay as part of the person over time or change with development and drive changes in behaviors. Sigmund Freud (1923/1961) stated that an individual’s personality is formed in early childhood and that future development of personality is determined by these early experiences. In contrast to this rigid model, Erik Erikson (1963) wrote that people are always changing and developing throughout their lives. This debate can be combined with the argument over continuity and discontinuity of behavior to produce a strong defense of development as a continually dynamic process.
For example, Patti, now 19 years old, has always been polite, reserved, and shy. The members of Patti’s family, including her parents and siblings, tend to be boisterous, outspoken, and social. Despite Patti’s environment and her siblings’ good-natured teasing, Patti remains quiet and well-mannered, even as a young adult. Patti’s unchanging characteristics may provide evidence for behavior stability.
Active Behavior Versus Passive Behavior
The final debate, over active behavior versus passive behavior, relates to whether children initiate behavior (activity) or are reactive to whatever happens because they believe it to be out of their control. A child with active behavior is one who acts on changes to get what was expected and may appear resistant to others’ expectations. A child with passive behavior is more likely to be flexible and adapts rapidly to unexpected circumstances without obvious stress.
Teagan and Kaya are twins with two very different personalities. Every day after dinner, Teagan and Kaya are allowed to have one cookie. Today, their mother told them they could not have a cookie because they did not put away their toys as she asked them to do. Teagan, a child with passive behavior, quietly leaves the dining room to get her coloring book even though she really wants a cookie. Kaya has always displayed more active behavior. She wants a cookie, too, so she asks her father for a cookie instead. Both siblings have found their own way to cope with the unexpected loss of a cookie.
As is evident in the number of deliberations and terms that occur in the field of child development, this area of study is complex. However, the field has basic perspectives that, though inherently complicated, fit together logically, especially in practice. These principles are part of the position statement of the National Association for the Education of Young Children (NAEYC, n.d.). They are described as “theoretical perspectives that inform decisions about early childhood practice” (see Table 1.1).
Table 1.1 NAEYC’s principles of child development and learning
All the domains of development and learning—physical, social and emotional, and cognitive—are important, and they are closely interrelated. Children’s development and learning in one domain influence and are influenced by what takes place in other domains.
Many aspects of children’s learning and development follow well documented sequences, with later abilities, skills, and knowledge building on those already acquired.
Development and learning proceed at varying rates from child to child, as well as at uneven rates across different areas of a child’s individual functioning. Development and learning result from a dynamic and continuous interaction of biological maturation and experience.
Early experiences have profound effects, both cumulative and delayed, on a child’s development and learning; and optimal periods exist for certain types of development and learning to occur.
Development proceeds toward greater complexity, self-regulation, and symbolic or representational capacities.
Children develop best when they have secure, consistent relationships with responsive adults and opportunities for positive relationships with peers.
Development and learning occur in and are influenced by multiple social and cultural contexts. Always mentally active in seeking to understand the world around them, children learn in a variety of ways; a wide range of teaching strategies and interactions are effective in supporting all these kinds of learning.
Play is an important vehicle for developing self-regulation as well as for promoting language, cognition, and social competence.
Source: National Association for the Education of Young Children. (2009). Developmentally appropriate practice in early childhood programs serving children from birth through age 8. Retrieved from http://www.naeyc.org/files/naeyc/file/positions /position%20statement%20Web.pdf.
1.4 Assessing a Child’s Development
Although milestones are reported to develop at certain ages, they may not necessarily be matched to the individual child’s actual age. In the field of child development, the actual age is referred to as the chronological age. A child’s chronological age is simply the amount of time in months (for infants) or years since birth.
Children are said to have typical development when they attain the predicted milestones anticipated for their chronological age. For typical development a child could demonstrate mild variations in either a positive or a negative direction, sometimes presenting simple irregularities like walking without ever crawling. However, extreme deviations from the typical expectant age of a developing skill should signal further examination. Early identification of issues is more likely when a child is assessed as soon as concerns arise. Early identification is known to lessen future delays when referrals to appropriate early intervention programs are made in a timely manner.
Renita was nervous that her son, Michael, was not where he should be developmentally. She noticed at the park that many other children Michael’s age were already walking and using several words. During the next visit to the pediatrician, Renita shared her concerns with Michael’s doctor. After examining Michael and looking at his height, weight, and head circumference charts in comparison to the average child, Dr. Johnson reminded Renita of the impact of Michael’s premature birth. Dr. Johnson shared that, although Michael may have a chronological age of 18 months, developmentally he may exhibit skills of a slightly younger child (D’Agostino, 2010). Dr. Johnson explained further that Michael would have an adjusted age of 16 months to reflect that he was born 2 months premature. Renita, while still concerned, was relieved to learn that children develop within a range of time and that a child’s birth circumstances, such as how close the child’s birth date is to the due date, influence when milestones might emerge.
Such referrals are generally initiated by a screening process to determine whether a full assessment is warranted. Referrals for screening and assessments must be approved by a parent in writing. The screening process is an unobtrusive brief evaluation of a child’s developmental skills. It generally takes place with the parent in attendance, and depending on the child’s age, the process may include a parent interview. The screening helps to determine whether the child should have a complete evaluation in some or all developmental domains.
Teacher's Approach to Assessment
Utilizing developmentally appropriate informal assessments can support a child's development positively.
Critical Thinking Question
•What might be the benefits of using developmentally appropriate informal assessments in child development?
Many screening instruments are available, and each differs in reliability and validity of results as well as in the amount of training needed to administer them, the ease of use, and the interpretation of results. Reliability refers to how consistent and stable the results are over time and across testers. For example, if two different teachers screen the same child with the same test at around the same date, the results should be similar. That would mean the test and the testers have reliability. Validity refers to whether the instrument measures what it is supposed to measure. For instance, if the instrument is used to screen for communication problems but really looks at how well the child eats independently, then the instrument does not have validity in communication.
If the screening results indicate significant delays or highly irregular patterns of development, then the steps for a full evaluation are basically the same as those for screening. Parent approval must be obtained for the referral for evaluation. The evaluation is typically done by an early intervention specialist, a team of specialists, or a psychologist. Testing results should be paired with the clinical judgment of professionals who know the child and the parents. Again, with parental permission, the child can be enrolled in special services, usually called early intervention or early childhood special education.
Child assessments are important whether or not a special need is suspected. According to the NAEYC (McAfee, Leong, & Bodrova, 2004), assessment is the process of finding out what a child can do in relation to that child’s optimal development by gathering information from several sources and then organizing and interpreting the information. Assessment provides the practitioner with invaluable information on how to play and interact with the child or on how to instruct the child. These assessments can be formal (using standardized testing measures) or informal (making frequent observations and documenting those observations).
Preschool children play musical chairs as their teacher watches.
© Miodrag Gajic/E+/Getty Images
▶Child observation is an important practice that can give caregivers and teachers valuable insight into children’s thoughts, feelings, and behaviors.
Developmental psychologists refer to good systematic observation as naturalistic observation. Naturalistic observation involves watching and listening to the child in the course of everyday activities, events, and contexts, and documenting the child’s behaviors (McKenchnie, 2008). Observations provide important information about what a child might think and feel; what triggers behaviors, or stimulates creativity, in a certain child; why a child may seem quiet or shy; who and what a child prefers to play with and why; when a child is sick or sad; and more. Observations by the practitioner also help build better relationships between the caregiver and the child and between the caregiver and the parent because observing a child in a structured way gives the caregiver a much improved understanding of the child’s idiosyncrasies and preferences. Consequently, observation gives clearer insight into each child’s individual characteristics and helps in future discussions of the child’s needs.
To conduct observations effectively, a caregiver or teacher must be deliberate and record faithfully what is seen and heard. This often happens by observing the child without interacting but should also happen when the observer is an active part of the group, with the understanding that participation in the activity will change some dynamics. Observations in both cases will provide understanding of the child’s learning style, behaviors, personality, and skill level. The observer also should monitor the child over time and over a variety of activities and times of the day. It is important to note how a child interacts in groups as well as individually with parents, other family members, other adults, and peers. It is also helpful to note the time of day, the length of the activity, which peers were present, and what occurred immediately preceding the observed activity.
Documenting what is seen and heard helps an observer to avoid retrospectively misunderstanding an interaction or forgetting important details. Observation notes and portfolio samples can be kept in files for future reference. Portfolio samples may contain samples of the child’s work, such as drawings; photos of the child’s science or art projects; anecdotal notes; photographs of the child at play; a dictated story; and similar items.
1.4 Assessing a Child’s Development
Although milestones are reported to develop at certain ages, they may not necessarily be matched to the individual child’s actual age. In the field of child development, the actual age is referred to as the chronological age. A child’s chronological age is simply the amount of time in months (for infants) or years since birth.
Children are said to have typical development when they attain the predicted milestones anticipated for their chronological age. For typical development a child could demonstrate mild variations in either a positive or a negative direction, sometimes presenting simple irregularities like walking without ever crawling. However, extreme deviations from the typical expectant age of a developing skill should signal further examination. Early identification of issues is more likely when a child is assessed as soon as concerns arise. Early identification is known to lessen future delays when referrals to appropriate early intervention programs are made in a timely manner.
