business ethics in-class activity

Cooper2021
1-31.pptx

Business Ethics Summer 2022 (1) Week 1, Lecture 3

Chaeyoung Paek

In today’s class…

We’ll learn one of three moral theories we’ll look at, Cultural Relativism.

There will be an in-class activity at the end of the lecture; respond to the “1-3 in-class activity” on the course Blackboard page.

James Rachels, "The challenge of cultural relativism"

Moral Evaluation

Sometimes, we can make a moral evaluation of a certain action.

(ex1) Chaeyoung skipping the line at Target

Morally wrong / impermissible / blameworthy

(ex2) Sam helping a lost kid at Target

Morally right / permissible/ praiseworthy

(ex3) 10-month old baby crying at Target

Not the object of moral evaluation

Moral Evaluation

Some actions seem obviously morally wrong.

(ex) Killing an innocent person

And some actions seem obviously morally right.

(ex) Saving a drowning kid

But for some actions, we need to engage in thoughtful considerations or debates before we make a good moral evaluation.

(ex) Having an abortion before 6 weeks

Moral Theories

Moral theories offer a systematic way in which we can morally evaluate a given action.

A moral theory provides moral principles based on which we can make moral evaluation.

(ex) Egoism: <An agent, S, should X if and only if X benefits S.>

Having a particular moral theory at hand can prevent you from morally evaluating a given action based on a whim or making inconsistent moral evaluations.

Moral Theories

Throughout Week 1-2, we’ll look at 3 different moral theories:

Cultural Relativism

Utilitarianism

Kantian ethics.

Let’s begin with the one that’s most popular, Cultural Relativism.

Cultural Relativism

It seems plainly true that different cultures have different ways of life.

(ex) 27-year-old man living with his parents in the US vs. 27-year-old man living with his parents in South Korea

And it also seems true that we should not judge the social conventions of other cultures.

(ex) Eating pork

But different cultures may have different moral codes!

(ex) Early Innuits + Infanticide

Does it mean that we should also withhold our judgment when it comes to moral codes of different cultures?

Cultural Relativism

Cultural Relativism: You should X if and only if you are in a society that approves of X.

Cultural relativists often believe that…

There is no universal truth in ethics; there are no moral truths that hold for all people at all times.

The moral code of our society is not special; it is just one among many.

It is mere arrogance for us to try to judge the conduct of people from different societies.

Cultural Relativism

You might think that all of these points sound plausible; in fact, you might wholeheartedly agree with all claims from Cultural Relativism!

Here’s one argument for Cultural Relativism:

The cultural differences argument

P1. Early Innuits thought infanticide was morally permissible.

P2. We do not think infanticide is morally permissible.

C. Therefore, there is no universal moral truth on whether infanticide is permissible or not; it depends on what society you are in.

Cultural Relativism

The cultural differences argument

P1. Early Innuits thought infanticide was morally permissible.

P2. We do not think infanticide is morally permissible.

C. Therefore, there is no universal moral truth on whether infanticide is permissible or not; it depends on what society you are in.

Q. Is this argument valid? Sound?

Cultural Relativism

The cultural differences argument

Not valid; the conclusion does not follow from the premises!

Not sound; an invalid argument cannot be sound.

Why is it not valid?

Suppose that the opposite from the conclusion is true; then there is a universal moral truth re: infanticide—infanticide is not permissible.

But even if that’s the case, (P1) and (P2) are still true; so (P1) and (P2) do not entail the conclusion.

Objections to Cultural Relativism

But cultural relativists may point out that it’s not enough to criticize their argument; what we need to provide is some objections.

Objection #1. Implausible consequences

Cultural Relativism entails that societies are morally infallible.

But societies are morally fallible!

(ex) Nazis + an approval from society

(ex) Martin Luther King + a disapproval from society

Objections to Cultural Relativism

Objection #2. Inconsistent with moral progress

We believe that our society can make moral progress as we make scientific/social progresses.

But if Cultural Relativism is true, then moral progress does not even make sense!

(ex) Late 19th century US society approved eugenics

Can we, as members of 2022 US society, morally evaluate their approval of eugenics?

If we cannot, how can we say that American society has made moral progress with respect to eugenics?

Objections to Cultural Relativism

Objection #3. Illusory benefits

Some people believe that Cultural Relativism is worth defending because it would prescribe cultural tolerance.

But Cultural Relativism is compatible with extreme cultural intolerance!

(ex) Xenophobic society

Objections to Cultural Relativism

Objection #4. Ill-defined without non-arbitrary fix

Cultural Relativism says that you should X if and only if the society you are in approves of X.

But what it means for one to be “in” a society?

(ex) Flying over Peru

What counts as a “society”?

(ex) You & Your significant other

And what counts as an “approval”?

Moral Truths

Cultural Relativism is quite popular among people, but it is extremely unpopular among philosophers.

We’ve seen some reasons why that’s the case.

Perhaps cultural relativism is popular among people because they mistake Cultural Relativism as the proposal of cultural tolerance—which seems true!

But as Objection #3 shows, Cultural Relativism does not always promote cultural tolerance.

Moral Truths

In this class, at least, we’ll assume that there are universal moral truths.

Some of them may require a lot of philosophical investigations and debates; we may disagree on which is morally true or not.

But that does not mean that there are no universal moral truth; it just means that moral truths are hard to find, just like scientific truths are.

Exercise: Cultural Relativism

Go to the course Blackboard page and click “1-3 In-class Activity” in “Materials for 1-3” folder.

Answer the questions and click “Submit”!