Using the argument you selected, analyze the argument by answering the following:
1. Identify the argument. Briefly summarize it WITHOUT editorializing.
2. Identify the type of causal reasoning used in this argument (effect to cause, cause to effect, or effect to effect). is the type of reasoning effective for the arguer? Be specific and build your own argument defending your selection.
3. Identify at least one fallacy. What type of fallacy is it? Is it effective in this argument?
4. Analyze the ethos of the arguer in this argument (not your opinion of the individual overall - just their ethos in this argument). Do they use logos or pathos in their argument? How does their use of evidence and reasoning contribute to their overall ethos?
5. Is this type of political argument effective? Why or why not?