Renita was nervous that her son, Michael, was not where he should be developmentally. She noticed at the park that many other children Michael’s age were already walking and using several words. During the next visit to the pediatrician, Renita shared her concerns with Michael’s doctor. After examining Michael and looking at his height, weight, and head circumference charts in comparison to the average child, Dr. Johnson reminded Renita of the impact of Michael’s premature birth. Dr. Johnson shared that, although Michael may have a chronological age of 18 months, developmentally he may exhibit skills of a slightly younger child (D’Agostino, 2010). Dr. Johnson explained further that Michael would have an adjusted age of 16 months to reflect that he was born 2 months premature. Renita, while still concerned, was relieved to learn that children develop within a range of time and that a child’s birth circumstances, such as how close the child’s birth date is to the due date, influence when milestones might emerge.
Such referrals are generally initiated by a screening process to determine whether a full assessment is warranted. Referrals for screening and assessments must be approved by a parent in writing. The screening process is an unobtrusive brief evaluation of a child’s developmental skills. It generally takes place with the parent in attendance, and depending on the child’s age, the process may include a parent interview. The screening helps to determine whether the child should have a complete evaluation in some or all developmental domains.
Teacher's Approach to Assessment
Utilizing developmentally appropriate informal assessments can support a child's development positively.
Critical Thinking Question
•What might be the benefits of using developmentally appropriate informal assessments in child development?
Many screening instruments are available, and each differs in reliability and validity of results as well as in the amount of training needed to administer them, the ease of use, and the interpretation of results. Reliability refers to how consistent and stable the results are over time and across testers. For example, if two different teachers screen the same child with the same test at around the same date, the results should be similar. That would mean the test and the testers have reliability. Validity refers to whether the instrument measures what it is supposed to measure. For instance, if the instrument is used to screen for communication problems but really looks at how well the child eats independently, then the instrument does not have validity in communication.
If the screening results indicate significant delays or highly irregular patterns of development, then the steps for a full evaluation are basically the same as those for screening. Parent approval must be obtained for the referral for evaluation. The evaluation is typically done by an early intervention specialist, a team of specialists, or a psychologist. Testing results should be paired with the clinical judgment of professionals who know the child and the parents. Again, with parental permission, the child can be enrolled in special services, usually called early intervention or early childhood special education.
Child assessments are important whether or not a special need is suspected. According to the NAEYC (McAfee, Leong, & Bodrova, 2004), assessment is the process of finding out what a child can do in relation to that child’s optimal development by gathering information from several sources and then organizing and interpreting the information. Assessment provides the practitioner with invaluable information on how to play and interact with the child or on how to instruct the child. These assessments can be formal (using standardized testing measures) or informal (making frequent observations and documenting those observations).
Preschool children play musical chairs as their teacher watches.
© Miodrag Gajic/E+/Getty Images
▶Child observation is an important practice that can give caregivers and teachers valuable insight into children’s thoughts, feelings, and behaviors.
Developmental psychologists refer to good systematic observation as naturalistic observation. Naturalistic observation involves watching and listening to the child in the course of everyday activities, events, and contexts, and documenting the child’s behaviors (McKenchnie, 2008). Observations provide important information about what a child might think and feel; what triggers behaviors, or stimulates creativity, in a certain child; why a child may seem quiet or shy; who and what a child prefers to play with and why; when a child is sick or sad; and more. Observations by the practitioner also help build better relationships between the caregiver and the child and between the caregiver and the parent because observing a child in a structured way gives the caregiver a much improved understanding of the child’s idiosyncrasies and preferences. Consequently, observation gives clearer insight into each child’s individual characteristics and helps in future discussions of the child’s needs.
To conduct observations effectively, a caregiver or teacher must be deliberate and record faithfully what is seen and heard. This often happens by observing the child without interacting but should also happen when the observer is an active part of the group, with the understanding that participation in the activity will change some dynamics. Observations in both cases will provide understanding of the child’s learning style, behaviors, personality, and skill level. The observer also should monitor the child over time and over a variety of activities and times of the day. It is important to note how a child interacts in groups as well as individually with parents, other family members, other adults, and peers. It is also helpful to note the time of day, the length of the activity, which peers were present, and what occurred immediately preceding the observed activity.
Documenting what is seen and heard helps an observer to avoid retrospectively misunderstanding an interaction or forgetting important details. Observation notes and portfolio samples can be kept in files for future reference. Portfolio samples may contain samples of the child’s work, such as drawings; photos of the child’s science or art projects; anecdotal notes; photographs of the child at play; a dictated story; and similar items.
1.5 Core Concepts of Development
After reviewing an extensive body of research, the Committee on Integrating the Science of Early Childhood Development of the National Academy of Sciences published what might be called the most influential report ever on the nature of early human development. This report, From Neurons to Neighborhoods (Shonkoff & Phillips, 2000), identified 10 core concepts of development (see Table 1.2).
Table 1.2: Core concepts of development
Human development is shaped by a dynamic and continuous interaction between biology and experience.
Culture influences every aspect of human development and is reflected in childrearing beliefs and practices designed to promote healthy adaptation.
The growth of self-regulation is a cornerstone of early childhood development that cuts across all domains of behavior.
Children are active participants in their own development, reflecting the intrinsic human drive to explore and master one’s environment.
Human relationships, and the effects of relationships on relationships, are the building blocks of healthy development.
The broad range of individual differences among young children often makes it difficult to distinguish normal variations and maturational delays from transient disorders and persistent impairments.
The development of children unfolds along individual pathways whose trajectories are characterized by continuities and discontinuities, as well as by a series of significant transitions.
Human development is shaped by the ongoing interplay among sources of vulnerability and sources of resilience.
The timing of early experiences can matter, but, more often than not, the developing child remains vulnerable to risks and open to protective influences throughout the early years of life and into adulthood.
The course of development can be altered in early childhood by effective interventions that change the balance between risk and protection, thereby shifting the odds in favor of more adaptive outcomes.
Source: From National Research Council and Institute of Medicine (2000). From neurons to neighborhoods: The science of early childhood development. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press. Reprinted with permission from the National Academies Press, Copyright © 2000, National Academy of Sciences.
These core concepts attempt to grasp the typical and atypical developmental paths of early childhood. They cover the prenatal period to kindergarten and address how early experiences affect all components of development from neurological development to cultural and societal influences. This work is based on four predominant themes:
•All children are born wired for feelings and ready to learn.
•Early environments matter and nurturing relationships are essential.
•Society is changing and the needs of young children are not being addressed.
•Interactions among early childhood science, policy, and practice are problematic and demand dramatic rethinking.
According to the core concepts, development progresses faster from the time of conception until birth than during any following stage of life (Shonkoff & Phillips, 2000). These concepts support and supplement NAEYC’s perspectives. Compare NAEYC’s perspectives (Table 1.1) with the National Academy of Sciences’s core concepts (Table 1.2) to find similarities and differences.
1.5 Core Concepts of Development
After reviewing an extensive body of research, the Committee on Integrating the Science of Early Childhood Development of the National Academy of Sciences published what might be called the most influential report ever on the nature of early human development. This report, From Neurons to Neighborhoods (Shonkoff & Phillips, 2000), identified 10 core concepts of development (see Table 1.2).
Table 1.2: Core concepts of development
Human development is shaped by a dynamic and continuous interaction between biology and experience.
Culture influences every aspect of human development and is reflected in childrearing beliefs and practices designed to promote healthy adaptation.
The growth of self-regulation is a cornerstone of early childhood development that cuts across all domains of behavior.
Children are active participants in their own development, reflecting the intrinsic human drive to explore and master one’s environment.
Human relationships, and the effects of relationships on relationships, are the building blocks of healthy development.
The broad range of individual differences among young children often makes it difficult to distinguish normal variations and maturational delays from transient disorders and persistent impairments.
The development of children unfolds along individual pathways whose trajectories are characterized by continuities and discontinuities, as well as by a series of significant transitions.
Human development is shaped by the ongoing interplay among sources of vulnerability and sources of resilience.
The timing of early experiences can matter, but, more often than not, the developing child remains vulnerable to risks and open to protective influences throughout the early years of life and into adulthood.
The course of development can be altered in early childhood by effective interventions that change the balance between risk and protection, thereby shifting the odds in favor of more adaptive outcomes.
Source: From National Research Council and Institute of Medicine (2000). From neurons to neighborhoods: The science of early childhood development. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press. Reprinted with permission from the National Academies Press, Copyright © 2000, National Academy of Sciences.
These core concepts attempt to grasp the typical and atypical developmental paths of early childhood. They cover the prenatal period to kindergarten and address how early experiences affect all components of development from neurological development to cultural and societal influences. This work is based on four predominant themes:
•All children are born wired for feelings and ready to learn.
•Early environments matter and nurturing relationships are essential.
•Society is changing and the needs of young children are not being addressed.
•Interactions among early childhood science, policy, and practice are problematic and demand dramatic rethinking.
