Business low class

Clearly identifies the relevant issue of the case

5 pts

Identifies the issue but is not a clear and concise statement

4 pts

Can see an issue but does not properly address it

3 pts

Having difficulty concentrating on the issue.

2 pts

Does not understand the issue

1 pts

No Marks

0 pts

Concisely states the rule

5 pts

Mostly states the rule

4 pts

Partially states the rule

3 pts

Vaguely states the rule

2 pts

Does not state the correct rule

1 pts

No Marks

0 pts

Clearly shows an understanding how the law applies to the facts.

5 pts

States how the facts and the law relate

4 pts

Does not clearly state how the facts and law relate

3 pts

Does not connect the facts or the law

2 pts

Unable to apply the law to the facts

1 pts

No Marks

0 pts

Clearly and Concisely states the conclusion

5 pts

States a good conclusion

4 pts

States a conclusion that is not concise but still on point

3 pts

States a conclusion

2 pts

Does not state a conclusion

1 pts

No Marks

0 pts

Clearly states what the case taught you

5 pts

States what the case is about (paraphrases case)

4 pts

States the case verbatim or interjected personal feelings into the response

3 pts

States ideas not connected to the case

2 pts

Did not understand the case.

1 pts

No Marks

0 pts

Response is thoughtful, contains substantive insight and analysis in relation to topic. makes strong connections to readings, lecture, experience, workplace

5 pts

Response(s) demonstrate significant understanding. Robust insight and analysis. Evidence of connections.

4 pts

Content response is accurate but superficial. Some responses may be off topic. Acknowledges connections exist.

3 pts

Lacks depth; responses too general, conclusory, simplistic in nature. Some aspects of response are off topic. Posts lack connections.

2 pts

Interjected emotional responses, personal feelings, and /or beliefs in analysis

1 pts

No Marks

0 pts