Week 3 Case Study Phase 1
Phase 1: Memo - due in week 3
In this phase, you need to create 3-5 page professional memo about your assessment of what needs to be done to meet the standards based on the National Infrastructure Protection Plan. You need to make sure that the language in the memo is clear of free of errors. You also need to be creative in presenting this information to capture the most important points from the National Infrastructure Protection Plan. You need to demonstrate critical thinking to prioritize the action items based on your findings.
Phase 1 grading will be based on answer quality, logic / organization of the memo, and language and writing skills, using the following rubric.
Points: 25 | Case Study | |||
Criteria | Unacceptable | Fair | Proficient | Exemplary |
1. Analyze authorities, roles, and responsibilities | Did not submit or incompletely analyzed authorities, roles, and responsibilities | Partially analyzed authorities, roles, and responsibilities | Satisfactorily analyzed authorities, roles, and responsibilities | Thoroughly analyzed authorities, roles, and responsibilities |
2. Analyze how to manage risk | Did not submit or incompletely analyzed how to manage risk | Partially analyzed how to manage risk | Satisfactorily analyzed how to manage risk | Thoroughly analyzed how to manage risk |
3. Determine methods for organizing and partnering for CIKR Protection | Did not submit or incompletely determined methods for organizing and partnering for CIKR Protection | Partially determined methods for organizing and partnering for CIKR Protection | Satisfactorily determined methods for organizing and partnering for CIKR Protection | Thoroughly determined methods for organizing and partnering for CIKR Protection |
4. Ensure an Effective, Efficient Program Over the Long Term | Did not submit or incompletely ensured an Effective, Efficient Program Over the Long Term | Partially ensured an Effective, Efficient Program Over the Long Term | Satisfactorily ensured an Effective, Efficient Program Over the Long Term | Thoroughly ensured an Effective, Efficient Program Over the Long Term |
5. 3 references | No references provided | Does not meet the required number of references; some or all references poor quality choices. | Meets number of required references; all references high quality choices. | Exceeds number of required references; all references high quality choices. |
6. Clarity, writing mechanics, and formatting requirements | More than 6 errors present | 5-6 errors present | 3-4 errors present | 0-2 errors present |
9 years ago 20