According to the core concepts, development progresses faster from the time of conception until birth than during any following stage of life (Shonkoff & Phillips, 2000). These concepts support and supplement NAEYC’s perspectives. Compare NAEYC’s perspectives (Table 1.1) with the National Academy of Sciences’s core concepts (Table 1.2) to find similarities and differences.
1.6 Developmental Influences and Critical Periods
The seminal report From Neurons to Neighborhoods (Shonkoff & Phillips, 2000) establishes the existence of many intrinsic and extrinsic influences on the developing child. These influences include all genetics, notably, the genetics of personality called temperament; effects of stress on brain development and other neurological structures; gender roles; culture; religion; family; community; economics, especially poverty; and institutions such as schools and government. These contexts and influences (including different types of temperament) and more are discussed in detail in Chapter 2. The following vignette provides a glimpse into the strong impact that influences such as temperament can have on children’s development:
Kevin was thrilled when he learned that his wife, Sheila, was pregnant again. The couple had recently celebrated the second birthday of their daughter, Arabella. Kevin and Sheila reveled in how easy the first years of life had been for Arabella. Arabella had an uneventful birth with equal ease in sleeping, eating, and interaction patterns. Everyone marveled at this wonderful toddler, with her pleasant disposition and outgoing personality traits or temperament. When Kevin and Sheila brought their son, Eli, home from the hospital they were optimistic that they would again enjoy relative ease in the first years. Quickly, the couple began to notice differences between their prior experiences with Arabella and what was emerging with Eli. Eli was fussy during feedings and difficult to get to sleep, and he would cry frequently unless he was held and rocked. The couple couldn’t help but wonder if something was wrong or whether they were simply witnessing differences between having a boy versus a girl. Kevin and Sheila learned that, although several influences such as gender, birth order, and nutrition account for variations in children, temperament is another contributing factor. Temperament refers to the personality traits that are believed to be innate from birth and remain constant through life. Kevin and Sheila began to see Arabella as their “easy” or “flexible” baby while Eli was their “feisty” child. They also learned that neither of the temperaments was necessarily good or bad but that how they talked to and interacted with each child needed to be different.
Understanding the basics of child development alerts adults to times when children’s development can be maximized. Maria Montessori introduced these times, called sensitive periods, in her book The Secret of Childhood (1936). This term is used to indicate that a certain experience or learning event has an especially strong impact on the developing brain during a limited time, or the sensitive period. However, newer findings have dispelled the old notion that the first 3 years of a child’s development were so sensitive to learning and reaching certain milestones that a child older than age 3 could not achieve the same milestones if they had not done so already. Today, learning is looked upon as lifelong and development is seen to continue throughout the lifespan.
Even so, a significant positive or negative event can have a permanent effect on performance or behavior during a certain time of development. If the timing of the event creates a long-lasting change, the time during which it occurred is called a critical period (Knudsen, 2004). Critical periods are rare for babies and children of any age, but they occur more frequently in the prenatal period. For example, by the end of the first trimester, certain hormones must be present to determine the development of the fetus as male or female (Wilson, George, & Griffin, 1981). Critical periods are more common in animals. Consider psychologist Konrad Lorenz’s (1937) theory of imprinting, or social bonding in infant animals. He described the process when ducks and geese form an attachment to the first thing they see moving after they are born. If they do not see anything moving and imprinting does not occur, the critical period is over and they may wander alone without any attachment.
Related to the concepts of sensitive and critical periods is the idea that babies are resilient in many ways. Even though there is plasticity of the brain and the neurological infrastructures, the timing of weighty experiences is crucial. Plasticity of the brain refers to the human brain’s capacity to change. See Figure 1.1 for a depiction of windows of plasticity in brain development. Sensory abilities are at a critical developmental “window” prenatally and at birth, moving into the toddler and preschool years, when primarily motor and language skills advance, followed by complex cognitive competencies. This depiction is not meant to imply that these are discrete windows of progress, but rather that the brain is changing continuously, as can be seen by the overlapping curves.
Figure 1.1: Windows of plasticity in brain development
■Critical periods of brain development occur at different developmental stages. These stages overlap and continually change.
Graph depicting the windows of plasticity in brain development. The x-axis is labeled “development” and the y-axis is labeled “plasticity.” The overlapping curves are plotted on the graph and labeled as follows: sensory, motor/language, and higher cognition. They are spread out across the x-axis but overlap each other. The start of the first curve, sensory, is labeled “birth.”
Source: From Hensch, T. K. (2005). Critical period plasticity in local cortical circuits. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 6(11), 877-888. Copyright © 2005 Nature Publishing Group. Reprinted by permission.
Clearly the brain is not static and capacities are not fixed at birth. The brain’s ability to compensate for difficulties demonstrates its astonishing plasticity (Hostinar & Gunnar, 2013). The sensitive and critical periods of time are good examples of how biology and experiences interrelate. Chapter 2 describes in more depth the influences of experiences on brain development.
Summary and Resources
In the scope of behavioral and developmental science, the study of child development is relatively new. This field of education is extremely important in current times because of society’s shift to extensive out-of-home care for young children. Child development is defined to be a dynamic process of acquiring increasingly advanced skills in five domains: motor, cognition, communication, social-emotional, and self-help. Achievement of these skills can be monitored through developmental milestones and their prerequisite skills, although children demonstrate variations in the rate and quality of skill acquisition. If a caregiver or teacher has any reason for concern regarding a child’s developmental progress, the parents should be notified and their permission sought to initiate screening. The screening process is a preliminary step that may or may not indicate the need for further developmental evaluation of the child.
Progress in one developmental domain is interdependent with progress in other domains, and that interdependence affects the rate and quality of developmental advancement. Development is influenced by both intrinsic and extrinsic factors, but experts in the field debate the extent, timing, and quality of this influence. Generally, these debates cover five concepts: nature versus nurture, continuity versus discontinuity, similarity versus uniqueness, behavior stability versus instability, and active behavior versus passive behavior (Slee, Campbell, & Spears, 2012).
A child’s development is complex, unique, continuous, and resilient. The concepts of sensitive and critical periods for acquisition of skills and behaviors are countered with a description of children’s brains’ plasticity, which is the brain’s ability to be modified after birth. The current neurological evidence for plasticity of the brain dispels prior belief that capacities for development are fixed at birth.
Chapters 2 and 3 detail the newest information on influences in child development and the developmental theories at the foundation of this field of study. Beginning with Chapter 4, the remainder of the book then presents extensive information for each of the developmental stages from conception through early childhood.
Key Terms and Concepts
active behavior versus passive behavioradolescencebehavior stability versus instabilitychild assessmentchild developmentchronological agecognitioncommunicationcontinuity versus discontinuitycritical perioddevelopmental agedevelopmental domainsdevelopmental milestonesearly childhoodearly interventionfine motor skillsgross motor skillsimprintinginfancymaturational perspectivemiddle childhoodmotor developmentnaturalistic observationnature versus nurtureplasticityprenatal stageprerequisite skillsreliabilityscreening processself-help skillssensitive periodsimilarity versus uniquenesssocial-emotional developmenttoddlerhoodtypical developmentvalidity
Discussion Questions
1.Mrs. Dexter has two daughters. Her older daughter took her first independent steps at 9 months old. Now her younger daughter is 15 months old and still has not walked, not even cruising while holding on to furniture. Mrs. Dexter is quite concerned. Does she have reason to be concerned?
2.Of all of the developmental domains, which one is the most interrelated to the others? Provide a rationale for your statement.
3.Think back to your early childhood experiences. Select an event that has influenced you until this day. Describe why it was so powerful.
4.What is your personal view of child development? Consider the debates of nature versus nurture and continuity versus discontinuity.
Web Resources
Zero to Three
www.zerotothree.org
This website provides parents and professionals with information on childhood development from birth to age 3 years.
American Academy of Pediatrics
www.aap.org
This website presents information for parents on children’s health, safety, injury prevention, and development issues.
Child Development Institute
http://childdevelopmentinfo.com
This website offers child development information, tips for parents, and recommendations for articles on parenting.
Developmental Theories
A mother and her son play with building blocks.
© Getty Images/Jupiterimages/Creatas/Thinkstock
“In theory, theory and practice are the same. In practice, they are not.”
Albert Einstein
Learning Objectives
After studying this chapter you will be able to:
■Explain the importance of studying theories of child development.
■Identify what Freud described as the three components of an individual’s personality.
■Compare and contrast Freud’s and Erikson’s psychodynamic theories.
■Identify how children’s actions are explained based on behaviorist theory.
■Describe the similarities and differences between Piaget’s and Vygotsky’s theories.
■Explain the key elements of Bronfenbrenner’s ecological systems theory.
■Identify the principal components of what Gardner refers to as “multiple intelligences.”
Chapter Overview
Developmental theories provide perspectives for understanding children’s development. A theory is a framework of beliefs that is used to think about a concept or concepts. Thus, a developmental theory is a framework of beliefs that guides researchers in observing human development and behaviors and, through good research, furthers our knowledge of children. The job of research scientists is to base modern thought, thus modern theory, on past theories. These modern thoughts take into consideration today’s society and environmental contexts. They are tested through research, and if shown to hold, these ideas are organized to create a new theory. These modern theories help practitioners understand and work with families and children in more effective ways. Putting the ideas and hypotheses of theories into the work with families and children is called practice. Therefore, practice is the implementation of theory or the translation of ideas and thoughts into actions. For example, an early childhood professional will want to use one or a combination of organized ideas (or theories) to understand why a child might behave the way that he or she does. Because theories are made up of certain ideas about how and why development occurs, they can help professionals look from different perspectives to understand how or why a behavior might occur, and can help to identify different approaches to enhance, eliminate, or change behaviors in their work with that child.
