| Dimension 1: Introduction CLO – 1.1, 1.2, 1.3 SLO – 9.1, 9.3. 1.3 | Points Range:18 (9%) - 20 (10%) Paper defines the problem scope and outlines the objectives of the analysis in a clear, concise, and professional manner | Points Range:16 (8%) - 17 (8.5%) Paper defines the problem, scope and outlines the objectives of the analysis mostly in clear, concise, and professional manner | Points Range:14 (7%) - 15 (7.5%) Paper defines the problem and scope, but fails to outline the objectives of the analysis | Points Range:0 (0%) - 13 (6.5%) Paper does not define the problem, scope and outline the objectives of the analysis |
|---|
| Dimension 2: Data Presentation CLO – 1.1 SLO -1.1, 9.1 | Points Range:27 (13.5%) - 30 (15%) Paper presents summary of data in an accurate and professional manner, and provides accurate interpretation of the data | Points Range:24 (12%) - 26 (13%) Paper presents summary of data mostly in an accurate and professional manner, and provides accurate interpretation of the data with minor errors | Points Range:21 (10.5%) - 23 (11.5%) Paper presents summary of data in an acceptable manner, but interpretation of the data contains major errors | Points Range:0 (0%) - 20 (10%) Paper does not present summary of data |
|---|
| Dimension 3: Model Specification CLO – 1.1, 2.1 SLO -1.5, 9.2, 9.3 | Points Range:36 (18%) - 40 (20%) Paper specifies appropriate statistical or/and linear programming model in an accurate and professional manner and provides accurate equations and a detailed description of decision variables | Points Range:32 (16%) - 35 (17.5%) Paper specifies appropriate statistical or/and linear programming model mostly in an accurate and professional manner and provides accurate equations and a detailed description of decision variables. | Points Range:28 (14%) - 31 (15.5%) Paper specifies appropriate statistical or/and linear programming model in an acceptable manner, and provides a detailed description of decision variables. However, paper provides erroneous equations | Points Range:0 (0%) - 27 (13.5%) Paper either does not specify statistical or/and linear programming model or specifies model in an unacceptable manner. No equation and description of decision variables were provided |
|---|
| Dimension 4: Interpretation of Results CLO -1.2, 2.2, 2.3 SLO -1.1, 1.2, 9.2, 9.3 | Points Range:36 (18%) - 40 (20%) Paper provides a clear, concise, consistent and accurate summary of results from statistical or linear programming models and uses words that could be understandable to the general public | Points Range:32 (16%) - 35 (17.5%) Paper provides a fairly clear, concise, consistent and accurate summary of results from statistical or linear programming models with minor errors, and uses words that could be understandable to the general public | Points Range:28 (14%) - 31 (15.5%) Paper provides summary of results from statistical or linear programming models, but with significant number of errors, and interpretations are not understandable to the general public | Points Range:0 (0%) - 27 (13.5%) Paper does not provide summary of results from statistical or linear programming models |
|---|
| Dimension 5: Integration of Biblical Principle CLO – 2.3 SLO -10.1, 10.2 | Points Range:18 (9%) - 20 (10%) Paper identifies and integrates biblical principles into the decision making process in an appropriate and insightful manner | Points Range:16 (8%) - 17 (8.5%) Paper identifies and integrates biblical principles into the decision making process mostly in an appropriate and insightful manner | Points Range:14 (7%) - 15 (7.5%) Paper identifies and integrates biblical principles into the decision making process mostly in an appropriate and insightful manner | Points Range:0 (0%) - 13 (6.5%) Paper does not identify and integrate biblical principles into the decision making process |
|---|
| Dimension 6: Policy recommendations & Conclusion CLO - 1.1, 2.2, 2.3 SLO -1.1, 1.2, 9.2, 9.3, 11.1,11.2 | Points Range:27 (13.5%) - 30 (15%) Paper addresses policy recommendations/implications in a business world in a professional manner, and provides clear and concise conclusions | Points Range:24 (12%) - 26 (13%) Paper addresses policy recommendations/implications in a business world in a fairly professional manner, and provides clear and concise conclusions | Points Range:21 (10.5%) - 23 (11.5%) Paper addresses policy recommendations/implications in a business world, but they are not relevant to the results. Conclusions are inconsistent and unclear. | Points Range:0 (0%) - 20 (10%) Paper does not address policy recommendations/implications and provide any conclusions. |
|---|
| Dimension 7: Quality of Writing CLO – 1.2, 2.2, 2.3 SLO – 1.1, 1.2, 1.5 | Points Range:18 (9%) - 20 (10%) Paper demonstrates smooth transitions between sentences and paragraphs with no typos and grammatical errors, and satisfies APA standards | Points Range:16 (8%) - 17 (8.5%) Paper demonstrates fairly smooth transitions between sentences and paragraphs with some typos and grammatical errors, and satisfies APA standards | Points Range:14 (7%) - 15 (7.5%) Paper demonstrates shaky transitions between sentences and paragraphs with major typos and grammatical errors, and satisfies APA standards | Points Range:0 (0%) - 13 (6.5%) Transitions between sentences and paragraph are very shaky, and paper is extremely difficult for a reader to understand with multiple typos and grammatical errors. APA standards were not met |
|---|