This chapter includes both the fundamental theories that laid the foundation for newer theories and the key contemporary theories. Included in this discussion are the psychodynamic, psychoanalytic, and psychosocial theories; behaviorist theory; Piaget’s theory of cognitive development; sociocultural theory; and social learning theory. Additionally, the key components of maturational theory, attachment theory, systems theories, information processing theory, and multiple intelligences theory are discussed.
Theories support the way we teach and interact with children, and many theories of development are relevant to improving current practices. Developmental theories tell practition-ers how development should progress and why it progresses in a particular way. However, practice does not always seem to follow any particular theory. This chapter delves into reasons why this may be, and identifies how theories of development can be used to help determine the approach or approaches best suited for working with a child.
Chapter 3
Developmental Theories
A mother and her son play with building blocks.
© Getty Images/Jupiterimages/Creatas/Thinkstock
“In theory, theory and practice are the same. In practice, they are not.”
Albert Einstein
Learning Objectives
After studying this chapter you will be able to:
■Explain the importance of studying theories of child development.
■Identify what Freud described as the three components of an individual’s personality.
■Compare and contrast Freud’s and Erikson’s psychodynamic theories.
■Identify how children’s actions are explained based on behaviorist theory.
■Describe the similarities and differences between Piaget’s and Vygotsky’s theories.
■Explain the key elements of Bronfenbrenner’s ecological systems theory.
■Identify the principal components of what Gardner refers to as “multiple intelligences.”
Chapter Overview
Developmental theories provide perspectives for understanding children’s development. A theory is a framework of beliefs that is used to think about a concept or concepts. Thus, a developmental theory is a framework of beliefs that guides researchers in observing human development and behaviors and, through good research, furthers our knowledge of children. The job of research scientists is to base modern thought, thus modern theory, on past theories. These modern thoughts take into consideration today’s society and environmental contexts. They are tested through research, and if shown to hold, these ideas are organized to create a new theory. These modern theories help practitioners understand and work with families and children in more effective ways. Putting the ideas and hypotheses of theories into the work with families and children is called practice. Therefore, practice is the implementation of theory or the translation of ideas and thoughts into actions. For example, an early childhood professional will want to use one or a combination of organized ideas (or theories) to understand why a child might behave the way that he or she does. Because theories are made up of certain ideas about how and why development occurs, they can help professionals look from different perspectives to understand how or why a behavior might occur, and can help to identify different approaches to enhance, eliminate, or change behaviors in their work with that child.
This chapter includes both the fundamental theories that laid the foundation for newer theories and the key contemporary theories. Included in this discussion are the psychodynamic, psychoanalytic, and psychosocial theories; behaviorist theory; Piaget’s theory of cognitive development; sociocultural theory; and social learning theory. Additionally, the key components of maturational theory, attachment theory, systems theories, information processing theory, and multiple intelligences theory are discussed.
Theories support the way we teach and interact with children, and many theories of development are relevant to improving current practices. Developmental theories tell practition-ers how development should progress and why it progresses in a particular way. However, practice does not always seem to follow any particular theory. This chapter delves into reasons why this may be, and identifies how theories of development can be used to help determine the approach or approaches best suited for working with a child.
Theories such as Sigmund Freud’s psychoanalytic theory and Erik Erikson’s psychosocial theory are popular frameworks for looking at individual development of sexuality, identity, and aggression. These developmental theories also help us understand personality, emotions, inner conflicts, and other workings of the mind. They are referred to by several names, including psychodynamic, psychoanalytic, and psychosocial theories.
Sigmund Freud
Sigmund Freud was a child development theorist who believed every person was made up of three parts: the id, the ego, and the super ego.
<span id="w21620" class="werd"> </span>
Critical Thinking Questions
•Consider a child learning to share. How might the id, ego, and superego be demonstrated?
•What consequences might result from a child who does not develop a strong superego?
Theories are not developed in a vacuum. The philosophical contexts of the times are important to keep in mind. For instance, when Sigmund Freud (1856–1939) developed his theory of psychoanalysis, deterministic models of human behavior were popular. Deterministic models were built on the beliefs that behaviors were determined or caused by some unconscious motives; therefore, children do not learn behaviors, they just react. Freud also believed that personalities are developed by age 5 years (Freud, 1990).
Freud’s work evolved around the idea of the mind having conscious and unconscious components with parts interacting to produce the personality of an individual. Freud referred to the parts of the personality by the terms id, ego, and superego. The id is the part of the personality that is inherited and contains the person’s basic impulses. It needs immediate gratification. The ego is a person’s realistic conscious self. The ego bridges the id and the superego to produce behaviors, and the ego can postpone gratification. The superego is the part of personality that provides the foundation of conscience. The conscience corresponds to the values developed by the child early in life. Generally, these values are based on those of the parents and society. Therefore, the superego judges the individual (self), criticizes thinking and behaviors, and supports feelings of guilt (Slee, Campbell, & Spears, 2012).
In addition, Freud theorized a series of stages of psychosexual development. They begin with the oral stage, when babies suck and mouth most items, including various body parts like fingers and feet. The next is the anal stage, when pleasure is gained from the anus. This relates to toilet training and the use of sphincter muscles to retain or expel. Following the anal stage is the phallic stage, when a young child might masturbate or have extreme intimate feelings for parents. Later comes the latency period, when sexual instincts are repressed and quiet. During this stage the child begins to develop family adult values. Finally, at the onset of puberty, the genital stage begins. This is when natural urges from the phallic stage return but the child has matured and internalized values that allow appropriate relationships separate from the family (Slee et al., 2012). Refer to Table 3.1 for more information regarding Freud’s psychosexual stages of development.
The tenets of Freud’s work are acutely limited by the lack of objective observation, and controversy exists regarding many of his ideas about development. However, Freud’s ideas provided a perspective of human development and personality that had never been identified before his work (Winer & Anderson, 2013). Valuable even to current work in psychology and developmental psychology include the notion that psychological problems throughout life are rooted in experiences during childhood, and that individuals have internal motivations beyond what is consciously understood (Winer & Anderson, 2013). Although many developmental psychologists have been critical of Freud’s work, his ideas spurred a way of thinking that can be seen as an important piece of the puzzle for how we currently view an individual’s development and motivation.
Table 3.1: Freud’s stages of psychosexual development
Stage
Key Behaviors
Approximate Age of Occurrence
Oral stage
Sucking and mouthing of objects
Birth to 1 year
Anal stage
Toilet training; the control of sphincter muscles during toileting
1–3 years
Phallic stage
Masturbation; intimate feelings for parents
3–6 years
Latency
Sexual instincts repressed; focus is on family adult values
6 years to puberty
Genital stage
Sexual urges return; maturation and internalization of values allows for appropriate relationships outside of the family
Puberty into adulthood
Source: Based on Freud, S. (1990). New introductory lectures on psycho-analysis (the standard edition). Complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud. J. Strachey (Ed.). New York: Norton.
Erik Erikson (1902–1994) was influenced significantly by Freud’s work, but a key difference was that Erikson believed in lifespan development of people. Additionally, Erikson broke from Freud’s strong emphasis on sexuality in development. He identified eight psychosocial stages of development and argued that the only way to progress to the next stage was by resolving the crisis within the current stage (Erikson, 1950). According to Erikson, the crises experienced in each stage are normal and are the result of biology and culture. The stages are trust versus mistrust (birth to 1 year), autonomy versus shame and doubt (2–3 years), initiative versus guilt (4–5 years), industry versus inferiority (6 to puberty), identity versus role confusion (adolescence), intimacy versus isolation (early adulthood), generativity versus stagnation (middle adulthood), and integrity versus despair (later adulthood) (Sharkey, 1997). Erikson stated that consequences, both negative and positive, derive from how each crisis is resolved. Individuals with positive resolutions had a better sense of self. See Table 3.2 for a description of the positive and negative consequences of crisis resolution in each stage.
Table 3.2: Erikson’s stages of psychosocial development
Stage
Crisis
Positive Consequences
Negative Consequences
Birth to 1 year
Trust vs. mistrust
Faith in the environment and self
Wariness of others
2–3 years
Autonomy vs. shame and doubt
A sense of self-control
Feelings of self-doubt about independence
4–5 years
Initiative vs. guilt
Learning to initiate one’s own activities
Feeling guilty over needs
6 years to puberty
Industry vs. inferiority
Feeling competent
Feeling inferior
Adolescence
Identity vs. role confusion
Forming a sense of identity
Confusion and self-doubt
Early adulthood
Intimacy vs. isolation
Ability to make commitments through intimacy
Inability to form relationships
Middle adulthood
Generativity vs. stagnation
Guiding the next generation and society
Concern only for self; being unproductive
Later adulthood
Integrity vs. despair
A sense of fulfillment and relative peace with self
A sense of gloom and hopelessness; dissatisfaction with life
Source: Based on Erikson, E. (1950). Childhood and society. New York: Vintage.
3.2 Behaviorist Theory
Early behaviorists were interested in understanding how learning operates. Ivan Pavlov (1849–1936) identified classical conditioning by watching dogs salivate when the sound of a bell was paired with the arrival of food. After repeated pairing of the sound with the serving of food, salivation was produced in the dog at the sound even without food. Much of the classical conditioning that occurs with children occurs through a passive association process, meaning the outcome is not intentional (Gazzaniga, Halpern, & Heatherton, 2009). A child who is consistently startled awake by thunder may begin to pair the emotion of fear with sleeping instead of simply with the thunder. In the classroom, a child may develop a school phobia based on, for instance, a teacher who produces anxiety in that child. In the presence of the feared teacher, the child feels anxious. With the feeling of anxiety elicited around that teacher over time, the child may feel anxious about school even when not around the feared teacher.
Ivan Pavlov observes one of the dogs on which he conducted his behaviorist experiments.
SCIENCE SOURCE/Photo Researchers/Getty Images
▶Ivan Pavlov is best known for his work in classical conditioning. Pavlov was successful in conditioning dogs to associate the sound of a bell with the arrival of food.
Other behaviorists such as B. F. (Burrhus Frederic) Skinner (1904–1990) looked at learning in animals. Later, in children, behaviorists viewed the consistent implementation of reinforcements and punishments as consequences of behaviors presented. Skinner (1938) referred to these principles as operant conditioning and used them to explain and to shape behaviors in animals and people. Skinner’s operant conditioning is the foundation of behaviorist theory. Behaviorist theory is based on the idea that behavior is a result of a person’s forming an association between demonstrated behavior and positive or negative consequences, or an association between a stimulus and a response (Skinner, 1954). Unlike psychodynamic theories, behaviorist theory (also referred to as behaviorism), is not related to biological drives or inner conflicts.
Behaviorism is based on objective and concrete observations of behaviors. Although these behaviors may have originated from internal sources, they are modified through the person’s experience of consistent external stimuli and consequences. A clear conceptualization of this is Edward Thorndike’s law of effect. According to the law of effect, behaviors that are followed by satisfying consequences will be repeated, but if they are followed by unpleasant consequences they will be avoided. Therefore, consequences drive a person’s behavior by extinguishing the behavior through aversive (unpleasant) consequences, or by strengthening the behavior through satisfying consequences. For example, a parent who wants a child to complete the desired behavior of cleaning her own room could reinforce the behavior either by providing the child with a satisfying consequence (e.g., a hug, a high five, a sticker, an allowance) or by taking away an unpleasant stimulus (e.g., stopping the continuous requests to clean the room). The focus on observable behavior over internal processes made behavioral theory more objective than prior theories, because it is based on observations instead of subjective beliefs of the inner cause of behavior.
3.3 Piaget’s Theory of Cognitive Development
Jean Piaget (1896–1980) believed that children are naturally motivated to learn. According to Piaget (1954), children pick up pieces of information, organize them, and revise what they already believe to be true. This is the foundation of his theory of constructivism. Thus we can see that this theory is based on how children build their own understanding of their experiences. Constructivism is based on incrementally increasing a child’s understanding and creating a good balance between the current understanding of events with those experiences that are new.
A baby places a toy in his mouth.
© Ana Blazic/iStock/Thinkstock
▶Piaget’s sensorimotor stage occurs from birth to about 2 years of age. This stage includes the mouthing of objects, which helps very young children learn about their environment.
Piaget identified four stages of cognitive development: the sensorimotor, preoperational, concrete operational, and formal operational (see Table 3.3). The first stage, the sensorimotor stage (which occurs approximately from birth to 2 years), describes the child as learning by manipulating objects including the mouthing, sucking, and banging of items. Much learning occurs through the child’s senses during this stage. During the sensorimotor stage, the child develops the ability to understand that things still exist even when the child cannot see them, called object permanence.
Piaget’s second stage of cognitive development, the preoperational stage (approximately 2–7 years of age), is sometimes broken up into the preconceptual and the intuitive substages. During this stage, the child is still influenced by the perception of the environment but is now capable of understanding basic symbolic representations, in which something can stand for something else. For example, a wooden block can represent a telephone, with a child pretending to talk with the block held up to the ear. During this stage, children’s thinking is characteristic of egocentrism, in which they can see and understand things only from their own perspective.
In Piaget’s third stage of cognitive development, the concrete operational stage (approximately 7–11 years of age), children can apply logical reasoning, but only to concrete things that can be seen; they are not yet able to understand abstract ideas. An important concept achieved during the concrete operational stage is that of conservation. Conservation is the understanding that qualities of physical objects do not change when they are moved around or arranged differently. The concept of conservation is often represented by the fact that two different shaped containers can hold the same amount of liquid.
Finally, in the formal operational stage (approximately 11 years of age to adulthood), the individual can think about future events and abstract ideas. The individual can think about things hypothetically and can aim to solve problems in a systematic fashion.
Table 3.3: Piaget’s stages of cognitive development
Stage
Age Range
Description
Sensorimotor
Birth to 2 years
Learning by manipulating objects, either by mouthing or by banging; senses are important; object permanence is established.
Preoperational
2–7 years
Preconceptual and intuitive stage, meaning the child is influenced by the environment and understands some basic symbols; egocentrism dominates thinking.
Concrete operational
7–11 years
Reasoning is applied to concrete objects and situations but not to ideas; conservation is understood.
Formal operational
11 years through adulthood
Abstract ideas and future events can be thought about; problem solving is possible.
Source: Based on Piaget, J. (1964). Cognitive development in children: Piaget, development and learning. Journal of Research in Science and Teaching, 2, 176–186.
Even with his assertion that all children go through these four stages, Piaget acknowledged the strong connection between experiences and biology. Piaget believed that environment can speed up learning (e.g., with quality child care and schools) or slow down learning (e.g., in the presence of inadequate opportunities and few enriching experiences). He believed that all children have a schema, which is a framework of knowledge that provides a model for understanding something. Over time the schema goes through a give and take with new experiences. When the give and take is settled, the unique understanding is integrated. For new understanding to take place, adaptation, or changes and modifications in a child’s current understanding, must occur. Adaptation consists of two components: assimilation and accommodation. Piaget’s concept of assimilation is the integration of new information into the individual’s current understanding of environmental experiences. In contrast, the concept of accommodation is the changing of an individual’s current structure of understanding in order to make sense of a new experience. Equilibrium is a balance between what is known and understood by the child and the new information acquired through experiences. Over time, children continue to have new experiences, integrating new information and utilizing the function of equilibrium to maintain a stable understanding of their experiences.
Jean Piaget
Jean Piaget, a Swiss psychologist, was one of the first to adapt Freud's work. Piaget conceived of four stages of human development, which he called the "cognitive development theory."
<span id="w24233" class="werd"> </span>
Critical Thinking Questions
•What activities can you do with a child to contribute to the development of the preoperational stage?
3.4 Sociocultural Theory of Development
A mother and her daughter play with a puzzle.
Brand X Pictures/Stockbyte/Thinkstock
▶Lev Vygotsky’s sociocultural theory is based on the idea that children learn a skill one step at a time. To support this learning, a caregiver should provide maximum help when a child is learning a new skill, and pull back support based on the child’s success in the skill. Through this scaffolding, the child will eventually be able to accomplish the task independently.
Differences exist between the theories of Jean Piaget and Lev Vygotsky (1896–1934), but both theories are biologically based, they have significant social components, and both theorists take a constructivist perspective of learning and development. Piaget stressed the natural side of children’s ability to construct their own thinking. By contrast, Vygotsky stressed social experiences as having a strong impact on children’s ideas. Piaget focused on the child’s internal structures (schemas), and Vygotsky stressed the importance of instruction and other learning opportunities in the external environment (Berk & Winsler, 1995).
Vygotsky’s sociocultural theory is based on the idea that social interaction and children’s participation in cultural activities are necessary for healthy development. These activities must include the cultural tools of communication and other skills that guide cognitive development (Berk & Winsler, 1995). Vygotsky saw children as learning through relationships with adults by communicating, playing, and socializing with each other. According to Vygotsky, the observation and imitation that come with such reciprocal play will advance a child’s cognitive development. In other words, he thought that in this way children would evolve from being externally to internally regulated.
Additionally, Vygotsky argued that children learn by going a step further than their current level of competence. He called this idea the zone of proximal development (ZPD). The ZPD is the difference between what a child can do independently and what can be accomplished with adult guidance. This idea is the basis for the current instructional strategy that requires the caregiver to provide maximum help to a child when the child is learning a new task. This teaching strategy is called scaffolding. As the child learns to perform the task with more independence, the caregiver intentionally reduces the amount of assistance until the child is able to complete the task independently (Vygotsky, 1986).
For example, consider a child who is playing with Legos and attempting to build a train. The caregiver watches as the child works to snap the blocks together to extend the tracks but notes that the child is having difficulty fitting the train on the tracks because they are too narrow. The adult can then take the child’s skills of Lego building to the next level by discussing the problem and a solution and demonstrating what it would take to widen the tracks. These steps would help bridge the child’s current level of problem solving to the next, more advanced level.
Lev Vygotsky
Lev Vygotsky was a Russian psychologist whose research led him to believe nurture was more influential than nature in child development. He developed a five step process of sociocultural development.
<span id="w25131" class="werd"> </span>
Critical Thinking Questions
•Do you agree with Vygotsky’s theory of nurture over nature? Why or why not?
•What would happen if a child moved successfully through the first four stages, but was unable to transition to complete the fifth stage?
A direct link to Vygotsky’s way of thinking is the method of teaching utilized by Maria Montessori (1870–1952), an Italian medical doctor turned early childhood specialist. She was strongly influenced by the views of Vygotsky (Bodrova, 2003), as can be seen in her developmental approach in which children learn by building on their natural interests. Montessori, like Piaget, believed children had an innate desire to learn. She also thought that children were capable of taking in a considerable amount of information from their environment if they were allowed to interact with, explore, and try real-life skills such as experiencing play kitchens, play supermarkets, and other relevant situations. She argued that children develop self-control and abstract ideas or imagination from experience with the environment around them. Thus, she advocated for a “hands-on” approach to teaching young children. This includes manipulating materials and interacting with objects; exploring with all of the senses; and providing young children with order, movement, and repetition (Dasbach, 2003). Montessori also believed in grouping children in mixed ages with the same teacher for a period of 3–6 years. This multiage approach allows for children to work at their own pace, and allows younger children to learn from older children and older children to learn from teaching the younger children (Association Montessori Internationale, n.d.). In using the Montessori Method within an early care and education program, the caregiver takes on the role of preparing the environment with well-planned materials and lessons. The value of this practice can still be seen today in many early care and education programs.
3.5 Social Learning Theory
Social learning theory is rooted in behaviorism but theorizes that children learn vicariously from others in social situations (Bandura, 1977) and must perform the new skill before learning is complete. Social learning theory differs from traditional behaviorist theories, which up until the time of Albert Bandura (1925– ) stated that behaviors are learned as a result of directly experiencing consequences. Social learning theory is similar in some ways to the Montessori Method, in which children interact with their environment, and to Vygotsky’s sociocultural theory, in which children learn from others.
According to social learning theory, there is no need to directly experience the consequences of every behavior, so there is no need for trial and error each time a child learns a new skill. Rather, learning can be achieved “vicariously” by observing others experiencing the consequences. Social learning theory states that vicarious learning is also possible for learning appropriate emotional responses and is believed to occur at all ages. An example of such vicarious learning is seen when siblings learn behavior from one another. If Paul is placed in time-out for hitting Stephanie, Stephanie witnesses the consequences of hitting. These consequences, including her parents’ stern reprimands, the time-out, and Paul’s crying, may inhibit Stephanie from hitting in the future in order to avoid the emotional response of sadness and crying, as well as the consequences of time-out and parental disapproval.
If a child can foresee consequences of actions and modify behavior ahead of time, that child is thought to have the higher mental processes of insight and foresight (Bandura, 1971). Social learning theory explains how patterns of behavior are learned and how their practice is regulated by self-directed influences. First, Bandura believed that learning by direct experience is important but that children can learn by observing what happens to others as a result of their behavior, and thereby can behave based on what they see others experience. Children can act in a way that they have seen produces a desirable outcome for another individual, and they can also learn not to act in a way that has produced an outcome for another individual that they wish to avoid. Differential reinforcement, or anticipated rewards (for desirable behavior) and punishments (for undesirable behavior), can be seen as the consequences that reduce poor behavior or enhance good behavior. Children observe or experience the consequences and receive feedback. This is what Bandura called the informative function of reinforcement and consequences. Reinforcements, or rewards, and negative consequences, or punishments, provide a wide range of information to the developing child. For example, a child experiencing or observing a punishment would not want to repeat a behavior that results in that consequence.
The consequences that occur for others promote learning through children’s observations of these behaviors and outcomes and through the modeling of certain behaviors. Modeling has four subprocesses in social learning theory: attention, retention, reproduction, and motivation. For the first component, attention, to occur, children must attend to and recognize the key features of a behavior. Being exposed to a behavior is not enough, as preferences, attention to detail, and opportunities for learning must be available. When children pay attention to a behavior, they must also remember it and achieve some permanence of that memory. This component of retention can occur in a variety of ways, including through mental representations of the behavior, or through rehearsing the behavior mentally, verbally, or through actual performance (Bandura, 1977). For the next component, reproduction, to occur, children need to have all of the skills required to imitate the activity and then be able to put these skills together. When children try to reproduce these skills, they self-correct based on the feedback of onlookers or based on their own experience of consequences. For modeling to occur, motivation is also necessary, as the observation of desirable outcomes of others’ behavior leads to the modeling of that behavior, whereas the observation of undesirable outcomes leads to the inhibition of that behavior.
Social, Emotional, and Physical Development
Social-emotional development includes the ability to regulate emotions, raise self-awareness, self-regulate behavior, build relationships, have positive interactions, show empathy for others, and eventually resolve conflicts. Physical development includes fine-motor and gross-motor development.
Critical Thinking Question
•In your future role, how will you support social, emotional and physical development?
Based on these four subprocesses of modeling, learning may not occur if any of the components is missing. Taking into account the attention component of Bandura’s social learning theory, children may fail to learn through observation based on not paying attention to the action. Based on the retention component, children may fail to learn by not adequately remembering what has occurred (Bandura, 1977). Additionally, through the reproduction component, children may fail to learn through observation based on difficulties with the motoric or physical requirements needed to reproduce the behavior. Finally, based on the motivation component, children may fail to learn by observation because of inadequate reinforcements for the observed behaviors (Bandura, 1977).
This process of modeling does not minimize the role of experiencing reinforcements and consequences for learning behaviors and skills, but it indicates that simple exposure to behavior through observation is not enough. Even carefully attending to components of the behavior will not be adequate if the observation is not retained, the behavior cannot be reproduced, or the behavior is not reinforced. Therefore, in social learning theory, reinforcement is supplemental and helpful but not the only necessary component for learning to take place.
In using social learning theory to identify how learning occurs, it is important to recognize not only how behavior is acquired but also how that behavior is regulated and maintained. For learning to be effective, children must regulate their own behavior by anticipating the consequences that have been experienced previously. Information about these consequences is received continually through what happens in the environment. The learned behavior is maintained by self-approval and self-disdain (based on internally developed standards), which are strongest when matched with external consequences.
3.6 Maturational Theory
Arnold Gesell (1880–1961) was an American research psychologist who believed that babies are born with all the material needed to develop and grow successfully. Through his maturational theory, Gesell emphasized the genetic and biological systems as the critical basis for a child to mature enough neurologically to develop skills according to a normal schedule (Gesell & Ilg, 1949). He believed that genetics determined the timing of a child’s maturation and little could be done to change the pattern. This was in contrast to theorists who believed development was the result of forming habits.
Practitioners who adhere to maturational theory often think children need more time to grow into the competence needed for certain skills. They believe that problems of development and behavior come from within the child so that supporting a child’s learning has limited value. They would argue that given more time, a child’s development will mature to the extent possible based on his or her unique genetics and biology, without intervention from practitioners or caregivers.
In his work, Gesell gathered information and data on a variety of children, detailed normative behaviors and skills, and listed his findings on a timetable of development. For example, he emphasized that motor development after birth followed the cephalocaudal pattern (discussed in Chapter 5), meaning from head to neck, neck to shoulders, shoulders to arms, arms to hands, and hands to fingers, and so on, and that this general pattern was difficult to alter. He created such a timetable for all developmental domains that physicians and parents could use to follow a child’s pattern of achieving developmental milestones. These developmental stages and milestones are still used today to monitor children’s developmental progress.
3.7 Attachment Theory
Attachment theory, introduced in Chapter 2, is the foundation for many social-emotional relationship interventions, therapies, and developmental understanding. According to this theory, for successful attachment to occur, an infant needs to develop a close relationship with at least one stable nurturing adult. This adult must be sensitive, responsive, and available to the child.
John Bowlby (1907–1990) had groundbreaking ideas that defined the importance of human relationships. He believed that attachment behaviors begin early in life with babies gurgling and cooing (Bowlby, 1988). These soft and pleasant noises, and early behaviors such as smiles, naturally endear the baby to adults and cause caregivers to want to be near the baby, which, of course, is important for relationships to develop. Recent studies have found that attachment has a biological and chemical basis through endocrine reactions at birth that promote alertness in the newborn so that the baby is receptive to touch.
A woman and her daughter smile at each other.
Joel Sartore/National Geographic/Getty Images
▶For a secure attachment to develop between a child and a caregiver, the caregiver must be sensitive, responsive, and physically available to the child. These caregiving characteristics allow a child to feel safe, secure, and loved.
As the baby develops, so does the emotion of attachment. This is observed in a toddler who, when experiencing fear, returns to the familiar caregiver for comfort. This person is referred to as the attachment figure. It is theorized that young children use the attachment figure as their secure base for exploration, attempting new activities, and learning from their surroundings. When there is no stable attachment figure or no attachment figure at all, anxiety and other mental health issues may occur. The lack of such a person is thought to produce the normal response called separation anxiety. Because a child’s development may be severely affected by lack of a secure attachment figure, it is important for parental caregivers as well as professional caregivers to develop a secure relationship with a child, based on providing the child with sensitive and responsive care, allowing the child to feel that his or her needs will be met, and by becoming a safe base from which the child can explore. Establishing a close bond with a child is important not only for short-term development and mental health, but for the long term, as well.
Although Bowlby is considered the founder of attachment theory, he often collaborated with Mary Ainsworth (1913–1999), who identified the concept of a secure base. Ainsworth developed an assessment procedure that evaluates the quality of attachment in relationships between caregivers and children. This procedure is called the strange situation (Ainsworth, Blehar, Waters, & Wall, 1978). Basically, the procedure requires that the target child be observed in a room with toys while a familiar caregiver and stranger interact with each other. The caregiver then leaves the room and the child is left alone with the stranger. The assessor watches how the child reacts to the caregiver’s departure and later return, as well as how the child plays while the caregiver is out of the room. The child’s relationship with the caregiver is then categorized as secure attachment, anxious-ambivalent insecure attachment, or anxious-avoidant insecure attachment. The first of these categories is considered positive because it means that the child is securely attached to the caregiver. The second two categories are negative outcomes since the child either would be anxious and insecure about the relationship with the caregiver or would avoid the caregiver. Later, other developmentalists extended Ainsworth’s work, adding a fourth classification called disorganized-insecure-attachment, for which children lack an organized strategy for dealing with the caregiver’s disappearance and subsequent reappearance (Main & Soloman, 1986).
As a result of the relatively strong hold of attachment theory on the field of early childhood, most personnel preparation programs within the field focus on the importance of healthy caregiver-child relationships. These relationships are developed over time and are produced primarily by a warm, nurturing, and responsive style of caregiving in everyday activities such as bathing, playing, feeding, and toileting.
3.8 Systems Theories
Systems theories describe complex conceptual frameworks of development by combining, organizing, and changing parts of past theories over time. They include dynamic and ecological theories that assert that a child’s development advances through interactions with simple systems and through experiences within several environmental contexts. In particular, dynamic systems theory explains how a complex skill like kicking a ball develops from simple behaviors like standing, balancing on one foot, aiming, visual coordination, and then, finally, the kick.
Ecological theories combine general systems of environment and consider the interrelationships of those contexts. For example, Urie Bronfenbrenner (1917–2005) believed both that heredity and environment have an impact on the developing child and that diversity and cultural variations are important factors of influence. He proposed that all systems in which a child participates, either directly or indirectly, have an influence on the child’s development and that to understand child development the whole system of contexts must be considered (Bronfenbrenner, 1979). His ecological systems theory (Bronfenbrenner, 1989) is generally represented by concentric circles to emphasize that the child is influenced by many factors, each set being in a different circle. These systems are the microsystem, mesosystem, exosystem, macrosystem, and the chronosystem (see Figure 3.1). The microsystem represents the direct interactions between the child and his or her immediate contexts, including the family, school, and peers. The mesosystem is where two or more of these microsystems are connected, such as how interactions with parents could affect how the child interacts with peers. The third circle is the exosystem, which includes people with indirect influence on the child, such as neighbors, parental work colleagues, and other services and supports to the parents. The child does not exist within the exosystem but is affected by this system through indirect means. The broadest set of influences is represented by the largest of the circles, the macrosystem, which includes cultural influences such as government, attitudes, and values. The chronosystem is made up of the historical changes that influence each of the other systems, including changes that occur over time for a given individual, or changes that occur over time for a given environment.
Figure 3.1: Bronfenbrenner’s ecological systems theory
■Bronfenbrenner’s ecological systems theory consists of the microsystem, mesosystem, exosystem, macrosystem, and chronosystem. These contextual systems interact to influence an individual’s development.
Circular three-dimensional depiction of the ecological systems theory. In the center circle is the silhouette of a person labeled “the individual; age, sex, health.” This is encompassed by a larger circle labeled the “mesosystem.” The mesosystem is comprised of the “microsystem,” or the interaction of family, religious and group affiliations, school, health services, and neighborhood, which all overlap with the individual. The “mesosystem” is encompassed by a larger circle labeled the “exosystem,” containing neighbors, legal services, social welfare services, mass media, and school funding. This is encompassed by a larger circle labeled the “macrosystem,” containing societal beliefs, attitudes and ideologies of the culture, and cultural context. The edge of this circular illustration is labeled the “chronosystem,” or time (the historical events that have a comprehensive effect on the other systems).
Based on Santrock, J. W. (2007). Child development (11th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill
From an early care and education professional’s perspective, ecological systems theory can provide a lens for viewing how influences from all environments can affect a child. For example, the microsystem is composed of the direct interactions between the child and his or her immediate contexts, including interactions with all caregivers at home and in the child-care setting. The mesosystem refers to connections between the child’s microsystems, such as how the child’s relationships with his or her parents affect the child’s relationships with caregivers in the early care and education setting. Within the exosystem, the jobs held by the child’s parents may affect the developing child, depending, for example, on the parents’ ability to leave work if the child is sick or to take time off for school involvement. The macrosystem could include how government policies affect the child, based on policies for early intervention or funding for early care and education programs. In terms of the chronosystem, it is important to view all of the child’s environments as being affected by the current historical time. For instance, different types of families are seen more commonly today and views of childrearing have changed over time. A caregiver can see that a child’s growth and development is based not just on factors that can be seen explicitly, but also on many factors that may not be considered immediately.
3.9 Information Processing Theory
Information processing theory is relatively new among developmental theories and deals with brain structures; neural connectors; and the processing, storage, organization, and retrieval of information in memory and attention. Computer systems and new technology contribute to the terminology used in describing this theory, as is evident in references to the hardware of the brain and the software of the strategies and methods used to process and remember information, through both short- and long-term memory. This theory is sometimes attributed to Robert Siegler, who described learning as information entering the brain from the environment through all of the senses (Siegler, 1996). According to this theory, the child processes and encodes information from all of the senses, and then the child’s memory decides what to keep. Similar to Piaget’s concept of adaptation, including assimilation and accommodation, information processing theory states that internal processes manage new experiences and the memories related to those experiences by relating and adding new information to existing information.
3.10 Multiple Intelligences Theory
A young girl plays the violin.
©LuminaStock/iStock/Thinkstock
▶Howard Gardner’s theory of multiple intelligences includes musical intelligence as one type within the set of intelligences that the theory proposes.
One of the most recent theories that has had an impact on child-care practices and the education of children in general was proposed in 1983 by a Harvard professor, Howard Gardner (1943– ). Gardner developed the theory of multiple intelligences and described it in his book Frames of Mind: The Theory of Multiple Intelligences. He proposed that different types of intelligence make up a fundamental set of intelligences in all people and that each person has a different combination of these intelligences. This well-received theory is avant-garde in some ways but lacks the support of research and science (see Table 3.4 for a description of these intelligences). Yet, Gardner’s theory has stimulated beliefs in the education field that are expanding on traditional understandings of “intelligence.” For example, some researchers have identified a social-emotional intelligence, which is considered to be the ability to assess emotions in others and to control emotions in oneself.
Table 3.4: Howard Gardner’s multiple intelligences
Linguistic intelligence involves sensitivity to spoken and written language, the ability to learn languages, and the capacity to use language to accomplish certain goals. This intelligence includes the ability to use language effectively to express oneself rhetorically or poetically; and language as a means to remember information. Effective writers, poets, lawyers, and public speakers are among those seen as having high linguistic intelligence.
Logical-mathematical intelligence consists of the capacity to analyze problems logically, carry out mathematical operations, and investigate issues scientifically. Gardner describes it as being the ability to detect patterns, reason deductively, and think logically. This intelligence is most often associated with scientific and mathematical thinking.
Musical intelligence involves skill in the performance, composition, and appreciation of musical patterns. It encompasses the capacity to recognize and compose musical pitches, tones, and rhythms. According to Gardner, musical intelligence runs in an almost structural parallel to linguistic intelligence.
Bodily-kinesthetic intelligence entails the potential of using one’s whole body or parts of the body to solve problems. It is the ability to use mental abilities to coordinate bodily movements. Gardner sees mental and physical activity as related.
Spatial intelligence involves the potential to recognize and use the patterns of wide space and more confined areas. It includes the ability to perceive the visual world in an accurate way, with the ability to alter and reconstruct visual elements without physically viewing those elements (Gardner, 1998).
Interpersonal intelligence is concerned with the capacity to understand the intentions, motivations, and desires of other people. It allows people to work effectively with others. Educators, salespeople, religious and political leaders, and counselors all need a well-developed interpersonal intelligence.
Intrapersonal intelligence refers to the capacity to understand oneself, to appreciate one’s feelings, fears, and motivations. In Gardner’s view it involves having an effective working model of ourselves and the ability to use such information to regulate our lives (Smith, 2002, 2008).
Naturalist intelligence (added after the publication of Frames of Mind) refers to the ability to categorize and recognize elements of the natural environment (Gardner, 1998).
Existential intelligence (proposed, but not yet included in Gardner’s list of intelligences) refers to the ability to contemplate ideas about life and death (Gardner, 1998).
Source: Based on Gardner, H. (1998). A multiplicity of intelligences. Scientific American, 9(4), 19–23.
The multiple intelligences theory provides food for thought regarding how to approach teaching if each child has a unique make-up of intelligences. According to this theory, most individuals possess various mixes of these intelligences; they have a different level of strength in each of the intelligences, and the manner in which people combine them and use them differs. Teaching children with the guidance of this theory would call for educators to accommodate the learning styles associated with the various intelligences. These educators would focus on the favored intelligence for each student and use the mode of learning that best suits that intelligence. For example, children who have a strong sense of body awareness and who like movement and touching would benefit from interacting with materials and role playing. Children who love music and are sensitive to sounds may learn better by tapping out information or having music playing in the background. Those who are strong in interpersonal intelligence may prefer to work on group activities and games and on team projects.
3.11 Integrating and Using Developmental Theories
The preceding sections describe many developmental theories. See Table 3.5 for a summary of those theories, the associated theorist or theorists, and the key concepts of each.
Table 3.5: Summary of developmental theories
Theory
Associated Theorist(s)
Key Concept(s)
Psychoanalytic theory
Sigmund Freud
•The mind has conscious and unconscious components, with parts interacting to produce the personality.
•Stages of development emphasize sexuality and gratification.
Psychosocial theory
Erik Erikson
•An individual needs to resolve a crisis in each of the eight stages of psychosocial development in order to progress to the next stage, with outcomes based on how each crisis is resolved.
Behaviorist theory
Ivan Pavlov
B. F. Skinner
Edward Thorndike
•Behavior is the result of associations formed between behavior and positive and negative consequences, or the associations formed between a stimulus and a response.
•Behaviorism is based on objective and concrete observations of behavior.
Theory of cognitive development
Jean Piaget
•Children are naturally motivated to learn, and learning occurs by building on a previous understanding of the environment.
•The four stages of cognitive development, the sensorimotor, preoperational, concrete operational, and formal operational stages, are based on the type of learning that takes place, from the relatively basic to the complex.
Sociocultural theory
Lev Vygotsky
•Social interaction and participation in cultural activities are necessary for healthy development, and children learn through relationships with adults by communicating, playing, and socializing.
•Children learn by going a step further than their current level of competence, with a caregiver providing maximum help when children are learning initially, and reducing help as children gain more independence (i.e., scaffolding).
Social learning theory
Albert Bandura
•Children learn vicariously through others in social situations, based on the consequences that others receive.
•A new skill must be performed before learning is complete (i.e., modeling)
Maturational theory
Arnold Gesell
•Genetic and biological systems are the basis for the development of skills according to a normal schedule.
•Genetics determines the timing of a child’s maturation and little can be done to change the pattern of milestone achievement.
Attachment theory
John Bowlby
•Attachment is a close and enduring bond between a child and a caregiver.
•Based on sensitive and responsive care, a child knows that his or her needs will be met and uses the caregiver as a safe base from which to explore the environment.
•In association with attachment theory, Mary Ainsworth discussed that children can be characterized as having different types of attachment based on interactions with the primary attachment figure.
Ecological systems theory
Urie Bronfenbrenner
•All contexts in which a child participates (either directly or indirectly) have a unique influence on that child’s development.
•Different contexts, from the closest influences to the most distant influences, interact to uniquely affect a child’s development.
Information processing theory
Robert Siegler
•In memory and attention, the storage, organization, and retrieval of information occurs similar to computer inputs and outputs.
•Computer systems and technology contribute to the terminology used in this theory.
Multiple intelligences theory
Howard Gardner
•Different types of intelligence exist, with a fundamental set of intelligences for all people.
•Each individual has a unique combination of the intelligence types.
When working with children, it is helpful to use knowledge of developmental theories to view growth and behavior from one or many theoretical perspectives. Using different theoretical lenses to observe children’s development can allow for a multifaceted understanding of what is occurring. Some theories may not apply to all situations, and some theories may help to explain the situation better than others.
In viewing one’s knowledge of developmental theories as somewhat of a tool box, an early childhood professional can identify which theory or theories can best help to make sense of the current circumstances. In identifying these theories, the caregiver can identify which approaches might work best to support the growth and development of the children in his or her care, based on the unique characteristics of the situation at hand.
Let’s consider a real-world situation. In an early care and education center there was a 4-year-old boy, Brian, with aggressive behavior toward his peers and his caregiver. Brian grabbed toys and hit other children. When he was frustrated with his Legos, he threw them across the room. Brian yelled at his caregiver and refused to cooperate when she asked him to clean up for snack time. His caregiver viewed Brian’s behavior through a variety of theoretical lenses.
She viewed Brian’s behavior partly through the lens of behaviorism, seeing his behavior as the result of operant conditioning. In acting in an aggressive way, Brian might have learned that this type of behavior got him the toys and attention he wanted from peers and caregivers. Because Brian’s aggressive behavior resulted in the reinforcing outcome of his getting what he wanted, this reinforcement led to an increase in the behavior. The caregiver considered Thorndike’s law of effect when interacting with Brian, being sure to use reinforcement for behavior she wanted to see more of (e.g., getting a hug, a sticker, or a high five when Brian exhibited acceptable behavior), and to use a form of punishment to decrease undesired behaviors (e.g., not getting the toy when he grabbed for it, not receiving the desired attention from peers, receiving a time-out from play when he exhibited the aggressive behavior).
The caregiver also viewed Brian’s behavior through the lens of Bandura’s social learning theory, thinking that Brian might imitate the good behavior of his peers based on his seeing them being rewarded for appropriate behaviors. The caregiver made sure that Brian had the opportunity to observe the consequences his peers received for good behavior, and she was consistent with those consequences for all of Brian’s peers. By vicariously observing the outcomes of his peers’ good behavior, Brian might begin to model these good behaviors in order to gain the same rewards that his peers had received.
The caregiver also used ecological systems theory to view Brian’s behavior, understanding that all environments have an influence on a child’s development and that Brian might have learned this behavior from home or community experiences or even the media (watching television). Bandura’s social learning theory, behaviorist theory, or other forms of learning could have been at play in all of these environments to influence Brian’s development, and the caregiver sought to work with Brian’s parents to identify what was occurring in all of his environments to influence his behavior.
Finally, using an attachment theory perspective, the caregiver wondered how secure Brian’s relationships were with his parents. If Brian did not have a secure relationship with one of them, Brian’s actions could be a response to his not knowing if his needs would be met or an indication that he does not understand how to interact socially with others. Brian’s caregiver sought to identify the quality of Brian’s relationships with his parents and was prepared to give Brian’s parents information on possible parent-child relationship interventions. Brian’s caregiver in the early care and education program made a concerted effort to establish a close relationship with Brian, making sure to be sensitive and responsive to his needs.
This early childhood caregiver used behaviorism, social learning theory, ecological systems theory, and attachment theory to make sense of Brian’s behavior. A different caregiver or professional might view Brian’s behavior through a different lens or lenses, making sense of Brian’s behavior in a different way, and might use a different approach to working with Brian and his family. Some approaches, however, have been shown to be more useful in some situations that in others, and it is important to identify the best ways in which to work with children and families.
Summary and Resources
The study of developmental theories is important as a guide to working with children of all ages. No one theory explains all aspects of the complexities of child development. In addition, it is difficult to separate theorists into categories because so many theories are advanced by building on the work of each other or integrating parts of several theories. However, most of the better known theories of child development have valid points and can be applied in different situations with different children. Researchers and others use the theories reviewed in this chapter to advance understanding of child development and to improve education and other child-care services.
Key Terms and Concepts
accommodationadaptationassimilationbehaviorist theorychronosystemconservationconstructivismdevelopmental theoryecological systems theoryegoequilibriumexosystemidmacrosystemmaturational theorymesosystemmicrosystemobject permanencepracticescaffoldingschemasocial learning theorysociocultural theorysuperegotheoryzone of proximal development (ZPD)
Discussion Questions
1.Name four concentric contexts of the ecological systems theory and list the components that made up those in your life. How influential was each circle when you were growing up? Do you believe this is the same for children now?
2.Do you believe there are multiple intelligences? If not, why? If yes, which would you consider to be the most important for career success, and why?
3.What would attachment theory indicate about the care and educational needs of a 6-year-old child who was adopted from the foster care system at age 4 years? What additional information might you need to answer this question, and why would you need it?
Web Resources
B. F. Skinner Foundation
http://www.bfskinner.org/
The B. F. Skinner Foundation promotes the science of behavior in part by making Skinner’s publications available for free or at low cost.
Jean Piaget Society: Society for the Study of Knowledge and Development
http://www.piaget.org/
This website provides information on the topic of human cognitive development.
Daily Montessori
www.dailymontessori.com